
Letters: Where are the voices of outrage at what's happening in Gaza?
The massacre of the people of Gaza continues unabated. After blocking food and aid into Gaza for three months, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finally allowed in a limited amount of food. However, the plan and means of distribution have proved deadly.
I read about people being shot by the Israeli military as they arrive at the food distribution sites set up to deliver food aid. The United States supports Israel's plan for food distribution, which requires many of the starving people to walk miles to one of only four distribution sites in Gaza. The cruelty is unimaginable.
Where are the voices of outrage at this inhumanity? I would like to hear our U.S. senators, Tammy Duckworth and Dick Durbin, our U.S. representatives and our religious leaders — Christian, Jewish and Muslim — speak out against killing and starving the people of Gaza and demand an immediate ceasefire, provision of food in a safe manner and negotiation of a peace agreement to end the killing and prompt the release of the people held hostage.
Netanyahu's plan in Gaza is obviously not working. Who will speak out?I cannot entirely agree with Ald. Brendan Reilly on his op-ed 'You can't separate anti-Zionism from antisemitism. Stop pretending you can' (June 12). While the call 'Free Palestine' is divisive and demonstrators should understand it is counterproductive, the bigger issue is what is happening in Gaza and the indiscriminate violence that results.
The burning of Jewish demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado; the killing of Israeli Embassy staffers Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgram in Washington, and the murder of 6-year-old Palestinian boy Wadea Al-Fayoume in Plainfield Township are equally tragic and pointless. All were committed in the aftermath of the horrific kidnappings by Hamas and Israel's brutal response.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, fending off a trial on corruption charges and an election he may lose, has prioritized his own political goals over the release of the hostages and an end to the carnage. Doctors in Gaza perform surgery without anesthesia on children screaming in pain; unarmed civilians are getting shot merely trying to get food; and an entire displaced population is starving without the most basic necessities in a land of rubble.
Israel's former prime minister, Ehud Olmert, accuses Netanyahu of actions that not only amount to war crimes but that also do not serve Israel's interests. Gaza is 'worse than hell on earth,' according to Mirjana Spoljaric, the head of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Spoljaric said that 'humanity is failing' as we watch these horrors. Yet the U.S. is blindly aiding and abetting these actions.
Much of the population of Gaza was not old enough to vote or was even born when Hamas was voted into power. They should not bear the brunt of this hell.
To calm the anguish that precipitates the kind of violence Reilly condemns, we should all urge our government to pressure Israel to stop this slaughter, return to the negotiating table and get the remaining hostages back.I was very disturbed to read the headline and subheadline on the front page of the Sunday paper concerning the Hope Clinic, 'New clinic in Chicago offers late abortions: Hope provides service to women up to about 34 weeks of pregnancy.'
That text leads one to believe a woman can just walk into the clinic at any point of her pregnancy up to 34 weeks and get an abortion, which is patently false.
It's not until the fourth paragraph (and a turn to Page 6) that the story reveals that abortions, in compliance with Illinois law, are only available to the point of viability (starting about 24 weeks), after which they are available only .
It's not until a second jump to the next page that the story mentions that cases beyond the second trimester are incredibly rare, with only 1% of abortions performed after 21 weeks. Most of those are due to dire medical situations.
In this era of short attention spans, headlines like this one are completely irresponsible. I understand that reporters don't write their own headlines, typically. However, it is an instantly shocking and provocative headline. Now, the Tribune has quite possibly put the clinic in the crosshairs of more anti-abortion rights organizations and possibly put at risk one of the few places where women can get desperately needed reproductive health care.
In the future, I hope the Tribune will put more effort into its headlines to ensure its readers quickly grasp essential main points of an article, particularly when women's health care is at stake.I do not consider 'Hope' to be the best name for the new Uptown abortion provider. My observation tells me it is hope for the human being in the womb. It is also a false hope for the mother. I am also disappointed that the front page would carry such appalling news. I suppose for those who agree with abortion access, it is welcome news. Yet, that is short-sighted.
There are life-affirming options before a woman conceives. There are agencies that teach those options. Even in the case of rape, brave women have given birth to a child whose fault the conception was not.
I fight each day to help men respect women and the reproductive process. I fight each day to master my own base instincts, and I try to teach other males to do the same.
Will I condemn women who use that clinic's services? No, I won't. I pray for the woman and the child. I monetarily support alternative help for women and those children. I help healing and forgiveness programs for women who have had abortions. I will try with all my might and ask heaven's might to make a world where abortion disappears.I'm a medical student in my final year of training, and for countless Saturdays over the past three years, I have volunteered at — and eventually led — a student-run free clinic in one of the most culturally rich corners of Chicago. I'm writing this from our clinic's work room while bantering with our Nepali clinic manager, who lived in Syracuse for a few years and is hinting that I should apply there for residency, and it has hit me just how special our setup here in the Rogers Park neighborhood really is.
Looking around the clinic, it feels like I've stepped onto a spinning globe. Our physician, a Syrian and a decadelong volunteer, chats easily with a patient in Arabic. When our phlebotomist with the Portuguese last name passes by, he pauses to ask how her grandchildren are. When our clinic manager realizes he forgot to bring a patient their medication, he presses a tired hand to his forehead and hurries off, bag in hand. I glance at our pharmacist, a tall Black woman who always catches any student who forgets to order medications, and we laugh and laugh. At the front desk, our interpreters for Hindi, Gujarati and Urdu greet me as I hurry past. Our student volunteers are a linguistic rainbow: Korean, Malayalam and Polish.
Then there's me: Chinese and serving as our clinic's go-to Spanish interpreter.
And we all eat the same clinic-provided American pizza for lunch.
Our patients speak all these languages and occasionally surprise us with more, such as French or Bangla. Every Saturday, students lead appointments and create care plans, working with physicians to teach patients what all their pill bottles mean and how to take care of themselves. Most of our patients are uninsured or underinsured.
For many, it's their first time learning the difference between hemoglobin A1C and just hemoglobin. Similarly, for our students, it may be their first — and maybe only — time ever treating patients from such diverse backgrounds. Just as our patients learn to build new habits, our students are building the ability to care across cultures, languages and lived experiences.
It's not perfect. Sometimes, we scramble to find interpreters, and sometimes, the waiting room fills, then keeps filling. But every week, the world comes together, and our future doctors learn how to care for anyone, anywhere.
In a moment when difference is treated as a threat, this clinic reminds me that it's actually exactly what makes us better.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Indianapolis Star
42 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's refusal to enforce TikTok ban is his most lawless presidential act
The first several months of Donald Trump's second presidential term have been marked by controversy and charges that he's a lawless president. However, the most brazen example of Trump's lawlessness is his refusal to enforce the TikTok ban, which has been passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court. On June 19, Trump extended the deadline for TikTok to shut down by another 90 days, marking the third time he has done so. The TikTok ban is the law of the land, and Trump's refusal to enforce it is a dereliction of his duties as president. Those who are silent on it should put aside their own personal motives and bring more attention to this fact. Many forget that a TikTok ban was originally Trump's idea, and that many Democrats wrote the idea off as just another piece of his anti-China agenda. However, things have changed. Trump seemingly developed a soft spot for TikTok because he believes it helped him win reelection. Still, in the time between Trump's original stance and his change of heart on the issue, a law banning TikTok passed the House and Senate and was signed in 2024 by then-President Joe Biden. The Supreme Court even upheld the ban, against the arguments of TikTok's lawyers. The law banning TikTok does have a provision that allows for the president to delay the deadline for TikTok to cease operations or agree to a sale. Still, the criteria allowing for such an extension are nowhere close to being fulfilled. Briggs: Jim Banks would let Trump commit any crime you can imagine The text of the ban allows for the president to extend the deadline a single time for 90 days, so long as TikTok is close to reaching a deal with an American company to sell. There is no indication that's the case, and Trump's arbitrary executive orders are flagrantly illegal. Even Trump's guise in refusing to enforce the law – the idea that he is attempting to give TikTok time to broker a deal − doesn't make sense. Nothing would be more compelling for TikTok to sell the app to an American company than the ban going into effect. An app that cannot run is useless to its owners, and their best course of action would be to sell. The president does not have discretion over which laws he would like to enforce and which he would like to ignore. Trump's decision to arbitrarily extend TikTok's lifespan does exactly that. The president, along with the rest of the executive branch, has an obligation to enforce the laws of the nation that have been passed by Congress and signed into law. A president's job is to enforce the law, whereas Congress' job is to decide what the law is. When a president can choose which laws he is to enforce, he is deciding what the law is, in a sense. Hicks: The middle class isn't disappearing. It's just spending money differently That's why Trump's refusal to enforce the ban is his most lawless action as president. Sure, there's the constitutionality of his deportation schemes and his reinterpretation of birthright citizenship, but those instances had judicial checks. In no other area is Trump as actively derelict in his duties as president without repercussions as he is in relation to the TikTok ban. For all the talk about Trump being a lawless president, Democrats and Republicans have both been relatively quiet about this single worst example of Trump acting as such. Republicans should be wary about the next administration of Democrats that comes along refusing to enforce a certain law because they disagree with it, or they simply don't feel like it. If Democrats were the ones refusing to enforce the ban on TikTok, it would be the only thing Republicans talked about. I'm sure that the outrage would be far louder if Trump were refusing to enforce other statutes, such as parts of the National Firearms Act, the tax code, or any other number of statutes that Democrats are sympathetic to. However, because it concerns a popular social media platform remaining in service, the complaints are rather quiet. Refusal to enforce laws is not a path Americans want our presidents to travel. That slippery slope can take us to some very dangerous places.


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Hamas leader and Oct. 7 mastermind Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa killed in airstrike, IDF says
Israel's military 'eliminated' a founding Hamas military leader responsible for planning the Oct. 7 attack, Tel Aviv officials claimed Saturday. Hakham Muhammad Issa Al-Issa was killed during a targeted airstrike on the Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City, Israel Defense Forces said. Al-Issa was one of the final remaining founding members of the terrorist organization's military wing and played a crucial role in the Oct. 7 attack that launched the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. Advertisement 'Issa led Hamas' force build-up, training, and planned the October 7 massacre. As Head of Combat Support, he advanced aerial & naval attacks against Israelis,' said an IDF post on X. 'The IDF & [Israel Security Agency] will continue to locate and eliminate all terrorists involved in the October 7 massacre.'


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Leaders React to Report Gaza Food Aid Seekers Being Shot by IDF Soldiers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Political and aid leaders are reacting to a report by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz in which several Israel Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers and officers said they were ordered to deliberately fire on Palestinians at aid distribution sites in Gaza. One soldier reportedly described the scene as a "killing field" adding, "Our form of communication is gunfire." Israel's leadership has rejected the report with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz saying the article includes "malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the world." Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. State Department and the IDF for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters The ongoing Israel-Gaza war has led to mass destruction, death, and famine in the enclave for 20 months. At least 1.9 million people—about 90 percent of the population in Gaza—have been internally displaced by Israeli bombardments, according to the United Nations. Israel's ground and air attacks have killed more than 55,300 Palestinians, per the Gaza Health Ministry. Last weekend, the U.S. joined Israel in its war against Iran by bombing three nuclear sites. The U.S., Israel's top diplomatic and financial ally, provides more than $3.8 billion in annual military aid, with an additional $17.8 billion authorized since Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed around 1,200 people and took 250 as hostages. In late-May, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israeli and U.S.-backed group, began distributing aid in the enclave that the World Food Programme warns is on the brink of famine. The group has received international criticism from various aid groups and leaders over its approach to distribution, which has resulted in hundreds of Gazans killed while waiting for aid. Israel controls the flow of aid into Gaza. Palestinians line up to receive a hot meal at a food distribution point in Gaza City on June 27, 2025. Palestinians line up to receive a hot meal at a food distribution point in Gaza City on June 27, 2025. BASHAR TALEB/AFP via Getty Images What To Know The Israeli newspaper's graphic report relied on several IDF soldiers and officers, who remained anonymous for security reasons. The report opens with the sentence: "Israeli soldiers in Gaza told Haaretz that the army has deliberately fired at Palestinians near aid distribution sites over the past month." The report found that commanders allegedly ordered soldiers to fire on crowds of Gazans awaiting food aid to drive them away or disperse them, even though they posed no threat. Between 400 and 550 people have been killed and thousands wounded near aid centers and in areas where residents are waiting for food trucks since late May, according to the Health Ministry in Gaza and the U.N. There are currently four GHF food distribution sites in Gaza, three in the south and one in the center, with limited time frames for aid collection, often leading Gazans to line up early. An IDF soldier reportedly told Haaretz, "It's a killing field." The soldier continued, "Where I was stationed, between one and five people were killed every day. They're treated like a hostile force – no crowd-control measures, no tear gas – just live fire with everything imaginable: heavy machine guns, grenade launchers, mortars. Then, once the center opens, the shooting stops, and they know they can approach. Our form of communication is gunfire." The soldier added that "there's no danger to the forces," and noted that the individual is "not aware of a single instance of return fire. There's no enemy, no weapons." Last year, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza amid Israel's war with Hamas. The report comes a day after the European Council called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, unconditional release of all hostages, and a permanent end to all hostilities. Palestinians gather at an aid distribution point set up by the privately-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), near the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on June 25, 2025. Palestinians gather at an aid distribution point set up by the privately-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), near the Nuseirat refugee camp in the central Gaza Strip on June 25, 2025. EYAD BABA/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a joint statement Friday: "The State of Israel absolutely rejects the contemptible blood libels that have been published in the Ha'aretz newspaper, according to which 'IDF Soldiers Ordered to Shoot Deliberately at Unarmed Gazans Waiting for Humanitarian Aid.' These are malicious falsehoods designed to defame the IDF, the most moral military in the soldiers of the IDF receive clear orders to avoid harming innocents – and operate accordingly..." United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres told reporters on Friday that the GHF is "inherently unsafe," and "it is killing people." He added: "People are being killed simply trying to feed themselves and their families. The search for food must never be a death sentence." A GHF spokesperson told Reuters on Friday: "It is unfortunate the U.N. continue to push false information regarding our operations. Bottom line, our aid is getting securely delivered. Instead of bickering and throwing insults from the sidelines, we would welcome the UN and other humanitarian groups to join us and feed the people in Gaza." Doctors Without Borders, also known as Medicins Sans Frontiers (MSF) said in a Friday statement: "The Israeli-US food distribution scheme in Gaza that was launched one month ago is forcing Palestinians to choose between starvation or risking their lives for minuscule amounts of system is a slaughter masquerading as humanitarian aid, and it must be immediately dismantled. Aid must not be controlled by a warring party to further its military objectives." The European Council said in a Thursday statement: "It deplores the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the unacceptable number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation. The European Council calls on Israel to fully lift its blockade on Gaza, to allow immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale into and throughout Gaza and to enable the U.N. and its agencies, and humanitarian organizations, to work independently and impartially to save lives and reduce suffering." J Street, a nonprofit who identifies as "pro-Israel, pro-peace, pro-Democracy America," wrote in an X, formerly Twitter, post on Friday: "This is a deeply troubling report, and a painful read for all who care about Israel's moral standing and Jewish values. These incidents demand thorough and transparent IDF as well as independent investigations into potential war crimes." George Conway, an attorney and co-founder of the anti-Trump Republican group The Lincoln Project, wrote in an X post on Friday: "...a chilling report from Haaretz that everyone should read. Even if only a fraction of this (and some of the paper's previous detailed reporting on possible war crimes) is true, we should all be deeply saddened and sickened, as I am right now." Kenneth Roth, former Human Rights Watch executive director, wrote in an X post on Friday: "Israeli officers and soldiers report being 'ordered to fire at unarmed crowds near food distribution sites in Gaza, even when no threat was present.' Hundreds of Palestinians were killed. The military prosecution seeks review of possible war crimes." Piers Morgan, who hosts Piers Morgan Uncensored wrote in an X post on Saturday: "Then the Israel govt should let international journalists into Gaza to verify that the IDF is indeed utterly blameless and behaving in the most moral way of any army in history, as it keeps insisting. The ongoing ban suggests it doesn't want the world to know the truth." What Happens Next? The fate of GHF is unclear, as several international human rights and aid organizations have called for its end as a "privatized, militarized" form of aid delivery.