'Overregulation' could force US companies to pull investments in EU
The members, led by Chair of the House of Representatives' Judiciary Committee Jim Jordan, met Minister of State for European Affairs Thomas Byrne and media regulator Coimisiún na Meán, as well as with representatives from Apple and Meta.
The delegation also visited Brussels and London in recent days.
Congressman Scott Fitzgerald said the US companies they have met are very frustrated that they are being "overregulated".
"America innovates, China replicates and Europe regulates," Mr Fitzgerald said.
"The EU is underestimating the level of frustration these companies are expressing and it could force them to pull back on the amount of business that they are doing here in Europe."
Mr Jordan said that during the meeting with Coimisiún na Meán Executive Chair Jeremy Godfrey, the delegation expressed concerns that US companies are being overregulated.
"We heard from Mr Godfrey the same argument we've heard from everyone else, that they are for free expression and that they follow the direction of the EU.
"When we are with the EU, they talk about the 27 member states having their own way of doing things.
"So there is a back and forth - EU to Dublin, Dublin to EU - but who is really in charge?
"It seems like two layers of bureaucracy that, in our judgement, are infringing on speech and are harmful to American companies," Mr Jordan said.
In a post on LinkedIn, Coimisiún na Meán said that it spoke about the critically important role that independent regulation plays in upholding everyone's fundamental rights online, including freedom of expression, in Ireland and across the EU.
"We also discussed our work to ensure that online platforms protect the privacy, safety and security of children and young people and the responsibility these platforms have to prevent their services from being used to spread terrorist and extremist content," the commission said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Moves to revive referendum on joining EU patent court as business groups contacted on timing
There have been tentative moves to revive the delayed referendum on Ireland's participation in the European Union's Unified Patent Court (UPC), with the Government seeking views of business groups on the timing of a rescheduled vote. The referendum on Ireland joining the 18 other EU member states that have signed up to the UPC system was originally pencilled in for June 2024 on the same day as the local and European elections. However, the holding of the UPC referendum was thrown into doubt amid the fallout from the defeat of the family and care referendums three months earlier. Soon afterwards the then-government announced it would be deferring the vote. Peter Burke , then minister for enterprise, said at the time: 'While the government continues to believe that joining the UPC is essential and that the referendum should be pursued, it is clear to me that more time is needed for public discourse and engagement on the matter to help inform the debate.' READ MORE The UPC is designed to provide a one-stop shop court for litigation on patents. The court's decisions will be binding on participating EU member states. Ireland joining in the UPC has been long called for by business groups and sectors such as the pharmaceutical industry. The Department of Enterprise has contacted business organisations and government departments about the referendum. Records released under the Freedom of Information Act include a letter from senior Department of Enterprise official John Newham to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland (AmCham). The March 28th letter set out how the legislation on the UPC referendum was pending committee and final stages in the Seanad. Mr Newham, the assistant secretary general, wrote that 'once the legislative process has been concluded an order setting a date for the referendum will issue'. He wrote that the timing of any further advancement of the Bill would be subject to a decision by Government and it would decide a referendum date 'in due course'. He noted the last government 'had concluded that a broader public conversation' on the UPC 'was essential before a referendum was held' and he sought feedback 'in order to assess if sufficient engagement is being held on the matter'. Mr Newham asked for information on 'any initiatives undertaken or planned to assist public understanding of this critical issue'. He also sought 'views on the appropriate timing of a referendum'. Enterprise Ireland , IDA Ireland and Research Ireland were among government agencies contacted by the department as it sought feedback on public awareness of the UPC referendum. The Department of Enterprise confirmed that other organisations contacted included Chambers Ireland , Ibec , the Irish Congress of Trade Unions and BioPharmaChem Ireland, all of which, like AmCham sent responses. AmCham, which represents US companies in Ireland, responded on April 30th, saying: 'It is of the utmost importance that an informed discussion occurs to generate public engagement with the topic.' It said it would work with its members to advance discussion and consideration of the UPC. AmCham said a member survey from 2024 showed that 41 per cent of respondents supported Ireland joining the UPC and 58 per cent were neutral on the matter. The organisation said it would be holding a webinar 'outlining the impact for Ireland, with key expert and member perspectives' and it would also be developing a fact sheet on the UPC for dissemination among members. In response to queries AmCham told The Irish Times: 'While we continue to work with members on this topic, a webinar has not taken place.' It said that the timing of the referendum was 'a matter for Government'. A Department of Enterprise statement said: 'While the Government remains committed to holding the referendum, the timing remains under consideration at this juncture.'
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on funding for nature: not an optional extra
Two developments, one national and one at EU level, have caused legitimate alarm and anger among environmental NGOs. They regard them both as 'gutting' commitments to green measures at the very moment when we should be supporting the development of coherent nature recovery plans under the flagship Nature Restoration Law. It is understandable that such measures slip down the priority list, given the multiple challenges our societies are facing. But this is not acceptable. The existential threats of climate change and biodiversity collapses remain. So it is disturbing that the European Commission's proposal for its next budget indicates that the EU Life Programme – the dedicated fund for environment, nature and climate action – is likely to be repealed. Life's proven return on investment can be seen in many Irish rural communities, exemplified by the Burren Programme. 'It would gut one of the EU's most effective tools just when we need it most,' according to the European Environmental Bureau, which represents 190 member organisations and 30 million individual supporters. It should be listened to. READ MORE Meanwhile, the Environmental Pillar, the national platform for environmental charities, uses similar language to describe the Government's revised National Development Plan: 'the gutting of nature from the Infrastructure, Climate & Nature Fund to finance transport, energy and water infrastructure projects in the National Development Plan is very alarming' the group says, as it undermines guarantees on nature restoration. It certainly seems to make nonsense of the current consultations on developing and implementing the National Nature Restoration Plan with farmers, fishers and environmentalists. Funding for this plan is naturally a key concern for all involved, and if it is not ring-fenced it will inevitably shift to areas of more immediate concern. We cannot continue to consider the health of our natural landscape and climate as an optional extra in planning; if it does not inform the core of our thinking, everything else is undermined.
The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
American citizen killed in the West Bank died from arson by Israeli settlers, his family say
THE US STATE Department has confirmed an American citizen had died this week in the West Bank, with family and Palestinian officials attributing his death to arson by Israeli settlers. The Palestinian Authority and witnesses reported on Thursday that Israeli settlers had set fire to homes and cars in the West Bank village of Silwad, the latest attack in the occupied territory. Khamis Ayyad, 41, died from smoke inhalation due to the fires, the Palestinian health ministry said. Speaking yesterday at a press conference in Chicago, Ayyad's family said he had moved to the West Bank several years ago with his wife and children, but continued to work for an American company. He is at least the second American citizen killed in West Bank settler violence in July, after a 20-year-old man was beaten to death while visiting family in the town of Sinjil. Advertisement Abdul Latif Ayyad mourns over the body of his uncle at his funeral in the West Bank village of Silwad, near Ramallah. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, demanded Israel investigate that killing, calling it a 'criminal and terrorist act,' but has yet to comment on the death of Ayyad. Contacted by news agency AFP, the Israeli military said 'several suspects… set fire to property and vehicles in the Silwad area,' but forces dispatched to the scene were unable to identify them. It added that Israeli police had launched an investigation. Asked for comment on the latest death, a State Department spokesperson said 'we can confirm the death of a US citizen in the town of Silwad in the West Bank,' without naming Ayyad. 'We condemn criminal violence by any party in the West Bank,' the spokesperson said, on condition of anonymity. The West Bank is home to some three million Palestinians, who live alongside about 500,000 Israeli settlers.
