The Midnight Medicaid Cuts: Why The GOP's Reconciliation Bill Is A Raw Deal For The American People
In the early hours of the morning, while most Americans were asleep, House Republicans convened a hearing that stretched into an eight-hour marathon to push through a sweeping 1,100-page reconciliation bill.
The timing was no coincidence. It was a calculated attempt to avoid scrutiny and quietly advance a legislative agenda that disproportionately benefits the wealthy, undermines essential public services, and fuels divisive culture wars.
This bill is not about economic growth or fiscal responsibility. It's the latest chapter in a long-standing political grift: one where working families are told to tighten their belts while the powerful receive handouts disguised as policy.
At the heart of the bill are aggressive cuts to Medicaid and food assistance—critical lifelines for millions of Americans. By moving up the timeline for mandatory work requirements to 2026, House Republicans are putting an estimated 14 million people at risk of losing their healthcare and three million households in danger of losing food security. These aren't just numbers—they represent real families who are already navigating an economy marked by uncertainty, inflation, and widening inequality.
Meanwhile, the bill remains generous to the wealthiest Americans, offering trillions in tax breaks to those who need them least. But it doesn't stop there. In a bizarre twist, it also includes a provision to create $1,000 'Trump Accounts' for babies born between 2025 and 2029. Ostensibly designed to support long-term savings, these MAGA-branded investment funds are more about political branding than substantive policy. It's a campaign slogan masquerading as a fiscal tool.
Simultaneously, the bill strips healthcare access from some of the country's most vulnerable populations. It imposes a sweeping ban on Medicaid and CHIP funding for gender-affirming care, not just for minors, but for all recipients. This isn't about protecting public funds; it's a targeted attack on the transgender community, one that erodes the foundational principle that healthcare should be accessible to all.
And if the stakes weren't high enough, the bill also includes provisions that compromise public safety. Language quietly added in the final hours eliminates the federal tax and registration requirement for gun silencers, long established as safeguards to help law enforcement trace weapons used in violent crimes. As Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Pa.) noted, this change is not just reckless—it's radical.
Even more troubling, an earlier draft of the bill included language that would have shielded former President Trump and his administration from contempt citations if they violated court orders. While the provision was ultimately removed, its mere presence reflects a dangerous willingness to circumvent the judiciary and concentrate power in the executive branch.
The bill also threatens access to reproductive and preventative health services by targeting Planned Parenthood. If passed, up to one-third of Planned Parenthood health centers—nearly 200 facilities—could be forced to close due to funding restrictions tied to abortion and gender-affirming care. This would severely limit access to cancer screenings, birth control, and general health care in underserved communities.
One of the most telling moments during the hearing, Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández (D-N.M.) held Republicans accountable for the sheer absurdity—and hypocrisy—of their priorities. When questioning a provision that repealed the federal excise tax on indoor tanning services, she asked the bill's sponsor to read the line item aloud. He refused.
'Oh, he doesn't want to read it,' Rep. Leger Fernández said. 'This is in their bill. They don't want to read a line from their own bill.'
Fernández then delivered a blistering critique: 'So if you have a tanning bed, you get a little bit of a tax break. And if you need a hospital bed in rural America, I'm sorry, you're out of luck.'
Her words underscored the bill's deeply skewed values, where luxury perks are prioritized over basic healthcare access.
This is not a comprehensive plan for economic recovery or public well-being. It's a deeply flawed document that prioritizes political loyalty, culture war distractions, and corporate interests over the everyday needs of American families. It represents the erosion of public trust, transparency, and responsible governance.
While some provisions—such as the nonprotection of public lands in Utah and Nevada—were rightfully removed, and attempts to strip federal employees of earned retirement benefits were reversed, these adjustments cannot redeem a bill that is fundamentally out of step with the priorities of the American people.
As this bill heads to the Senate, lawmakers—and the public—must remain vigilant. Because this isn't just bad policy. It's a dangerous precedent. Governance should be transparent, equitable, and rooted in service to the people, not pushed through under the cover of darkness to serve the ambitions of a few.
The American people deserve better.
SEE ALSO:
SPLC: U.S. Hate Groups Declined—Is It Really A Good Thing?
Harvard Fights Back Against Trump International Student Ban
SEE ALSO
The Midnight Medicaid Cuts: Why The GOP's Reconciliation Bill Is A Raw Deal For The American People was originally published on newsone.com
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
12 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump celebrates 6-month mark in office, touts US as 'most respected country' in the world
President Donald Trump celebrated the six-month mark of his second White House term by declaring that the United States has become the "hottest" and the "most respected" country in the world. "Wow, time flies!" he wrote on Truth Social on July 20. "Importantly, it's being hailed as one of the most consequential periods of any President. In other words, we got a lot of good and great things done, including ending numerous wars of Countries not related to us other than through Trade and/or, in certain cases, friendship." He added: "'One year ago our Country was DEAD, with almost no hope of revival. Today the USA is the 'hottest' and most respected Country anywhere in the World.' Happy Anniversary!!!" Trump's second term has been met with several challenges, including the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, which he said he would end. The Israel-Hamas war in Gaza also rages on, alongside ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire and secure the release of hostages. In a separate post, Trump also talked about his poll numbers "going up" among Republicans and MAGA base and claimed they "hit 90%, 92%, 93%, and 95%, in various polls, and are all Republican Party records." At the same time, a couple of recent polls showed Trump's overall approval rate dropping. A recent Economist/YouGov poll, conducted from July 11 to July 14, showed 41% of Americans strongly or somewhat approve of Trump's job performance, while 55% strongly or somewhat disapprove. The results, according to the survey, are the "largest share of Americans who have disapproved of Trump's job performance so far in his second term as president." Another poll, released July 20 by CBS/YouGov, placed Trump's approval rating at 42%, with disapproval at 58%. The survey previously found Trump's approval rating was 45% in June and 47% in mid-April. Trump's on a roll. Why isn't he smiling? Answer: Jeffrey Epstein Democratic leadership is not buying Trump's self-assessment Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin was critical of Trump's self-assessment, adding that every American needs to ask themselves if they are better off than they were six months ago. 'Unless you're a billionaire or a big CEO, the answer is no," he said in a statement. "In six months, Donald Trump has skyrocketed prices for basic necessities, sparked an erratic trade war with no end in sight, and orchestrated the largest cuts to health care and food assistance in American history. As Trump's reckless trade agenda forces small businesses to plan for recession, working families are drowning in sky-high energy, gas, and grocery prices." Contributing: Kathryn Palmer
Boston Globe
42 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Edwin Feulner, ‘Heritage Foundation's George Washington,' dies at 83
Weyrich went on to found several other conservative groups. Dr. Feulner ran Heritage from 1977 to 2013, and he became interim head again for a brief period in 2017. Two years ago, during a 50th anniversary celebration at Mount Vernon, the organization's current president, Kevin Roberts, called Dr. Feulner 'the Heritage Foundation's George Washington.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As Dr. Feulner described it, the foundational principles of Heritage included 'free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional values and a strong national defense,' The New York Times reported in 2018. Advertisement The group was in the news during the last presidential election, when Kamala Harris and other Democrats argued that a Heritage document called Project 2025 would become a shadow agenda for Donald Trump's second term. Trump strenuously sought to dissociate himself from the nearly 900-page list of policies, which included doctrinaire right-wing positions on such politically delicate subjects as abortion. Advertisement What rarely came up during the public debate is how Project 2025 belonged to a long tradition of striking success that Heritage has enjoyed in shaping Republican presidential administrations. The document was the latest iteration of the Mandate for Leadership, a wish list for new presidents that Heritage has habitually issued around election cycles since Ronald Reagan took power in 1981. Dr. Feulner explained how the tradition got started in Project 2025's afterword, which he wrote, titled 'Onward!' In the fall of 1979, senior officials of the Nixon and Ford administrations, William E. Simon and Jack Eckerd, told Dr. Feulner that, upon assuming office, they had received no practical guidance on how to institute conservative policies on issues such as free markets, government size, and national security. They added that their briefings came from liberal predecessors or career civil servants who favored the status quo. Dr. Feulner and others at Heritage were early supporters of Reagan's. Long before Reagan beat Jimmy Carter in the 1980 election, Heritage decided to spend $250,000 to put together a guidebook for a Reagan presidency. The result, weighing in at 1,093 pages, was distributed by Reagan at his first Cabinet meeting, Ed Meese, later Reagan's attorney general, told the Times in 2018. Dr. Feulner described the document to The Washington Post in 1983 as 'the nuts and bolts of how you make the kind of changes that philosophers and academics have been talking about.' Heritage soon reported that about 60 percent of its suggestions had been acted on by the new administration in its first year in power. The foundation was generally a booster of Republicans, but it also saw its mandate as condemning Republicans when they failed to live up to principle. Advertisement In 1987, after Reagan signed an arms control agreement with the Soviet Union and praised reforms undertaken by Mikhail Gorbachev, Dr. Feulner told the Times that conservatives felt 'Ronald Reagan walked away from them in the end.' He was harsher still on George H.W. Bush, whose tax increases constituted a cardinal sin. Meese discovered what inducements were possible by staying loyal to the cause. After Reagan's second term, Meese joined Heritage as a fellow making an annual salary of $400,000. Soon after George W. Bush assumed office, Dr. Feulner dispensed the ultimate praise. 'More Reaganite than the Reagan administration,' he told the Times. He added that he and Karl Rove, Bush's top political adviser, spoke a couple times a week. A new measure of the power of the Heritage Foundation came in 2013, when Jim DeMint, a Republican senator from South Carolina, resigned in order to succeed Dr. Feulner. 'There's no question in my mind that I have more influence now on public policy than I did as an individual senator,' he told National Public Radio in 2013. DeMint was associated with the Tea Party, which Heritage had helped to finance and organize. During the 2016 presidential campaign, as other members of the Republican establishment turned against Trump, DeMint pursued a collaborative relationship with the campaign. When Trump won, Dr. Feulner became head of domestic policy for the incoming president's transition team. Heritage was ready with a database of thousands of loyal conservatives to appoint to political offices. 'By betting long odds on Trump, he succeeded,' Daniel Drezner, then a columnist at The Washington Post, wrote of DeMint. 'Heritage has easily been the most influential think tank in the Trump era.' Advertisement In 2017, during a White House dinner for grassroots leaders of the conservative movement, Dr. Feulner was the only think tank official invited — and he sat next to Trump. 'In some respects, Trump the nonpolitician has an incredible advantage, even over Ronald Reagan,' Dr. Feulner told the Times in 2018. Reagan 'knew there were certain things government couldn't do,' he added. Trump, on the other hand, has had a different mentality: 'Hell, why can't we do that? Let's try it.' Edwin John Feulner Jr. was born in Chicago on Aug. 12, 1941. His father was a self-made success in real estate, getting a college degree in night school and later helping to develop downtown Chicago. His mother, Helen (Franzen) Feulner, doted on Eddie, the eldest son, as her favorite, his three younger sisters later told Lee Edwards, author of 'Leading the Way: The Story of Ed Feulner and the Heritage Foundation,' a biography. He grew up saying grace before meals and serving as an altar boy at a local Catholic church. In 1963, he earned a bachelor's degree in English and business from Regis University, a Jesuit institution in Denver. While there, he experienced an ideological awakening while reading Russell Kirk's book 'The Conservative Mind' and Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn's 'Liberty or Equality.' In his spare time in Washington, he studied by correspondence for a doctorate in political science from the University of Edinburgh. He earned the degree in 1981. As a young man, he was an aide to two Republican members of the House of Representatives: Melvin Laird, from Wisconsin, and Philip Crane, from Illinois. Advertisement The Heritage Foundation was launched by a $260,000 donation from beer baron Joseph Coors. His seed money for Heritage was 'arguably the most consequential that's ever been spent in the world of public policy,' John J. Miller wrote in a remembrance for The Wall Street Journal in 2003. Richard Mellon Scaife, a banking and oil scion, became another major early donor. But wary of charges that Heritage was a tool of a few rich men, Dr. Feulner built a substantial membership list with the help of Richard Viguerie, a conservative marketer. By 1984, The Washington Post described Heritage's annual budget of over $10 million as 'the biggest of any think tank in Washington, left or right.' In 2023, its revenue was $101 million. The Times reported that Dr. Feulner's 2010 salary was $1,098,612. In 2005, The Washington Post found that Heritage swerved from criticizing the government of Malaysia to praising it around the time that a Hong Kong consulting firm cofounded by Dr. Feulner and advised by his wife, Linda, began representing Malaysian companies. In a statement, the Heritage Foundation denied that its reports were influenced by Feulner family business interests or any other external factor. Dr. Feulner's survivors include his wife; his children, Edwin III and Emily V. Lown; and several grandchildren. Flush with power in 1984, Dr. Feulner told the Times about the value of political irrelevance. 'The years in the wilderness gave us the time to work out challenges to the prevailing orthodoxy,' he said. He saw 'intellectual ferment' happening on the left — new ideas, new institutional energy. 'Now we are in the mainstream,' he cautioned, 'and we will suffer for that like the liberals before us.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Miranda Devine: Trump wins the Epstein battle — as the left, media foolishly believe prez on the skids
If you listened to the rest of the media — both mainstream and social media — you would think Donald Trump was on the skids, that MAGA was at last turning on the president over the so-called Epstein Files. But nothing could be further from the truth, according to polling the president crowed about over the weekend and, also, according to history. Every single time his enemies count him out, Trump roars back with a vengeance. The latest effort last week to try to smear him as a sexual deviant and damage his marriage by tying him to child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein is a case in point. The Wall Street Journal story Thursday was tame by comparison to the lurid rumors and wishful thinking that ripped through Washington, DC, and newly anti-Trump Elon Musk's X all week. The story claimed Trump had contributed a letter to a leather-bound book created for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003 by the pervert financier's gal pal Ghislaine Maxwell. The typewritten letter reportedly involved an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein that included the lines 'Enigmas never age' and 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' In its description of the letter, which it did not publish, the WSJ said there was also a doodle of a naked woman and Trump's signature. Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture, calling it 'FAKE,' before launching a $10 billion libel action. Trump said: 'These are not my words, not the way I talk.' Ditched 'creep' long ago I can't express my own views about the merits or otherwise of the story for legal reasons since The Post and the WSJ share the same parent company. But I can say it's a nothing burger. So what if Trump wrote the letter, or not? The date is 2003, five years before Epstein was convicted of prostituting a child and was registered as a sex offender, before the world found out what a monster he really was. It's no secret that Trump was chummy with Epstein in his heyday in Manhattan and Palm Beach, when the late pervert was a social-climbing financier throwing star-studded parties. Epstein was a fixture of elite East Coast social circles in the 1990s. It would be strange if Trump didn't know him. But the saga shows Trump in a good light because, years before Epstein's 2008 arrest and sweetheart plea deal, Trump banned him from his Mar-a-Lago club 'for being a creep,' says White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. According to legal filings and a 2020 book by lawyer Bradley Edwards, who represented several Epstein victims, Trump threw out Epstein around 2004, for sexually assaulting the daughter of a friend and Mar-a-Lago member. The New York Times claims Trump and Epstein also fell out over business around the same time when they competed to buy a house in Palm Beach, forcing up the price and annoying Trump. Either way, there is no dispute that Trump cut ties with Epstein more than 20 years ago, which distinguishes him from other high-flying Epstein pals, such as Prince Andrew, former bank CEO Jes Staley and Bill Gates, who kept up the association even after Epstein was convicted. It was during Trump's first presidency that federal prosecutors came after Epstein again, charging him in July 2019 with sex trafficking and conspiracy to traffic minors for sex. One of the main prosecutors was none other than Maurene Comey, the daughter of notorious FBI Director James Comey, whom Trump had sacked two years earlier. James Comey is now in the crosshairs of the FBI, along with former CIA Director John Brennan, after current CIA Director John Ratcliffe referred them for criminal investigation two weeks ago over freshly declassified evidence that highlights their roles in the Russia collusion hoax. Maurene Comey was fired Wednesday, one day before the WSJ story was published, and one day after the White House was alerted to the story. She told colleagues in an email that her ouster was 'unexpected' and unexplained. Comey was also the lead prosecutor of Ghislaine Maxwell in 2021 over her role in Epstein's sex trafficking. According to the WSJ, the 'birthday book' Maxwell compiled was in the files examined by the DOJ during the investigations of Epstein and Maxwell. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! There is no indication of anything more than a circumstantial link between Comey's ouster and the WSJ story, but the timing is intriguing. Like everything else with Epstein, people are inclined to see links where there are none. After the WSJ story broke Thursday, Trump asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to release 'any and all pertinent grand jury testimony, subject to court approval' that was gathered by New York federal prosecutors in 2019. But just because people associated with Epstein doesn't make them complicit in his crimes. The DOJ and FBI have said there is no 'Epstein client list,' as in a list of men to whom he pimped out underage girls. What does exist is Epstein's 'little black book,' bulging with 1,971 names, uncovered in 2009 when his butler tried to sell it. It has been the subject of intense reporting, but you can't judge the names guilty just because Epstein had their number. 'There are a lot of names associated with Epstein that had nothing to do with Epstein's conduct,' broadcaster Bill O'Reilly said last week, quoting Trump. 'They maybe had lunch with him or maybe had some correspondence. 'If that name gets out, those people are destroyed — because there's not going to be any context. The media doesn't care about context — so you can't do that.' Many of the now-adult victims of Epstein were cheated of their chance to confront their tormentor in court because he died in pretrial detention. But the judge allowed them to testify in the Manhattan federal courtroom where Epstein would have been tried, to tell the world what his sexual depravity meant. I was in that courtroom in August 2019 to witness this display of feminine courage as 17 young women lined up at a microphone, heads held high, to place their suffering on the record. Six others had their lawyers read out letters. Through tears and shaky voices, they told their stories so we would understand the toll of broken trust. 'I was nothing more than a teenage prostitute. I was his slave,' said one victim who was a 16-year-old virgin when she says Epstein raped her. The most outspoken victim, Virginia Giuffre, who reportedly committed suicide three months ago, told the court: 'Epstein did not act alone.' Get Miranda's latest take Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Want even more news? Check out more newsletters Giuffre, who fell prey to Epstein at 16, alleged she was 'passed around like a platter of fruit' to 'powerful men,' including Prince Andrew, who settled out of court after she sued him for sexual abuse. She accused other powerful men, but never Trump. In fact, in her 2015 memoir, she explicitly ruled out Trump. As much as the liberal media is salivating at the prospect of another Get-Trump pile-on, there is just nothing there. 'X is not reality' Meanwhile, the same media is ignoring the latest bombshell revelation in the Russiagate scandal unveiled last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, where the evidence of wrongdoing by President Barack Obama and his henchmen exists and is compelling. Trump is having the last laugh, anyway, as CNN pollster Harry Enten pointed out last week. 'If anything Donald Trump's approval rating has gone up since this whole Epstein saga started,' Enten said. 'He is at the apex or close to it in terms of his popularity [with Republicans], Epstein Files complaints or not. Who knew Twitter and X are not reality.' It just goes to prove the noisiest loudmouths who claim to represent MAGA just represent themselves.
