SEBI set to deepen equity mkt; derivatives a cause of concern
'Very short-term derivatives continue to dominate equity derivative volumes, especially expiry-day index options. This is an imbalance that is obviously unhealthy and may have potential for adverse consequences,' said Sebi Whole-Time Member Ananth Narayan.
He was addressing the 11th Capital Markets Conclave organised by the CII.
'I would strongly endorse the view that, towards this end, we must look for ways to further deepen our cash equities markets, even as we look to improve the quality of our derivatives market by extending the tenure and maturity of the products and solutions on offer. We need constructive engagement from all stakeholders to achieve this,' he said.
Citing the market regulator's own research, Narayan pointed out that 91 per cent of individual traders in futures and options (F&O) incurred net losses in FY25 - collectively losing over Rs 1 lakh crore - funds that could otherwise contribute to responsible investing and capital formation.
He highlighted that the Indian derivatives market is unique, with expiry-day index option turnover often exceeding the cash market by as much as 350 times.
'Unlike longer-term derivatives, these short-term products contribute little to capital formation and may actually add to market volatility,' Narayan said.
While acknowledging that exchanges, brokers, and other intermediaries have significant revenue dependence on such trading volumes, the Sebi official questioned the sustainability of this trend.
'Is all this at all sustainable?' he asked.
Sebihas already introduced regulatory measures in October 2024 and May 2025 aimed at curbing excesses in this space, which Narayan said are showing some early signs of moderation. However, he emphasised the need for continuous engagement with stakeholders to ensure that both capital formation and market health are protected.
'We must look for ways to deepen our cash equities markets while improving the quality of derivatives through longer-tenure products,' Narayan said, urging industry collaboration.
Responding to a question, he underscored the advantages of listing, particularly in the current environment where valuations are 'very, very attractive. Going public can unlock substantial value and enable companies to raise capital in a 'very meaningful manner,' acting as a 'force multiplier' for achieving scale and growth.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
5 minutes ago
- India.com
After two failed businesses, This Delhi man built Rs 200000000 company in just 3 years, his unique idea was to..., his net worth is...
New Delhi: From facing early setbacks in his father's established business to founding his own refurbished mobile phone business, Neeraj Chopra's entrepreneurial journey has all the makings of a Bollywood blockbuster — drama, setbacks, a unique idea, and an impressive comeback. Today, when everyone has a mobile phone in their hand, Neeraj turned this very device into a business worth crores. Without any major investment or marketing, he launched a startup named Zobox, which refurbishes old mobile phones and sells them again — all in an eco-friendly manner. In a mere three years, Zobox has achieved a turnover of Rs. 20 crore. The range of mobile phones available at Zobox spans across various well-known brands, ensuring there's something for every customer. 'Opting for refurbished mobile phones allows our customers to save money while also playing a part in creating a sustainable future,' says Neeraj, the founder of Delhi-based Zobox to the Weekend Leader. 'We are all about making eco-friendly choices and promoting responsible consumerism.' All you need to know about Zobox: Zobox's refurbished phones are priced 30-50 per cent lower than the maximum retail price of new models. The refurbished phones come with a six-month warranty For instance, if a brand-new handset costs Rs. 10,000, Zobox offers the refurbished version of the same model for just Rs. 3,000-5,000. Each phone listed on the Zobox app 'Zobiz' undergoes a rigorous inspection and certification process, guaranteeing quality and reliability. Launched in December 2020, Zobox operates under the registered name, Zobox Retails Private Limited. Started in 2020 with just Rs 50 lakh in capital and a team of 8–10 people, the company crossed a turnover of Rs 20 crore in just three years. Today, Neeraj's net worth is around Rs 37 crore, and Zobox is rapidly expanding its footprint across the country. Neeraj Chopra: Man Who Earned Rs 20 Crore Business in Just Three Years Neeraj was born into a business-class family in Delhi Neeraj's initial business experiences were marked by struggles and learning curves. His father, who was trading in pesticides and seeds, later ventured into the wholesale business of electronic components in Delhi's renowned Old Lajpat Rai Market. Neeraj finished his Class 12 at Naval Public School, Delhi, in 1998 Neeraj went on to pursue his from Satyawati College under Delhi University. When Neeraj started his college journey, his father took him under his wing to teach him about the family business. At 18, he was sent to Hong Kong to gain practical experience by working with his uncle. His life in Hong Kong was focused on the import of electronic components from China and then selling them in India. Returned to India in 2010 After the death of his uncle in 2010, Neeraj returned to India and joined the family business. However, working in the country proved to be a challenging experience for him. He later ventured into his own businesses in sectors like real estate and power banks, but faced losses in both. He observed that just like Cars24 resells used cars, mobile phones could also be refurbished and sold again. This thought led to the birth of Zobox — a startup that repairs and refurbishes old mobile phones and sells them at affordable prices.
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sensex falls over 100 pts, Nifty below 24,700 amid US trade deal jitters
Indian equity benchmarks experienced a decline for the fourth consecutive session, influenced by uncertainties surrounding a delayed interim trade agreement with the U.S. and continuous foreign fund outflows. Weak corporate earnings further contributed to the downward pressure. Investor sentiment remains fragile amidst geopolitical and economic concerns, with specific stocks like Bharat Electronics and Infosys facing losses. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Experts View Global Markets Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FII/DII Tracker Indian equity benchmarks opened lower for the fourth consecutive session on Tuesday, weighed down by uncertainty over a delayed interim trade deal with the United States, continued foreign fund outflows, and weak corporate 9:24 am, the BSE Sensex was down 117 points, or 0.15%, at 80,73, while the Nifty50 declined 36 points, or 0.15%, to 24, portfolio investors (FPIs) offloaded Indian equities worth Rs 6,081 crore ($700.92 million) on Monday, as per provisional data — their biggest single-day selling since May 30. The sharp outflow has heightened concerns about near-term market sentiment remains fragile ahead of the August 1 deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump for progress on a trade agreement, with fears growing over potential geopolitical and economic repercussions from further early trade, Bharat Electronics (BEL), Eternal, Infosys, ICICI Bank, TCS, and HDFC Bank were among the top laggards on the Sensex, falling up to 2.5%. Meanwhile, Reliance Industries, Adani Ports, Tata Motors, and Power Grid opened in the the sectoral front, the Nifty IT index slipped 0.4%, weighed down by losses in Infosys, Wipro, and Coforge. In contrast, Nifty Metal, Realty, and Oil & Gas indices gained over 0.5%, offering some support to the the broader market, the Nifty Midcap 100 edged up 0.1%, while the Nifty Smallcap 100 declined 0.4%, reflecting mixed sentiment across individual stocks, Waaree Energies surged over 4% after the company reported an 89% YoY jump in consolidated net profit for Q1 FY26, coming in at Rs 745 crore compared to Rs 394 crore in the same period last year."There are more headwinds than tailwinds for the market now. The major issue weighing on markets is that the expected trade deal between India and the US has not happened so far and the probability of a deal before the August 1 deadline is becoming lower. President Trump's success in reaching deals with Japan and EU, which were advantageous for the US, may further make the US position harder on deal with India," said Dr. VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments."Sustained FII selling is impacting the market despite the DII buying. It is better to remain in a wait and watch mode," Vijayakumar Matalia, Derivative Analyst at Choice Broking, said, "After a negative opening, Nifty can find support at 24,600 followed by 24,500 and 24,300. On the higher side, 24,800 can be an immediate resistance, followed by 24,900 and 25,000."Asia shares eased on Tuesday while the euro nursed its losses as investors pondered the downside of the U.S.-EU trade deal and the reality that punishing tariffs were here to stay, with unwelcome implications for growth and Nikkei eased 0.8%, while Chinese blue chips fell 0.1%.European shares steadied after Monday's sell-off. EUROSTOXX 50 futures edged up 0.2%, while FTSE futures and DAX futures both added 0.1%. S&P 500 futures nudged up 0.1%, while Nasdaq futures added 0.2%.The selling from Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) extended for the sixth day as they sold equities worth Rs 6,082 crore on July 28, while Domestic institutional investors (DIIs) bought equities worth Rs 6,764 crore on the same day.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
5 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Jane Street to argue that retail demand drove its India options trades
Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. A 105-page order from Sebi detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinised. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2 per cent at the open and fell further during the day. Sebi alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. Partial Hedging Sebi's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16 per cent and 25 per cent of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10 per cent of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. Huge Turnover Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at Sebi's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said.
