Federal lawsuit alleges discrimination against Vietnamese women nail techs
The fight for licensed manicurists to be able to work as self-employed without passing a test is going to court.
Backed by Vietnamese American nail technicians and nail salon owners holding protest signs, including 'stop Asian hate,' Republican Assemblyman Tri Ta announced Monday morning the filing of a discrimination lawsuit outside of the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Santa Ana.
'Earlier this year, our office received many concerns from Vietnamese American manicurists and nail salon owners,' Ta said at a news conference. 'Their lives were turned upside down overnight when the independent contractor status expired on January 1.'
'It is not just unfair, it is discrimination,' he added.
Licensed barbers, cosmetologists, estheticians and electrologists can still work as independent contractors under state labor law without being subjected to a rigorous test.
But exemptions under Assembly Bill 5 expired this year for manicurists.
The change has left manicurists and nail salon owners alike confused as to whether non-employees can continue renting booths for their businesses — a decades-long industry practice.
Ta, whose 70th Assembly District encompasses Little Saigon, said 82% of manicurists in the state are Vietnamese, with 85% of those being women.
The federal discrimination suit, filed on May 31, represents several Orange County nail salon businesses as well as individual manicurists.
Gov. Gavin Newsom and the heads of five state agencies and boards are named as defendants.
'This lawsuit seeks only one thing — to make sure that all professionals in the beauty industry are treated equally and to eliminate the obvious discrimination against the Vietnamese community,' the complaint reads.
Attorney Scott Wellman, who is litigating on behalf of the nail salon owners and manicurists, held up a copy of the complaint during the news conference. He claimed the equal protection rights of his clients under the U.S. Constitution are being violated by the lack of an exemption.
'This wrong has to be righted,' Wellman said.
The suit represents a change in strategy for those fighting on behalf of aggrieved manicurists and nail salon owners.
In February, Ta introduced Assembly Bill 504, which aimed to reinstate the exemption for manicurists, but later claimed the proposed legislation couldn't even get a hearing from the committee on labor and employment. He followed up in March by calling for the U.S. Department of Justice to launch an investigation into alleged racial discrimination codified in California labor law, before ultimately turning to federal court.
'These hardworking professionals deserve the same freedom to set their own hours, to choose their own clients, to rent their own booths and to run their own businesses on their own terms just like other peers in the beauty industry,' Ta said Monday.
Ta and the suit cite statistics from a UCLA Labor Center report on California's nail salon industry that was published last year. Co-authors of the report, though, have been publicly critical of Ta's efforts to have the exemption reinstated.
'As an industry predominantly consisting of Vietnamese and female manicurists, AB 5 protects the community from misclassification and labor violations that have long existed at the workplace so that they can receive the wages, benefits and protections that all workers deserve,' said Lisa Fu, executive director of the California Healthy Nail Salon Collaborative and report co-author.
The report found that 80% of nail salon workers are considered low-wage earners, with 30% of manicurists in the state classified as self-employed, which is triple the national rate.
Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, who authored the sunset provision in AB 5, previously told TimesOC that the nail salon industry has a long history of high misclassification rates that needed added guardrails for labor rights 'while still allowing individual business owners the ability to work as a sole proprietor and simply rent space from a salon.'
Manicurists who back the federal discrimination suit spoke out at Monday's press conference.
'I want to be able to continue to work as an independent contractor,' said Loan Ho. 'It gives me more flexibility. I have time to raise my children.'
Emily Micelli works out of Blu Nail Bar at Fashion Island in Newport Beach, which is the lead plaintiff in the suit. She has more than 20 years of experience as a nail technician and doesn't want to be a nail salon employee.
Micelli left the previous nail salon she worked out of when the owner wouldn't allow her to continue as an independent contractor.
'I cannot keep clients on my phone, make appointments and come up with my own custom design packages,' Micelli said after the news conference. 'I have to abide by the salon's rules. It will make me lose business.'
Micelli believes that while the law may be well-intended, it otherwise serves to discriminate against Vietnamese American women like herself.
'I know the law wants to protect us as workers,' she said, 'but being a W-2 [worker] is better for office workers not for people like us, who are artists. I'm actually an artist — a nail artist.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
21 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Musk Reignites Feud, Labels Trump Bill 'Insane, Destructive'
Elon Musk has renewed his criticism of President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill,' showcasing his fierce opposition to the measure at a critical time. As Senate Republicans scrambled to advance the newly-revised 940-page proposal, Musk took to social media on Saturday to highlight his disapproval. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,' Musk said to his more than 220 million followers on X. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past, while severely damaging industries of the future.' Musk, the former lead of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), who had a spectacular falling out with Trump not long after leaving the White House, doubled down on his stance in a series of follow-up messages. The Tesla CEO referred to the bill as 'political suicide' for the Republican party, citing poll data that showed an approval of his stance against the measure. Musk went on to say that the bill 'raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, the biggest increase in history, putting America in the fast lane to debt slavery.' Musk's long-established opposition to the Big, Beautiful Bill proved to be a sticking point during his DOGE leadership, and notably became a point of contention between himself and Trump, his one-time ally whose presidential campaign he helped fund. Read More: The Musk-Trump Implosion Can Be Seen From Space In early June, Musk said the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' He took things a step further by telling his millions of followers to 'call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill!' In the midst of Musk's public criticism, Trump's domestic policy bill, which centers tax and spending cuts, cleared a significant hurdle on Saturday night. The Senate delivered a 51-49 vote to take up the bill, after holding the floor open for hours to debate with holdouts and secure the numbers necessary to move forward. Vice President J.D. Vance arrived at the Capitol ready to break a potential tie, and he reportedly held deep talks with people unsure of pledging their support to the bill. Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky notably voted to block consideration of the measure. Sen. Tillis said he could not support the bill due to his concerns over Medicaid cuts and what that would mean for people in his state. 'The Senate version… contains significant changes to Medicaid that would be devastating to North Carolina, and I cannot support it,' Tillis said. 'The Senate should go back to the House's common-sense approach to Medicaid reform to enact work requirements while protecting care for those who truly need it.' Trump took to his own social media platform, Truth Social, to air his grievances with Tillis' oppositional stance. 'Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the primary against Senator Thom Tillis,' he said. 'I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.' Sen. Paul, meanwhile, took a stance against the bill's provision to raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion. On Saturday evening, he shared Musk's X post showcasing poll numbers being against the bill, and commented: 'Not that we should govern by poll, but it is very clear people don't want this extreme amount of debt and reckless spending.'Explaining his issue with the numbers, Sen. Paul said: 'How about this: Tweak the 'Big, not so beautiful, bill' so it doesn't add so much to the debt? The legislation, as currently written, would pay someone like Elon Musk $1000 per child, and we know how prolific he is . . . No offense, Elon, but is that a wise use of our $$?' Responding to Sen. Paul's vote, Trump said: 'Did Rand Paul vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy?'On the other end of the opposition, some hard-right Republicans held off on their votes until the last minute, angling for further spending cuts into the bill in exchange for their support. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who had earlier in the day urged fellow Republicans not to rush through the bill before knowing exactly what it contained, dramatically changed his vote to a yes in the closing moments. Speaking out after his last-minute change of heart, Sen. Johnson said: 'Biden and the Democrats left behind enormous messes that we are trying to clean up—an open border, wars, and massive deficits. After working for weeks with POTUS and his highly capable economic team, I am convinced that he views this as a necessary first step and will support my efforts to help put America on a path to fiscal sustainability.' Read More: Trump Lobbies for Passage of 'Big Beautiful Bill' Hours After Big Setback in Senate The newly-revised bill—released just after midnight on Saturday—may have advanced, in spite of the vocal opposition it faced from some, but there is still a lot of work to be done. The measure will now be debated in the Senate, and if it passes the Senate, it will go back to the House. The timeline is incredibly tight, as Trump has expressed his desire to sign the bill on July 4th. In the early hours of Sunday morning, Trump celebrated the progress the bill has made thus far, saying he was 'very proud' of the Republican party. 'Tonight we saw a great victory in the Senate,' Trump said, before going on to name the key people involved in advancing the measure. 'I look forward to working with them to grow our economy, reduce wasteful spending, secure our border, fight for our military/veterans, ensure that our Medicaid system helps those who truly need it, protect our Second Amendment, and so much more.'
Chicago Tribune
32 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
After a dramatic vote, the Senate pushes ahead on Trump's tax break and spending cut plan
WASHINGTON — Capping a tumultuous night, the Republican-controlled Senate advanced President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and increased deportation money, with more weekend work ahead as Congress races to meet his Fourth of July deadline for passage. By a 51-49 tally and with Vice President JD Vance at the Capitol to break a potential tie, the Senate cleared a key procedural step Saturday as midnight approached. Voting had come to a standstill, dragging for more than three hours, with holdout senators huddling for negotiations and taking private meetings off the Senate floor. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to move ahead on Trump's signature domestic policy plan, joining all 47 Democrats. 'Tonight we saw a GREAT VICTORY in the Senate,' Trump said in a social media post afterward. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. Trump had lashed out against holdouts, threatening to campaign against one Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who had announced he could not support the bill because of Medicaid cuts that he worried would leave many without health care in his state. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the Senate version of the bill would increase by 11.8 million the number of people without health insurance in 2034. Tillis and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted 'no.' Renewed pressure to oppose the 940-page bill came from Elon Musk, who criticized it as 'utterly insane and destructive.' Ahead for senators now will be an all-night debate and amendments. If they are able to pass it, the bill would return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans released the bill 'in the dead of night' on Friday and were rushing through before the public fully knew what was in it. He forced a full reading of the text that began late Saturday and continued into Sunday morning. At its core, the legislation would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments are also causing dissent within GOP ranks. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said the environmental rollbacks would amount to a 'death sentence' for America's wind and solar industries. The Republicans are relying on the reductions to offset the lost tax revenues but some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. As the roll call teetered, attention turned to Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who was surrounded by GOP leaders in intense conversation. She voted 'yes.' A short time later, Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., drew holdouts Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming to his office. Vance joined in. The talks dragged on. Then Vance led them all back in to vote. Later, Scott said he had met with the president, adding, 'We all want to get to yes.' Lee said the group 'had an internal discussion about the strategy to achieve more savings and more deficit reduction, and I feel good about the direction where this is going, and more to come.' The release of the bill's draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the measure to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals, including shifting food stamp costs from the federal government to the states or gutting the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, were deemed out of compliance with the rules. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to the Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary hurdles and objections from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the package would cost the poorest Americans $1,600, the CBO said. The Senate included a compromise over the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states, but the issue remains unsettled. The current SALT cap is $10,000 a year, and a handful of Republicans wanted to boost it to $40,000 a year. The final draft includes a $40,000 cap, but limits it for five years. Many Republican senators say that is still too generous, but House Republicans are not fully satisfied either. House Speaker Mike Johnson sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington.
Politico
37 minutes ago
- Politico
Final Senate vote in view on Trump's megabill
Senate Republicans are moving forward, slowly, towards final passage of their sprawling tax and domestic policy bill early next week. But the most grueling part is still ahead. The Senate, in a late-night 51-49 vote, cleared a major hurdle when it moved onto general debate on the package. Democrats are expected to use every minute of their allotted 10 hours with floor speeches trashing the bill, but Republican leaders will likely forfeit the bulk of their own debate time to speed up action on the measure. Still ahead is a vote-a-rama, a barrage of amendment votes that will likely force senators to work overnight into Monday morning. Democrats could try to break the all-time record of 44 amendments set in 2008. 'It's going to be a long one, but we're ready,' said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) Democrats are expected to try and put Republicans on the record on issues that could resonate in the midterms, including tax cuts for the wealthy, Medicaid cuts, and changes to food assistance for the poor, or SNAP. But Democrats aren't the only ones who could squeeze Republicans. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine.), who has vocally opposed the Medicaid cuts, plans to offer amendments, including to raise income taxes on the wealthiest Americans to pre-2017 levels. Democrats already leveraged one of the few tools at their disposal in the minority: slowing things down. They used chamber rules to force clerks to read the 940-page bill aloud. Democrats hoped that even in the dead of night, it would give them an opportunity to highlight the most unpopular issues for their base and swing voters. Senate aides estimated that the reading could take around 15 hours. But Republicans are projecting confidence they'll be able to bat down amendments that could endanger passage. A Congressional Budget Office analysis released late Saturday night reports that the Senate bill would reduce budget deficits by $508 billion — but only if the assumption is that all the expiring tax cuts are extended permanently and have no cost. The accounting maneuver called 'current policy baseline' is a crucial part of Senate Republicans' strategy. Compared to the House-passed bill, the Senate version would likely increase deficits by about $3.3 trillion, up from $2.4 trillion for the House version. That's well above the maximum deficit increase conservatives in the House have said they'll agree to. The CBO analysis also says the latest version of the Senate bill would reduce the number of people with health insurance by 11.8 million by 2034. The bill still faces problems in the House this week even before the Senate clears it sometime Monday. House GOP leaders told lawmakers on a Saturday conference call that they would provide 48 hours notice for members to return to Washington. They urged lawmakers to talk with the White House and their home-state senators if they had concerns, rather than registering to reporters or on social media. As Senate GOP leaders unveiled the latest version of the megabill Saturday, more than a dozen House GOP lawmakers were saying privately they wouldn't vote for the bill unless its Medicaid provisions align more closely with the House-passed version. Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.), who represents a district with a large Medicaid population, said in a statement he'd vote against it unless it returned in total to the House-passed Medicaid text. But Senate conservatives have demanded more changes to Medicaid as part of an eleventh-hour deal that unlocked the votes Senate GOP leadership needed to proceed with the bill. Fiscal hawks won the promise of an amendment related to lowering the share the federal government covers compared to states for Medicaid expansion enrollees. Senate Majority Leader John Thune declined to comment about any concessions, but Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said he believed Thune and President Donald Trump would help build support for the amendment that will be spearheaded by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.). Johnson also told reporters 'the president's pretty confident that whatever we pass here in the Senate, he'll be able to convince people in the House to pass as well.' Lisa Kashinsky and Jordain Carney contributed to this report.
