logo
Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

Furious Covid-19 bereaved demand justice for care homes ‘disgrace'

Daily Mirror19 hours ago

The Covid-19 Inquiry will on Monday hear from relatives prevented from saying their final goodbyes to loved ones in care homes, while parties were being held in Downing Street
Families are demanding that politicians are held to account after describing their heartbreaking final moments with loved ones.
This week the UK Covid-19 Inquiry will look at the impact of the pandemic on care homes and how social distancing guidelines meant many relatives were prevented from saying their final goodbyes. Families have told of their anger that ex-PM Boris Johnson 's government had at the same time been holding parties in Downing Street and flouting social distancing rules. The first wave of the pandemic saw the virus sweep through care homes as untested residents were sent there from struggling hospitals.


During the first peak between March and June 2020 66,000 people died in care homes, with a third of those deaths attributed to Covid-19.
Sharon Cook's parents were care home residents in Hinckley, Leicestershire, and died a week apart in 2020. Sharon, 60, told the Mirror: 'There was no even waving through the window for us because they were on the second floor.
'When we found out the government were having parties it just felt like we were being disrespected. You have to put your grief on hold because you're dealing with your anger because your loss is being disrespected. Then we had all the denials and all these countless thousands of deaths were kind of being written off as some sort of typing error. That government was a disgrace.'
Sharon's mum Joan, aged 85, fell ill and had to be taken to hospital and a few days later tested positive for Covid and passed away. Her dad Alf Cook, 87, was a Parkinson's sufferer and was given the news in his care home.

Sharon explained: 'Dad had been very much looked after by mum in the care home and suddenly she wasn't there. I think sometimes he thought he was the problem, not the pandemic, and that everyone was wearing masks because of him.
'I'm an only child and I was all he had but at that point there were no more visits. I was really upset about that because I just felt he needed me. He didn't take long then he died. I did wonder if he just gave up because I wasn't allowed in. You just get swamped by grief.'
The Mirror revealed in November 2021 that gatherings had taken place in Downing Street when London was under tier 3 restrictions during 2020. They included a number of leaving parties and a Christmas party on December 18.

Louise Baker, from Aberdeen, told the Mirror her father Sandy Adam died at his care home two days before the infamous Christmas party. Louise, 49, said: 'Before lockdown dad would come round our house every Sunday for dinner. He had dementia but it wasn't that far progressed that he didn't know who we were.
'After lockdown none of it made sense to him. Initially we could just shout in through a small gap in his tilt window but he was very hard of hearing. We couldn't hug him. I was extremely angry because we found out one of those parties in Downing Street coincided with my dad's death. I'm absolutely furious.'

Sandy, a retired dentist, had been allowed a meeting on the car park with Louise before his death at the age of 81 but they were not allowed within five metres of each other. She explained: 'It was so difficult because he felt the cold quite acutely and he was really grumpy. You weren't allowed to hug and like to do anything normal and he couldn't hear us. He just sat there with his arms folded.'
Sharon and Louise's accounts will be played today in an impact film at the start of Module 6 in front of inquiry chair Baroness Heather Hallett.

Louise added: 'In the next pandemic there has to be a balance struck between the protection of the both people who are vulnerable to infections and their right to dignity and the right to human contact and their right to family life. I'm not pretending I have any of these answers but we need to find a balance.
"There needs to be a recognition of the damage being done by the deprivation that people were experiencing, that level of isolation and the removal of basic rites of passage, like being able to see your loved one's body in their coffin.'

Among the key government decisions being discussed at the inquiry from this week will be that in March 2020 to rapidly discharge hospital patients into care homes without testing or a requirement for them to isolate. A 2022 High Court judgement that ruled the policy was unlawful as it failed to take into account the risk to elderly and vulnerable care home residents of asymptomatic transmission of the virus.
Between early March and early June 2020, nearly 20,000 care home residents in England and Wales died with Covid-19. That's about a third of all care home deaths during that period.

Many bereaved care home families, including Sharon Cook, say their loved ones had Do Not Resuscitate - so called DNRs - placed on them against their wishes.
Sharon said politicians should be held to account for their handling of the pandemic and subject to criminal proceedings if found to be negligent. She said: 'There needs to be greater accountability. I often say that if it was a pilot that had acted so recklessly and cost people their lives unnecessarily, or if it was a surgeon, there wouldn't be any question about, they would be interrogated and summoned to court. So why are politicians any different?

'It's not right that people with this much power can treat it with such little respect, have such devastating outcomes and no consequences.'
Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK has written an open letter to the inquiry chair Baroness Hallett objecting to the fact that ex-PM Boris Johnson will not appear before the latest module about the social care sector.
Jean Adamson, a spokesperson for Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said: 'Bereaved families have waited years for this moment. The care module is one of the most important parts of the Inquiry. It will examine how and why thousands of people were left unprotected in care homes and in the community, and why so many died without support, without dignity, and without accountability.

'But we are seriously concerned about the way this module is being handled. It is unacceptable that Boris Johnson and other key decision-makers will not be called to give evidence.'
A Lancet study later found that during the first wave of the pandemic care homes residents were 17 times more likely to die compared to private home residents of a similar age. This compared to a ten times higher risk before the pandemic, as people in residential care are generally more frail and unwell.

Covid bereaved families are expected to gather outside the opening of Module 6 of the inquiry today. The £200 million inquiry was set up to examine the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic, the UK's response to it and to learn lessons for the next pandemic. Its latest module on the social care sector will take place at Dorland House in Paddington, west London.
Ben Connah, Secretary at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, said: 'Sharon and Louise's stories are so powerful. Sadly, their experiences are not unique. Tens of thousands of people living in care lost their lives to Covid during the pandemic.
'This is why it is so important that the UK Covid-19 Inquiry spends the next five weeks investigating how the virus affected the care sector. Questions will be asked in public of key politicians, scientists, healthcare professionals and other experts. Our Chair, Baroness Heather Hallett, will get answers.
'We will begin with powerful evidence from bereaved individuals. Their experiences are front and centre of our hearings this week.
'The inquiry is making speedy progress. The country must learn the lessons of the last pandemic as quickly as possible - because we all know there will be another one.'
This week the inquiry will investigate the impact of the pandemic on the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It will start with opening statements from core participants and impact evidence from bereaved individuals before an appearance from former Health Secretary Matt Hancock on Wednesday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Welfare reforms remain cruel policy despite changes - they are fatally flawed'
'Welfare reforms remain cruel policy despite changes - they are fatally flawed'

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'Welfare reforms remain cruel policy despite changes - they are fatally flawed'

The UK government claims its latest benefits shake-up will help disabled people back into work, offering 'opportunity' and 'support.' But, despite the concessions the government has made, beneath the surface of their welfare reforms remains a cruel, short-sighted policy that risks driving thousands of disabled people in the future into poverty. This is still a fatally flawed bill. At Mind, we've heard from nearly 600 people with mental health problems who currently receive benefits. Nearly two-thirds (63%) said a reduction in welfare support would harm their ability to work or even look for a job. That's hardly surprising when 93% said the changes would damage their finances. How can anyone focus on job hunting if they can't afford the bus fare to an interview, or are too busy working out how to feed their children to polish up a CV? The government has agreed that protections will remain in place for disabled people currently receiving benefits. But if these protections are right for disabled people now, why are they not also right for disabled people in the future? The most controversial changes around future access to PIP (Personal Independence Payments) remain. The way new applicants will be assessed from next year will strip away PIP from thousands of people who would previously have qualified. PIP isn't about work incentives, it's there to help cover the extra costs disabled people face. Scope estimates disabled households need at least an extra £1,000 a month just to have the same standard of living as others. Taking that away might make a government spreadsheet look better, but it strips away a vital lifeline for people who become unwell in the future. Unless the bill is scrapped altogether, it will lead to poverty. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday. People tell us they use PIP to pay for essentials like transport (81%), food (78%), and help with daily living when they're too unwell to leave home (70%). Half said that they needed PIP to cover the cost of treatments unavailable through the NHS, such as therapy for debilitating conditions like PTSD. The extra costs of mental illness may be invisible, but they are no less real. Side effects of antipsychotics, for example, can include tremors, heart problems and drowsiness, which impact on day-to-day life significantly. Even with concessions, the cuts this bill introduces to future benefits makes it untenable. What we need instead is decent mental health services, evidence-based employment programmes, and compassionate, flexible workplaces. We urge MPs to oppose these plans and call on the government to build a system that supports people to live, recover and Thrive.

Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'
Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Emma Roddick on Ewing, Flynn and being on female 'hit list'

The former minister also criticised comments Mr Ewing made last weekend that independence should be put "on the back burner" for a decade while the Scottish Government focused on improving public services. In a wide ranging interview, the MSP for the Highlands and Islands, 27, who was the youngest MSP to be elected in 2021, also spoke about how she responded to being on a "hit list" of female SNP MSPs some in the party reportedly wanted to oust. READ MORE: And she described how she felt after being sacked as equalities minister by First Minister John Swinney and her hopes for a return to government one day. Mr Ewing, a former rural affairs secretary and the son of the late SNP trailblazer Winnie Ewing, shocked the world of Scottish politics last week, when he announced he would be standing against the SNP as an independent candidate in his seat of Inverness and Nairn at the Holyrood election next year. The 67-year-old, who now sits as an independent MSP, has pointed to his prominent role and personal support in the constituency in his bid for re-election. But speaking to The Herald Ms Roddick cast doubt on whether Mr Ewing's personal support in the constituency would help him win as she underlined her optimism she would retake the seat for the SNP. READ MORE: "What we have in Inverness is not a party built around any one person. It's a fantastic group of grassroots-led local activists which believes in a vision of an independent Scotland where we treat everybody more fairly, and the Highlands gets an equal say in national issues and policy decisions. So I will be relying on that campaign and we can win in the way we have won every election since 1999," she said. "What is more important than any one person is what you are standing for. My message and the SNP's message has always been clear about what we are trying to do and I believe I can get that message across." She was asked if she was concerned that a pro-UK party could win the seat with the pro-independence vote split by both the SNP and Mr Ewing. She said: "I will certainly be making it very clear to SNP supporters that that's what we want to avoid. If they do vote on the basis of seeking Scotland's independence or even greater powers for the Highlands it needs to be the SNP and me who they go for." SNP MSP Emma Roddick speaks to The Herald's Kathleen Nutt (Image: GordonTerris/Herald&Times) She was asked if she agreed with Mr Ewing's comments that independence should be put on the backburner for a decade. "Absolutely not," she said arguing that independence "shouldn't be seen as an alternative to dealing with a crisis or immediate issues. Because the reason why we are not able to react in the way we want to to things like the Covid pandemic, the cost of living crisis, Brexit, is because we do not have full powers. "I expect there will be events and crises in the next session, whether that is related to growing tensions in the world, the UK's part in those tensions, artificial intelligence, climate change, global challenges that we have and as a country we react to. "It's very likely that we are going to face other situations, where we would want greater powers at our disposal to react. For me having independence as these things continue to come up is vital." Ms Roddick highlighted differences between her and Mr Ewing's views on social and equality issues, and on fox hunting. (Image: Gordon Terris) She is a strong advocate for equal marriage and supported the Scottish Government's Gender Recognition Reform Bill which was designed to make the process easier for transgender people to obtain a gender recognition certificate. Mr Ewing voted against both equal marriage and gender recognition reform, and opposed an outright ban on fox hunting in 2001 whilst a member of the rural development committee. "I know this doesn't come across in descriptions of me online but I have never prioritised talking about social issues. For me it's quite a fundamental issue in the same way that independence is," she said. "I just believe in equality for everyone, that Scotland should have its own say in decisions that are made for the country. "I accept that I am very closely aligned to a lot of these issues that Fergus is on the absolute opposite [side] of. Being a member of the LGBTQ+ community I just will always stick up for others in that community, especially in the face of hate crime and attempts to remove rights." She added: "I am not keen on fox hunting. I am happy with equal marriage ... he is happy with fox hunting." Ms Roddick was highly critical of the SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn's decision to stand as a candidate for Aberdeen South and North Kincardine at the Holyrood election next year while holding onto his Aberdeen South seat until the next general election. He made his intention public in a newspaper interview in November last year. (Mr Flynn later backed down saying he will step down as an MP to become an MSP.) Months after her criticism, in February this year, Ms Roddick appeared on a 'hit list' of female SNP MSPs. It had been reportedly drawn up by allies of Mr Flynn who wanted the five women listed to be replaced with ex-SNP MPs. Senior SNP figures denied Mr Flynn drew up such a list. But Ms Roddick believed the list existed and that she was on it. She said: "It wasn't surprised in the slightest. I am on a lot of lists. I experience a lot of misogyny in this role." She pointed out she had criticised the former Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross for being both an MP and an MP and couldn't say "nothing" when someone in her party was "then trying to do the same." She was asked how she would get on with Mr Flynn if they are both elected to Holyrood next year, she said: "I've just spent four years in a group with Fergus Ewing, I'm sure I'll cope. I will more than happily chat to him. I have good relationships with MSPs in every party in this place. It is harder when criticism comes from your own party." Ms Roddick was appointed equalities minister by First Minister Humza Yousaf in 2023 but ceased to continue in the post under his successor Mr Swinney. The Herald pointed out she was sacked as equalities minister when John Swinney became First Minister. At the time Patrick Harvie, the Scottish Greens co-leader, suggested her exit from government raised concerns over a potential watering down of equalities legislation. "How did it feel being removed as a minister from a job you presumably much loved?" we asked. "There were very mixed feelings around that at the time. I was excited to take on being a member of the rural affairs and islands committee," she said after a long pause. "The week that I left government I joined the committee and was immediately immersed in the agriculture and rural communities bill." Pressed if she was sad to leave the ministerial role, she said: "No I think I'm happy with what I achieved [as equalities minister] and since." And asked if she would like to return to government? "If it were the right role," she said. Mr Ewing said: "An answer to all of this would be almost as long as the A9 - which of course has not been dualled. "Broken promises to the Highlands cannot be ignored; competent government must be restored; and the main parties must work together like non-politician grown-ups do if Scotland is to be a better place." Mr Flynn was approached for comment.

A flyer made me realise I'd never had sober sex
A flyer made me realise I'd never had sober sex

Metro

time17 hours ago

  • Metro

A flyer made me realise I'd never had sober sex

It was day three of rehab when I was handed the leaflet. I was sitting in a group session, exhausted, anxious, and still emotionally raw from a medically supervised detox and days of intense therapy and AA meetings, when I glanced down and read the title on the front: Sober Sex . I blinked. 'Sober sex?' I thought, confused. And then it hit me. I had never had sober sex. Not once. At 53 years of age, I realised – with horror – that I had always needed a drink in order to be intimate. It floored me. I felt both embarrassed and upset. I suddenly saw myself clearly. The supposedly confident, flirty, empowered woman I believed I was… had always needed alcohol to take her clothes off. Without it, I didn't feel relaxed enough to be vulnerable, to connect, or to let go. It was a sobering truth in every sense of the word. Until going to rehab, the last time I'd been sober for more than 24 hours was 17 years earlier, when I was pregnant with my longed-for son. I discovered alcohol at 15, like so many teens in the 80s. Those drunken encounters went hand in hand with my first romance. I lost my virginity drunk and awkward, and from then on, alcohol and sex were a package deal. In my 20s, I was loud, extroverted and magnetic – or so I thought. In reality, booze gave me a mask to hide behind. It gave me courage. It gave me permission. I spent years dating and having sex with men who drank like I did. I didn't even understand people who stayed sober. All my romances were fuelled by large glasses of wine and poor judgment. But finally, in 2002, I met 'the one' – my wonderful husband Andy – while drunk in a beer garden. We bonded over red wine and quickly fell in love. We had a beautiful 15-year marriage, but even then, we were never sober during sex. Alcohol was part of our relationship, part of our way to relax. At first, it was just a shared bottle over dinner. Then it became a large glass the moment I walked through the door after work. Sundays meant a roast lunch and the bottle opened by midday. If I'm honest, two or even three bottles a day became the norm. In 2017, tragedy struck. Andy suffered a heart attack that caused a catastrophic brain injury. He needed 24/7 care, and for three long years, I grieved the man I'd loved, knowing he wasn't coming back. When Covid took him in 2020, I turned entirely to the bottle. I couldn't cope or function without it. Alcohol was the only effective tool to deal with my loss. By that point, I was drinking three bottles of red wine a day. When I couldn't be seen drinking, like in the office, I'd resort to vodka hidden in Diet Coke bottles. It wasn't about enjoyment anymore. It was about survival. Or at least, what I thought was the only way I could survive. Post-lockdown, desperate for connection, I started dating again. I was nervous about the idea of new relationships as a widow, so I drank before every date to steady my nerves, to feel sexy, and to get through the night. Unsurprisingly, none of those relationships lasted – my drinking scared them off. One man called me out on my habits and raised his concerns with my family, so I ended things before he could get too close. By 2023, my body was beginning to give out. One morning, after a particularly heavy day and night of drinking at a corporate event, I suffered a fall in a supermarket car park. I was shaky, unsteady on my feet, and went down hard, smashing my face and injuring my leg. I needed weeks of physiotherapy just to walk properly again. Not long after, I ended up in A&E following a failed attempt to detox alone. That night made it painfully clear: I couldn't do it on my own and on November 6, 2024, I checked into The Priory in Altrincham for a 28-day rehab stay. It was, without doubt, the best decision I've ever made. But when I saw the words 'sober sex', I was paralysed by fear. How on earth was I ever going to date, or even think about sex, without a drink? Then, while on my first ever sober holiday – a treat to myself to celebrate 90 days sober – a silver-haired man caught my eye. He was handsome, charming, and clearly interested. I sneakily manoeuvred myself next to him at the theatre show and he introduced himself as Troy. When Troy asked why I was drinking alcohol-free lager, I told him the truth – that I was in recovery. He was kind and understanding. So, the next evening, I invited Troy to a fancy steakhouse onboard using a free loyalty perk. He said yes. That night, as we said goodbye, he leaned in for a kiss – my first sober kiss. I told him as much. He smiled and gave me a huge hug, and we agreed to meet the next day. At dinner the following night, we laughed and flirted a lot more. I noticed he wasn't drinking, opting for iced tea over the margaritas he'd been drinking the night before. When I asked why, he said, 'If this is going to be your first sober sex, I want to be present and in the moment, too.' I was stunned by his thoughtfulness, it made me feel relaxed and at ease. Later that night, and into the morning, I experienced something I never had before: Fully present, connected, vulnerable, joyful, sober sex. No fog. No regrets. No forgetting. Just me, him, and the moment. And the best part? Waking up hangover-free, remembering everything in vivid detail. We spent the rest of the cruise together, and although we live continents apart and a long-term relationship isn't feasible, we've met up since and even cruised together again last month. It may not be a forever romance, but it gave me something priceless: The confidence that I can connect without alcohol. It also taught me that intimacy without booze is far superior. I'm now 230 days sober. My health has improved, as has my outlook. To help others like me, I recently launched a dating app for people in recovery, or who are sober-curious, to find genuine connections. You can find out more about SoberLove here I've had other romantic encounters since Troy and I can attest that sex is much better sober. More Trending It's more thoughtful, more generous, more present. I'm more athletic, more connected, and crucially, I remember it all. I make better decisions. I only do what I truly want to do. Looking back, I mourn the years lost to drunken fumbling and forgettable nights. But I'm also proud. I've taken back control of my life and my body. View More » My only regret? Not doing it sooner. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I took weight loss jabs and ended up in hospital four times MORE: Anyone envious of 'perks' I get as a disabled person doesn't understand MORE: I'm a former night owl who now loves waking up at 5am

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store