‘Insult to daughters of the nation': Amid row over MP minister's jibe, NCW chief Vijaya Rahatkar bats for Colonel Sofiya Qureshi
Rahatkar made the remarks in a post on X. While she did not name anybody, her post comes after Shah, a minister in the BJP government in Madhya Pradesh, said earlier this week that those who had widowed India's daughters were taught a lesson by Prime Minister Narendra Modi using their 'own sister'. The Congress had alleged that Shah was referring to Colonel Qureshi, who briefed the media on Operation Sindoor last week.
In her post, Rahatkar wrote, 'It is extremely unfortunate that statements are being made by some responsible persons which are derogatory and unacceptable towards women. This not only hurts the dignity of women in our society but is also an insult to the daughters of the nation who are playing an important role in the security of the country.'
'Dear Colonel Sofiya Qureshi is a proud daughter of this nation, a sister of all Indians who love their country, who has served the country with courage and dedication. It is our responsibility to respect her hard work, dedication, and leadership skills. The entire country is proud of brave women like Colonel Sofiya, and such derogatory statements against her should be strongly condemned,' Rahatkar further wrote.
Rahatkar also referred to the CBSE board exam results announced on Tuesday, in which girls outperformed boys, saying, 'When girls have once again proved their mettle by performing brilliantly in the latest CBSE results, it becomes even more important that we adopt a respectful attitude towards women. To move towards a progressive nation, it is necessary that women move ahead and lead in every field. Everyone is urged to adopt a respectful language and attitude towards women in public life.'
She added: 'Underestimating the participation and contribution of women is not only unacceptable but also an obstacle to the development of the country.'
Rahatkar's post came on a day when Aam Aadmi Party leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh criticised Shah for his remarks, saying he 'should be removed from the Cabinet and arrested'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Monsoon session: Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla convenes all party meeting, urges Opposition members to let House function
Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Friday called for an all-party meeting after the lower house was adjourned amid sloganeering and protests by Opposition members, urging for members to let the house function properly. During the meeting, there was also a discussion regarding a session on Operation Sindoor. The proposed 16-hour discussion in Parliament is set for July 28. Earlier today, both the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha were adjourned. While the upper house is set to meet now on Monday 11 AM, Lok Sabha is set to convene again at 2 PM. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla has called for the House to function with discussions and dialogues, including the Question Hour, to continue, amid protests by Opposition members demanding a discussion on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar. Efforts are currently being made to reach a consensus during the all-party meeting. The opposition MPs have been demanding a discussion on several key issues of public importance, including the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise being carried out by the Election Commission (EC) in Bihar ahead of the upcoming assembly elections. Live Events "There's a way to register a protest. If you don't want to run the house is adjourned till 2:00 PM today," Birla said earlier while addressing the lower house, as the Opposition members entered the well of the house, holding placards. Before adjourning, the Speaker urged the opposition members to allow the lower house to function normally and objected to the banners, saying that the "stalemate" is not good. "Come, there will be a discussion to end the stalemate. There will also be representatives from the there is disagreement, it should be expressed as per house norms," Birla said. Earlier in the day, Congress MP Manickam Tagore moved an adjournment motion notice to discuss the "Mass Disenfranchisement of 52 Lakh Voters in Bihar", which he called as a "deliberate assault on the constitution and democracy by the Modi Government using the Election Commission." The Parliament has witnessed frequent adjournments for the last four days since it began on July 21. Yesterday, the proceedings in both houses of Parliament were adjourned for the day amid protests by the opposition. Meanwhile, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Friday joined the protest by MPs of the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance (INDIA) against the ongoing SIR of voter rolls in poll-bound Bihar. The protest, which entered its fifth consecutive day, was held at Parliament's Makar Dwar. Several senior Congress leaders, including the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi , and party leader Priyanka Gandhi, also participated in the protest.
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
Parliament Unfiltered: I Came, I Saw But Did I Question it?
If our parliament can specially meet to celebrate anniversaries, why not for issues like terrorist attacks, inflation, unemployment, women's safety or climate change? Opposition MPs protest in Lok Sabha demanding rollback of Bihar SIR during the monsoon session of parliament. Photo: PTI June 30 marks the International Day of Parliamentarism every year and its commemoration seems more valid as the downhill status of democracies all over the world comes to mind. An incisive couplet by John Dryden states, 'Democracy is essentially anti-authoritarian – that is, it not only demands the right but imposes the responsibility of thinking for ourselves.' V-dem or the Varieties of Democracy index, published in March of this year, points out that India is experiencing 'Autocratization'. Honouring this day in its right spirit calls for a systematic analysis of the developments in the parliament in recent years, acknowledging citizen discontent registering the damage and calling on to policymakers for a reformation that is as much internal as is political. Special session: A hot potato? The demand by opposition parties for a special session post Pahalgam terror attack and the government's reluctance to take it up poses a lot of questions about the direction our democracy is heading towards. The terror attack's implications have been on everyone's lips since April 22 when it blurred the boundaries between black and white. Arguing that 'it is crucial for the people and their representatives to discuss', Congress MP and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi had written to Modi demanding a special session (followed by subsequent similar demands), but received no response from the government and an uncanny silence reluctance. A few incidents highlighted the need of a special session: the defence ministers' meeting at SCO concluded without a joint statement due to a lack of consensus on whether there should be strict dialogue against terrorism; the United States' President, Donald Trump, announcing a ceasefire between India and pakistan speaks volumes of New Delhi's geopolitical standing and decisions MEA has taken, putting a question mark on the future of our foreign policy; deputy chief of army staff Lieutenant General Rahul R. Singh emphasised China's involvement during Operation Sindoor. It is to be noted that he is the first such official to talk about it, while others have been constantly downplaying China's role, giving a clear indication about the unaligned opinions of our defence officials. Chief of defence staff General Anil Chauhan acknowledged loss of aircraft and downing of jets during the four day clashes with Pakistan recently, evading deeper questions about why, how and how many losses we actually suffered, raising questions about the government's credibility. Here's what makes me question the government's indifference to the demand: in 2017, a joint midnight session was held to launch goods and services tax (GST); in 2023, a special session was held to commemorate the 75th anniversary of India's independence in the new parliament building; and the law on women's reservation in parliament and state assemblies was also passed during this special session. All of these are issues that coincidentally align with the ruling BJP-led government's ideologies and an apparent sense of effort is felt when the same special sessions are demanded in the aftermath of terrorist attacks that sent the whole nation into shock. A backdrop of dissent: Reluctance as refusal to reimagine The list of reluctances is longer than just the demand for a special session, the unfulfillment of which is saddening. The lesser number of sittings, shorter sessions, budget being guillotined and passing of bills within minutes – they all point towards a sorry state of affairs. Lok Sabha's sittings have come down from an average of 135 in a year in the first term of Lok Sabha to just 55 in the 17th. A research by PRS suggests that in 2020, the Indian parliament sat in session for 33 days only, a historic low. When Covid struck and suspended the daily lives of millions of people, the Indian parliament sat shut while many others switched to functioning online or in hybrid mode and met on set dates like in the UK, Australia, Canada and South Africa. The Supreme Court of UK, in 2019, struck down the prorogation of parliament by the Queen as it prevented 'Parliament from being able to do its job.' Canada organised a virtual parliament, allowing MPs to ask questions over a video call, while Chile amended its constitution, permitting the senate to hold sessions in a mixed face-to-face and virtual mode, with remote voting, preventing the compromise on sittings. Sessions have been cancelled and called off on various occasions due to unnecessary reasons, like for the Vidhan Sabha elections in five states in 2011, when political parties agreed to cut short the budget session. In 2017, 2018, 2022 and 2023, winter session was delayed and curtailed because of assembly elections, stifling the parliament's power as an effective institution. The government's unilateral power to decide where, when and on what agenda the session takes place robs citizens of their right to question through elected representatives, equating the opposition's power of check and balance to zero. In the 17th Lok Sabha, 11 out of the 15 sessions were adjourned early. As a result, 40 scheduled sittings did not take place. Parliament: Rejuvenation of rights or erosion of efficacy? In 2004, 2013, 2018 and 2023, 100% of the budget was guillotined, meaning it was not debated at all before being passed. In the monsoon session of 2020, the controversy around farm bills was used by the government as an excuse to push through 15 bills in just eight hours in the absence of opposition due to their boycott. In 2021, during monsoon session again, Lok Sabha cleared 18 bills amid protests by the opposition who demanded debate on farmers' protests and the Pegasus spyware scandal. Disappointingly enough, in 2023, the opposition protested in demand for a discussion on the Manipur crisis but the Rajya Sabha passed a bill within just 3 minutes. Even a papdi chaat cannot be prepared in 3 minutes! Many other controversial bills, like forest conservation amendment bill and digital personal data protection bill, were also passed quickly with no opposition MP participating in debate. Every citizen wants laws to be passed with clear deliberation, intense discussion and stakeholder consultation on the merits and demerits through parliamentary committees, but that is not happening anymore. The percentage of bills referred to parliament standing committees has been just 60%, 71%, 25%, 16% and 20% between the 14th and the 18th Lok Sabha (so far), respectively. Can we ever unsee that? All this evidence forces me to challenge the parliament as a democratic institution and dub it as the government's bill passing factory. This might sound dystopian, but the country's highest institution for lawmaking as we are taught in school books has blatantly failed to live up to its name and fame. A meeting was indeed convened on April 24 with the presence of ministers and leaders from all parties. The absence of the prime minister pointed towards the lack of importance allotted to contemporary issues of national relevance. However, a meeting doesn't suffice for a well-organised session and ultimately the special session never took place. This concerning trend effectively calls to question the accountable executive, stable legislature and righteous judiciary we preach other democracies about. Are we fooling ourselves? To conclude All I wonder as a young person struggling to mark my presence in this democracy is that if our parliament can specially meet to celebrate anniversaries, why not for issues like terrorist attacks, inflation, unemployment, women's safety or climate change? Such is the resistance of the government to debate controversial issues like Pahalgam terror attack, electoral rolls revision in Bihar, etc that it would rather let the opposition protest and disrupt proceedings than schedule the debate. The ongoing 21-day-short monsoon session of parliament has already lost more than four days to early adjournments. The need of the hour are longer parliament sessions so that there is time and space for discussion on all these urgent issues. The parliament exists to deliberate on issues that matter to us – the country's citizens – and is not an instrument of celebrating the myriad meaningless milestones of the government. Readers of this article must rise to summon their questioning capacity and become active agents of change. As Dryden said, let's take the responsibility of thinking for ourselves, ourselves! Just as the age-old saying goes, 'Fine words butter no parsnips', we, as citizens, demand an effective resolution to issues coupled with a proactive approach to accountability. It is high time we stopped taking empty promises for real action and impact. Questioning today may guarantee us a better place in next year's democracy index – the one we blankly stare at every year. The true commemoration of International Day of Parliamentarism will only take place the moment we truly become 'citizens' and not 'followers'. It is imperative for us to demand accountability as we are the demos (people) in this democracy. Guncha Shandilya is a student of history at University of Delhi and worked on this article as part of her research internship with Maadhyam, a civic engagement initiative. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
From AWACS To Tejas: What Rs 87,000 Crore Defence Deal Will Bring For IAF
These two defence deals worth Rs 87,000 crore will not only boost the Indian Air Force's strength but also give a major push to the country's domestic defence sector Amid rising global tensions and fresh conflicts in East Asia, India is fast-tracking the modernisation of its Air Force in response to growing threats from neighbouring China and Pakistan. The recent Pahalgam terror attack and the swift success of Operation Sindoor have highlighted the urgent need for advanced aerial capabilities, especially after revelations that China provided Pakistan with real-time intelligence during the conflict. With an evolving regional arms race and mounting security challenges, India is set to invest heavily in next-gen air technology to safeguard its borders and maintain strategic superiority. According to reports, a significant defence deal worth Rs 87,000 crore is underway to enhance the Air Force's capabilities. The government has already approved a Rs 20,000 crore deal, with another Rs 67,000 crore agreement likely to receive approval soon. The agreement is reportedly in its final stages and could be announced at any time. On one hand, these two defence deals worth Rs 87,000 crore will significantly boost the strength of the Indian Air Force; on the other, they are expected to give a major push to the domestic defence sector. Interestingly, neither the purchase of BrahMos cruise missiles nor any foreign fighter jets like the Rafale are part of these deals. At the heart of NETRA Mk-II is its indigenously developed AESA radar, which will be mounted on each aircraft to provide 360-degree real-time coverage. This advanced system can detect, track, and identify enemy aircraft, missiles, UAVs, and select ground targets far beyond India's borders. Unlike its predecessor, the Mk-II uses cutting-edge gallium nitride (GaN)-based AESA technology, offering improved detection range and enhanced resistance to jamming. Tejas Fighter Deal Worth Rs 67,000 Crore Furthermore, the Defence Ministry is expected to greenlight a new batch of Tejas MK1A fighter jets. The government is finalising a Rs 67,000 crore contract with Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) for 97 additional Tejas MK-1A fighter jets, crucial for modernising the Indian Air Force and expanding its operational fighter jet squadrons from the current 30 to the authorised strength of 42. This acquisition aims to increase combat readiness and replace ageing aircraft like the MiG-21. This latest Rs 67,000 crore deal follows a previous Rs 48,000 crore contract for 83 Tejas MK-1AA jets signed in February 2021. India Accelerates Air Force Upgrade India's commitment to enhancing its Air Force capabilities continues, highlighted by the purchase of Rafale fighter jets from France and considerations for acquiring fifth-generation fighter jets to address immediate needs. Concurrently, work is progressing rapidly on the AMCA project to develop indigenous fifth-generation fighter aircraft, with bids invited for a Rs 15,000 crore prototype design initiative involving both government and private sector companies. Alongside fighter jets, advancements are being made in missile development, evidenced by India's recent successful test of a hypersonic missile. Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
