Tesla to expand robotaxis to San Francisco area within two months, Musk says
Tesla last month rolled out a test of the long-promised service in a limited area of Austin, Texas, with about a dozen vehicles, a select group of passengers and many restrictions, including a safety monitor in the front passenger seat.
Tesla will expand the service to "a larger area in Austin this weekend," Musk said on his social media platform X in response to a post from a user about the lack of an update on expansion. Musk did not specify the location or size of the expansion.
Another X user - Tesla Owners Silicon Valley - then asked about an expansion to the Bay Area, and Musk replied, "Waiting on regulatory approvals, but probably in a month or two."
The successful expansion of robotaxis will be crucial to Tesla's future as sales of its aging lineup of electric vehicles have slumped amid rising competition and a backlash against Musk's embrace of far-right political views. Much of the company's trillion-dollar valuation hangs on Musk's bet on robotaxis and humanoid robots that are powered by artificial intelligence.
Commercializing autonomous vehicles has been harder than anticipated with high costs, tight regulations and investigations forcing many, including General Motors' (GM.N), opens new tab Cruise unit, to shut down. Until Tesla's recent rollout, Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Waymo was the only company running driverless robotaxis charging fees from passengers.
Waymo with about 1,500 vehicles has been expanding its service cautiously for years and is currently available in San Francisco and other cities in the Bay Area, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Austin and Atlanta. Musk has said Tesla will ramp up the service rapidly to other U.S. cities.
But while Tesla faced almost no regulation in Texas, California tightly controls where and how firms can operate autonomous vehicles and requires testing data for permits.
In California, Tesla would need a series of permits from the state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to operate a fully autonomous robotaxi service that charges customers.
The CPUC in March gave Tesla the first in a series of approvals required to eventually launch the service. The DMV and CPUC did not respond to Reuters' requests for comments outside of regular business hours.
Tesla's public test in Austin led to multiple traffic problems and driving issues, social media videos from the company-selected riders showed over the first few days.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
20 minutes ago
- Finextra
From advisors to algorithms: The shift in wealth guidance
From advisors to algorithms: The shift in wealth guidance 0 Editorial This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. For decades, wealth management was a relationship business. Clients used to meet their financial advisors in offices, discuss life goals, and trust human judgment to guide their financial futures. However, over the last decade, a quiet revolution has taken place: one that's replacing handshakes with algorithms and intuition with machine learning. Today, millions of people receive financial advice not from a person, but from a platform. Robo-advisors, AI-driven planning tools, and hyper-personalised investment apps are reshaping how we think about wealth, and who gets to build it. However, according to McKinsey, by 2034, 'at current advisor productivity levels, the advisor workforce will decline to the point where the industry faces a shortage of roughly 100,000 advisors.' McKinsey data shows that advice revenues have been the main economic driver for the US wealth management industry. Revenues 'generated from fee-based advisory relationships [...] have grown from approximately $150 billion in 2015 to $260 billion in 2024, and growth in the number of human-advised relationships has outpaced population growth by three times in the same period.' Amid the growing demand for advice, declining advisor head count and addressing the shortage with an advisor talent and productivity system, the quiet revolution has advocated for the recruitment of new-to-industry advisors. By improving the advisor career path for entry-level talent, there is also a clear path for new sources of talent by targeting career switchers. Recruitment will not be enough. This is where generative AI comes in. McKinsey's estimate reveals that even a '30-40% average advisor adoption of more wealth-management-specific gen-AI-enabled tools and processes across the value chain and across the full advisor population by 2034 can deliver 6-12% of time savings – and, in turn, increase advisor capacity.' From suits to software Addressing a 100,000-advisor capacity shortage will be no easy feat, especially with the first wave of robo-advisors having emerged in the early 2010s, offering low-cost, automated portfolio management. They were simple, rules-based systems, efficient, but impersonal. Fast forward to 2025, and the landscape has evolved dramatically. Modern AI-driven platforms don't just rebalance portfolios. They analyse behavioural patterns, anticipate life events, and tailor advice to individual goals, risk appetites, and even emotional states. What began as a cost-saving tool has become a sophisticated engine for personalised wealth guidance. As Sébastien Payette, director consulting expert, financial services, CGI, writes, robo-advisors are becoming an 'integral part of investment strategies for both retail and high-net-worth (HNW) and ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) investors.' He points to three key trends: 'Hybrid advisory models – Traditional financial institutions are incorporating robo-advisors alongside human expertise, offering a blend of automated technology and personalised, face-to-face financial guidance. Hyper-personalisation – Advanced robo-advisors utilise AI-driven insights that integrate financial market data with investors' digital footprints, tailoring investment strategies to unique financial goals, risk appetite, and life stages. Diversified asset offerings – Robo-advisors are expanding beyond equities and fixed-income products to include alternative investments such as derivatives, real estate, private equity, and cryptocurrencies, broadening the scope of automated wealth management.' What AI does better Payette also explains that smarter AI and predictive analytics through robo-advisors 'will leverage even more advanced AI capabilities to predict market trends and mitigate risks, leading to increasingly optimised portfolios and investment strategies.' AI's appeal lies in its speed, scale, and objectivity. It can: Monitor markets and portfolios in real time. Optimise tax strategies across multiple jurisdictions. Detect behavioural biases and nudge users toward better decisions. Offer 24/7 access to insights, no appointment necessary. For younger investors and the mass affluent, these tools offer something traditional advisors often couldn't: accessibility. With lower fees and intuitive interfaces, AI has opened the door to wealth planning for millions previously priced out of the conversation. As the World Economic Forum states, 'large language models (LLMs) are still evolving. They are expanding beyond robo-advisors, progressing from chatbots to assistants to agents, reducing the advice gap for retail investors. 'The essential question is can AI systems deliver the level of emotional intelligence and empathy required by investors to share information and needs in ways they do with their human advisors, i.e., could machines ever replace human advisors?' But what's lost? Despite its advantages, AI lacks something essential: human empathy. Financial decisions are rarely just about numbers. They're about fear, ambition, family, and identity. A human advisor can read between the lines, sense hesitation, and offer reassurance. An algorithm, no matter how advanced, can't replicate that, at least not yet. There's also the question of accountability. When an AI-driven platform makes a poor recommendation, who's responsible? The developer? The firm? The user? As AI takes on more advisory functions, these questions become more urgent — and more complex. Can AI wealth models be credible? Yes, by processing vast datasets with speed and precision. Agentic AI can also integrate collaboration with human experts, which strengthens the credibility of the systems. Can AI wealth models be reliable? Yes, AI is consistent and free from human error, but there are transparency concerns. LLMs can offer guidance and with modules such as retrieval augmented generation (RAG), context is enriched. Can AI wealth models be intimate? Yes, AI can recognise sentiment, but cannot offer the lived experience and cultural nuances that humans can. Can AI wealth models be self-oriented? Yes, AI can operate without personal biases, but the data its trained on or how it's deployed by financial firms may introduce conflicts of interest. Regulatory oversight may be needed to ensure AI acts in the best interests of the clients, and recommendations are not biased. The rise of hybrid models Rather than replacing human advisors, many firms are now blending the best of both worlds. This transformation or phase of the evolution requires a balanced approach that capitalises on AI systems but preserves human touch. This is how trust-based relationships can be built in wealth. These advisors can use AI to handle data-heavy tasks, while humans focus on relationship-building and strategic guidance. It's a model that promises both efficiency and empathy, and it's gaining traction fast. In conversation with Finextra in 2023, Renato Miraglia, head of wealth management and private banking, Italy, at UniCredit, says that human beings will continue to be essential in the relationship with private and wealth clients into the future, but the use of data and technology will change the analytical tools with which client materials are produced. He cites the value of generative AI to create highly personalised and detailed real-time reports and analyses on the peculiarities of each client's position. 'The wealth manager of the future will use new and sophisticated tools to analyse risks and investment opportunities – and this will improve the accuracy of financial planning. The next generation of tools consider key elements in an integrated way, taking a holistic view of factors such as the interaction with real estate or business assets, changes in lifestyle, and elements of risk that can be secured through various forms of insurance,' Miraglia elaborates. The next evolution The future of wealth guidance may not be about choosing between humans and machines, but about redefining the role of each. As generative AI becomes more conversational and emotionally intelligent, it could take on more nuanced advisory roles. Meanwhile, human advisors may evolve into financial coaches, helping clients navigate not just markets, but meaning.
Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Bessent calls for deeper US bank regulatory reforms, scrapping dual capital requirements
WASHINGTON, July 21 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Monday called for deeper reforms of what he called an antiquated financial regulatory system and said regulators should consider scrapping a "flawed," Biden-era proposal for a dual capital requirement structure for banks. Speaking at the start of a Federal Reserve regulatory conference, Bessent said excessive capitalization requirements were imposing unnecessary burdens on financial institutions, reducing lending, hurting growth and distorting markets by driving lending to the non-bank sector. "We need deeper reforms rooted in a long-term blueprint for innovation, financial stability, and resilient growth," Bessent said in prepared remarks. The Trump administration is pursuing a broad reform agenda aimed at cutting rules governing financial institutions, including capital requirements, arguing that such actions will boost economic growth and unleash innovation. Bessent said regulators have for too long pursued a "reactionary approach" that has weakened competitiveness and led to byzantine regulations. The Treasury chief, who earlier on Monday called on the Fed to review its operations to safeguard its monetary policy independence, said the Treasury would take a stronger role in driving reform efforts by regulators, including the Fed. "To that end, the department will break through policy inertia, settle turf battles, drive consensus, and motivate action to ensure no single regulator holds up reform," Bessent said of the Treasury. Banking regulators should consider abandoning the dual structure proposed in July 2023, but never enacted, that would have seen banks comply with the higher of two different methods of measuring their risk capital requirements. The proposal, which came after the high-profile failure of Silicon Valley Bank and other institutions in 2023, would have significantly increased the amount of capital banks needed to set aside for potential losses. It drew intense opposition from the industry. "This dual-requirement structure did not derive from a principled calibration methodology. It was motivated simply to reverse-engineer higher and higher capital aggregates," Bessent said. "It also was at odds with capital reform as a modernization project because it would have preserved the antiquated capital requirements as the binding floor for many, perhaps most, large banks." Bessent also called for regulatory capital relief not just for large banks but also at the smaller, community bank level. One solution, he said, would be to allow any bank not subject to modernized capital requirements a choice to opt in. "This would result in a meaningful reduction in capital for those banks," Bessent added. While he said Treasury would prioritize financial regulatory policy that puts American workers first and prioritizes growth, he said regulators needed to carry out statutory mandates for financial safety and stability and consumer protection. "Rationalizing and tailoring regulation does not have to amount to regulatory weakening," Bessent said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
BNSF hires Goldman, CSX seeks bankers as Union Pacific sparks rail M&A race, sources say
July 21 (Reuters) - BNSF Railway has hired Goldman Sachs (GS.N), opens new tab and CSX Corp (CSX.O), opens new tab is in talks to bring on financial advisers, as rival Union Pacific's interest in acquiring Norfolk Southern sparked a wave of deal preparations that could reshape the U.S. freight rail industry, sources said. The moves by BNSF, owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab , and Jacksonville-based CSX come after Union Pacific (UNP.N), opens new tab began exploring a potential acquisition of Norfolk Southern (NSC.N), opens new tab, which could create a $200 billion coast-to-coast rail network and mark the most significant consolidation in the sector in decades. Any potential deal is expected to undergo intense regulatory scrutiny and remains far from certain. Goldman and CSX declined to comment. BNSF did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Shares of Norfolk Southern were up 2.4% in extended trading. Berkshire bought BNSF in 2010, paying $26.5 billion for the 77.4% of the railroad it didn't already own. The last major rail merger occurred in 2023, when Canadian Pacific acquired Kansas City Southern, forming the first network to span Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. That deal followed a failed bid by Canadian National, underscoring how competitive pressures can quickly escalate in the sector. In 2024, Union Pacific led the industry with $24.3 billion in revenue, followed by BNSF, CSX, Canadian National ( opens new tab Norfolk and Canadian Pacific Kansas City ( opens new tab. Talks between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are still in early stages, the people said. Any merger would require approval from the Surface Transportation Board, which could take up to two years. CSX would be a better fit for Union Pacific than Norfolk Southern, said David O'Hara, managing director at MKP Advisors. 'With first-mover advantage, Union Pacific will buy whoever in the East wants to make themselves available," O'Hara said. "And whoever is left out in the cold ultimately will get bought by Burlington Northern - that will almost have to happen."
