Nissan's future looks bleak
While the cuts only affect four per cent of the plant's 6,000 workers, the question now is whether this is just the start. So serious is the state of Nissan's finances – it announced losses of $4.5 billion (£3.3 billion) in 2024, with this year not expected to be any better – that it would be foolish to assume this is where it will end.
The company has maintained that the Sunderland plant is at the heart of its corporate strategy and it justified the lay-offs as necessary to produce a 'leaner more flexible' operation. Football mad Mackems though might note that these comments sound uncomfortably like the endorsements football club chairmen give under-fire managers days before they, well, fire them. There are certainly reasons to be anxious: on the same day Nissan announced the Sunderland lay-offs it was reported that the company had asked some suppliers in the UK and EU to delay payments to free up short-term funds.
The importance of Nissan to the Sunderland area is hard to overstate. Thousands of people are directly employed at the plant with an additional 4,000 jobs in the city reliant on the company in some way. By staying put in Sunderland, Nissan has bucked the trend in an area synonymous with declining industry. Its presence has acted as a symbol of hope and pride for almost 40 years now. Nissan has been a sponsor of Sunderland FC and runs the Nissan Academy offering engineering courses and apprenticeships for students amongst many other good works. But what happens if it shuts up shop? The prospects for Sunderland look bleak.
Despite recent difficulties, the company is still officially bullish about its future in the region and has ambitious plans. These include the 'Arc' business strategy, which it claims will transform the process of electric car production and maximise efficiency and profits. To this end the company has invested a billion pounds in a nearby battery plant to supply its new range of EVs.
The problem is that none of this will work if customers are not interested and Nissan has been haemorrhaging sales to the much 'leaner and more flexible' Chinese competitors for years. The company, which once looked like the future, has been characterised of late by strategic missteps, complacency, and missed opportunities. It has been a long time since Nissan's confident forward thinking corporate rhetoric has matched reality.
Partly as a result of its tarnished reputation, the reaction to Nissan's plight here in Japan has been mixed. Emblematic companies are expected to do the country proud not embarrass it and Nissan has done rather too much of the latter in recent years. The Carlos Ghosn affair was especially wounding. Once seen as the company's likely saviour, his 'great escape' from police custody inside a musical instrument box in 2019 was as farcical as it was humiliating.
There is a feeling here that the company is its own worst enemy and may be beyond saving. The Japanese government tried to intervene to salvage Nissan with support for a once unthinkable merger with Honda and the courting of Elon Musk as a potential saviour. Both schemes failed, possibly because the principles took a look at Nissan's books and drove off at speed.
Some sympathy is due perhaps, at least for Nissan in the UK, where the huge difficulties resulting from the ever-changing diktats of climate-obsessed governments (Conservative and Labour) have put the industry under great strain. The wholly unnecessary set of circumstances that has led the UK to have among the highest industrial energy prices in the world makes plants like Sunderland vulnerable when its owners are struggling in a fiercely competitive market.
It would be a massive reputational embarrassment for Nissan if it were to withdraw or dramatically scale back its operations in Sunderland, and no one is suggesting that such an eventuality is imminent. Still, it might be wise to think of this week's announcement as a warning and a clarion call for sensible policy making. One would hope that the Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is listening carefully.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
3 hours ago
- Scotsman
ScotWind: Mingyang Smart Energy wind power project creates double-edged dilemma over security
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... When the West of Orkney Wind Farm received planning permission from the Scottish Government last month, it was a rare bright spot for a sector that's been bruised by global economic headwinds and domestic regulatory uncertainty for over a year. The decision marks a key step forward in the project's plan for 125 wind turbines to be fixed to the seabed about 30 kilometres west of the Orkney mainland, allowing the generation of enough electricity to power two million homes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It also makes West of Orkney the first of 20 wind farms – collectively known as ScotWind – to be given such consent since Crown Estate Scotland awarded options to develop seabed acreage in the North Sea in 2022. The granting of onshore consent is a significant planning milestone for the Muir Mhòr Offshore Wind Farm project. Yet while the decision will be welcomed by the project's backers – TotalEnergies of France, Renewables Infrastructure Development Group of the UK, and Corio Generation, part of Australia's Macquarie – the mood among most of the other ScotWind developers is anxious. That's because, a thousand miles away in London, consent of a different kind is pending that has greater consequences for the future of ScotWind. Westminster has for months been grappling with whether to allow a Chinese wind turbine manufacturer, Mingyang Smart Energy, to build a wind turbine blade factory in the Inverness area. The deliberations have widened to whether the Chinese company's kit should be used in the UK's offshore wind supply chain at all. The case in favour is economically compelling. Mingyang, like many businesses in China's green tech juggernaut, produces turbines more cheaply than its European rivals. Mingyang's factory would also create hundreds of green jobs in the North-east of Scotland. Small wonder that Holyrood has earmarked £30 million for the project. The investment from Mingyang would be around £120m, attractive for Labour as it tries to attract foreign investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The case against boils down to two issues: perceived security threats to the UK's critical national energy infrastructure and supply chain dependency. An aerial view shows wind turbine blades stored on the quayside ready for shipping at the Siemens Gamesa blade factory in Hull. Picture: Paul Ellis/AFP via Getty Images Concerns have been raised by MPs including Andrew Bowie, Nick Timothy, Christine Jardine and Harriet Cross that because the operational software embedded in a turbine remains in the control of the manufacturer after installation, the risk exists that a wind farm using Chinese turbines could be switched off, causing damage to downstream transmission and grid. Cyber espionage is another worry. Germany has already raised a red flag. A paper commissioned from the German Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies by the country's defence ministry this year said that the Waterkant wind farm off the German coast should not go ahead on the grounds of public safety, citing planned use of Chinese wind turbines. For anyone who still thinks this is far-fetched, it's worth reading two recently published government policy documents that lay out the stark geopolitical reality of our times. China is assessed in the Strategic Defence Review as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge', while the National Security Strategy says: 'Economic coercion will become more common as other states weaponise trade or use export controls and supply chain dependencies to gain advantage." Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dependency stems from the fact that more than 60 per cent of ScotWind's wind farms are designed to be floating units in deep waters, unlike the fixed bottom technology used by West of Orkney. Mingyang specialises in floating turbines. The only other manufacturers in the game, Vestas and Siemens-Gamesa, are too financially constrained to develop floating turbines at scale any time soon. They are also busy fulfilling existing orders for fixed-bottom projects. This means that, without Mingyang, much of ScotWind is less likely to materialise, jeopardising the UK's overall offshore wind targets. The government now finds itself on the horns of a geopolitical dilemma. Sir Keir Starmer, on whose desk the Mingyang decision likely now sits, must now navigate between the White House's antipathy towards wind power – expressed yesterday in the gutting of Biden-era tax credits for wind and solar in Trump's 'big beautiful bill' – and China's desire to expand its wind power champions in Europe. Tension flared last month when China's embassy in London slammed as 'groundless' any 'so-called security concerns' over the use of Chinese wind equipment in the UK's energy infrastructure. This came after a report that Washington had warned London about national security risks associated with allowing Mingyang to build a plant in the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The dilemma is complicated by the fact that another Scottish offshore wind project, Green Volt, backed by Eni of Italy and Tokyo Electric Power Company, reportedly intends to use Mingyang turbines. It was the only successful bidder from Scotland at the last government auction that allocates offtake prices, meaning it is well advanced. Allowing Mingyang in with technical and legal safeguards would be one option. Another would be to incentivise Vestas and Siemens-Gamesa to ramp up floating wind turbine technology, providing more flexibility to developers. I understand one measure under consideration is sweetening the terms of the next auction to make it more viable to incorporate Siemens-Gamesa turbines in project plans. Germany might also look at channelling some of the up to €1 trillion recently approved as part of relaxing the 'debt brake' to upgrade its military and infrastructure for its own offshore wind champion, Siemens-Gamesa.
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Popular restaurant chain announces sudden closure of all UK branches
In a sad update on Instagram, the chain confirmed all its restaurants have now been shut down - and diners have been left devastated by the news A popular restaurant chain has closed down after 20 years and has shuttered all its UK locations. Chinese dim sum restaurant Ping Pong was founded in 2005 by restaurateur Kurt Zdesar. But in a sad update on Instagram, the chain confirmed all its restaurants have now been shut down. Ping Pong said: "It's a wrap. After 20 unforgettable years, all Ping Pong locations are now permanently closed. 'We're incredibly proud of what we built, an independent hospitality brand full of creativity, flavour and soul. To everyone who joined us over the years, for dim sum dates, happy hours, bottomless brunches, and just-because catch-ups – thank you. 'You shared your moments with us, passed around little parcels of deliciousness, and helped make Ping Pong what it was. To our collaborators, suppliers, and the incredible team who kept the steam going, thank you. It's been sum-thing truly special.' Devastated diners have been responding to the social media post, with one person saying: "Noooo, we've made some amazing memories there, birthdays, anniversaries , you name it. The food was always so amazing" Another commented: "This is very very sad. Will be sorely missed." A third said: "WHAT?? WE HAD NO CHANCE TO SAY GOODBYE! NO WARNING." A fourth posted: "We had so many good times there. The food and the lychee cocktails will be sorely missed." Another said: "Omgggggggggg nooooooooooo!!!!!!!! If I knew I'd have made one last trip. So sad." It comes after Ping Pong received backlash last year after it replaced its service charge with a discretionary 15% "brand charge" that it said covered franchise fees and other brand-related expenses. Ping Pong said at the time that it was trialling the charge ahead of new legislation which made it illegal for employers to hold back service charges from their staff. It came against a backdrop of higher inflation and energy costs for businesses. Ping Pong reported trading losses of £1.4million in the year to March 2020. Art Sagiryan, Ping Pong chief executive, told The Times: 'Everyone in the industry is waiting to see who does what. There will be people introducing cover charges, there will be people introducing higher bills or menu prices, and we in the interim are trying to decide where we will go.' It comes after restaurant chain Browns closed its first ever branch in Brighton last month. The brasserie and bar chain is known for its traditional British menu, alongside its breakfasts, lunches, afternoon teas, and traditional Sunday roasts. This specific Browns branch was the first to open in 1973. The restaurant chain currently has 26 sites across the UK, with branches in London, Bristol, and Cambridge.
Top Gear
5 hours ago
- Top Gear
Sayonara, Godzilla: one last ride through Tokyo in the R35 Nissan GT-R
Big Reads Nissan's nuclear monster has gone back into the ocean – we fight it one last time Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Gojira is dead. Japan's motoring kaiju has been laid to rest, driven back into the icy depths of the Pacific and far away from this clanging metaphor. The supercar world is safe once again. Because for the best part of 18 years, the 'R35' Nissan GT-R was busy laying waste to all that came before it. Including, in its very earliest incarnation, Jeremy Clarkson's neck. 'They haven't built a new car here,' JC said, right before Nissan's reanimated Godzilla attacked him. 'They've built a new yardstick .' Advertisement - Page continues below Perhaps foolishly, we reanimated the R35 from its deep slumber in Nissan's Yokohama HQ for one last ride; a valedictory sendoff on home turf before a hot ride to its natural hunting ground – the Hakone turnpike – flanked by pair of modified GT-Rs that never left our side. Our travels quickly taught us that Japan's a brilliant paradox of a nation: high tech with an ancient, historic core. Photography: Toby Thyer You might like Just like Godzilla, itself an unconventional yardstick wrapped in a paradox. Here was a car designed like a brick that featured cutting edge aerodynamics. A car that appeared to be an artificial, self driven computer on wheels that required very human effort to tame and extract performance from. And crucially, a four seater, £50k-ish Nissan (at launch) that'd eat a BMW M3 for breakfast and eye up a Porsche 911 Turbo for lunch. Ferrari and Lamborghini were on the menu for dinner. Not that the R35's chief engineer, Kazutoshi Mizuno, ever saw it that way, thinking of his 2007 baby as a 'new kind of supercar, one with no competitors'. Advertisement - Page continues below Hiroshi Tamura – the GT-R's product planner back in those heady days – elaborated. 'Some people asked me, 'What were your competitors for the R35?'' Tamura-san told 'In some circumstances like a track day, it's OK to compare to some of the other performance cars. 'But to be honest, I didn't see any sports car as a rival, because of the 'trend making' standpoint of this car. We did not see any rivals because we were so focused on going our own way,' he added. Trend making . That's the yardstick Clarkson was talking about. Nissan wasn't trying to build a nondescript machine that'd simply outthrust a 911 Turbo for half the price, it was trying to lay down a performance benchmark for the 21st century. Back then it probably had no idea just how much of the 21st century it'd see. Skip 19 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox. A period in which it saw off challenges left, right, and sometimes sideways. The first of which just happened to be the fastest car on Earth: the 997 911 Turbo. 'Driving these two cars back to back,' Top Gear's Bill Thomas said back in 2008, 'it's not long before you realise that the Nissan makes the Porsche seem old fashioned. The GT-R is truly extraordinary.' 'The GT-R is part car, part Terminator,' editor at large Jason Barlow noted when it faced up against the Audi R8. 'To stand beside this car now is to look upon a near perfect representation of the 21st century sports car,' added TG's Matt Master when Godzilla faced off against the Evo X. 'It's back to that schoolboy fantasy. Otherworldly, yet right here in front of me, and as spectacular and dramatic in the metal as any car I've ever clapped eyes on.' It remains unexpectedly, spectacularly brutal even in 2025, perhaps more so in an age of unearned, easy electric pace. The sheer force unleashed when the T-Spec's 562bhp V6 awakens is genuinely incredible, soundtracked by an engine note that's a mix of fine tuned heavy industry and turbo hiss. God, this thing is supernaturally quick. More than its technical prowess and sheet metal attraction is the supercar banner it carried on behalf of Japan. 'It's an important car because it's the first time a Japanese car was properly tested at the Nürburgring,' Tetsuya Yamano told Yamano-san won three consecutive Japanese Super GT300 titles from 2004 to 2006, so he knows a thing or three about JDM honour. 'It was the first time Japan really went all out to make a 'special' car. 'It makes Japanese people proud because we made it. Before this, we could never really battle with German and Italian supercars, but with the R35 we finally could,' he added. The GT-R is like Gundam tech. It embodies strong power, controlled by technology. You are the commander. The car is the extension 'If I had one last lap in it? Fuji Speedway, 300kph,' he said with a smile. Though, 300kph [186mph] is just the start of another chapter of the R35's story, because it continued a very fine tradition instigated by its kaiju predecessors: being tuned to within an inch of its life. 'The GT-R is arguably Japan's flagship model,' said Iain Litchfield, founder of Litchfield Motors. 'More importantly, the R35 has built a community of performance enthusiasts who have bought into and built on the GT-R's reputation.' The GT-R has been at the heart of this tuning house for more than 17 years, so Litchfield's been privy to the GT-R's history like no other. 'The real difference the GT-Rs have had is allowing their enthusiastic owners a blank canvas to create their dream car,' he added. Dream cars that'd routinely see upwards of a thousand horsies without breaking a sweat. Nissan itself treated the GT-R's base to a healthy package of updates over the years, steadily improving the raucous, untamed heavyweight's technology and refinement, but also its power and purpose as the years rolled by and the competitor landscape – and consumer desires – shifted. Against the Honda NSX in 2018 – a fiendishly complex hybrid supercar that instantly made the R35 seem even more like its neolithic silver screen namesake – TG's Tom Ford noted that 'it might basically be the same car as the giant killer that arrived in 2007, but it just goes to show that the basic recipe was very, very right'. Skip 20 photos in the image carousel and continue reading A recipe crafted by Mizuno-san and Tamura-san that put the owner and enthusiast at the heart of everything. Forget the myth and technology and warp speed and competition and cricked necks and shattered supercar egos – you were the biggest part of the GT-R's story. 'I realised the most important thing is that the car is for a customer,' Mizuno-san told TG back in 2012. 'The GT-R is a Japanese supercar. What is Japan? It is takumi [artisanship]. This is Japanese spirit. It is a special skill that adds something special in the customer mind and passes it on to the next generation. 'So the GT-R is takumi . I do this for the customer, not for myself or company pride,' he added. In the here and now, Tamura-san painted with the same brush. 'The question was how do we make performance car fans happy, and the answer was the R35,' he told TG. 'I wanted to create happiness. 'The GT-R is like Gundam tech. It embodies strong power, controlled by technology. You are the commander. The car is the extension. Its shape is not Italian exotic. It's not American muscle, or German tech, but it's the spirit of our super sports car scene. The most important thing is how the customer, how the audience feels 'It's like the heartbeat of Japan,' he added. Only Nissan knows what ingredients will feature in the recipe for the next GT-R... if there even is one. At the time of writing, the company is undergoing yet another recovery plan, slashing jobs, culling factories, and ditching all post-2026 new car development. The Hyper Force concept from 2023 pointed to a steroidal 1,341bhp AWD electric Godzilla, but that too looks like it's been driven back into an icy slumber while Nissan fights for its very life. But Tamura-san reckons we shouldn't get too hung up on what'll power the new Godzilla if it ever resurfaces from the Pacific, but rather – like this R35 – what it'll represent. 'We need to show the next trend,' he said. 'This is a very important role for the GT-R. In my opinion the most important thing is how the customer, how the audience feels .'
