logo
Scotland is sleepwalking into a dementia care crisis

Scotland is sleepwalking into a dementia care crisis

In a desperate bid to plug predicted budget gaps, members of Integration Joint Boards (IJBs) across the country are choosing to find millions of pounds of savings from their older people and community care budgets.
Unfortunately, this is where the mainstay of community support and dementia-specific services can be found.
Among the worst affected areas are care at home, respite and day care services, which provide lifeline support to people who are in a moderate to advanced stage of their illness. Post diagnostic support services are also under pressure in some areas, despite a world-leading commitment that every person diagnosed should receive a minimum of one year's support.
To make matters worse, many families are also being hit with significantly increased charges for many forms of community support.
Read more:
All of this will place an inordinate level of pressure on family carers, while the lack of community support for people with dementia will without doubt accelerate their increased level of need – denying each person the chance to live well with support for a long as possible.
It will also place a remarkable strain on other elements of our health and social care system and will be nothing more than a short-term budget balancing saving. We do not need to look too far for evidence to back this up. During the Covid pandemic we witnessed first-hand the significant impact of stopping community services on individuals and their families.
Many of these latest decisions have already been made, with no opportunity for those whose lives will be profoundly affected by this slash-and-burn approach to have their views heard.
Henry Simmons is concerned over the cutsMost worryingly in recent months, we are aware of several specialised dementia facilities that have been threatened with significant funding cuts or complete closure due to financial pressures, with people finding out these plans with only months, sometimes weeks, to consider alternatives.
Scotland is sleepwalking into a dementia care crisis.
It is estimated that around 90,000 people in Scotland are living with dementia, and this number is expected to rise significantly in the coming years. As the population ages, the demand for dementia services will inevitably increase, making it essential that we have robust systems in place to support those in need.
We believe this highlights an urgent need for a comprehensive review of the current dementia strategy and its main priorities. That's why Alzheimer Scotland has written to all MSPs, MPs and council leaders across the country, as well as to ministers and local government body COSLA calling for urgent action.
The impact of these cutbacks on individuals and their families cannot be overstated.
In the moderate and advanced stages of dementia, the need for specialist high quality support increases – yet this is where many of the cuts are planned or have been imposed.
Carers and family members are being left to shoulder the burden, leading to almost unbearable physical, emotional and financial strain. The lack of adequate support services such as specialised day care and residential respite care exacerbates the challenges faced by those living with dementia and their families.
We believe services like day care and post diagnostic support are an essential form of healthcare and should not be treated as disposable extras that can be discarded on a whim whenever budgets are under pressure.
It is not right that dementia care is left to a postcode lottery.
We are calling for a guaranteed pathway where evidence-based interventions are given to everyone with a dementia diagnosis throughout the progression of their condition – every time, everywhere throughout Scotland.
Read more:
This postcode lottery must end. Dementia care must be a priority and it must be regarded in the same way as other illnesses such as cancer, chest, heart and stroke – all of which have clear pathways and standards that are consistently enforced across the country.
Scotland's dementia strategy must take an immediate and effective lead on this. There should be no doubt what you will be offered as you go through your time living with dementia. It should not be left to local commissioners to make decisions purely based on how much money is left in their budgets.
Dementia is a progressive, terminal condition arising from many forms of untreated brain disease. There is no cure and no disease modifying drugs at present. We owe it to every person living with dementia and their families to provide the right care, treatment and support.
It is not too late to stop the decimation of community and specific dementia services. Our political and health leaders must act quickly if we are to protect tens of thousands of Scotland's most vulnerable people from these devastating cuts.
Henry Simmons is Chief Executive of Alzheimer Scotland

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A flyer made me realise I'd never had sober sex
A flyer made me realise I'd never had sober sex

Metro

time2 hours ago

  • Metro

A flyer made me realise I'd never had sober sex

It was day three of rehab when I was handed the leaflet. I was sitting in a group session, exhausted, anxious, and still emotionally raw from a medically supervised detox and days of intense therapy and AA meetings, when I glanced down and read the title on the front: Sober Sex . I blinked. 'Sober sex?' I thought, confused. And then it hit me. I had never had sober sex. Not once. At 53 years of age, I realised – with horror – that I had always needed a drink in order to be intimate. It floored me. I felt both embarrassed and upset. I suddenly saw myself clearly. The supposedly confident, flirty, empowered woman I believed I was… had always needed alcohol to take her clothes off. Without it, I didn't feel relaxed enough to be vulnerable, to connect, or to let go. It was a sobering truth in every sense of the word. Until going to rehab, the last time I'd been sober for more than 24 hours was 17 years earlier, when I was pregnant with my longed-for son. I discovered alcohol at 15, like so many teens in the 80s. Those drunken encounters went hand in hand with my first romance. I lost my virginity drunk and awkward, and from then on, alcohol and sex were a package deal. In my 20s, I was loud, extroverted and magnetic – or so I thought. In reality, booze gave me a mask to hide behind. It gave me courage. It gave me permission. I spent years dating and having sex with men who drank like I did. I didn't even understand people who stayed sober. All my romances were fuelled by large glasses of wine and poor judgment. But finally, in 2002, I met 'the one' – my wonderful husband Andy – while drunk in a beer garden. We bonded over red wine and quickly fell in love. We had a beautiful 15-year marriage, but even then, we were never sober during sex. Alcohol was part of our relationship, part of our way to relax. At first, it was just a shared bottle over dinner. Then it became a large glass the moment I walked through the door after work. Sundays meant a roast lunch and the bottle opened by midday. If I'm honest, two or even three bottles a day became the norm. In 2017, tragedy struck. Andy suffered a heart attack that caused a catastrophic brain injury. He needed 24/7 care, and for three long years, I grieved the man I'd loved, knowing he wasn't coming back. When Covid took him in 2020, I turned entirely to the bottle. I couldn't cope or function without it. Alcohol was the only effective tool to deal with my loss. By that point, I was drinking three bottles of red wine a day. When I couldn't be seen drinking, like in the office, I'd resort to vodka hidden in Diet Coke bottles. It wasn't about enjoyment anymore. It was about survival. Or at least, what I thought was the only way I could survive. Post-lockdown, desperate for connection, I started dating again. I was nervous about the idea of new relationships as a widow, so I drank before every date to steady my nerves, to feel sexy, and to get through the night. Unsurprisingly, none of those relationships lasted – my drinking scared them off. One man called me out on my habits and raised his concerns with my family, so I ended things before he could get too close. By 2023, my body was beginning to give out. One morning, after a particularly heavy day and night of drinking at a corporate event, I suffered a fall in a supermarket car park. I was shaky, unsteady on my feet, and went down hard, smashing my face and injuring my leg. I needed weeks of physiotherapy just to walk properly again. Not long after, I ended up in A&E following a failed attempt to detox alone. That night made it painfully clear: I couldn't do it on my own and on November 6, 2024, I checked into The Priory in Altrincham for a 28-day rehab stay. It was, without doubt, the best decision I've ever made. But when I saw the words 'sober sex', I was paralysed by fear. How on earth was I ever going to date, or even think about sex, without a drink? Then, while on my first ever sober holiday – a treat to myself to celebrate 90 days sober – a silver-haired man caught my eye. He was handsome, charming, and clearly interested. I sneakily manoeuvred myself next to him at the theatre show and he introduced himself as Troy. When Troy asked why I was drinking alcohol-free lager, I told him the truth – that I was in recovery. He was kind and understanding. So, the next evening, I invited Troy to a fancy steakhouse onboard using a free loyalty perk. He said yes. That night, as we said goodbye, he leaned in for a kiss – my first sober kiss. I told him as much. He smiled and gave me a huge hug, and we agreed to meet the next day. At dinner the following night, we laughed and flirted a lot more. I noticed he wasn't drinking, opting for iced tea over the margaritas he'd been drinking the night before. When I asked why, he said, 'If this is going to be your first sober sex, I want to be present and in the moment, too.' I was stunned by his thoughtfulness, it made me feel relaxed and at ease. Later that night, and into the morning, I experienced something I never had before: Fully present, connected, vulnerable, joyful, sober sex. No fog. No regrets. No forgetting. Just me, him, and the moment. And the best part? Waking up hangover-free, remembering everything in vivid detail. We spent the rest of the cruise together, and although we live continents apart and a long-term relationship isn't feasible, we've met up since and even cruised together again last month. It may not be a forever romance, but it gave me something priceless: The confidence that I can connect without alcohol. It also taught me that intimacy without booze is far superior. I'm now 230 days sober. My health has improved, as has my outlook. To help others like me, I recently launched a dating app for people in recovery, or who are sober-curious, to find genuine connections. You can find out more about SoberLove here I've had other romantic encounters since Troy and I can attest that sex is much better sober. More Trending It's more thoughtful, more generous, more present. I'm more athletic, more connected, and crucially, I remember it all. I make better decisions. I only do what I truly want to do. Looking back, I mourn the years lost to drunken fumbling and forgettable nights. But I'm also proud. I've taken back control of my life and my body. View More » My only regret? Not doing it sooner. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I took weight loss jabs and ended up in hospital four times MORE: Anyone envious of 'perks' I get as a disabled person doesn't understand MORE: I'm a former night owl who now loves waking up at 5am

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'
Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

Daily Mirror

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

The Covid-19 Inquiry will on Monday hear from relatives prevented from saying their final goodbyes to loved ones in care homes, while parties were being held in Downing Street Families are demanding that politicians are held to account after describing their heartbreaking final moments with loved ones. This week the UK Covid-19 Inquiry will look at the impact of the pandemic on care homes and how social distancing guidelines meant many relatives were prevented from saying their final goodbyes. Families have told of their anger that ex-PM Boris Johnson 's government had at the same time been holding parties in Downing Street and flouting social distancing rules. The first wave of the pandemic saw the virus sweep through care homes as untested residents were sent there from struggling hospitals. ‌ ‌ During the first peak between March and June 2020 66,000 people died in care homes, with a third of those deaths attributed to Covid-19. Sharon Cook's parents were care home residents in Hinckley, Leicestershire, and died a week apart in 2020. Sharon, 60, told the Mirror: 'There was no even waving through the window for us because they were on the second floor. 'When we found out the government were having parties it just felt like we were being disrespected. You have to put your grief on hold because you're dealing with your anger because your loss is being disrespected. Then we had all the denials and all these countless thousands of deaths were kind of being written off as some sort of typing error. That government was a disgrace.' Sharon's mum Joan, aged 85, fell ill and had to be taken to hospital and a few days later tested positive for Covid and passed away. Her dad Alf Cook, 87, was a Parkinson's sufferer and was given the news in his care home. ‌ Sharon explained: 'Dad had been very much looked after by mum in the care home and suddenly she wasn't there. I think sometimes he thought he was the problem, not the pandemic, and that everyone was wearing masks because of him. 'I'm an only child and I was all he had but at that point there were no more visits. I was really upset about that because I just felt he needed me. He didn't take long then he died. I did wonder if he just gave up because I wasn't allowed in. You just get swamped by grief.' The Mirror revealed in November 2021 that gatherings had taken place in Downing Street when London was under tier 3 restrictions during 2020. They included a number of leaving parties and a Christmas party on December 18. ‌ Louise Baker, from Aberdeen, told the Mirror her father Sandy Adam died at his care home two days before the infamous Christmas party. Louise, 49, said: 'Before lockdown dad would come round our house every Sunday for dinner. He had dementia but it wasn't that far progressed that he didn't know who we were. 'After lockdown none of it made sense to him. Initially we could just shout in through a small gap in his tilt window but he was very hard of hearing. We couldn't hug him. I was extremely angry because we found out one of those parties in Downing Street coincided with my dad's death. I'm absolutely furious.' ‌ Sandy, a retired dentist, had been allowed a meeting on the car park with Louise before his death at the age of 81 but they were not allowed within five metres of each other. She explained: 'It was so difficult because he felt the cold quite acutely and he was really grumpy. You weren't allowed to hug and like to do anything normal and he couldn't hear us. He just sat there with his arms folded.' Sharon and Louise's accounts will be played today in an impact film at the start of Module 6 in front of inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett. ‌ Louise added: 'In the next pandemic there has to be a balance struck between the protection of the both people who are vulnerable to infections and their right to dignity and the right to human contact and their right to family life. I'm not pretending I have any of these answers but we need to find a balance. "There needs to be a recognition of the damage being done by the deprivation that people were experiencing, that level of isolation and the removal of basic rites of passage, like being able to see your loved one's body in their coffin.' ‌ Among the key government decisions being discussed at the inquiry from this week will be that in March 2020 to rapidly discharge hospital patients into care homes without testing or a requirement for them to isolate. A 2022 High Court judgement that ruled the policy was unlawful as it failed to take into account the risk to elderly and vulnerable care home residents of asymptomatic transmission of the virus. Between early March and early June 2020, nearly 20,000 care home residents in England and Wales died with Covid-19. That's about a third of all care home deaths during that period. ‌ Many bereaved care home families, including Sharon Cook, say their loved ones had Do Not Resuscitate - so called DNRs - placed on them against their wishes. Sharon said politicians should be held to account for their handling of the pandemic and subject to criminal proceedings if found to be negligent. She said: 'There needs to be greater accountability. I often say that if it was a pilot that had acted so recklessly and cost people their lives unnecessarily, or if it was a surgeon, there wouldn't be any question about, they would be interrogated and summoned to court. So why are politicians any different? ‌ 'It's not right that people with this much power can treat it with such little respect, have such devastating outcomes and no consequences.' Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK has written an open letter to the inquiry chair Baroness Hallett objecting to the fact that ex-PM Boris Johnson will not appear before the latest module about the social care sector. Jean Adamson, a spokesperson for Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said: 'Bereaved families have waited years for this moment. The care module is one of the most important parts of the Inquiry. It will examine how and why thousands of people were left unprotected in care homes and in the community, and why so many died without support, without dignity, and without accountability. ‌ 'But we are seriously concerned about the way this module is being handled. It is unacceptable that Boris Johnson and other key decision-makers will not be called to give evidence.' A Lancet study later found that during the first wave of the pandemic care homes residents were 17 times more likely to die compared to private home residents of a similar age. This compared to a ten times higher risk before the pandemic, as people in residential care are generally more frail and unwell. ‌ Covid bereaved families are expected to gather outside the opening of Module 6 of the inquiry today. The £200 million inquiry was set up to examine the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, the UK's response to it and to learn lessons for the next pandemic. Its latest module on the social care sector will take place at Dorland House in Paddington, west London. Ben Connah, Secretary at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, said: 'Sharon and Louise's stories are so powerful. Sadly, their experiences are not unique. Tens of thousands of people living in care lost their lives to Covid during the pandemic. 'This is why it is so important that the UK Covid-19 Inquiry spends the next five weeks investigating how the virus affected the care sector. Questions will be asked in public of key politicians, scientists, healthcare professionals and other experts. Our Chair, Baroness Heather Hallett, will get answers. 'We will begin with powerful evidence from bereaved individuals. Their experiences are front and centre of our hearings this week. 'The inquiry is making speedy progress. The country must learn the lessons of the last pandemic as quickly as possible - because we all know there will be another one.' This week the inquiry will investigate the impact of the pandemic on the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It will start with opening statements from core participants and impact evidence from bereaved individuals before an appearance from former Health Secretary Matt Hancock on Wednesday.

The suspended doctor selling workers sick notes on demand
The suspended doctor selling workers sick notes on demand

Telegraph

time7 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The suspended doctor selling workers sick notes on demand

A suspended doctor is selling sick notes online to customers who want to go on holiday, take months off work for alleged Covid infection or care for an ill dog, The Telegraph can reveal. Asif Munaf, who was suspended from the medical register over anti-Semitic social media posts, runs Dr Sick Ltd, a company that offers same-day sick notes for as little as £29. Without any face-to-face or phone consultation, Telegraph reporters were able to obtain medical certificates granting five months off work for Covid, six weeks for anxiety over a sick pet, and four weeks of home working to enable them to go on holiday abroad. All three notes were issued within hours of the requests being made. A dossier of evidence has been shared with the General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates doctors, and the Care Quality Commission (CQC), the healthcare watchdog. The revelations are likely to reignite concern over Britain's growing sick note culture. Workers took 148.9 million sick days last year, an 11 per cent rise on a decade ago. The surge prompted a crackdown by former prime minister Rishi Sunak, who proposed stripping GPs of the power to sign people off work amid fears the system is fuelling a productivity crisis. On Saturday, Helen Whately, the shadow work and pensions secretary, condemned the 'rogue' Dr Sick Ltd as 'a symptom of a deeper sickness in our welfare system', and criticised Labour for scrapping the Tories' planned fit note reforms. The former Conservative health minister said: 'Sick notes to care for your dog or sunbathe in Malta signed off within hours, no ID, no checks, no link to the NHS. This rogue website is a symptom of a deeper sickness in our welfare system. 'We need an end to the system where it is easier to get a sick note than a job. Labour scrapped our reforms to the fit note system, and now we are living with the consequences. 'Too often, decisions are made without evidence, without scrutiny, and without consequence. Sick notes have become a pathway to permanent dependency, trapping the very people who need real help in a system that's quietly given up on them.' Figures disclosed by the Department for Work and Pensions reveal that, as of November last year, almost 5.8 million people in England and Wales are claiming out-of-work benefits. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer was forced to water down plans to cut personal independence payments – financial support for disabled people – following an unprecedented rebellion from his own MPs. Mr Munaf, 37, a serial entrepreneur who has appeared on Dragon's Den and The Apprentice, was dropped from the BBC spin-off The Apprentice: You're Fired last February after describing Zionism as a 'godless satanic cult' and Zionists as 'odiously ogre-like' in posts on X. He was temporarily suspended by the GMC that same month. After a hearing in August 2024, the interim suspension was lifted and replaced with practice restrictions. Mr Munaf has continued to share anti-Semitic content online, including Holocaust denial and claims that 9/11 was 'a Jewish job'. Last November, the GMC again imposed an interim suspension pending investigation. Posing as a supermarket worker with Covid, a Telegraph reporter was issued a sick note within four hours of completing Dr Sick Ltd's online form, without being asked for proof of a positive test. Although the request was for two weeks off, the certificate granted five months. This appeared to contradict Dr Sick Ltd's own policy stating that any leave longer than six weeks requires GP approval. For the second note, the reporter claimed to be a nursery teacher anxious about a dying pet. 'I need to be home with my dog, especially as these are likely to be his last weeks,' they wrote. A certificate was issued within two hours granting six weeks' leave for 'significant distress following recent personal events'. The dog was not mentioned. The final request, made under the reporter's real name, sought an 'adjustment to work duties' to allow remote working while they took a Mediterranean holiday. 'To be honest, I need this adjustment because I want to join my friends on holiday in Malta next month, but please don't put that on the certificate,' they wrote. 'I am confident I can perform my job working remotely for that week, and from home the other weeks. The office work and daily commute on the hot and sweaty tube has made me stressed and I will feel much better with some fresh air, a change of scenery, and more time at home.' That request was approved within an hour. 'Having reviewed the medical history and current symptoms,' the certificate stated, 'I have deemed them unfit for work in their current capacity. 'This is due to significant stress and heat exhaustion with difficulty focusing from the recent hot weather which is impacting their ability to perform their duties. Accordingly, we have advised them to rest and recover by working from home to avoid the heat and humidity on the London Underground.' At no point was the reporter asked for ID, GP details or medical evidence. The only requirement was to write a sentence of more than 20 words describing their symptoms and requested dates of absence. All three certificates, branded with the Dr Sick logo, bore the name, GMC number and apparent signature of a GMC-registered doctor employed by a locum agency used by NHS trusts. When contacted by The Telegraph, the agency said their employee had denied working for Dr Sick Ltd or signing the documents. Mr Munaf did not respond when asked if this was true. The entrepreneur did say that he had no role in issuing the certificates himself, saying: 'I don't issue the medical notes – I run the business.' He claimed: 'Dr Sick Ltd is an ICO-registered, UK-based digital service with a team of five fully GMC-registered UK doctors who issue fit notes in accordance with HIPAA-aligned guidelines'. It is understood the ICO, the data watchdog, has no record of Dr Sick Ltd's registration. HIPAA is a US healthcare privacy law; it does not apply in the UK. Because he has been temporarily suspended by the GMC, Mr Munaf is prohibited by law from practising medicine or presenting himself as a medical doctor. The Medical Act 1983 states that a doctor subject to such an interim suspension order, 'shall be treated as not being registered in the register' and that anyone who 'wilfully and falsely pretends' to be a registered medical practitioner may be committing a criminal offence. This could include an individual using the 'Dr' title to imply they are registered and fit to practise medicine. Until he was contacted by The Telegraph, the Dr Sick website advertised 40-minute 'online medical consultations' with Mr Munaf for £150. A now-deleted webpage offered virtual appointments under the banner of 'expert medical advice' from 'fully registered doctors'. The booking app featured a 'Dr Asif Munaf' logo with a stethoscope. In small print, he described himself as a 'former doctor'. He also continues to style himself as 'Dr Asif Munaf' wearing hospital scrubs, a stethoscope, and listing his medical qualifications in promotional material across his online health ventures. Mr Munaf said: 'Dr Sick doesn't offer 'medical consultations' – we offer medical certification from registered doctors. This is not a GP surgery, nor is it pretending to be. No stethoscopes, no pretending to be House MD here. As for my own consultations, these are heath and lifestle [sic] focused.' Trustpilot reviews for Dr Sick are mixed. Some praised the fast service and said employers accepted their notes. Others complained the certificates looked unprofessional. 'The letter literally says 'from dr sick' on it. Who wants to send that to their boss,' wrote one reviewer. Another said: 'It may come from genuine doctors, but it could not look more fake if they tried.' One user warned the service was open to abuse. 'I feel this is out of order whereby you are providing sick notes to people who simply fill out a questionnaire. We could all go off sick by simply paying a small fee,' she wrote. Dr Sick Ltd is not alone in offering same-day sick notes to paying customers. One rival firm, charging as little as £29.49, claims its notes are 'widely accepted by small and large employers alike' and boasts over 10,000 UK customers. Mr Munaf also runs AM Wellness Ltd, an 'integrative health' clinic launched in 2022, offering medical consultations, full-body MRI scans for £1,688 to detect cancer, intra-venous (IV) nutrient infusions, weight loss injections, blood tests and genetic screening. He told The Telegraph he does not 'administer anything medical' at the clinic. A GMC-registered GP joined as co-director last month. Despite offering a wide range of 'treatment and diagnostic services', AM Wellness Ltd is not registered with the CQC. Mr Munaf said this was 'because we legally don't need to be'. 'The CQC themselves confirmed our business model doesn't fall within their regulatory scope,' he added. A CQC spokesman referred The Telegraph to the list of 'regulated activities' defined in regulations made under the Health and Social Care Act 2008. These include doctor consultations, diagnostics such as MRI and blood tests, genetic screening and treatments using IVs and weight loss drugs. 'While we would not be able to make a speculative decision about particular providers, any provider wishing to carry out regulated activities is required to register with CQC to do so, this should be done before carrying out regulated activities,' the spokesman said. They added that anyone with concerns should contact the CQC, which 'can and has' prosecuted unregistered providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store