Earthquake Preparedness: Japan's Critical Decade
The Central Disaster Management Council of the Japanese government has unveiled a new basic plan to reduce the impact of a major Nankai Trough earthquake. It aims to reduce 80% of the estimated death toll of 298,000 within the next decade.
The urgency of disaster preparedness is underscored by recent seismic activity in another region of Japan. Beginning in late June, the Tokara Islands in southern Kagoshima Prefecture experienced a swarm of over 1000 earthquakes since June 21. The islands are along the Ryukyu Trench, near the Philippine Sea Plate and the Eurasian Plate subduction zone. Although no major damage has been reported, the persistent tremors have significantly heightened public anxiety.
Adding to this sense of unease is a prediction circulating online, based on a manga titled The Future I Saw, that a catastrophic earthquake would strike Japan on July 5.
The previous plan, introduced in 2014, set the same goal of cutting the death toll by 80 percent over ten years. In practice, however, the reduction reached only about 20 percent. The new strategy must avoid repeating the same failures.
Japan must thoroughly investigate why the previous disaster mitigation targets fell so far short, identify the gaps, and reflect those lessons in the new plan. Meeting these goals is a vital responsibility the government owes to its citizens. Evacuees from Tokara Island arrive at Kagoshima Port by ferry on July 4. (©Sankei by Kotaro Hikono)
It is undeniable that the progress of past disaster countermeasures was inadequately monitored and assessed. The new plan addresses this by shifting from irregular progress checks to annual evaluations and by quadrupling the numerical targets for key measures.
Many challenges remain. These include the construction of embankments and tsunami evacuation facilities, as well as the seismic retrofitting of homes. Effective solutions must be devised and implemented steadily to address such pressing issues.
Countermeasures against a Nankai Trough earthquake will be the top priority for the new control-tower Disaster Management Agency, which the government plans to launch in fiscal 2026. The agency's effectiveness as a central command body will be put to the test in this effort. At the same time, stronger support for local governments is essential.
To reduce the number of tsunami-related deaths, swift evacuation at the onset of strong shaking is critical.
The new plan calls for an investigation into factors that prevent residents from recognizing the urgency of early evacuation. This review must be conducted without delay, and its findings incorporated into future countermeasures. A tsunami of up to 31 meters is expected to reach Shimoda City in Shizuoka Prefecture in the event of a major earthquake along the Nankai Trough.
Nankai Trough earthquakes are estimated to occur every 100 to 150 years, though the intervals can vary. The last major quake, which struck near the end of World War II, came about 90 years after the Ansei era earthquake in the late Edo period. Now, with 80 years having passed since the war, it would not be surprising if the next temblor occurred within the next decade.
As outlined in the new plan, the coming ten years could be our final opportunity to significantly decrease disaster risk. The government must act swiftly to accelerate its efforts with this sense of urgency.
At the Central Disaster Management Council meeting, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said, "It is important for various entities, including the national government, local governments, companies, and NPOs, to join forces and promote countermeasures." Yet, above all, what truly matters is the Prime Minister's determination and action.
The public must also understand the importance of preparedness. They should take proactive steps within their control, such as securing furniture to prevent injuries during an earthquake.
In the upcoming Upper House election, each party has pledged to strengthen disaster preparedness efforts, including for earthquakes. We look forward to meaningful policy debates focused on the nation's disaster management strategy.
Author: The Sankei Shimbun
このページを 日本語 で読む
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump says Japan will invest $550 billion in US at his direction. It may not be a sure thing
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is bragging that Japan has given him, as part of a new trade framework, $550 billion to invest in the United States. It's an astonishing figure, but still subject to negotiation and perhaps not the sure thing he's portraying. 'Japan is putting up $550 billion in order to lower their tariffs a little bit,' Trump said Thursday. 'They put up, as you could call it, seed money. Let's call it seed money.' He said 90% of any profits from the money invested would go to the U.S. even if Japan had put up the funds. 'It's not a loan or anything, it's a signing bonus,' the Republican president said, on the trade framework that lowered his threatened tariff from 25% to 15%, including on autos. A White House official said the terms are being negotiated and nothing has been formalized in writing. The official, who insisted on anonymity to detail the terms of the talks, suggested the goal was for the $550 billion fund to make investments at Trump's direction. The sum is significant: It would represent more than 10% of Japan's entire gross domestic product. The Japan External Trade Organization estimates that direct investment into the U.S. economy topped $780 billion in 2023. It is unclear the degree to which the $550 billion could represent new investment or flow into existing investment plans. What the trade framework announced Tuesday has achieved is a major talking point for the Trump administration. The president has claimed to have brought trillions of dollars in new investment into the U.S., though the impact of those commitments have yet to appear in the economic data for jobs, construction spending or manufacturing output. The framework also enabled Trump to say other countries are agreeing to have their goods taxed, even if some of the cost of those taxes are ultimately passed along to U.S. consumers. On the $550 billion, Japan's Cabinet Office said it involves the credit facility of state-affiliated financial institutions, such as Japan Bank for International Cooperation. Further details would be decided based on the progress of the investment deals. Japanese trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa, upon returning to Japan, did not discuss the terms of the $550 billion investment. Akazawa said he believes a written joint statement is necessary, at least on working levels, to avoid differences. He is not thinking about a legally binding trade pact. The U.S. apparently released its version of the deal while Japanese officials were on their return flight home. 'If we find differences of understanding, we may have to point them out and say 'that's not what we discussed,'' Akazawa said. The U.S. administration said the fund would be invested in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals, computer chips and shipbuilding, among other industries. It has said Japan will also buy 100 airplanes from Boeing and rice from U.S. farmers as part of the framework, which Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said would be evaluated every three months. 'And if the president is unhappy, then they will boomerang back to the 25% tariff rates, both on cars and the rest of their products. And I can tell you that I think at 25, especially in cars, the Japanese economy doesn't work,' Bessent told Fox News' 'The Ingraham Angle.' Akazawa denied that Bessent's quarterly review was part of the negotiations. 'In my past eight trips to the United States during which I held talks with the president and the ministers,' Akazawa said. 'I have no recollection of discussing how we ensure the implementation of the latest agreement between Japan and the United States.' He said it would cause major disruptions to the economy and administrative processes if the rates first rise to 25% as scheduled on Aug. 1 and then drop to 15%. 'We definitely want to avoid that and I believe that is the understanding shared by the U.S. side,' he said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. On buying U.S. rice, Japanese officials have said they have no plans to raise the current 770,000-ton 'minimum access' cap to import more from America. Agricultural Minister Shinjiro Koizumi said Japan will decide whether to increase U.S. rice imports and that Japan is not committed to a fixed quota. Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, has suggested that the Japanese agreement is putting pressure on other countries such as South Korea to strike deals with the U.S. Trump, who is traveling in Scotland, plans to meet on Sundayv with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to discuss trade. 'Whatever Donald Trump wants to build, the Japanese will finance it for him,' Lutnick said Thursday on CNBC. 'Pretty amazing.' ___ Yamaguchi reported from Tokyo.
Japan Forward
16 hours ago
- Japan Forward
James E Auer Burial at Sea Reflects Lifetime of Building Japan-US Trust
このページを 日本語 で読む Recently, I had the honor of participating in the burial at sea ceremony for the ashes of James E Auer. Founder of the Vanderbilt University Center for US-Japan Studies and Cooperation, he was also among the first strong supporters of JAPAN Forward. I first met Dr Auer when he was the director of Japan Affairs at the United States Department of Defense. As I reviewed in my mind Dr Auer's considerable contributions to the Japan-US alliance, I was also reminded how true it is that history often repeats itself. Jim Auer's joint Japan-US funeral took place on July 12 on the deck of the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force minesweeper tender JS Bungo as it sailed the Sea of Japan near the port of Maizuru. The first-ever joint Japan-US funeral at sea was held in Japanese waters in accordance with Auer's own wishes. The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force captain hands Jim Auer's family the US flag draped over his remains during the burial at sea ceremony. JSS Bungo, July 12 (©JMSDF) I first met James Auer in 1979 when Jimmy Carter was the US president. During the Carter administration, Auer served as Director for Japan Affairs at the Department of Defense. Shortly after the end of 1979, the US government dramatically changed its longstanding policy toward Japan's defense efforts. It began by directly demanding a "steady and significant" increase in Japan's defense spending. The stern demands made by the Carter administration were many times more intense than the relatively mild calls (so far) for defense increases by the Trump administration. However, both administrations shared the view that the level of Japan's defense spending was too low. This had become a major political concern for the United States. President Jimmy Carter was a liberal Democrat who was influenced by the US failure in the Vietnam War. Initially, he adopted a very moderate ー bordering on appeasement ー approach to foreign policy. In particular, the Carter administration showed an attitude that could be termed cooperative and even friendly toward the Soviet Union. It initially overlooked Moscow's ongoing efforts to expand globally. Judging this attitude to reflect passivity on the part of the US, the Soviet Union actively sought to expand communist influence in many countries around the world. This trend culminated in full-scale Soviet military invasion of Afghanistan at the end of 1979. Japanese Prime Minister Masayoshi Ohira (1978-1980) with President Jimmy Carter. (Image courtesy of Wikimedia Images.) President Carter then publicly apologized for his misperception of Soviet intentions. It was then that he turned his attention to strengthening the defenses of the Western camp. One upshot of this change of heart was an official statement calling on Japan, a major ally, "to make steady and significant increases in defense spending." It was a dramatic policy reversal. Only a few months earlier, Carter himself had declared that the US would have no problem with Japan limiting its defense spending to less than 1% of its gross domestic product. However, the Japanese government at the time did not respond to this request for a significant increase in defense spending. This was still an era in which the pacifist concept was deeply entrenched. Tokyo's thinking was still colored with such views as "an increase in defense spending will invite war." When presented with Japan's FY1980 defense budget, Carter's Secretary of Defense Harold Brown strongly lashed out at Japan. He called the amount of spending proposed by Tokyo "self-satisfaction that cannot be justified in any way whatsoever." Members from both parties in both houses of the US Congress joined the administration's call. Their views were reflected in major media editorials castigating Japan's defense posture as a "free ride." Tensions with the US side became even more pronounced after President Ronald Reagan's Republican administration took office in 1981. However, the basic rationale behind the US military buildup continued, even as it had under the Carter administration. That was "preventing war by strengthening defense." James Auer was the central figure within the US government who worked to bridge this gap between the respective positions of Tokyo and Washington DC. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe congratulates James E Auer and his wife at the 31st Seiron Award Ceremony on March 7, 2016. (©Sankei) With tremendous support from his immediate superior in the Reagan administration, Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, Auer used his long-standing connections with Japanese bureaucrats, politicians, and the media to explain American strategic thinking and the reality of the Soviet military threat. Simultaneously, he also vigorously attempted to explain the situation to those in the US who made crude accusations against Japan. James Auer thereby laid the groundwork for an era of close bilateral relations between the Reagan administration and the Japanese government under Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone. Not long afterward, the communist regime in the Soviet Union collapsed in a historic event. It is fair to say that the international significance of Japan-US defense cooperation, to which Auer so mightily contributed, lives on to this day. Recently, there has been overblown Japanese rhetoric about the defense relationship, such as "Japan will decide its own defense budget" and "Hey America, don't underestimate us." In light of this history, however, this rhetoric seems inappropriate. Jim Auer's children and grandchildren toss flowers into the Sea of Japan following the burial at sea of Dr Auer. July 12 (©JMSDF) (Read the column in Japanese.) Author: Yoshihisa Komori JAPAN Forward Special Advisor and Associate Correspondent in Washington, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む
Canada News.Net
20 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump hails Japan trade pact as job-creating breakthrough
WASHINGTON, D.C.: This week, President Donald Trump unveiled a new trade framework with Japan, announcing a 15 percent tariff on goods imported from the country—a significant reduction from the 25 percent rate he had previously warned would take effect on August 1. Trump hailed the deal as a historic win for the U.S. economy, writing on Truth Social, "This Deal will create Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs — There has never been anything like it." He also emphasized continued strong ties between the two nations, saying, "The United States will continue to always have a great relationship with the country of Japan." According to the president, Japan has agreed to invest US$550 billion into the United States economy "at my direction" and to open its market to more American products, specifically automobiles and rice. This new agreement marks a strategic pivot in Trump's tariff campaign, replacing an earlier, more aggressive stance with a framework he claims will enhance trade fairness and boost domestic job creation. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba responded early on June 23, stating that the agreement would prove mutually beneficial and foster greater cooperation between Tokyo and Washington. The acknowledgment signals a rare moment of harmony amid months of tariff escalations and trade tensions. While Trump's initial round of tariffs, introduced in early April, rattled global markets and triggered fears of a slowdown, those concerns appear to have eased for now. Still, the president's latest social media statement left some questions unanswered—most notably, whether the 25 percent tariff on Japanese-built automobiles remains in effect or has been folded into the new 15 percent rate. The Japan agreement fits within Trump's larger strategy of framing tariffs not as punitive but as economically transformative. His administration argues that revenues generated from tariffs will help reduce the U.S. budget deficit, incentivize companies to shift manufacturing to American soil, and address chronic trade imbalances. Officials believe this will result in a stronger, more self-reliant industrial base. However, the effectiveness of this approach remains contested. Tariffs are still causing deep uncertainty in business circles, where companies fear rising costs. A stark example came on a day earlier, when General Motors reported a 35 percent drop in net income for the second quarter. The company blamed the slump partly on tariff pressures and warned of further hits to its business in the near future. Its stock took a sharp downturn following the announcement, underlining the volatility that continues to shadow Trump's trade agenda. As the August 1 deadline nears for the imposition of new tariffs outlined in letters sent to world leaders, Trump has expanded his strategy. Alongside the Japan deal, he also announced a new trade framework with the Philippines, imposing a 19 percent tariff on Filipino goods, while ensuring American exports to the country would remain untaxed. Similarly, he reaffirmed an identical 19 percent tariff on goods imported from Indonesia. Trade data shows the U.S. had a $69.4 billion trade imbalance with Japan last year, while the imbalance stood at $17.9 billion with Indonesia and $4.9 billion with the Philippines. These figures reflect how the U.S. imports significantly more from these nations than it exports to them. Both Indonesia and the Philippines, being less affluent economies, could be more vulnerable to the impact of these tariffs. Amid these moves, the European Union is also under pressure. Trump had sent a letter earlier in the month, threatening all 27 EU member states with 30 percent tariffs on their exports, effective August 1, if no agreement is reached. Meanwhile, separate negotiations with China remain underway. The current round of talks is scheduled to continue until August 12, while a baseline 30 percent tariff remains in effect on Chinese goods. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced he would travel to Stockholm on July 28 and 29 to meet with Chinese counterparts. As Trump escalates his multi-front trade strategy, the coming weeks will be pivotal in determining whether these new agreements can hold, and whether the bold predictions of job growth and economic revival will come to pass—or give way to rising costs and deeper global uncertainty.
