Xiaomi's new smart air conditioners are finally coming to Europe – and I'm pretty excited about it
QUICK SUMMARY
Xiaomi has listed its first smart air conditioners for global markets – the Mijia Air Conditioner Pro Eco 2.6kW and 3.5kW models. Both offer cooling and heating, smart features like AI Energy Saving mode and Xiaomi Home app control.
Pricing and release dates are still unknown, but they're expected to be affordable.
Xiaomi has really been on a roll lately with its smart home lineup, and I've especially been loving the look of its new smart water tap. However, as many fans know all too well, a lot of Xiaomi's coolest new gadgets tend to launch exclusively in China – which can be extremely frustrating.
Well, that trend is finally starting to change. Xiaomi has officially listed the Mijia Air Conditioner Pro Eco 2.6kW and Mijia Air Conditioner Pro Eco 3.5kW on its global website, which means they're headed to international markets. These will be the brand's first smart air conditioners available outside of China, and it looks like Europe is first on the list.
We don't have confirmed release dates or pricing just yet, but knowing Xiaomi's track record, they're likely to be competitively priced. We also expect them to be pretty popular, especially as there isn't much of an existing market for air conditioners in Europe anyways.
Both models offer cooling and heating capabilities, with up to 3.6kW heating capacity and 860W heating power. The 2.6kW model is best for rooms between 10 and 20m², whilst the 3.5kW unit suits larger spaces of 15 to 25m².
Users can also control them remotely via the Xiaomi Home app, access Mijia AI Energy Saving mode, and track real-time energy usage. There's also Google Assistant voice support, and they integrate smoothly with the rest of the Xiaomi smart home ecosystem.
Other handy features include smart pre-heating, anti-condensation tech, and filter cleaning reminders – all designed to make life just a little more comfortable.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scientists hit quantum computer error rate of 0.000015% — a world record achievement that could lead to smaller and faster machines
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have achieved the lowest quantum computing error rate ever recorded — an important step in solving the fundamental challenges on the way to practical, utility-scale quantum computers. In research published June 12 in the journal APS Physical Review Letters, the scientists demonstrated a quantum error rate of 0.000015%, which equates to one error per 6.7 million operations. This achievement represents an improvement of nearly an order of magnitude in both fidelity and speed over the previous record of approximately one error for every 1 million operations — achieved by the same team in 2014. The prevalence of errors, or "noise," in quantum operations can render a quantum computer's outputs useless. This noise comes from a variety of sources, including imperfections in the control methods (essentially, problems with the computer's architecture and algorithms) and the laws of physics. That's why considerable efforts have gone into quantum error correction. While errors related to natural law, such as decoherence (the natural decay of the quantum state) and leakage (the qubit state leaking out of the computational subspace), can be reduced only within those laws, the team's progress was achieved by reducing the noise generated by the computer's architecture and control methods to almost zero. Related: Scientists make 'magic state' breakthrough after 20 years — without it, quantum computers can never be truly useful "By drastically reducing the chance of error, this work significantly reduces the infrastructure required for error correction, opening the way for future quantum computers to be smaller, faster, and more efficient," Molly Smith, a graduate student in physics at the University of Oxford and co-lead author of the study, said in a statement. "Precise control of qubits will also be useful for other quantum technologies such as clocks and quantum sensors." Record-low quantum computing error rates The quantum computer used in the team's experiment relied on a bespoke platform that eschews the more common architecture that uses photons as qubits — the quantum equivalent of computer bits — for qubits made of "trapped ions." The study was also conducted at room temperature, which the researchers said simplifies the setup required to integrate this technology into a working quantum computer. Whereas most quantum systems either deploy superconducting circuits that rely on "quantum dots" or employ the use of lasers — often called "optical tweezers" — to hold a single photon in place for operation as a qubit, the team used microwaves to trap a series of calcium-43 ions in place. With this approach, the ions are placed into a hyperfine "atomic clock" state. According to the study, this technique allowed the researchers to create more "quantum gates," which are analogous to the number of 'quantum operations' a computer can perform, with greater precision than the photon-based methods allowed. Once the ions were placed into a hyperfine atomic clock state, the researchers calibrated the ions via an automated control procedure that regularly corrected them for amplitude and frequency drift caused by the microwave control method. In other words, the researchers developed an algorithm to detect and correct the noise produced by the microwaves used to trap the ions. By removing this noise, the team could then conduct quantum operations with their system at or near the lowest error rate physically possible. Using this method, it is now possible to develop quantum computers that are capable of conducting single-gate operations (those conducted with a single qubit gate as opposed to a gate requiring multiple qubits) with nearly zero errors at large scales. This could lead to more efficient quantum computers in general and, per the study, achieves a new state-of-the-art single-qubit gate error and the breakdown of all known sources of error, thus accounting for most errors produced in single-gate operations. This means engineers who build quantum computers with the trapped-ion architecture and developers who create the algorithms that run on them won't have to dedicate as many qubits to the sole purpose of error correction. RELATED STORIES —'The science is solved': IBM to build monster 10,000-qubit quantum computer by 2029 —Scientists forge path to the first million-qubit processor for quantum computers after 'decade in the making' breakthrough —'Quantum AI' algorithms already outpace the fastest supercomputers, study says By reducing the error, the new method reduces the number of qubits required and the cost and size of the quantum computer itself, the researchers said in the statement. This isn't a panacea for the industry, however, as many quantum algorithms require multigate qubits functioning alongside or formed from single-gate qubits to perform computations beyond rudimentary functions. The error rate in two-qubit gate functions is still roughly 1 in 2,000. While this study represents an important step toward practical, utility-scale quantum computing, it doesn't address all of the "noise" problems inherent in complex multigate qubit systems.
Gizmodo
8 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Google Assistant Is Basically on Life Support and Things Just Got Worse
Voice assistants are… not perfect. That's me being nice. But if I were to cease being nice, I'd probably say something more like 'voice assistants suck,' and I think most would agree I'd be justified in saying so. While no voice assistant really manages to escape that criticism, I usually opt for Google Assistant, which—in my experience—is the least sucky. Or it used to be, but after some recent hiccups, I may have to start rethinking that dishonorable distinction. Last week, Google Assistant users reported that the voice assistant was bordering on broken. Those complaints across Reddit and X were so loud, in fact, that Google itself decided to get out there and address them. Here's Google's Director of Product Management, Google Home & Nest, Anish Kattukaran, doing some damage control on X last week. Hey everyone, I want to acknowledge the recent feedback about Google Assistant reliability on our home devices. I sincerely apologize for what you're experiencing and feeling! — Anish Kattukaran (@AnishKattukaran) July 23, 2025Pretty bad, right? Well, unfortunately, those attempts at getting out ahead of problems appear mostly rhetorical, because things somehow have gotten worse, and now Google Home is at the center of what I would describe as a reputation shitstorm. According to way too many people on Reddit, Google Home is so broken that some people are actually unable to even turn their smart lights on and off properly. And it's not just lights; if Reddit complaints are anything to go off of, it looks like all kinds of smart devices are affected by problems with Google Home, including other speakers and even (disconcertingly) cameras and smart doorbells. While Google has apparently promised to fix the issues, it looks like, for lots of people, they've persisted. A quick scan of the Google Home subreddit reveals that connectivity issues and general issues are still pouring in, with no official announcement from Google. Mileage may vary, but if you're one of the many unlucky Google Home users having issues with third-party devices, you can pull open your Google Home app and navigate to the settings and see if the connecting app is still synced. To do that, go to Settings in the bottom-right corner, then tap 'Works with Google,' and a list of your synced apps should show up. If they're no longer synced, re-sync the app by finding it under 'Add new.' If they're still synced and not working, unsync the app by tapping on the icon and then tap 'Unlink account.' After that, you can try syncing once more and hope that it works. Obviously, having to do any of this is annoying for lots of reasons. For one, people use the Google Home app and smart products on a daily basis to do things like turn their freaking lights on and off. It's also frustrating from a more general standpoint, given Google Assistant's slow erosion over the past few years to the point where some of its core functions have basically broken. To me, this is the clearest indication that voice assistants are in a very bad place, and something needs to be done. That something, if Google, Apple, and Amazon have anything to do with it, will probably be a much-needed dose of AI chatbots like Gemini, but it remains to be seen whether an infusion of a large language model will be enough. The bittersweet news is that it looks like it can't possibly get any worse, though. On the bright side, Apple must feel pretty good about delaying its promised next-gen Siri. Better late than broken, I say.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Alibaba Stock Climbs on AI?Powered Smart Glasses Debut
July 28 - Shares of Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) climbed about 2% in early trading Monday after the e?commerce giant unveiled its first AI?powered smart glasses. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with BABA. The Quark AI Glasses will arrive in China by year?end 2025, featuring hardware driven by Alibaba's Qwen large language model and its Quark AI assistant. Users can make hands?free calls, stream music, translate languages in real time and transcribe meetings via a built?in camera. Wearables stand as the next frontier alongside smartphones, and Alibaba aims to embed Quark more deeply into daily life. The glasses integrate with the company's ecosystem, offering navigation, Alipay payments and Taobao price comparisons without a phone. Alibaba faces a direct rivalry with Meta (NASDAQ:META) that partnered with Ray?Ban on its smart eyewear, and Chinese tech giant Xiaomi, whose own AI glasses appeared in early 2022. Hangzhou-based company has not disclosed the pricing or detailed specifications of the product, but the move highlights its aim at targeting consumer-level hardware and AI services. Shareholders will monitor how the new product can enable Alibaba to build a revenue diversification policy and strengthen revenues in its huge technology lineup. Based on the one year price targets offered by 38 analysts, the average target price for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd is $149.53 with a high estimate of $176.15 and a low estimate of $102.26. The average target implies a upside of +24.57% from the current price of $120.03. Based on GuruFocus estimates, the estimated GF Value for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd in one year is $111.74, suggesting a downside of -6.91% from the current price of $120.03. Gf value is Gurufocus' estimate of the fair value that the stock should be traded at. It is calculated based on the historical multiples the stock has traded at previously, as well as past business growth and the future estimates of the business' performance. For deeper insights, visit the forecast page. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
