Maine Legislature passes restrictions on federal immigration enforcement
This story was updated following Senate action and enactment votes.
Both chambers of the Maine Legislature approved a bill to restrict local authorities from carrying out federal immigration enforcement.
After about three hours total of debate across chambers, the Senate voted 21-14 for passage on Tuesday, following the House of Representatives that approved it earlier by one vote. Both chambers enacted the bill on Wednesday, sending it to the governor.
Meanwhile, both chambers on Tuesday rejected a competing proposal that would prevent local agencies from adopting any policies that restrict them from assisting in such enforcement.
During both the House and Senate debate, Republican legislators argued restricting local police from collaborating with federal authorities on immigration matters would make Maine a 'sanctuary state,' putting a target on Maine in light of President Donald Trump threatening to withhold federal funding from and conduct immigration raids in so-called sanctuary jurisdictions.
Meanwhile, Democrats argued the bill would do no such thing. Rather, they said, adding such restrictions is necessary to ensure the rule of law is upheld since the Trump administration has violated legal norms and ignored court orders in a mass push to remove noncitizens.
LD 1971, the bill the House advanced, passed with a 74-73 vote. It would place restrictions on some immigration enforcement activities, but it is more limited in scope than originally proposed.
Effort to restrict Maine police from carrying out federal immigration enforcement splits lawmakers
After law enforcement authorities raised concern about the proposal hindering federal partnerships that sometimes touch on some immigration issues, such as drug enforcement task forces, the amended version clarifies that only work done by local police for the primary purpose of immigration enforcement would be banned.
'This bill does not prevent Maine law enforcement agencies from doing their job,' bill sponsor Rep. Deqa Dhalac (D-South Portland) said on the floor, pointing out that immigration enforcement is an authority generally reserved to federal authorities. 'Instead, it provides clarity. Especially, it will ensure that Maine law enforcement can focus on their primary mission, safeguarding our communities and upholding the state laws.'
Consideration of these restrictions comes amid state and national scrutiny of immigration enforcement.
Trump announced late Sunday that he was directing ICE officers to conduct immigration raids in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, the nation's three most populous cities that are all led by elected Democrats in heavily Democratic states.
'I want ICE, Border Patrol, and our Great and Patriotic Law Enforcement Officers, to FOCUS on our crime ridden and deadly Inner Cities, and those places where Sanctuary Cities play such a big role,' Trump wrote on social media, referring to cities that don't coordinate with federal immigration officials for civil enforcement.
The announcement escalates a week-long conflict in Los Angeles, where large protests started after immigration officials began arresting people at work sites across the city. Trump directed 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to L.A. amid the protests without California Gov. Gavin Newsom's consent.
'I never imagined that I would be standing here questioning whether the state of Maine should regulate when and how our police officers interact with their federal counterparts,' Rep. Tavis Rock Hasenfus (D-Augusta) said on the floor.
Hasenfus went on, 'But nor could I have imagined that I'd be living in a country where federal agents would appear in our communities in unmarked vans and masks, executing orders without question, simply to meet arbitrary quotas. Nor did I imagine a time when our federal government would so routinely ignore lawful court orders instructing them to abide by basic constitutional principles.'
Pointing to other injustices in the nation's history, Rep. Victoria Doudera (D-Camden) argued that some of the Trump administration's actions are in line with that legacy.
'I think it's been all too American in our past,' Doudera said, 'but I think it represents the worst of what America is and we need to stand up in this Legislature and be for the best that America has.'
Others praised the Trump administration on immigration enforcement. 'We should not stand in their way when they come into our great state to do their job and arrest these criminals,' said Rep. Michael Soboleski (R-Phillips).
Soboleski is the sponsor of the immigration bill the Legislature rejected, LD 1656, which would prevent local agencies from adopting any policies that restrict them from assisting in the enforcement of federal immigration law. After the House voted against passage 77-71, the Senate followed suit with a 20-14 vote against it.
'This legislation is a critical step towards ensuring that Maine remains a law-abiding partner with federal government particularly,' Rep. Jennifer Poirier (R-Skowhegan) said of LD 1656. 'In the realm of immigration enforcement, the Trump administration has made it clear that states and localities that impede federal immigration enforcement risk losing significant federal funding.'
Wells Police pauses ICE agreement in light of pending legislation that would ban it
In an executive order in late April, Trump threatened to withhold federal funding from so-called sanctuary jurisdictions, a move a judge has since blocked.
In the Senate Tuesday night, Assistant Minority Leader Matthew Harrington (R-York), a 17-year veteran of law enforcement and current reserve police officer for the Kennebunk Police Department, said that he has personally detained suspects for federal immigration authorities under multiple administrations.
'This is nothing new to our state,' Harrington said, 'but this bill is going to handcuff law enforcement's ability to assist those agencies with those investigations.'
Sen. Joe Baldacci (D-Penobscot) disagreed.
'In normal times, the arguments of my Republican friends might persuade me or influence me on this decision,' Baldacci said. 'But the fact of the matter is, we do not live in normal times. We actually have an administration that does not respect law, that runs roughshod over the law.'
Representatives made similar points in the House earlier Tuesday.
'I say this as someone who has often been critical of my party's view on border security — this isn't about border security anymore. It's about cruelty,' Rep. Adam Lee (D-Auburn) said.
Not all in the Democratic Party agreed. Rep. Dani O'Halloran (D-Brewer) argued, 'Criminal networks do not stop at city or state lines, and neither should our collaboration as law enforcement agencies.'
But a violation of immigration law, the enforcement that LD 1971 seeks to ban, is a civil rather than criminal violation, Rep. Ellie Sato (D-Gorham) pointed out.
In normal times, the arguments of my Republican friends might persuade me or influence me on this decision. But the fact of the matter is, we do not live in normal times. We actually have an administration that does not respect law, that runs roughshod over the law.
– Sen. Joe Baldacci (D-Penobscot)
Other legislators who voted against LD 1656 amplified concerns raised by the Maine Municipal Association during the bill's public hearing that municipalities would be on the hook to pay for their local police taking on federal immigration enforcement work, expanding their legal risk with no compensation
'For me, that is also terribly concerning,' said Rep. Amy J. Roeder (D-Bangor).
In the upper chamber, it is also troubling to at least one senator from across the aisle.
Sen. Rick Bennett (R-Oxford), who voted for LD 1971, said, 'I, for one, am concerned about the use of Maine resources and the taking of those resources for activities that are governed by whatever party is in the White House. We need to focus on Maine, and I believe that this amended version actually accomplishes that.'
Concerns about these costs have been raised by residents in the town of Wells, whose police force became the only in Maine to enter into an agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement under what's called the 287(g) program.
After the 287(g) program was discontinued in 2012 due to the discovery of discriminatory practices such as racial profiling, Trump revived it to bolster ICE's capacity by deputizing local police officers to detain immigrants.
But Wells Police Department has since paused its agreement to see if the Legislature votes to ban such contracts. On Friday, Wells residents submitted a petition to their town manager with more than 900 signatures calling for the department to permanently terminate the agreement.
The Judiciary Committee opted to postpone until next year consideration of another bill, LD 1259, that seeks to explicitly prohibit these contracts, but LD 1971 would also have this effect.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ICE Agents in Despair Under Stephen Miller's Impossible Orders
A new report from The Atlantic's Nick Miroff finds morale at Immigration and Customs Enforcement is suffering as the agency, under the direction of President Trump and Homeland Security adviser Stephen Miller, targets undocumented immigrants who haven't committed crimes. While the Trump administration may claim its deportation campaign prioritizes violent criminals and gang members, in reality, it has focused on arresting noncriminals, evidently to hit quotas passed down by Trump and Miller. And while the administration may claim ICE agents are happier than ever, Miroff's report—based on conversations with 12 current and former ICE personnel—shows that the change is frustrating many agents and officers. One ICE veteran finds the job so 'infuriating' that the agent is considering quitting. 'No drug cases, no human trafficking, no child exploitation,' said the agent, who complained about having to focus instead on 'arresting gardeners.' A former agent told Miroff that 'morale is in the crapper,' and 'even those that are gung ho about the mission aren't happy with how they are asking to execute it—the quotas and the shift to the low-hanging fruit to make the numbers.' Another former ICE official suggested that this shift is vindicating criticisms the agency has faced in the past, observing, 'What we're seeing now is what, for many years, we were accused of being, and could always safely say, 'We don't do that.'' One of Miroff's interviewees was Adam Boyd, a young attorney who resigned from the agency's legal department because it's no longer focused on 'protecting the homeland from threats.' Instead, he said, 'It became a contest of how many deportations could be reported to Stephen Miller by December.' Boyd told Miroff: 'We still need good attorneys at ICE. There are drug traffickers and national-security threats and human-rights violators in our country who need to be dealt with. But we are now focusing on numbers over all else.' One former ICE official said that there are now 'national-security and public-safety threats that are not being addressed,' as the agency moves staff from its Homeland Security Investigations division, focused largely on transnational crime, to its Enforcement and Removal Operations division—a move that many perceive as retaliation for HSI in recent years distancing itself from the agency's deportation arm. When Miller issued his demand for 3,000 arrests per day, he reportedly steamrolled any veteran officials who dared to speak up about its impracticality, which has led many to keep silent since then for fear of drawing his ire, Miroff writes. This means that 'no one is saying, 'This is not obtainable,'' an ICE official told him. 'The answer is just to keep banging the [ICE rank-and-file] and tell [them] they suck. It's just not a good atmosphere.'
Business Insider
27 minutes ago
- Business Insider
U.S. Senators Warn Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang about His Trip to China
Two U.S. senators—Republican Jim Banks and Democrat Elizabeth Warren—sent a letter to Nvidia (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang on Friday, urging him to be cautious during his trip to China. They asked him not to meet with any companies that are believed to be helping China get around U.S. export restrictions, especially those connected to the Chinese military or intelligence agencies and that are listed on the U.S. export blacklist. The senators warned that even appearing to support these companies could weaken U.S. efforts to control advanced chip exports. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Huang's trip was scheduled for the same day the letter was sent. In response, an Nvidia spokesperson said that when American technology leads the global standard, 'America wins,' and noted that China has one of the world's largest groups of software developers. They added that AI systems should be designed to run best on U.S.-based hardware, which would encourage other countries to choose U.S. tech over alternatives. However, the concern from lawmakers is that Huang's meetings could expose weaknesses in current rules and send the wrong signal about America's stance on protecting its technology. This issue ties into recent tensions between Nvidia and U.S. regulators. At the Computex trade show in May, Huang praised President Donald Trump's decision to loosen some AI chip export rules and called the earlier restrictions ineffective. But newer limits put in place in April could still cost Nvidia up to $15 billion in lost revenue. Lawmakers are now considering laws that would require chipmakers to verify where their products end up. There are also growing fears that Chinese companies like DeepSeek are helping the military and using fake companies to dodge the rules. Despite all this, Nvidia is reportedly preparing a cheaper version of its Blackwell AI chips specifically for the Chinese market. What Is a Good Price for NVDA? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on NVDA stock based on 37 Buys, four Holds, and one Sell assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average NVDA price target of $176.29 per share implies 6.7% upside potential.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs will hit harder in the coming months, with traders growing weary of the trade drama, Morgan Stanley's CIO says
Tariff pain will be felt more acutely in the coming months, Mike Wilson says. The Morgan Stanley CIO predicts three consequences from tariffs that could show up this quarter. Stocks could take a hit as investors wait for more concrete trade deals to materialize, Wilson said. Morgan Stanley's chief investment officer says investors are growing weary of the trade drama, warning that tariffs' negative impacts could start showing up for companies and in markets soon. Mike Wilson, the chief US equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, said he foresaw a slew of consequences stemming from President Donald Trump's tariffs, which could begin to impact markets as soon as the third quarter. Investors have stayed relatively calm so far this week, despite Donald Trump escalating his trade war. The president announced fresh tariffs on more than 20 countries this week, a separate 50% tariff on copper imports, and pushed out his original deadline to August 1. "I would say, 'Here we go again,'" Wilson said, speaking to Bloomberg on Friday about the latest tariff announcements. Here's what Wilson sees ahead. Investors are familiar with Trump's tariff negotiating playbook after seeing the president whipsaw on his trade policy during Liberation Day, Wilson said. "I mean, this is President Trump's style. He goes hard, and then he, you know, he doesn't back off completely, but it's a back-and-forth," Wilson said. But traders hungry for more concrete trade deals could soon grow tired of the drama, Wilson said. Trump — whose team once pushed the idea of 90 trade deals in 90 days — hasn't nailed down many deals with trading partners yet. "That's not going to work forever. Eventually we have to get to some deals," Wilson said. "There will become a point of exhaustion, is the way I like to think about it." Corporations have been shielded from the impact of tariffs so far, thanks to businesses relying on existing inventory to sell products to consumers. But that could change in the next few months, Wilson said. Smaller corporations could be especially affected in third quarter earnings season, he added, as they don't have as much pricing power to be able to pass along the cost of tariffs to consumers. "It hasn't begun to flow through to pricing or margins. But that we think begins to change in the third quarter, and that could be the catalyst, because stocks will react to a hit in margins," he added. Inflation could also begin to creep higher in the third quarter as tariffs finally start to work their way through the economy, Wilson speculated. Tariffs are widely thought to raise inflation, as companies can hike prices to offset the cost of import duties. That could also push out the market's expectations for interest rate cuts, as the Fed will look to keep rates elevated if inflation grows hotter. "Perhaps we get a spike in inflation, which, you know, then causes the Fed to sound more hawkish, and the market will care about that for sure," Wilson added. Read the original article on Business Insider
