logo
Browns beat writer has flaming critique on QB Dillon Gabriel

Browns beat writer has flaming critique on QB Dillon Gabriel

USA Today31-05-2025
Browns beat writer has flaming critique on QB Dillon Gabriel
The Cleveland Browns are through one week of OTAs, and there are already takes being thrown around about rookie quarterbacks Dillon Gabriel and Shedeur Sanders.
And for once, the spotlight is actually on the third round pick Gabriel, rather than the fifth rounder, Sanders. It's not necessarily in a positive light, however, as The Athletic's Zac Jackson has raised concerns regarding how the Big Ten Offensive Player of the Year has looked thus far. And from his eyes, it has not been overly impressive.
Here is what Jackson of The Athletic had to say on the former UCF, Oklahoma, and Oregon quarterback who the Browns selected with the 94th overall pick in the draft:
"Dillon Gabriel does not look like an NFL quarterback to me. Like zero percent... I just don't think any other team was taking him in the top-100 or even the top-150. If I am wrong and the Cleveland Browns have their quarterback, that would be great. One of these years, I would love to cover a normal franchise and a rookie quarterback that sticks around for more than 6-to-18 months. But if it's Dillon Gabriel, I will be beyond shocked."
It's way too early to make any definitive statement about the Browns' quarterback situation heading into what will be a hotly contested battle throughout training camp. We'll see if Gabriel is catching the attention of the coaching staff thus far more than he is the local media.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NBA reporter addresses Nikola Jokic's future with Denver Nuggets after declining contract extension
NBA reporter addresses Nikola Jokic's future with Denver Nuggets after declining contract extension

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

NBA reporter addresses Nikola Jokic's future with Denver Nuggets after declining contract extension

The Denver Nuggets came into the offseason hoping to convince Nikola Jokic to remain with the franchise for years to come. After an array of moves to overhaul the rotation, the three-time NBA MVP told the team he wouldn't sign a contract extension this summer. NBA reporter Sam Amick of The Athletic said on Sactown Sports 1140 that there are 'no signs' Jokic wants out of Denver anytime soon. While he is eligible to hit NBA free agency in 2027, there is no belief that he is even entertaining it right now. Advertisement Related: NBA power rankings, see where the Nuggets land Nikola Jokic contract (Spotrac): $55.224 million salary (2025-26). $59.033 million salary (2026-27), $62.841 million player option in 2027 After consecutive seasons of being eliminated in the Western Conference Semifinals, Denver became more aggressive this summer. The team moved off the Michael Porter Jr. contract, upgraded with Cam Johnson, and created the financial flexibility to add more talent to the roster. Once the deal was official, the Nuggets added Bruce Brown and Jonas Valanciunas to fortify their rotation for next season. All three additions are widely viewed as strong enough for Denver to re-establish itself as one of the elite teams in the Western Conference. Read More: 50 best NBA players right now, find out where Nikola Jokic ranks There's another incentive for Jokic to hold off on a contract extension this summer. By waiting until next year, he'll be eligible to sign a four-year extension worth upwards of $290 million. It's a far better return than the three-year, $212 million deal he could've signed this offseason. Advertisement While NBA teams like the Los Angeles Clippers and Los Angeles Lakers are hoping Jokic plays out the final two years of his deal, then tests the open market in 2027, that still seems unlikely to happen. With the moves Denver made this summer to remain a championship contender, there's no reason to believe Jokic is questioning his future with the team. Related Headlines

Cleveland wants total block on Browns plan to move: I-Team
Cleveland wants total block on Browns plan to move: I-Team

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Cleveland wants total block on Browns plan to move: I-Team

***Previous coverage above: Judge rules on dismissal of Browns lawsuit*** CLEVELAND (WJW) – Attorneys with the city of Cleveland have filed a motion with Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court asking a judge to block the Browns from taking any action at all toward moving to Brook Park until the lease for the current stadium is up at the end of the 2028 season. The city is asking the judge to grant summary judgment saying the Browns have breached the lease with the city. The motion adds the Browns breached the lease by making plans to build a new, enclosed stadium and move the team to Brook Park. 'The plain language of the Lease broadly prohibits the Browns from doing—or even standing idly by while someone else does—anything that might cause the Browns to leave Cleveland,' the motion states. Ohio Task Force 1 heading to Texas for search and rescue operation following devastating floods Attorneys for the city said the Browns have disregarded their obligation under the lease and have made steps to move to Brook Park. 'To the public, the parties, and the Court, the Browns 'have made it clear that they will not fulfill their contractual duties with the City,'' the motion states. 'As this Court observed, 'The Browns have given notice to the City that they intend to move, they have finalized the purchase of 167 acres of land in the City of Brook Park, they have given formal notice to the City that they are leaving, they have engaged in frequent strategy and planning meeting with the Mayor of Brook Park, they have entered into a partnership with a contractor for the purpose of constructing a new stadium, and they are procuring financing.' Id. The Browns cannot possibly contest these findings—they publicly boasted about all of them, and described their breach in open court.' A hearing on the motion has not yet been set. On Friday, Judge Lauren Moore denied the Browns' motion to dismiss the case filed against them by the city of Cleveland and also declined a request to put the case on hold. The city of Cleveland sued the Browns in January, saying the team is restricted from moving due to the Modell Law. However, last month, the state legislature reworked the Modell Law saying teams can move as long as they do not leave the state of Ohio. The Browns asked to wait until the federal case is resolved. But since that case is on hold indefinitely, the judge dismissed that request as moot. The Browns also argued the case was 'unripe,' meaning the city had not yet been negatively impacted by the Browns' move. But the judge ruled the Browns' plan to move out of Cleveland to Brook Park is already a done deal. Following the ruling, Cleveland Law Director Mark Griffin issued a statement to the I-Team that reads, 'We appreciate Judge Moore's diligence in thoughtfully applying the law and look forward to further addressing the merits of our case in her court.' University Hospitals doctors claim they were fired for trying to unionize; the hospital said it was misconduct A spokesperson for the Browns said in a statement the organization is complying with the obligations of its downtown stadium lease, which expires in 2029, and that it remains focused on building the new 'world-class' enclosed stadium in Brook Park. 'We are as confident as ever in our legal position and look forward to a prompt resolution of the city's meritless claims,' the statement reads. The I-Team has also learned Brook Park has applied for about $80 million in state money for road projects around the dome site. Cuyahoga County Executive Chris Ronayne said he predicts major traffic headaches around the airport once the Browns start playing in Brook Park. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Phillies lash out after Brewers rookie Jacob Misiorowski makes All-Star team: ‘It's a joke'
Phillies lash out after Brewers rookie Jacob Misiorowski makes All-Star team: ‘It's a joke'

New York Post

time7 hours ago

  • New York Post

Phillies lash out after Brewers rookie Jacob Misiorowski makes All-Star team: ‘It's a joke'

The Phillies aren't happy with Jacob Misiorowski's controversial All-Star Game selection. The Brewers' hard-throwing rookie was chosen as a replacement for Matthew Boyd after just five starts and 25 2/3 innings, breaking the 2024 record set by Pirates ace Paul Skenes of 11 games. The news didn't go over well in Philadelphia's clubhouse. 'What a joke,' Turner said, according to The Athletic. 'That's f— terrible. I mean, that's terrible, dude.' 3 Cristopher Sánchez #61 of the Philadelphia Phillies throws a pitch in the first inning during game two of a doubleheader against the San Diego Padres at Citizens Bank Park on July 2, 2025 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Getty Images Added Nick Castellanos: 'It's turning into the Savannah Bananas.' The Phillies have two deserving starting pitchers – Christopher Sánchez and Ranger Suárez – who were snubbed despite Philly's ace Zack Wheeler opting out of the game. Sanchez has often been mentioned as the pitcher who should have been selected, with ESPN's Jeff Passan and Jomboy Media's Chris Rose mentioning him Friday night after Misiorowski's addition. The Phillies' southpaw owns a 2.59 ERA with 116 strikeouts over 107 2/3 innings this season, all of which rank top 12 in the National League. 3 Jacob Misiorowski #32 of the Milwaukee Brewers before the game against the St. Louis Cardinals at American Family Field on June 13, 2025 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Getty Images 'If he's not an all-Star, then no one is,' Turner said. Sánchez wasn't selected in part because he's starting the Phillies' first-half finale Sunday against the Padres, which his teammates disagreed with. 3 Philadelphia Phillies starting pitcher Ranger Suarez (55) delivers during the first inning against the against the San Diego Padres at Petco Park. IMAGN IMAGES via Reuters Connect 'That shouldn't be the case,' Realmuto said. Added Kyle Schwarber, the team's lone player who will be attending the game: 'He should be named an All-Star still.' Suárez has been even better, albeit in fewer innings after missing the first month of the season with a back injury, posting a 1.94 ERA in 83 2/3 innings. 'That's just how MLB does it now,' Realmuto said. 'Nothing against the Misiorowski kid. But those two (Sánchez and Suárez) are deserving of being on the team in the first place. There's no doubt.' MLB reportedly offered to make the pair All-Stars under certain conditions. Suarez was reportedly told by league officials that he could be an All-Star if he agreed to pitch an inning, but he declined, deciding to rest for the second half instead. 'Even if you're going to ask hi that, then he should be labeled an All-Star at that point,' Schwarber said. 'Not just if you can pitch.' Sanchez was asked to 'make himself available' for an inning due to the restriction after pitching Sunday, per The Athletic, which he reportedly declined. His agent denied that version of events to the outlet, saying Sanchez is willing to pitch. 'It's unfortunate,' Schwarber said of the two snubs. 'But I wish my teammates were there. We know what we have, and I think that we're grateful for what we have.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store