
He spent three horrific years in a Doha jail, now Abdullah Ibhais wants justice from Qatar and Fifa
Ibhais describes how, in the middle of the process, one Qatari official came out with the following.
'You think you can fight the state?'
Ibhais couldn't do anything but laugh in shock. 'At that moment I realised how deep the issue was.' The Jordanian national was finally released on 11 March 2025, having served his full sentence. In July 2024, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detentions declared he had been a victim of arbitrary detention and urged Qatari authorities to immediately release him.
Human rights groups like FairSquare believe his case serves as a prism for the story of that entire World Cup. Ibhais wasn't just a worker in the preparations for the most watched sporting event in the world, he was a media manager. His case consequently involves the long and controversial build-up, the migrant workers, the media coverage, how Qatar spins and how Qatar works.
Ibhais' version is that he went to investigate workers rights' complaints, stood up for them by advising the Supreme Committee to acknowledge their role, before he was the subject of a malicious prosecution. FairSquare say Ibhais provided plenty of evidence for his case.
The version from within Qatar points to Ibhais' April 2021 conviction for 'bribery', 'violation of the integrity of tenders and profits' and 'intentional damage to public funds'. Ibhais' conviction was upheld on appeal, although his sentence was reduced from five years to three years.FairSquare say there was almost no evidence for this, other than Ibhais' own confession, which he retracted and said was coerced. The human rights body says his allegation of coercion is highly credible. The UN working group's finding that he was a victim of arbitrary detention is also highly significant, especially in light of Fifa 's refusal to comment when contacted by The Independent.
He now wants to go further than just fighting the state. He wants to try and sue both Qatar's Supreme Committee and Fifa, for negligence.
'They couldn't even follow their own guidelines,' Ibhais says of Fifa. 'I'll try every possible avenue, either in Switzerland, the US or any country where they have jurisdiction or bilateral agreements with Fifa.'
Fifa did previously repeat the line 'any person deserves a trial that is fair and where due process is observed and respected', but FairSquare describe this as meaningless. The Independent covered Ibhais' case during the 2022 World Cup, and speaks to him now in the Norwegian capital, the night before he does a series of events at the Oslo Freedom Forum. It is the first time Ibhais has left Jordan, as well as his wife and two young children, since he was deported from Doha after his release. The timing is apt, given this is five days before Saturday's Champions League final in Munich, where Qatar could enjoy their next great sporting moment. .
The discussion turns to Qatar's previous great sporting moment: the hosting of that World Cup.
Ibhais says he couldn't even watch it. Such obstinacy took concerted effort, given that the prison guards apparently rolled huge TVs into the mess hall for all 29 days, with prisoners not allowed to change the channel from BeIN Sport.
'During the World Cup was the worst,' Ibhais says. 'It felt like total defeat.
'OK, it's hard to be cut away from your family, but the feeling of injustice was the hardest thing to cope with. They got what they wanted, here it was, you're there, no one cares and there's nothing you can do. Life goes on, yours doesn't.'
It is shortly into telling this story that Ibhais offers what he feels is a crucial caveat.
'I accept I am biased.'
How could he not be, given his experience?
Ibhais was eventually detained at a prison that was closest to the Khalifa International Stadium, which hosted England's opening 6-2 win over Iran. He later alleged he was 'physically assaulted by the prison guards', before being subjected to 'complete darkness in solitary confinement… with temperatures near freezing as the prison's central air-conditioning was used as a torture device' so that he couldn't sleep for 96 hours.
'That was all true,' Ibhais says, 'because they were so worried I was going to do something before the World Cup. They felt like teaching me a lesson.'
Ibhais adds that the conditions in the prison were completely unhygienic. He hasn't actually gone to a doctor since his release, something a little surprising given that he chose to see a therapist before he was even arrested.
'I was having panic attacks because I realised what I was part of, and I couldn't live with it,' Ibhais says. 'That realisation was worse than prison. It is shocking. Prison, I expected. This, I didn't.'
It's at this moment that Ibhais feels a point needs to be stressed. Throughout the entire 2022 World Cup cycle, Qatar's persistent narrative was that a young state was going through a journey of development, especially as regards the issue of migrant workers. The plea was for understanding, amid reference to necessarily gradual reforms.
Ibhais knows this well, since his job was to push that narrative.
'They couldn't care less,' he says. 'Forget about how they address the whole issue. Listen to how many Qataris talk to their own workers. It is depressing, the way they yell at them, the way they more or less think of these men and women as slaves.
'Even the most progressive, when they're angry, there's zero respect. Maybe they'll apologise later.'
Ibhais says this even extended to prison, where detained Qataris essentially 'hired south Asians to clean for them'. He agrees with the analysis that all reforms were 'superficial'.
'They think they are right and moral, just because they are rich. It took me so long to understand they are bad people. I really believed for so long. Even when they actually detained me, even when they forced me to sign a confession that was already printed – even after all of this – I still believed they can't be so bad.
'I was under the impression mid-level officials decided this, and the trial couldn't be swayed.'
It's why he says that one sentence from an official – 'You think you can fight the state?' – suddenly made everything so clear.
Against that, there nevertheless remains so much mystery to the case, from the motivations to how high it went. Ibhais believes the reason he was detained cuts to the very nature of the state.
'It was the concept of whistleblowing. It was not what I exactly said,' he explains. 'They didn't like that someone can challenge the way they are doing things.
'They are positioning themselves as leaders of change, and all that trust lies with the Supreme Committee. So if you tolerate such behaviour and the Supreme Committee is discredited, you discredit everything. And if you're paying $250bn for this reputational campaign…'
Tellingly, Ibhais was mostly housed with 'state security prisoners' and political dissidents.
'They have so many layers of classification but the most important is 'state security' and people they want to isolate from the world.'
One question brings a reference to 'people they're afraid of', to which Ibhais interjects. 'They're not afraid of anyone. It's people they want to silence.'
He says those first six months were 'extremely hard'.
'I basically lost my life. Feeling helpless and away from my family was devastating. Then I thought 'this might take a long time', so I had to find a way to deal with this.'
Ibhais started writing to anyone he could think of, from Amnesty to media. That started to bring some peace of mind, aided by the knowledge his wife could still work in Doha, so their two children – now aged six and eight – could be looked after. He says 'this was part of the deal with the public prosecutor when I signed the confession'.
'Thank God we managed. Of course, all our savings evaporated. I always had hope someone, somewhere, would recognise what was done.'
He didn't find that recognition at Fifa, which is one major reason he wants to take action. Despite supplying Fifa with all of his material, Ibhais says he was essentially 'ghosted'.
That was just over a year before the World Cup, and Ibhais believes that Qatar felt he was 'low enough that people would forget'.
'There's a hierarchy. There are original Qataris, then from Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, then the westerners, then other Arabic people, then you have Bangladeshis, Indians… I am in the middle. That's why they thought it would be easy to make an example of me.'
Ibhais says his treatment greatly eased once the tournament ended. He was even allowed to speak to his family for 15 minutes every week. When he was eventually free with them in March, it was 'like coming back to life'.
'I still feel I am in that moment. It still feels great.'
***
There is another element to Ibhais' story. As a World Cup media manager, Ibhais had to deal with journalists like those at The Independent. He outlines how such a state handled such criticism, but also how it influenced him.
'I believed you were being racist,' Ibhais reveals. 'I believed that the US, the UK and Australia were just pissed off because they lost to Qatar.'
If that sounds familiar to anyone who has followed the public discussions on 2022, what follows will be even more familiar.
'The whole media strategy that unfortunately I was part of is called 'drop by drop' – feeding a counter-message. We start by letting you say whatever you want, then plant the seeds of doubt. 'What if it's this? Or maybe this…?' 'Have you checked yourself?' 'How about you come and see for yourself?'
'So a journalist like you would say whatever he wants, but if you add a quote from us, we are part of the conversation.
'If someone critical gets an interview, it's only with top people highly trained with key messaging.
'At the same time, we generate as much positive content as possible. So, your content will appear, but also ours, and then we work on the search-engine optimisation to gradually rise step by step.
'We called it 'flip the pyramid'. And because English-speaking media were so critical, we bypassed them for other languages.'
Ibhais smiles. 'I put that in place… and then suffered from it for a long time.'
So what does Ibhais think about Saturday, and Qatar's PSG potentially becoming European champions?
'At this point, I don't care. Qatar is much more powerful. If I can hold them accountable for what they did to me, it will end there. It's a big fight and there's a lot going on in the world, Ukraine, Gaza… who cares about [Gianni] Infantino?'
The final mention is instructive, as it indicates where much of his anger lies.
'Fifa should take most of the blame. They knew what they were getting into, but stood by it. Fifa's policies open the door for any future hosts to do the same as Qatar. They got away with it, and saw how all the negative attention in the world will not be able to touch them.'
Ibhais hopes that can change through legal action, but his own story now has a positive note, at least. He can hug his family, just as he dreamed of in that Doha cell.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
British couple craig lindsay foreman held in Iran moved to separate prisons
A British couple detained in Iran for seven months on espionage charges have been moved to separate prisons in and near Tehran, heightening fears for their welfare, their son said on Monday. Lindsay and Craig Foreman, both 52 and who previously split their time between south-east England and Spain, were seized in Kerman, in central Iran, in early January while on a round-the-world motorbike trip. Their family have known little about their whereabouts since then, but say they learned on Sunday via the Foreign Office that Lindsay has been transferred to Qarchak women's prison near the capital. Human rights groups have repeatedly criticised the dire conditions reported there. 'It's one of the worst prisons in the world,' Lindsay's son Joe Bennett told AFP on Monday. His stepdad, Craig, has been moved to Tehran's infamous central prison, also known as Fashafouyeh, which is about 30km (18 miles) south of the capital and has similar notoriety. Bennett, who has yet to talk to his parents since they were detained more than 200 days ago, called the developments 'unbelievably tough'. 'Because of where they are, I'm worrying more than I was ever,' he added, urging Iranian authorities to allow British officials fresh access to the couple and to let his parents call home. 'You're just thinking, is she OK,' he said of the seven-month ordeal, adding 'it's like you feel sick all the time'. 'I do have confidence in their resilience, they are mentally strong,' Bennett said. But the 31-year-old sales manager, who used to speak to his mum nearly daily, fears overcrowding at their new prisons and that they may be abused, as well as a fallout from their enforced separation. 'I believe they will be, together, as strong as possible, but now they've been separated … that lifeline has been taken.' The couple, who were on a 'once-in-a-lifetime' trip, entered Iran from Armenia and had only intended to stay four days before crossing into Pakistan. Relatives first realised something was wrong when the couple stopped communicating but their messages on WhatsApp and other platforms showed as having been read. Iran then said in February that the Foremans were accused of entering the country 'posing as tourists' to gather information. It claimed to have established links between the couple and foreign intelligence services, and that they were being held on 'espionage charges'. Bennett dismissed the claim that his parents were spies as 'crazy'. 'They're not spies or political players. They are just two people who are travelling around the world.' He also renewed his criticism on Monday of the UK government, saying it felt as if ministers and officials were just going 'through the motions' in their response. A Foreign Office spokesperson said it was 'deeply concerned' at Iran's espionage allegations and that it continues to raise the case 'directly with the Iranian authorities'. 'We are providing them with consular assistance and remain in close contact with their family members,' she added.


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘No one should act surprised,' says UN expert who warned of starvation in Gaza last year
The UN expert who first warned that Israel was orchestrating a campaign of deliberate mass starvation in Gaza more than 500 days ago, has said that governments and corporations cannot claim to be surprised at the horror now unfolding. 'Israel has built the most efficient starvation machine you can imagine. So while it's always shocking to see people being starved, no one should act surprised. All the information has been out in the open since early 2024,' Michael Fakhri, the UN special rapporteur on the right to food, told the Guardian. 'Israel is starving Gaza. It's genocide. It's a crime against humanity. It's a war crime. I have been repeating it and repeating it and repeating it, I feel like Cassandra,' said Fakhri, referring to the Greek mythological figure whose warnings and predictions were ignored. On 9 October 2023 – two days after the deadly Hamas attack – Israel's then defense minister, Yoav Gallant, declared a 'complete siege' of Gaza and said he would halt the supply of electricity, food, water and fuel. By December 2023, Gazans accounted for 80% of the people in the world experiencing catastrophic hunger, according to UN and international aid agency figures. Now, widespread starvation, malnutrition and disease are driving the sharp rise in hunger-related deaths across Gaza, with more than 20,000 children hospitalized for acute malnutrition between April and mid-July, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global initiative that provides real-time data on hunger and famine for the UN and aid groups. The 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out' across the Gaza Strip, the IPC warned in an alert earlier this week. Fakhri was among the first to warn about the impending famine – and the need for urgent action to stop Israel from starving 2 million people in Gaza. In an interview with the Guardian published on 28 February 2024, Fakhri said: 'We have never seen a civilian population made to go so hungry so quickly and so completely, that is the consensus among starvation experts … Intentionally depriving people of food is clearly a war crime. Israel has announced its intention to destroy the Palestinian people, in whole or in part, simply for being Palestinian … this is now a situation of genocide.' The following month, the international court of justice recognized the risk of genocide in Gaza and drew attention to the 'spread of famine and starvation'. The ICJ said that Israel must immediately take all necessary and effective measures, in cooperation with the UN, to ensure unfettered access to humanitarian aid including food, water, shelter, fuel and medicines. In May, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and former defense minister Gallant became the first ever individuals to be formally accused by an international court of deliberate starvation, which is a war crime. In July 2024, a group of UN experts including Fakhri declared a famine after the first deaths from starvation were reported in Gaza. Fakhri also published a detailed report for the UN into Israel's decades-long control over food production and supplies to Palestinians, a stranglehold which meant 80% of people in Gaza were dependent on aid when Gallant announced the current siege in October 2023. Yet there has been little or no action to stop Israel starving Palestinians, which it has achieved by systematically destroying local food production (greenhouses, orchards, farmland) and blocking aid – in violation of international law. According to Fakhri, this is why famine has now taken hold in Gaza. 'Famine is always political, always predictable and always preventable. But there is no verb to famine. We don't famine people, we starve them – and that inevitably leads to famine if no political action is taken to avoid it. 'But to frame the mass starvation as a consequence of the most recent blockade, is a misunderstanding of how starvation works and what's going on in Gaza. People don't all of a sudden starve, children don't wither away that quickly. This is because they have been deliberately weakened for so long. The state of Israel itself has used food as a weapon since its creation. It can and does loosen and tighten its starvation machine in response to pressure; it has been fine-tuning this for 25 years.' Despite stark images of skeletal Palestinians, the Israeli government and some of its allies have continued to insist that the hunger is the result of logistical problems, not a state policy. Last week Netanyahu said: 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza. There is no starvation in Gaza.' Unicef is among multiple aid agencies to confirm that malnutrition and starvation have escalated since early March 2025 – when Israel unilaterally violated a ceasefire agreed after Donald Trump returned to the White House. Israel reinstated a total blockade after allowing some aid trucks in during the ceasefire, though UN agencies and charities on the ground said it was never enough to fully meet the needs of the starved, sick and weakened population. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an opaque logistics group backed by Israel and the Trump administration, began operations in May, with armed security provided by private contractors and the Israeli military. It was authorized to replace 400 UN distribution hubs with just four across Gaza, in response to unproven claims that international aid was being diverted by Hamas. The UN and hundreds of aid groups condemned the move as a weaponization of aid that violated long-established humanitarian norms. On 1 June, Israeli soldiers killed 32 people at GHF sites, and since then more than 1,300 starving Palestinians have been killed trying to access food. Israel has long sought to discredit and weaken the UN and other international mechanisms including the courts, which it sees as hostile to its ongoing de facto annexation of Palestinian territories, accusing them of antisemitism. 'This is using aid not for humanitarian purposes, but to control populations, to move them, to humiliate and weaken people as part of their military tactics. The GHF is so frightening because it might be the new militarized dystopia of aid of the future,' Fakhri said. In a statement, GHF rejected the reports of Palestinian deaths as 'false and exaggerated statistics' and accused the UN of not doing enough. 'If the UN and other groups would collaborate with us, we could end the starvation, desperation and violent incidents almost overnight. We could scale up, add more distribution sites and ramp up direct-to-community delivery which GHF is piloting now,' a spokesperson said. The Israeli government did not respond to request for comment. The deaths from starvation and aid-hub massacres come on top of at least 60,000 Palestinians killed by Israeli bombs and tanks. Studies have concluded that the real death toll is almost certainly much higher, and Israel has continued to deny international researchers and journalists entry into Gaza. Fakhri and other UN experts have repeatedly urged member states and corporations to act to stop the bombs and famine by cutting financial and military aid and trade with Israel, as well as broad-based economic and political sanctions. 'I see stronger political language, more condemnation, more plans proposed, but despite the change in rhetoric, we're still in the phase of inaction. The politicians and corporations have no excuse, they're really shameful. The fact that millions of people are mobilizing in growing numbers shows that everyone in the world understands how many different countries, corporations and individuals are culpable.' Fakhri argues that in light of the US persistent vetoing of ceasefire resolutions at the UN security council, it is incumbent on the UN general assembly to call for peacekeepers to accompany humanitarian convoys into Gaza. 'They have the majority of votes, and most importantly, millions of people are demanding this. Ordinary people are trying to break through an illegal blockade to deliver humanitarian aid, to implement international law their governments are failing to do. Why else do we have peacekeepers if not to end genocide and prevent starvation?'


Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Gaza student leaves France after ‘death to Jews' posts row
A student from Gaza in France on a scholarship has left the country after her anti-Semitic remarks on social media were branded 'unacceptable' by the government. Nour Attaalah, who arrived in France on July 11, called for the killing of Jews in posts made online in the past two years, it is claimed. In a statement by the foreign ministry Jean-Noel Barrot, the French foreign minister, 'stressed the unacceptable nature of the comments made by Ms Attaalah, a Gazan student, before she entered French territory'. The posts, which have since been deleted, led to a judicial investigation for condoning terrorism, and an inquiry to determine why they had not been detected in advance. The Sciences Po Lille school said Wednesday that her social media comments had been confirmed, without elaborating. Ossama Dahmane, the student's lawyer, said the 'alleged facts are largely based on shared tweets, taken out of context'. But the foreign ministry said: 'Given their seriousness, Ms Attaalah could not remain on French territory. She left France today to go to Qatar to continue her studies there.' Her lawyer said Ms Attaalah had chosen to 'pursue her studies in another country in a spirit of appeasement and to guarantee her security', even though 'she firmly denies the accusations made against her'. The young woman, who had received a student visa and a government scholarship as part of a programme for Gaza students, had been due to join Sciences Po Lille in the autumn. She arrived in France on July 11, according to a French diplomatic source. Last Friday, France said it would suspend a programme receiving Palestinians from Gaza until an investigation into how the student accused was allowed into the country was concluded. 'No evacuation of any kind will take place until we have drawn conclusions from this investigation,' Mr Barrot told Franceinfo radio. All Gazans who have entered France will undergo a second screening, he added. The foreign ministry would not say how many students have been affected, citing privacy reasons. But France has helped more than 500 people leave Gaza since the latest war between Palestinian militant group Hamas and Israel started, including wounded children, journalists, students and artists. The conflict, triggered by Hamas's October 7 2023 attack on Israel, has seen Israel retaliate with a deadly military campaign and an aid blockade in Gaza that some rights groups have qualified as 'genocide'. Following the suspension, Arthur Delaporte, spokesman for the opposition Socialist Party, said a blanket ban was inappropriate. 'France cannot suspend its policy of welcoming evacuated Gazans: our common humanity is at stake,' he said on X. Last Thursday, Lille's general prosecutor that a judicial probe has been opened against the student for allegedly trying to 'justify terrorism' and 'justify a crime against humanity'. The controversy erupted shortly after Emmanuel Macron, the French president, announced France would recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer said the UK would do the same unless Israel takes 'substantive' steps, including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza.