Scotland's people do not endorse these war crimes by Israel
READ MORE: Banning Palestine Action an 'abuse of power', High Court told
This is not just shameful; it is intolerable.
Scotland's people do not endorse these crimes. We are not willing participants in this grotesque complicity. But as long as we remain shackled to a Ruritanian state run by blustering buffoons in London, our voices – and our values – are overridden on the world stage. Scotland's future is harmed by being shackled to a backward-looking, imperialist-days-of-yore set of dreamers with no hope and no aspiration of rising from the decay of Rule Britannia long gone!
How long will Scots put up with this? There comes a point when silence makes us complicit too. If Westminster's foreign policy is to be conducted in the service of imperial nostalgia and military-industrial partnerships, then it's past time Scotland cut its ties. Even now we see frantic efforts to silence dissent by the arrest of citizens wearing T-shirts with slogans unacceptable to the misguided foreign policy of the Gilbert and Sullivan characters who grace the stage of Westminster.
Independence is not only about economic potential or democratic renewal – it is also a moral necessity.
Peter Macari
Aberdeen
THOUSANDS turned out in the rain for the pro-Palestine demonstration on Saturday in Edinburgh. It was organised by the [[Gaza]] Genocide Emergency Committee in response to a Declassified UK report on the RAF's 518 spy flights over [[Gaza]] since October 2023.
The protest followed the Starmer regime's banning of the peaceful protest group [[Palestine]] Action on July 2. Protesters held defiant signs: 'Genocide in [[Palestine]] – Time to Take Action.'
Starting from St Giles, the crowd marched to Queen Elizabeth House to hear speakers including Tommy Sheppard and Lesley Riddoch.
READ MORE: Protesters gather outside court for Palestine activists hearing
Then it was on to John Swinney's official residence at Bute House. Speakers included a Dundee firefighter whose Fire Brigade Union (FBU) members sourced and refitted a fire engine with medical and firefighting equipment for Palestinian firefighters in the West Bank town of Nablus in July 2024.
The engine, which had all necessary paperwork, was driven from Dundee to Southampton and shipped to the port of Ashdod, where on July 21 2024 it arrived and was immediately seized by the Zionist entity. Four months later, the FBU sent a letter to the entity's UK ambassador demanding its release.
The engine remains impounded as the Zionist entity's violence against and murder of Palestinians in the West Bank intensifies and its genocide of Gazans grinds on. What says the UK Government? Nothing.
READ MORE: Who is on the Freedom Flotilla Handala ship to Gaza?
Last Tuesday three women were arrested under the Terrorism Act 2000 because they allegedly drove a van into a perimeter fence around the Leonardo weapons facility in Edinburgh. The Scottish administration provides public funding to the company which manufactures laser targeting components for F-35 jets used by the Zionist entity to bomb Gaza.
I couldn't help but wonder how different things could be if Scotland were an independent nation, able to project its people's voices and values onto the world stage, rather than a vassal of a disunited and venal state that is actively supporting the annihilation of an entire people.
Leah Gunn Barrett
Edinburgh
EVERY time I think that I have grappled sufficiently with my emotions so that I am not in a permanent state of outrage and an all-consuming sadness, the soldiers of the world's 'most moral army' do something that rips through that facade and exposes yet another act of utter depravity and barbarism. I have seen footage of a British surgeon, Nick Maynard, practically in tears as he says children are being targeted 'as if it's a game' where one day they are shot in the head, another day the neck, and yet another day the testicles.
READ MORE: IDF soldiers 'arrested at Tomorrowland festival over war crimes'
Can you imagine how our politicians would denounce this if Russians were doing it to Ukrainians? The UN is impotent; South Africa, Ireland, Norway and Spain have taken action, along with countries from the Global South. Yet we, along with the US and Germany, continue to aid and abet this, and if we protest we can be charged with supporting terrorism. This is sick sick sick and we will never let our craven 'leaders' – 'critical friends' all – forget it.
Marjorie Ellis Thompson
Edinburgh
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
13 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Freed hostage Emily Damari accuses Starmer of being on wrong side of history
Emily Damari accused the Prime Minister of 'moral failure' over the move. Sir Keir announced on Tuesday that the UK could take the step of recognising statehood in September, ahead of a major UN gathering. The UK will refrain from doing so only if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. The move has been criticised by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed it 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Ms Damari, who was released from Hamas captivity in January, said in a post on Instagram on Wednesday: 'Prime Minister Starmer is not standing on the right side of history. Had he been in power during World War II, would he have advocated recognition for Nazi control of occupied countries like Holland, France or Poland? 'This is not diplomacy — it is a moral failure. Shame on you, Prime Minister. 'As a dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by Prime Minister Starmer's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace — it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy. 'By legitimising a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, the Prime Minister is not promoting a solution; he is prolonging the conflict. Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you!!!' In a statement from Downing Street on Tuesday after an urgent Cabinet meeting on Gaza, Sir Keir said the UK's 'message to the terrorists of Hamas is unchanged but unequivocal: they must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza'.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer's historic Palestine plan is driven by weakness — not strength
Keir Starmer's announcement that the UK will recognise a Palestinian state in September (unless Israel meets stringent conditions) was undeniable theatre. But in the drama of the statement on Tuesday evening, there was a nagging sense that it was more performative than an act which would change things on the ground in Gaza and Israel. – and a majority of people believe he has – but the real issues are whether he has done it for the right reasons, and if it was an act of strength or weakness. The fury from Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who accused his British counterpart of 'rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism', seemed to suggest a lack of influence the UK government has collectively and Sir Keir has personally. While Labour's foreign affairs select committee chair Dame Emily Thornberry suggested that Netanyahu's reaction shows Britain does have influence, the fact is that it is quite clear that it will not shift Israeli policy one jot. But maybe that does not matter. Foreign secretary David Lammy was loudly applauded at the United Nations when he announced the intention to recognise a Palestinian state. It may not have been a complete coincidence that Arab countries including Qatar and Egypt issued a strong statement shortly afterwards, urging Hamas to disarm and give up control of Gaza. But the reality is that the last few days have underlined that only one man can influence events in the Middle East outside the participants in the ongoing war – Donald Trump. It seems highly significant that Sir Keir waited to have his meeting with Trump at Turnberry before following French president Emmanuel Macron 's lead on the recognition issue. Added to that, the decision only seemed inevitable once Trump effectively gave permission for the UK to diverge from US policy, saying he had no problem with the prospect of Sir Keir taking a position on Palestinian statehood. But in terms of money, weapons supply and political clout, it requires America to tell Israel to stop starving Palestinians and to force a ceasefire. While Trump has said he wants to stop the hunger, his appetite to force a ceasefire is still in question. Meanwhile, Sir Keir has tried to counterbalance the US power with the new E3 group - Britain, France and Germany. This latest intervention came as a result of his E3 talks on Friday and Saturday. The group's creation is viewed by some as a recognition in itself that the EU has lost some diplomatic clout as a result of Brexit and Europe's three biggest powers needed to team up again. The biggest problem he has is that whether it is Netanyahu, German chancellor Friedrich Merz or Trump, every international leader knows that Tuesday evening's theatre was more about domestic politics for Sir Keir. Factions within his cabinet and the wider Labour party, growing political pressure from the trade unions and MPs has forced his hand on Palestine to appease the domestic situation. But perhaps most of all, the emergence of Jeremy Corbyn's new party also genuinely spooked Sir Keir and his top team. Former Labour MP Jonathan Ashworth was among those who were ousted by pro-Gaza independent MPs last year, with health secretary Wes Streeting and justice secretary Shabana Mahmood coming dangerously close to losing their seats. By coming out strongly against Israel's actions in Gaza, Sir Keir will be hoping to secure the votes of wavering voters who may have been tempted to back Corbyn's new pro-Gaza party. So there is a sense that while Sir Keir has shown leadership and probably come to the right conclusion, however, the reasons that he has done so are more about weakness at home rather than strength on the international stage.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
First Epstein files, now Trump finds himself in another rift with GOP — this time on Gaza
Senate Republicans and President Donald Trump are once again on opposing sides about a central tenet of Republican orthodoxy: This time, on Israel and Gaza. Earlier this week, Trump directly contradicted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu refuted claims by multiple international groups saying that Gaza was at the point of starvation, calling it a ' bold-faced lie.' Trump responded during a joint press conference with U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer when he finally acknowledged that there is ' real starvation ' in Gaza. Even Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the far-right MAGA firebrand from Georgia, jumped in on it and called the war in Gaza a 'genocide,' using language that historically only progressives used to describe the war. And public opinion has largely shifted against Israel after the deadly Oct. 7, 2023 terror incursion into Israel where Hamas brutally raped and murdered 1,200 innocent people and took 251 hostages. With Joe Biden exiting the stage, Democrats are having their reckoning with the party's historic support for Israel. But many Republicans feigned ignorance. 'I haven't seen what the president said. So, was it today?' Sen. Jim Banks of Indiana, one of the more MAGA House members who got a promotion last year, responded when asked about Trump's comments by The Independent on Tuesday. The Senate remains one of the last true bastions of Republican orthodoxy on foreign policy, which is to say, support for a strong military and America having a prominent role as the enforcer of the global order. Support for Israel remains a core tenet of this style of support, both because of Christian conservatives' theology about the Holy Land and the critical strategic position of Israel in the Middle East. Republicans historically viewed Israel's placement in an area of the world rife with conflict as another asset for intelligence and security purposes. Trump represented a break from that, focusing more on 'America First' ideology wherein he adopted more isolationist rhetoric, though he still robustly backs Israel and assisted with its war with Iran. That might be why Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-NE), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told The Independent to contact his office. Sen. Todd Young, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Marine Corps veteran, refused to answer questions. Despite the fact that Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) faces a MAGA primary challenge from Texas' wayward and scandal-ridden Attorney General Ken Paxton, read from the hymnal of the Bush Republicans. 'I think there's definitely a humanitarian crisis, but i think the blame is not Netanyahu, the blame is Hamas,' Cornyn told The Independent. When asked if that's what Trump meant, Cornyn said 'you'd have to ask him.' Despite the fact Trump relocated the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem in his first term and continues to support Israel militarily, he clearly views the American relationship with Israel in a far more transactional light than his Senate counterparts. During one point of Israel's war with Iran, Trump famously said ' they don't know what the f*** they're doing.' Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, told The Independent there is 'clearly a humanitarian crisis there,' said people should remember that Hamas caused this. Democrats for their part sought to exploit Trump's remarks on Gaza. Unburdened from having to defend Joe Biden's record on Gaza, numerous Democrats pointed to Trump's record to raise the suffering in Gaza. 'What we can do is continue to call upon President Trump, who now has acknowledged that people are starving to death in Gaza, to call upon Prime Minister Netanyahu to let the UN a delivery system,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), told The Independent. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) joined Van Hollen's letter this weekend to cease funding for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and instead resume sending money to the United Nations for food distribution. But Sanders said Trump deserves no credit. 'Look at any newspaper in America today and you see pictures of starving children, this is not a brilliant observation,' he told The Independent. Last week on the Senate floor, Sen. Amy Klobuchar delivered a speech excoriating Netanyahu. This came weeks after she met with Netanyahu during his visit to Congress. But Klobuchar said her remarks were not an about-face. 'The reason I went was to raise the lack of humanitarian aid into Gaza and that they had to have more access points,' she told The Independent. 'I think it's getting worse and worse and I know they've let some aid in but it is not enough. This is a crisis, it's a humanitarian crisis, and people are starving.' Sen Angus King, an independent from Maine who caucus with the Democrats, went one step further. On Monday evening, he released a statement that he would not support any type of aid whatsoever to Israel as long as children starved. For an even-keeled moderate, it was a stunning remark. 'They've cut off water, off and on, and they've really and they've created a situation now where it's so desperate that people are I are going after the aid in a desperate kind of way, and they're, they're using armed troops in that situation,' he told The Independent. 'They have the power to fix it. If they fix it, I'm with them until they fix it. I'm out.' But Senate Republicans will likely attack any Democrat who signed Van Hollen's letter, specifically vulnerable Democratic senators, even as some of the Democrats are Jewish supporters of Israel. One in particular: Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), who faces a tough re-election next year.
