Ireland mother-and-baby-home scandal: Tuam excavation to start soon, uncovers dark history of children's burial
In 2014, the now 71-year-old produced evidence that 796 children, from newborns to a 9-year-old, died at Tuam's mother-and-baby home.
Her research pointed to the children's likely final resting place: a disused septic tank discovered in 1975.
'There are no burial records for the children, no cemetery, no statue, no cross, absolutely nothing,' Corless said.
It was only in 2022 that legislation was passed in Parliament enabling the excavation work to start at Tuam.
Historian Catherine Corless poses on the site of the former St Mary's Mother and Baby Home, in Tuam, in the outskirts of Galway, western Ireland, a site believed to contain a mass grave of children and mothers. Photo / AFP
Dark shadow
'It's been a fierce battle. When I started this, nobody wanted to listen. At last we are righting the wrongs,' Corless said.
'I was just begging: take the babies out of this sewage system and give them the decent Christian burial that they were denied,' she added.
In findings published in 2021, the Commission of Investigation found 'disquieting' levels of infant mortality at the institutions.
Women pregnant outside of wedlock were siloed in the so-called mother-and-baby homes by society, run by the state and the Catholic church, which has historically held an iron grip on Irish attitudes.
After giving birth at the homes, mothers were then separated from their children, often through adoption.
The state-backed inquiries sparked by the discoveries in Tuam found that 56,000 unmarried women and 57,000 children passed through 18 such homes over 76 years.
The commission report concluded that 9000 children had died in the homes across Ireland.
Often church and state worked in tandem to run the institutions, which still operated in Ireland as recently as 1998.
Homes were run in various ways – some funded and managed by local health authorities and others by Catholic religious orders such as the Bon Secours nuns who managed the Tuam home.
'All these babies and children were baptised but still the church turned a blind eye. It just didn't matter, they were illegitimate, that's the stance that they took,' Corless said.
Analysis at the Tuam site in 2016 and 2017 identified human remains in underground cavities. A commission of investigation later concluded that they were in a disused sewage tank.
But it was only in 2022 that legislation was passed in Parliament, enabling the works to start there.
For Anna Corrigan, 70, who was in her mid-50s when she learned that her late mother gave birth in secret to two boys, John and William, in Tuam, the slow process has been 'justice, Irish-style'.
As no death certificate was ever issued for William, and John's death was not medically certified, the few official documents Corrigan has been able to access have left her with more questions than answers.
'Dirty little secrets'
In her kitchen, she showed AFP a copy of a 1947 inspection report of the Tuam home.
It described John as 'a miserable, emaciated child', even though he was born healthy a year earlier.
Both could be buried in Tuam, according to Corrigan, while William may also have been illegally adopted out of the country.
'They prevaricate, they obfuscate, they make it difficult for people to get to the truth,' she said.
'There are dirty little secrets in Ireland that have to be kept hidden. Ireland has a wholesome reputation around the world but there's also a dark, sinister side,' she said.
A team was finally appointed in 2023 to lead the Tuam site excavation, tasked with recovering, memorialising and re-burying remains recovered at the site once the work starts.
Sample DNA will be taken from people who have reasonable grounds to believe they are a close relative.
'I never thought I'd see the day that we'd get over so many hurdles – push them to finally excavating what I call the 'pit', not a grave,' said Corrigan.
'I'm glad it's starting, but if we can even find and identify a certain amount, it's not going to give us all closure,' she said.
– Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Exploring diligently throughout Question Time
When I get back from leave, I am going to have to find out if the HR department is in cahoots with the government. The two occasions I took a break last year coincided with one of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's two visits to Dunedin, and the other with Health Minister Simeon Brown's trip to town. So naturally as soon as I headed out the door last week Mr Brown was back in Dunedin again for another hospital announcement — one slightly more palatable than the last one. I still have some way to go to beat my much-respected former boss Audrey Young: her holidays had such a spooky habit of coinciding with party leaders being rolled that it came to be known as "the curse of Audrey" — but it's still a little frustrating. So having missed all the fun, let's go back in time to Parliament's last sitting week, and Wednesday's Question Time, which may have set a record. Of the 12 questions, a quarter were asked by southern MPs ... although maybe only a third of those elicited anything which might have been of any interest to their constituents. First up was Act New Zealand Southland list MP Todd Stephenson, who got to ask the acting Prime Minister — who, coincidentally, just happened to be his party leader David Seymour — the hardy perennial of whether he stood by all his government's statements and actions? Spoiler alert: yes, he did ... particularly the NZ Infrastructure Commission's freshly announced National Infrastructure Plan. Mr Stephenson followed up by asking about access to new medicines — which the man who is also an associate health minister with responsibility for drug-buying agency Pharmac was more than happy to talk about — and then GPs (ditto). It was going so well, but Mr Stephenson then incurred the Speaker's wrath by asking his leader to comment on comments made once upon a time by the little-remembered Labour MP Charles Chauvel about the Regulatory Standards Bill. "No, that's not something you [Mr Seymour] can make any comment on whatsoever. So sit down and have another go at the question," the Speaker harumphed. Fair play to Mr Stephenson; he found a cunning way around the Speaker's edict by asking if the acting PM agreed with any statements that he had recently seen in relation to the Regulatory Standards Bill. "Well, I do, as a matter of fact," Mr Seymour replied with glee, before embarking on the sort of answer which makes Gerry Brownlee turn puce. Q10, from National Waitaki MP Miles Anderson, was much more benign, as he asked Agriculture Minister Todd McClay about the government's plan to ban full farm-to-forestry conversions — as covered in last week's Southern Say. No alarms and no surprises here, as Mr McClay gave a suitably apocalyptic answer to Mr Anderson's question: "What is the impact on rural communities of whole farm-to-forest conversions?" Q11, from Labour Taieri MP Ingrid Leary to Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka on proposed changes to the Retirement Villages Act, was when things got really interesting. She wanted to know if the draft legislation would include "provisions for repayments but not mandate them". This is a topic close to Ms Leary's heart (she has a member's Bill in the ballot on just this subject), not to mention thousands of retirement village residents and their families affected by the issue. Most villages operate under an occupation rights (ORA) agreement system, whereby residents buy the right to live in what might well be their final home, but not ownership of it. That sum is then held until the ORA ends. An ORA does not come cheap — in the realm of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Which is high, true, but which may also be fair enough in some circumstances: villages are expensive to build and costly to run. But an ORA comes with associated bonds and fees, and gruesome tales abound of residents, or their families, being obliged to pay fees after moving to a higher-care unit or dying. Also problematic is the process of getting out of an ORA. The village will usually claim a portion of the ORA as an "exit fee" and then resell the ORA. However, that right may well have accumulated a considerable capital gain in the intervening period — something that the former ORA owner cannot benefit from. Many, and Ms Leary is one, think this effectively means villages are enjoying an interest-free loan from their residents — albeit that they receive a secure and comfortable lifestyle and residence for their golden years. Consumer has been running a campaign for years on the issue of what it sees as unfair retirement village contracts; Mosgiel's Brian Peat, president of the Retirement Village Residents' Association, has also been hot on the topic for a number of years. Mr Potaka has bad news for Ms Leary, saying that the Northern Advocate article on which she has based her question had been incorrect Undeterred, she then asked if Mr Potaka would commit now to mandating fair repayment times and terms. "There are a number of matters that we are considering as part of a broader reform of this matter, including dispute resolution protections, and a wide range of consumer protections and various matters, including those that the member referred to, will be considered and are still under active consideration," Mr Potaka replied reassuringly ... but not reassuringly enough for Ms Leary, who pointedly followed up with: "What other sectors are there where people have no control over when someone pays them back their own money?" That was quite a broad and open question, Mr Potaka replied, but he could say that the government was "responsibly reviewing" a wide variety of matters, including consumer protections for elderly folks living in retirement villages. Would that include, perhaps supporting a law change which would require operators to give residents their money back within three months, Ms Leary wondered, knowing full well that such a Bill existed. "If the member is asking me to jump in front of Cabinet and make decisions by way of a question and answer session, I will not be doing that," Mr Potaka said. "What I will be doing is diligently and professionally undertaking my responsibility as associate minister of housing to explore these issues and bring these matters through the policy decisions and, ultimately, to this fine chamber." But whether that exploration makes anyone happy is a question for another day.
The Spinoff
5 days ago
- The Spinoff
The odds of the new suicide prevention action plan succeeding are slim to none
To truly reduce suicide rates in Aotearoa, we need to think beyond rehashed policies and one-size-fits-all prevention tactics, writes counsellor Anna Sophia. This post contains discussion of suicide: please take care. For a list of resources that can help if you or someone you know is feeling suicidal, see below. When someone close to you dies by suicide, the space-time continuum cracks open. One moment, you're living your ordinary life; the next, you've been sucked into a vortex. You replay the graphic details of their death over and over. You tell yourself that if you cycle through it one more time you might discover a glitch in the chaotic world system that could bring them back. Soon enough the painful reality sinks in. They made a choice and they are not returning. In Aotearoa, a dark cloud descends and takes away more people each year than car accidents. Psychiatrist and author Kay Redfield Jamison, in Night Falls Fast (1999), describes suicidal despair as a complete loss of hope accompanied by overwhelming psychological pain. People in this state believe that nothing will ever improve. They feel trapped, alone and unable to see any other options. The aftermath of losing someone by suicide is fraught with flashbacks and self-questioning. It blows apart the layered veneers of your life. While you do eventually rebuild, one fragile piece at a time, you always carry with you two unanswerable questions: 1) Why did they do it? 2) Was there anything I could have done to stop it? Over the course of my six decades of life, I have experienced more than my share of this aftermath personally and professionally. In 1990, when my father was 56 years old, he killed himself. It was a cold, wet night in early June. He didn't leave a note, just a couple of TAB tickets with 'good tickets' scrawled on the back. (Yes we checked them. They were not winners.) My father was a heavy drinker and a gambling man, a New Zealand Navy veteran who had joined up as a teenager just in time for dispatch to the Korean War. When he wasn't drinking, even on blue sky days he lay morosely on the couch in a darkened room, chain smoking Pall Mall filters and not speaking. Thirty-five years ago, men like my father did not talk about their feelings, let alone seek counselling. In many parts of Aotearoa, not much has changed. When I was nine years old we lived in Te Awamutu and I attended the Catholic school there. (The Finn brothers did too but they are older than me.) That year two of my class mates lost their fathers to suicide. In the 1990s a university friend died in a mental health ward shortly after her baby was born. Later that decade my former university lecturer, a person of immense talent took her own life, and two years ago my long-time friend Paula died in a suspected suicide. As a counsellor, I have listened to many stories from people who have lost loved ones to suicide and from others who had either attempted to take their own life or seriously considered it. Last week, the latest suicide prevention action plan was published. It looks similar to its predecessors with a few extra embellishments. My father loved horse racing so I'll use his language: it's a rank outsider, the odds of winning are slim to none, and I'm not betting my money on it. In 2008, MP Jim Anderton, whose daughter died by suicide, said: 'We are already fortunate in New Zealand to have people with a range of expertise who are committed to suicide prevention. And we have a variety of initiatives happening right now and contributing to suicide prevention across the country.' Seventeen years later nothing has changed and suicide remains one of our most complex health and social issues. Suicide is an emotive subject and it remains difficult to have open and transparent conversations about it. Media restrictions, a historical residue of whakama and sheer discomfort means bereaved people are often met with silence. I think the silence is the inability of many people to hold the horror and complexity of this kind of death. Alongside shock, grief and overwhelming sadness, there can also be anger and sometimes feelings of relief. In the year ended June 30, 2024, just over 600 people died by suicide. If each had 50 people in their circle – whānau, friends, colleagues, classmates – then 30,000 people this year are carrying that loss and asking the same questions I did. Why did they do it? Was there anything I could have done to stop it? If we want to reduce suicide rates in Aotearoa, we need to think beyond rehashed policies that paper over the cracks in our socioeconomic system. Community initiatives often flicker into life then burn out due to underfunding or exhaustion. In the 2000s, Rick Stevenson biked around the country as a part of his organisation Project Hope, launched after his son Mike's suicide. He wanted mental health education to be mandatory in all secondary schools. I knew Mike. When I dropped out of high school and worked as a cook in a weed-spraying gang, Mike was part of the crew. He and I stayed up late drinking and dreaming up future selves. He was contemplative and intelligent, and his death cut short a future filled with possibilities. If I gathered everyone I know who has died by suicide into a room, the only thing they'd have in common would be their self-inflicted death. One-size-fits-all prevention tactics won't work. A deeper, more nuanced approach is required. Late last year I wrote about the community counselling centre in Marton, in the Southern Rangitīkei district where I work as a manager and counsellor. Oranga Tamariki, with which we had previously enjoyed a long relationship, responded to a mandate from government to cut its spending, and our funding – along with that of similar organisations – was slashed. While the Counselling Centre is unlikely to be on the receiving end of funding from the new suicide prevention initiatives, there is no doubt that in our corner of rural Aotearoa we are stopping people taking their own lives. We've been keeping accurate statistics for 26 years. Most of our clients are depressed. Over 50% are referred from local GP clinics and often the referral notes will say, 'Has suicidal thoughts but no plan to action.' We have on hand evaluations stating the counselling they received made a difference to their lives. Although our organisation is small, it reflects the broader population of Aotearoa. Similar community-based initiatives exist across the country, doing critical preventative work in the mental health realm. After my article was published, local National MP Suze Redmayne visited the centre. We drank coffee and talked and she appeared impressed by our service. She said she would chat with mental health minister Matt Doocey and maybe organise for him to visit us. To date, I haven't heard from either of them. Repeated emails to Oranga Tamariki asking them to restore our funding have also gone unanswered. Our service is still running thanks to philanthropic community support but we have had to reduce our availability from five days a week to four. The Auditor General's report released last month sharply criticised Oranga Tamariki's cuts, noting poor documentation, late decisions and inadequate understanding of the impact of the cuts on children and whanau. How can we have faith in a government that on one hand takes away proven preventative mental healthcare funding and on the other claims it can reduce something as complex as suicide rates? While I strongly back therapeutic support, especially free counselling, I also take a broader sociological view of improving overall mental health and wellbeing. Suicide prevention isn't just a matter of services or slogans. It demands that we reckon with how we live – as individuals and as a society. John Weaver's Sorrows of a Century: Interpreting Suicide in New Zealand (2014) is a powerful exploration of 12,000 coroners' reports from 1900–2000. He concludes that suicide must be understood within wider social forces: economic insecurity, war, illness, trauma. He advocates for 'deep prevention': long-term investment in meaningful employment, cradle-to-grave healthcare, and far-reaching education. He describes these ideas as 'utopian' but necessary, and emphasises extensive social action to improve lives before they slump into despair about the future. Since the book's publication, new stressors have emerged: a devastating pandemic, runaway technology, climate crises, and the psychological burden of constant global violence. In Aotearoa, the cost of living has risen dramatically. The cost of renting even substandard accommodation is taking a huge portion of household income. Every day I walk past long lines of hungry people queueing for food at a local food rescue. The government's suicide prevention plan also doesn't reflect on deeper holistic considerations – like our relationship to Papatūānuku. Contemporary capitalist society has severed us from the whenua and desensitised us from knowing the deeper parts of ourselves which then impacts our relationships with each other. Many people I meet – not just clients – struggle to name what they are truly feeling or to even locate that feeling within their own body. Capitalism demands our compliance and silence. Even our bereavement policy – three days' leave – suggests a culture that minimises death and grief. How can you return to your workplace bereaved by any death, and especially suicide, after just three days? To work with solutions for just an individual is pointless, and no plan, however well-meaning, will reduce suicide numbers if we are blind to the stresses of the socioeconomic and ecological environments where despair festers. As sociologist Alison Pugh writes, 'we are living through a crisis not just of loneliness but of human invisibility'. I haven't lost hope. Not because of any single plan, but because of the people I meet each day doing their best to heal and create fulfilling lives for themselves and their whanau. This is where suicide prevention truly lives – not in glossy plans, policies and shallow governmental rhetoric, but in community, care and the slow, quiet work of rebuilding what we've lost. TAUTOKO Suicide Crisis Helpline – 0508 828 865
Otago Daily Times
29-06-2025
- Otago Daily Times
Faster treatment not always fairest
Anyone who has struggled to get elective surgery will not be surprised a report from the Auditor-general shows the post code lottery in healthcare is in better shape than they are. In the report, "Providing equitable access to planned care treatment", tabled in Parliament last week, John Ryan says the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act requires Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora to ensure Māori and other population health groups have equitable access to the health services they need. This means ensuring access to elective or planned treatment is based on clinical need, not background, circumstances or where they live. He concluded the way treatment is provided is often not equitable or timely. It depends on where you live. Those waiting longer are disproportionately those living in rural areas, those socially deprived, Māori, Pacific peoples, and those with disabilities. Thresholds to qualify for treatment are not consistent across the country, a throwback from the old district health board days, and although there is work under way to introduce national thresholds, this is not going to happen overnight. A national threshold has been introduced for cataract treatment. This meant about 1800 people were added to the waiting list in the Southern district. The report shows the huge variance in the orthopaedic thresholds. In Southern, for instance, your condition would need to be significantly worse to qualify for treatment than if you were in Canterbury or Auckland. The Auditor-general is far from the first to raise concerns the government's emphasis on using the private sector to provide more timely treatment could result in less equitable access to treatment. For a start, private hospitals providing outsourced treatment are not equally distributed across the country. (Health Minister Simeon Brown has downplayed this issue, citing the availability of the National Travel Assistance Scheme to help those who have to travel away from home for treatment. However, despite some improvement to the rates last year, this still leaves anybody travelling a long distance by car for treatment considerably out of pocket.) As the report notes, those selected for treatment in private would generally be non-complex patients. Patients with comorbidities making them unsuitable for treatment at the private hospitals were more likely to be Māori and Pasifika or socially deprived. Another issue raised in the report was the lack of translation services in some private clinics, so they might not accept patients with no or limited English language. Complex patients not suitable for private hospital treatment would remain on a waiting list in a public hospital while others with similar clinical needs would be treated privately. "This can complicate efforts to ensure that long-waiting routine patients are prioritised and, ultimately, that Health New Zealand provides treatment equitably for all New Zealanders." Making changes in one part of the stretched health system can often affect another part, something not always fully appreciated by policy makers. The report points out, for instance, when clinicians spend more time providing planned care, they have less time to provide first specialist assessments. Another concern of the Auditor-general is the lack of information about unmet need, and although he acknowledged this could be difficult, HNZ would benefit from a better understanding of it. "A good place to start would be to measure the level of unmet need from people who are referred for assessment but do not meet current treatment thresholds," he wrote. There have been calls for better understanding of unmet need for years, but little enthusiasm from politicians to assess this in a comprehensive way, possibly because they are fearful of what it would expose. Mr Ryan's planned care recommendations for HNZ include making a plan with clear times for introducing nationally consistent thresholds, acting to improve equity of access and ensuring faster access did not increase inequity, strengthening knowledge of unmet need, and clear public reporting on how long people wait for treatment, variations in access and how it will improve equity of access. The issues raised in the report should be taken seriously by HNZ and its political masters, but the government's almost simplistic focus on its narrow set of health targets does not convince us they will be.
