Karandlaje seeks NHRC intervention over ‘targeting' of Hindutva groups in Dakshina Kannada
Accusing the police of acting under pressure from the Congress government and 'systematically targeting and harassing' individuals associated with Hindutva organisations, social workers and traders in Dakshin Kannada, Union Minister of State for Labour and Employment, Shobha Karandlaje, has sought the intervention of the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC).
In a letter addressed to N.K. Sudhindra Rao, the Chairman of PCA, and a copy marked to the NHRC on Tuesday, the Minister said that a 'pattern of intimidation' began shortly after the recent change in police leadership in Mangaluru and has been directed almost exclusively at members of the Hindu community.
'Many of those being harassed have no criminal background or history of unlawful activity. The selective nature of these actions raises serious concerns about the misuse of police force as a tool of political vendetta, which is entirely unacceptable in a democratic society governed by the rule of law.'
The Minister pointed out that the use of State machinery to intimidate and harass citizens not only breaches their constitutional protection but also violates the spirit of the Supreme Court's guidelines on police conduct.
'Such actions, if allowed to continue unchecked, risk undermining the credibility of law enforcement and disturbing communal harmony in the region.'
Urging the authority to intervene to stop unlawful actions, Ms. Karandlaje said, 'A thorough and impartial inquiry must be conducted into the conduct of the police officers involved, and those found guilty of violating constitutional norms and citizens' rights should be held accountable. It is imperative that the Police Complaints Authority upholds its duty to ensure that policing in Karnataka remains fair, just and within the framework of law.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
Christianity, Islam and communism and the global conquest
Each claims exclusive truth, dismissing predecessors as flawed: Christianity supersedes Judaism via Jesus as the Messiah; Islam negates both, presenting Muhammad as the final prophet; Communism rejects all as 'opiates of the masses,' promoting a materialist utopia with monotheistic zeal. Rooted in apocalyptic visions, these absolutist ideologies fuel conflicts by compelling adherents to impose their truth globally, often at the expense of non-adherent civilisations Over the past two millennia, universalist ideologies like Christianity, Islam, and communism have driven global conflicts, pursuing territorial, demographic, and cultural dominance, each emerging at different points in history. They targeted each other and pluralistic civilisations such as Roman, Greek, Persian, Mesoamerican, and Hindutva, with only the resilient Hindutva enduring, albeit with significant losses. Readers may note that in 1892, Chandranath Basu coined the term "Hindutva" for his eponymous book as a synonym for Sanatan Dharma, avoiding the colonial term "Hinduism," and we accordingly use it to refer to Sanatan Dharma. This article examines their aggression, ideology's primacy over economics, impacts on civilisations, intra-ideological conflicts, and exceptions like the Mongol invasions. Defining lasting conflicts: Lasting conflicts involve sustained territorial conquest, demographic shifts, and cultural imposition, reshaping civilisations over centuries. Christian colonialism, Islamic conquests and immigration, and Communist expansions (Soviet occupations, China's Tibet annexation) reflect universalist mandates—crusade and evangelisation, jihad, or class war. Non-adherents defend their existence, unlike in short-term disputes. Shared roots of prophetic monotheism: Christianity, Islam, and communism share a prophetic monotheistic framework, granting believers a mandate to subjugate non-believers, seen as obstacles to a universal truth. While Judaism also stems from the same prophetic monotheistic tradition, it markedly differs by being non-proselytising, non-expansionist, and refraining from imposing its beliefs on others. Each claims exclusive truth, dismissing predecessors as flawed: Christianity supersedes Judaism via Jesus as the Messiah; Islam negates both, presenting Muhammad as the final prophet; Communism rejects all as 'opiates of the masses,' promoting a materialist utopia with monotheistic zeal. Rooted in apocalyptic visions, these absolutist ideologies fuel conflicts by compelling adherents to impose their truth globally, often at the expense of non-adherent civilisations. Christianity-The Sword and the Cross: Christianity expanded aggressively via crusades, colonialism, and missionary work. From the 15th to 20th centuries, Spain, Portugal, Britain, and France conquered territories, eradicating non-Christian civilisations. Spanish conquests destroyed Aztec, Inca, and Maya cultures through genocide and forced Christianisation, justified by the 1513 Requerimiento. British colonisation devastated Aboriginal Australia, while missionary work disrupted African and Asian cultures, creating Christian populations. Though trade was a motive, Christianity's divine mission to 'civilise' non-believers was primary. Intra-Christian conflicts, like Catholic-Protestant wars and British exploitation of India show the ideology's unifying force against non-Christians. Islam-Conquest and demographic expansion: Islam's rapid expansion started in the seventh century, transforming the Middle East, North Africa, and beyond, through jihad-driven conquests, with economic incentives like jizya taxes contributing. The Islamic conquests (632–750 CE) largely wiped out pre-Islamic Arab, Persian-Zoroastrian, and Egyptian-Coptic cultures. The Umayyad conquest of Spain (711 CE) and Ottoman advances, including the 1453 fall of Constantinople, subdued Christian territories. In the Hindu civilisational region, Islamic invasions (8th–18th centuries) devastated Hindu and Buddhist heritage, turning Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Indonesia, and Malaysia into Islamic nations, while leaving significant Muslim populations in other formerly Hindu and Buddhist lands. Contemporary Islamic immigration to non-Muslim regions like India, Europe, and the Americas is seen as demographic aggression, reinforcing cultural enclaves despite economic motives. Intra-Islamic conflicts, like the Sunni-Shia Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988), reflect disputes over governance highlighting religion's role. The Israel-Iran conflict, intensified by the U.S. bombardment of Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21, 2025, stems from historical Islam-Judaism-Christianity tensions, like the 627 CE Banu Qurayza execution, with doctrinal clashes driving persistence despite geopolitical framing. Communism-Ideology as empire: Emerging in the 19th century, communism became an aggressor through territorial and ideological Soviet Union's annexation of Eastern Europe, the Baltic states, and Central Asia imposed Marxist-Leninist ideology, suppressing local cultures. The Ukrainian Holodomor (1932–1933) killed four million, targeting non-Communist identities. China's annexation of Tibet devastated Buddhist culture, and Mao's cultural revolution eradicated Confucian and Taoist heritage. Intra-Communist conflicts, like the Sino-Soviet split and the 1979 Vietnam-China war, arose from competing Marxist visions. While strategic motives existed, communism's universalist mission to eradicate non-proletarian systems prioritised ideology, aligning with the destruction of non-Communist cultures. Victims-The loss of pluralistic civilisations: Christian, Islamic, and Communist aggression devastated non-Abrahamic civilisations. Roman and Greek cultures were subsumed by Christianity; Egypt's Coptic heritage was marginalised by Islam. Pre-Islamic Arab-paganism vanished, and Persian-Zoroastrianism was nearly eradicated, with survivors fleeing to India as Parsis. Mesoamerican civilisations—Maya, Inca, Aztec—were destroyed by Spanish conquests, and Indigenous Australian societies faced cultural erasure under British rule. Hindu and Buddhist civilisations lost territories like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Tibet to these aggressors. In India, the huge Muslim population creates demographic tensions. These losses underscore the destructive impact of universalist ideologies on pluralistic civilisations, with even resilient survivors like Hinduism facing profound erosion. Religion and ideology over economics: The primacy of religion and ideology in historical and contemporary conflicts stems from their universalist mandates. Christianity's Great Commission (Matthew 28:19) propelled missionary zeal and colonial expansion. Islam's concepts of jihad and ummah drove conquests and cultural dominance. Communism's vision of class struggle and proletarian revolution sought global ideological supremacy. While economic factors played a role, they were often secondary to ideological imperatives. For example, the Crusades (1095–1291) aimed to reclaim Jerusalem but secured trade routes as a byproduct. Soviet expansion prioritised ideological control over Eastern Europe, with economic gains as a secondary outcome. Ideology unified aggressors, casting non-believers as existential threats. Intra-system conflicts further highlight ideological dominance. Catholic-Protestant wars, Sunni-Shia rivalries, and Sino-Soviet tensions arose from competing interpretations of truth, not mere economic disputes. Non-Abrahamic societies, lacking similar universalist drives, often adopted defensive postures to protect their pluralistic or localised traditions. Enduring conflicts, driven by Christianity, Islam, and communism, manifest through conquest, colonisation, missionary efforts, immigration and ideological subversion. These actions aim to impose a universalist vision. Historically, Christianity pursued global dominance through conquest, colonisation, evangelisation, and cultural imposition. Today, Islam expands its influence in the Christian West and Hindu India through legal and illegal immigration, increasing Muslim populations. Muslim migration patterns suggest motives beyond economics, as migrants bypass wealthy, less-populated Middle Eastern Islamic nations in favour of non-Muslim countries. Similarly, Bangladeshi and Rohingya Muslims frequently migrate illegally to Hindu-majority India, altering its demographics, yet rarely seek refuge in nearby Islamic states like Malaysia or Indonesia. These patterns suggest a strategic demographic expansion targeting non-Muslim societies for transformation. The Hindu resilience and suffering: Hindutva exemplifies a resilient yet heavily impacted survivor. It withstood Islamic invasions and rule, and British colonialism but lost territories like Afghanistan (once Gandhara), Pakistan, Bangladesh and parts of Southeast Asia to Islam. India's growing Muslim population poses ongoing demographic challenges, reflecting the continuation of Islamic expansion. The exceptions: The Mongol invasions (13th century), a non-Abrahamic aggression, devastated Islamic, Christian, and Buddhist regions, partly in response to Islamic provocations like execution of Mongol envoys (1218 CE). Unlike Christianity, Islam, and communism, the Mongols lacked a universalist ideology and eventually assimilated into Islam, limiting their comparability. Japanese imperialism (1931–1945), rooted in Shinto nationalism, was another short-lived exception, defeated in 1945. These cases align with reactive resistance to expansionist ideologies but do not match the sustained aggression of universalist systems. Conclusion: For the past 2,000 years, Christianity, Islam, and communism, propelled by unyielding universalist zeal, have unleashed relentless conflicts and genocides, obliterating pluralistic civilisations—Roman, Greek, Persian, Mesoamerican, and Indigenous Australian—while resilient Hindutva suffered profound territorial and demographic wounds. The Mongol invasions, a fleeting exception, ultimately succumbed to Islam, mirroring broader resistance to such expansion. Since their emergence, these ideologies have banished lasting peace, their insatiable drive for global supremacy raging unchecked, ceaselessly reshaping the world at the grievous cost of pluralistic and localised traditions. (The writer is a retired IPS officer, and a former Director of CBI. Views are personal)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'I think RSS has moved on': Did Shashi Tharoor defend the Sangh? Here's what Congress MP said on Rahul Gandhi's 'Manusmriti' charge
Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor and LoP Rahul Gandhi - File Image NEW DELHI: Amidst the growing rift with the Congress Party, Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor on Saturday appears to have sided with the RSS-BJP over the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi's accusation that the RSS wanted 'Manusmriti', not the Constitution. While answering to a question over Rahul Gandhi's tweet that the RSS-BJP want Manusmriti instead of the Constitution, Congress MP said that historically the Raebareli MP is right as then RSS chief MS Golwalkar had said that one of the greatest flaws of the Constitution is that there is nothing of the Manusmriti in it. "But I think the RSS itself has moved on from those days," Tharoor said. "Historically, he's (Rahul Gandhi) referring to the fact that that was a criticism expressed at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. Mr Golwalkar, amongst others, said that one of the greatest flaws of the Constitution is that there is nothing of the Manusmriti in it, but I think the RSS itself has moved on from those days. So, as a historical statement, it's accurate, whether it's a reflection of how they feel today. The RSS should be in the best position to answer that..." Tharoor said while talking to reporters. Shashi Tharoor's widening rift with the Congress Party has come under renewed spotlight after a string of pointed remarks and cryptic social media posts seemingly challenging the party's leadership. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo One such post read, 'Don't ask permission to fly. The wings are yours. And the sky belongs to no one.' This, followed by a series of similar messages, signaled growing tensions between Tharoor and the party. The tensions between Tharoor and Congress leadership rose after he praised PM Modi's diplomacy during Operation Sindoor in a Hindu article, describing his 'energy' and 'dynamism' as assets for India's global standing. The PMO shared the piece, fuelling speculation about Tharoor's loyalty. Congress chief Mallikarjun Kharge indirectly rebuked him, suggesting his praise for PM Modi was inappropriate. "We say nation first, but some consider Modi first, country later. What can we do about that?" he asked. Tharoor, however, clarified that his remarks reflected national interest, not support for the BJP.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
With Digha as Rathyatra focal point, Bengal showcases its brand of peaceful religiosity
1 2 Kolkata: Rathyatras held across Bengal on Friday with the one at Digha Jagannath temple at its epicentre showcased the non-aggressive tradition of the Hindu religion — distinct from the Ram Navami processions in Howrah and elsewhere in the state marked with the brandishing of swords and lathis. Across Bengal, the number of chariots swelled this time — from one or two to six and seven at each place — and all the rallies recorded huge footfall. This was seen not only at Digha, but at all traditional spots — Cooch Behar's Madan Mohan temple, Malda, East Midnapore's Mahishadal, Sutahata, Tamluk and Mecheda, Mahesh and Chandernagore in Hooghly, Barasat in North 24 Parganas, Maheshtala in South 24 Parganas, and of course Kolkata. The festive spirit united all, across gender and social strata, as chariots rolled down the streets. While Dona Ganguly is set to perform Odishi with her troupe in the 'Ulto Rath' mela on July 3, women in Cooch Behar danced to tunes of DJ as they scrambled to touch the ropes of the rath. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata In Mahishadal, royal family member Haraprasad Garg said the organisers were overwhelmed with the participation of women and youngsters at the event this year. "The crowd this year has broken all records. The participation of women was significant. I have come to know that some were injured in a stampede during the rathyatra," Garg said. Mahesh Jagannath Temple chief priest Piyal Adhikari endorsed the view. "The GT Road stretch close to our temple was choked as people who could not make it to Digha came to us," he said. In Bengal, where people breathe politics into every incident, men in para addas are now busy calculating which party — Trinamool or BJP — would gain out of religious processions in the state. As of now, no Chinese wall separates those participating in the Ram Navami processions and Friday's Rathyatras. In fact, there is an overlap of participants — the bottom line being they are all Hindus. It is believed that Lord Jagannath comes down from the temple during this time of the year and goes for an annual visit to his birthplace along with his siblings Balabhadra and Subhadra. The servitors to this occasion are dalapatis, non-Brahmins who break the rigorous caste hierarchy. During his journey, Lord Jagannath halts at his maternal aunt's place and has sweet pancakes. The sweet story mingles beautifully with Bengal's culture, showcasing how Lord Jagannath was Bengal's own. Just like Lord Rama ruling the hearts of those from Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, through culture and legends. The Bengal CM walked the extra mile by taking Lord Jagannath to remote villages from where people couldn't reach the yatras. Mamata Banerjee has sent a photograph of Lord Jagannath and the Lord's prasad to every household in Bengal. BJP and RSS could manage to take a few thousands from Bengal to the Ayodhya's Ram Mandir. Bengal BJP netas, who claim themselves to be the sole representatives of Hindus, have questioned religious credentials of Digha temple. Suvendu Adhikari even announced he would fetch the 'mahaprasadam' from Puri and distribute it among devotees. In other words, BJP netas couldn't ignore Digha's grand rath showcase. Former Bengal BJP president Dilip Ghosh had even attended the temple's opening. Interestingly, many TMC netas had taken out their own Ram Navami processions. While a section of political observers maintains that since participants are all Hindus, religious processions might consolidate sentiments and they might choose the party that has called itself the protector of Hindus. The majority, however, gives a clear advantage to Banerjee for choosing a religious motif close to hearts and taking everyone along. They believe that Lord Ram may not have much of an impact in the land of Goddess Durga, Maa Kali, and Lord Jagannath.
