logo
Have always tried to balance directive principles and fundamental rights, says Chief Justice of India Gavai at felicitation by legislature

Have always tried to balance directive principles and fundamental rights, says Chief Justice of India Gavai at felicitation by legislature

Time of India4 days ago
Mumbai: Chief Justice of India (CJI) B R Gavai on Tuesday said that whenever he gets an opportunity, he tries to balance the guiding principles of state policy of the Constitution and fundamental rights.
Gavai mentioned that it was a tightrope walk to balance the directive principles and fundamental rights. He stated that the three arms of the Constitution — the executive, legislature, and judiciary — have fulfilled their responsibilities at the completion of 75 years of the Constitution, as desired by Bababsaheb Ambedkar. Gavai emphasised that both directive principles and fundamental rights are considered equal and are the soul of the Constitution.
"I have always said that this position is an opportunity for me to serve the country and society," Gavai said.
Gavai was speaking on the Constitution during his felicitation by the legislature in Vidhan Bhavan's central hall for taking oath as the 52nd chief justice of India.
You Can Also Check:
Mumbai AQI
|
Weather in Mumbai
|
Bank Holidays in Mumbai
|
Public Holidays in Mumbai
Referring to Ambedkar's speeches, Gavai noted that a Constitution can not be static but has to be organic and evolving to suit the needs of the people.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Pernas e tornozelos inchados? Descubra o que pode ajudar a drenar agora
aartedoherbalismo
Undo
Gavai expressed that the felicitation at the state legislature was special since his father, R S Gavai, represented people in the same legislature for many years. "Today I am being felicitated in the same hall. This is a matter of pride for me," Gavai said.
His father was chairperson of the legislative council and governor of Bihar, Kerala and Tripura. Earlier, the legislature passed a resolution congratulating Gavai on his appointment as chief justice of India.
Gavai said Ambedkar was criticised for giving more powers to the Centre and less to the states in the Constitution. "But later Babasaheb explained his position and said that the Centre and the states have equal powers. In the early days, the SC had the view that whenever there was a conflict between the directive principles and the fundamental rights, then fundamental rights would prevail. But later, both these principles were considered equal," he said.
"While working in a constitutional position, whether it is a Supreme Court judge or a high court judge, you are expected to work only in accordance with the fundamental rights and guiding principles enshrined in this Constitution. Babasaheb always said that the Constitution of India is a tool to create a bloodless revolution in the country," he said.
"In the last 22 years, good work of justice was done. Babasaheb and the framers of the Constitution had a dream of creating social and economic equality.
I got the opportunity to play a significant role in fulfilling this dream. This honour is given by 12.87 lakh crore people," he said.
"After the Amrut Mahotsav of the country's Constitution, we have now started moving towards its centenary — 75 years is not considered a long period for any Constitution," he said.
"Babasaheb always said that women are the most backward in this country. To bring those women into the mainstream, revolutionaries Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule opened the gates of education.
After that, a revolution took place in the entire country. Therefore, today women are at the forefront in all fields. This country got a woman prime minister and two women presidents. There was no president from the tribal community.
But this was made possible by the Indian Constitution," Gavai said.
Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said humanity and sensitivity are Gavai's great qualities.
"While working as a judge in the Bombay high court, he faced many difficult situations.
On the one hand, there was the law, and on the other hand, there was the wider public interest. At that time, he emphasised how the law could be interpreted in the wider public interest. He made many decisions with the idea that not everything happens according to the law every time, but this wider public interest should be accommodated in it.
In these cases, there would have been great dissatisfaction among the people. But he tried to find a way out of it too," Fadnavis said. "He never faced the pressure of his relationships. You can have tea with him, but his orders will always be on the side of justice. Often people go into a shell after becoming judges or chief justices. But Bhushan Gavai never went into a shell. He is always available to everyone. He interacts with the very last person wherever he sees them," Fadnavis said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries

Time of India

time22 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries

This is an AI image. United States is working toward an interim trade agreement with India that could reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, giving the country a more favorable position compared to other countries in the region. Unlike many nations, India is not expected to receive a formal tariff hike notice this week, and the agreement may be announced through an official statement, Bloomberg reported, quoting sources. The proposed interim trade deal between the two nations would allow both the sides to continue negotiations, giving India time to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement expected later this year, the source added. India, US near trade deal. What happens next if New Delhi joins Trump's shortlist? The planned agreement is likely to set a baseline tariff of under 20%, down from the 26% initially proposed, with provisions to allow further adjustments as part of a final pact. However, the exact timeline for the interim deal remains uncertain. If finalised, India would likely join a select group of nations that have reached trade arrangements with the Trump administration. In contrast, several other countries were hit with surprise tariff hikes of up to 50% this week, ahead of the August 1 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 기미, 레이저말고 이렇게 해보세요 에스테틱최원장 Undo India is pushing for a more favourable deal than the one signed with Vietnam, which included 20% tariffs. Vietnam, caught off guard by the high rate, is now seeking a revision. So far, only the UK has officially signed trade deals with the Trump administration. Earlier on Thursday, Trump told NBC News that he is considering imposing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't yet received specific rates. Currently, the baseline tariff for most US trade partners stands at 10%. For Asian countries, announced rates so far include 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines, and as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar. Despite being among the earliest to initiate trade discussions this year, India-US relations have shown recent tensions. While Trump indicates an imminent agreement, he has also suggested additional tariffs regarding India's BRICS membership. An Indian negotiation team is expected to visit Washington soon to push forward trade talks. India has already made its final offer to the Trump administration and outlined its non-negotiable positions. The key sticking points remain, including the US demand for India to allow genetically modified (GM) crops, something New Delhi has firmly opposed, citing concerns for farmers, while the other unresolved issues include agricultural non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles in the pharmaceutical sector, the source added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Bangalore University clarifies allegations of discrimination against Dalit faculty
Bangalore University clarifies allegations of discrimination against Dalit faculty

India Gazette

time40 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

Bangalore University clarifies allegations of discrimination against Dalit faculty

Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India] July 12 (ANI): Bangalore University has issued a clarification through an official letter to the SC/ST Teachers Association, stating that the allegation of following an anti-Dalit policy is not true. The university highlighted that it has always given due representation and priority to teachers from Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, in an official statement. The response was made with reference to a letter from the Association that raised concerns about discrimination in statutory appointments, violation of reservation norms, and delay in filling backlog posts. The university clarified that appointments of statutory posts such as Vice-Chancellor, Registrar, Finance Officer, and Registrar (Evaluation) are made directly by the Government. Therefore, the university has no role in these appointments. It is unfortunate that these appointments are being viewed as discriminatory. At the university level, wherever appointments are within its control, SC/ST faculty members have been given preference. Out of 30 administrative positions like Directors, Coordinators, Special Officers, and Nodal Officers, 22 posts are held by SC/ST teachers. Further, four faculty members were transferred to Bangalore University from other universities by the State Government with the Governor's approval, considering the shortage of permanent teaching staff. Currently, out of 126 teaching staff at the university, 80 belong to SC/ST communities, which is 63.5% of the total faculty. The university also pointed out that no other public university in Karnataka has filled backlog vacancies to the extent that Bangalore University has. Out of the 55 backlog posts identified by the Social Welfare Department, 35 have already been filled, and the process to fill the remaining is underway. In the academic year 2024-25, 44 faculty members were promoted as Associate Professors, out of which 29 belong to SC/ST categories. The university reaffirmed its commitment to social justice and equal representation in all appointments. (ANI)

Madras HC presses ECI on AIADMK symbol decision delay
Madras HC presses ECI on AIADMK symbol decision delay

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

Madras HC presses ECI on AIADMK symbol decision delay

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Friday questioned the Election Commission of India (ECI) over its 'hesitation' in deciding on representations seeking freezing of AIADMK's poll symbol 'Two Leaves' and election of Edappadi K Palaniswami as the general secretary of the party. There are multiple civil suits pending in courts regarding the issues. When the petitions filed by EPS seeking a direction to the ECI for speedy disposal of the representations, which were submitted by expelled AIADMK party men including former MPs P Ravindranath, KC Palanisamy and Surya Moorthy, came up for hearing, the ECI's counsel Niranjan Rajagopalan told the HC that the commission would take a decision 'as expeditiously as possible' and time frame need not be set by the court. The bench of Justices R Subramanian and K Surender said it could see 'hesitation' on the part of the ECI and asked its counsel whether he wanted the bench to disclose why there is such a 'hesitation'. Making an oblique reference to the timeline set by the Supreme Court to the President regarding granting of assent to bills passed in State Assemblies in the Tamil Nadu Vs Governor RN Ravi case, the bench said, 'If the President can be set a timeline, why can't the Election Commission?" It also asked, 'Is the Election Commission above the President? The ECI counsel responded, 'Everyone is equal in the Constitution.' The two-judge bench directed the counsel to file written instructions by July 21 on the time period by which it can take a decision on the representations and adjourned the hearing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store