Baby Name Vance Drops In Popularity
On Friday, the agency released the official list of most popular baby names in the US in 2024. Between 2023 and 2024, the name Vance fell 41 places, from the 955th most popular baby name for boys to No. 996 ― one of its lowest-ever rankings in the annual SSA lists, which date to the 1880s.
'On the whole, parents are likely avoiding the name Vance because it's simply not so fashionable anymore, but JD Vance is likely accelerating its decline,' Sophie Kihm, the editor-in-chief of Nameberry, told HuffPost. 'Political names tied to presidents and VPs were very common in the early 20th century, but today's parents generally stay away from overt political associations in baby names.'
Even looking back to the late 1800s, the more positive influence of politicians on baby names is evident.
'Grover Cleveland pushed both his first and last names into the Top 100 in 1884,' said Abby Sandel, the creator of the baby name blog Appellation Mountain. 'Bryan first trended way back in 1896, when William Jennings Bryan ran for ― and lost ― the presidency. The name Franklin spiked in 1933, as FDR took office.'
Kihm noted that modern parents are more likely to use names inspired by celebrities, influencers, and those figures' children than politicians.
'JD Vance is a polarizing figure and, right now, the most dominant association with the name Vance,' Kihm said. 'Parents that may have otherwise considered the name Vance may have nixed it from their lists to avoid assumptions or questions about their political affiliations. Interestingly, though, Elon actually rose by a few births. I bet we'll see that reverse in the 2025 data.'
The name Vance briefly dropped off the Top 1,000 list in 1998 and 2000 but quickly recovered. Interestingly, the name rose in popularity from 2022 to 2023 before JD Vance joined the presidential ticket. But if its current trajectory continues, the name Vance may fall off for good this year.
Meanwhile, the name Donald dipped 14 spots from No. 658 to No. 672 ― continuing a general trend of decline that goes back decades (with a couple of fleeting boosts after President Donald Trump entered the political arena).
'Vance did have a brief rise in the early 2000s and then again around 2015, the latter influenced by singer Vance Joy,' Kihm explained. 'But overall, it's dropped significantly from its height. Before 1970, Vance was impressively steady in the rankings, hovering in between No. 300 and No. 500.'
The name peaked in popularity in 1969 at No. 328 and started appearing more on the pop culture scene over the next decade or so.
'Vance was very much a late 1970s style star,' Sandel said. 'Lance, too. During the 1980s, television series The Dukes of Hazzard cast briefly included a character called Vance Duke.'
Both she and Kihm believe the decline of Vance is largely driven by style, even if accelerated by politics. Plus, fans of The Office might associate it too strongly with the 'Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration' character.
'I'm not at all surprised to see that Vance dropped in the rankings,' Kihm said. 'Statistically, it's a dad name or even a grandpa name. Vance was never so popular that it feels inextricably tied to a particular generation ― in this case, Gen X ― but that 'anc' sound found in names like Lance and Nancy has a strongly dated feel.'
That doesn't mean all parents have fully rejected political ideals in their baby naming choices, however.
'One hopeful name from the new data that might point to how parents are feeling about the world around us?' Sandel said. 'Truce debuted in the boys' Top 1,000.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance: Some Americans Are More American Than Others
The day after President Trump signed a bill that throws unprecedented amounts of money at ICE, extends tax cuts for the wealthy, and slashes health-care and social services to do so, Vice President JD Vance was in San Diego. And while he might have been far away from Washington, the administration's immigration crackdown was front of mind: he was there to give a keynote address at a dinner hosted by the Claremont Institute, the southern California nonprofit that's earned a reputation as a 'nerve center' for MAGA thought. At the core of Claremont thinking is immigration. The think tank pushed for an end to birthright citizenship long before that objective entered the mainstream of the GOP; it claimed ownership over Vance's thinking on the topic after Trump chose him as his running mate last year. It was not wrong to do so. During the 2024 Republican National Convention, Vance tried to sand down the idea of what it means to be an American citizen to a more European level: the country belongs more to those who share its 'common history,' he said, not just those who ascribe to its values. He put Claremont's intellectual approach to nativism into action last year, stoking racial tensions over Haitian immigration to Springfield, Ohio. On Saturday, Vance took up the theme again. But this time, he had more to point to than theoretical arguments or viral campaign moments. The second Trump administration is pumping huge amounts of cash into the country's detention and removal infrastructure for immigrants; it's moved to end birthright citizenship; it's staged high-profile civil liberties abuses with various efforts to remove people quickly and scare off others from coming; it is contemplating denaturalizations. Its radical actions do not undercut the fact that there was also a strong messaging component to Vance's Saturday remarks: the administration wants to talk about immigration to the exclusion of nearly everything else. What Vance expressed to the friendly Claremont audience was a dramatically reduced vision of American citizenship. It's one in which having ancestors who have lived here for generations entitles you to more; a vision of citizenship that's long existed around the world, with a notable and aspirational exception in the United States. 'Identifying America just with agreeing with the principles, let's say, of the Declaration of Independence — that's a definition that is way over-inclusive and under-inclusive at the same time,' Vance said. He explained that such a definition 'would include hundreds of millions, maybe billions of foreign citizens who agree' with the principles of the Declaration of Independence, dubbing it 'the logic of America as a purely Creole nation.' By the opposite token, Vance said, conceiving of American citizenship 'purely as an idea' would 'reject a lot of people that the ADL would label as domestic extremists, even though those very Americans had their ancestors fight in the Revolutionary War and the Civil War,' he said, referencing the Anti-Defamation League, a nonprofit that was founded to combat antisemitism and that, among other activities, tracks far-right groups. 'I think the people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America than the people who say they don't belong,' he concluded. Dog whistles aside (you can count quite a few in the above), Vance is channeling an idea that undergirds the administration's most aggressive immigration policies — policies that are, after the additional $170 billion that Congress appropriated for enforcement this month, set to expand. Vance wasn't talking about an America that's entirely closed off to new immigrants; rather, it's an America where 'heritage' counts as much as values. Watching this, it's easy to go too far down the opposite path: thinking that what Vance is describing is a leap towards something new; assuming that America has always found a way to offer people citizenship based on values and not descent from some old stock. And it is, in part, new: Vance is making this argument to support, fawn over, and give his boss and his boss's favorite policies a highbrow sheen. The vice president hit a familiar note in setting up New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani (D) as a foil, demanding that he show 'gratitude' to the country and attacking him for not being sufficiently patriotic on the Fourth of July. 'I wonder, has he ever read the letters from boy soldiers in the Union Army to parents and sweethearts that they'd never see again?' Vance asked. Yet that bizarre line of argument was revealing in its own way. For all Vance's — and those on the new right's — talk of imposing a new order on American politics, they're still reactionaries of a very old variety. Birthright citizenship, after all, was enshrined in the Constitution after those Union soldiers' victory in the Civil War. What he described on Saturday was fundamentally regressive: a vision of American citizenship anchored far in the past.
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Few see falling birth rates as a priority: Survey
Few Americans see falling birth rates as a national priority, according to a new survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. When asked in the Thursday survey about how large of a problem declining birth rates in the U.S. is, 28 percent of respondents said it is a major issue while 44 percent called it a minor one. Twenty-seven percent didn't consider it a problem at all. The U.S. birth rate fell to an almost record low last year, per preliminary data. A vital statistics rapid release report published earlier this year by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that about 3.6 million babies were born in the U.S. last year, a 1 percent increase from a record low number of births two years ago. The U.S. birth rate consistently dipped following the Great Recession in 2007, with births slightly rising in 2021, per CDC data. Some Republican leaders in recent months have emphasized pronatalism, encouraging Americans to have more children. Top proponents include former White House adviser Elon Musk and Vice President Vance. Americans, however, said the cost of raising children is more of a problem, per Tuesday's poll. In the AP-NORC survey, 76 percent said childcare costs are a big issue while just 18 percent considered it to be a minor one. Five percent of respondents said it was not a problem at all. The AP-NORC poll took place from June 5 to 9, with 1,158 people and a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Miami Herald
11 hours ago
- Miami Herald
JD Vance Heckled, Booed at California Dinner
Vice President JD Vance was heckled by protesters as his motorcade left a restaurant in California on Sunday. Vance and his wife, Usha, had dined at the Michelin-starred Soichi Sushi in San Diego prior to the incident. Newsweek emailed Vance's office for comment by email outside of regular working hours. Vance was in San Diego over the Fourth of July weekend to attend events as part of his role as the finance chair of the Republican Party. He also attended the Claremont Institute's 2025 Statesmanship Award dinner that was held in his honor in the city on Saturday night. Video posted on social media showed people gathered on the street booing Vance's Secret Service motorcade as it left the restaurant. Some called out Vance for dining at an exclusive restaurant while flash floods were hitting Texas. The death toll from the floods has now climbed to more than 100 people. One man said: "Hope your Michelin-starred sushi was worth it with 82 people dead in Texas! Thanks for cutting the National Weather Service." Another protester shouted: "Get the hell out of San Diego, a******!" This is a breaking story. More to follow. Related Articles The Dollar Is Sinking: Here's WhyDonald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Heads Back to the House: What's Next?Supreme Court to Hear JD Vance CaseJD Vance is Crushing the 2028 Election Competition Right Now: Survey 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
