
When athletes decide the right time to retire
Shrenik Avlani For most athletes the end comes abruptly. But some like P.R. Sreejesh are prudent enough to leave on their own terms P.R. Sreejesh, who recently received the Padma Bhushan, retired after the Paris Olympics in 2024. Gift this article
All through April the Indian Premier League (IPL) was in full swing, and then came the cross-border tensions. On either side of that tense week, two of India's greatest World Cup winning batsmen announced their retirement.
All through April the Indian Premier League (IPL) was in full swing, and then came the cross-border tensions. On either side of that tense week, two of India's greatest World Cup winning batsmen announced their retirement.
Before the Board of Control for Cricket in India announced the squad for India's forthcoming tour of England in June, both Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli decided that the time was right to step away. To retire from a profession, in this case a highly skilled and niche one, is a very personal life event. Yet, it isn't as if millions of fans hadn't voiced pretty strong sentiments in favour of Kohli and Sharma retiring after India lost the away Test series in Australia in November-January. Also read: Virat Kohli had at least 2 years of cricket left in him, should have been Test captain, says Ravi Shastri
2024 was a big year for retirements, not uncommon, especially after a mega sporting event like the Olympics. Tennis legend Rafael Nadal put down his racket for good. Football royalty Toni Kroos won the Champions League with Real Madrid, turned out for Germany one last time in the Euros and called time on his glorious career. Ravichandran Ashwin announced his retirement from Test cricket midway through India's tour of Australia.
One of world hockey's best and India's most successful goalkeeper, P.R. Sreejesh, won his second consecutive Olympic bronze medal in Paris 2024 and left on a high.
With tennis star Novak Djokovic, 38, basketball legend LeBron James, 40, world football's biggest stars Cristiano Ronaldo, 40, and Lionel Messi, 37, advancing in age, this year is likely to see a few more retirement announcements.
Had Sharma and Kohli still been in the plans for India's summer tour of England, many cricket-obsessed Indians, who have no clue about what it takes in terms of fitness, skill and focus to play at the highest level, would most likely have decided for the two champions that it is high time they quit. Self-proclaimed pundits would have flooded YouTube with lengthy videos and clickbait shorts, armchair trolls would have typed out poorly spelled and expletive-laden filth on X, while reels and posts would have popped up on Instagram.
The thing is, no one but the player and their coach have the right to decide when it is time to retire. And that's because they are in the best position to know, says former India Test cricketer-turned television pundit Deep Dasgupta. 'In cricket, selectors could drop a player and then it is up to the player to take a call," he adds.
To Sreejesh, who is now the coach of India's under-21 men's hockey team, it is clear that retirement is the player's decision. 'The only other person who can contribute to a player's decision on retirement is their coach. No one else," says the double Olympics medal-winner. SLOWING DOWN
Most athletes hit their peak between the ages of 25 and 30, though this varies by sport. Peak performance can last from three-five years, depending on factors like training, genetics and injury management. During those golden years, a player performs effortlessly. Once that window of perfect equilibrium passes, performance gradually declines. This can be due to a lot of interconnected physiological and psychological factors, says sports scientist Vaibhav Daga, head of sports science and rehabilitation and sports medicine consultant at the Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital, Mumbai.
'Athletes at their peak seem to perform effortlessly due to years of training, refined technique and mental mastery. With age, they undergo physiological changes, including deterioration in reaction time, flexibility and range of motion, loss of muscle mass and strength, decline in cardiovascular efficiency and recovery rate, changes in hormone levels, neuromuscular decline and metabolic changes. These changes make it harder for athletes to maintain the speed, power, endurance, and flexibility needed for elite performance," he says.
'This combination of physical wear, psychological strain and external pressures makes it hard to maintain peak performance indefinitely," explains Daga, who has also worked with the Indian cricket team and multiple IPL franchises.
But this decline doesn't mean that the player's hard-earned skills simply disappear. It just becomes a lot harder, and takes a lot more work to continue to keep performing at a very high level. Stories of ageing players using cryo chambers, ice baths and sleep pods have been around for decades now.
Sreejesh explains this using the analogy of a car. 'A new car is usually very good and requires little maintenance. But with age and use, it goes through wear and tear and it requires regular and more frequent servicing to perform well. The human body needs special treatment and care to perform at the elite level and as you age it needs a lot more of that."
In a professional athlete's case, that 'servicing" means extra focus on training, nutrition and recovery—one has to work harder and longer in the gym to ensure strength, speed, mobility and flexibility are maintained, and pay more attention to the recovery protocol.
Dasgupta points out that players with that requisite amount of extra focus are the ones who can keep playing for a longer period of time. 'When you are in your 20s, you have all the energy in the world and are trying to make your name in the game. By 35-36, if you are still playing, you have made it and become famous. The question that arises then is do you still have the hunger, are you ready to make the sacrifices and put in 10-12 hours each day to be able to play at the top level? That's the first thing that hits you," says Dasgupta.
'I still loved the game and wanted to continue playing cricket, but I didn't want to put in such long hours. So, I quit. It happens early in the career for some and late for others… but everyone reaches this stage," he says.
I realised hockey is just a game I love, and I have to prepare for life after hockey. So, I read, educated myself, went to the market and did the school runs to prepare for life after I stop playing IN THE MIND
Professional sports can also take a toll on an athlete's mental health and emotional state. Anyone with a long career in professional sports goes through periods of shock and denial (in case of injuries), anger and frustration (when they make errors or miss games), depression and anxiety (over performance, fear of injury, loss of form) and eating disorders (in an effort to stay in shape). The transition away from a sports career is usually challenging for athletes, say sportspersons and sports medicine experts.
Till the moment that Sreejesh was injured in 2017, and was forced to take a few months out, hockey was everything to him. 'Overnight, someone else was hailed as the Great Wall of India," recalls Sreejesh. 'That put things in perspective… I realised hockey is just a game I love, and I have to prepare for life after hockey. So, I read, educated myself, went to the market and did the school runs to prepare for life after I stop playing."
Not everyone is this practical. As they approach their mid-30s, many players begin to fear for their post-sport future as they have no clue what to do once their career is over. And for most athletes, the end comes abruptly. Studies show that athletes suffer more depressive episodes than the general population.
'An athlete's professional career winds down at a time when those of their friends and peers are just about taking off in their mid to late 30s. It's natural for them to feel lost as they have known or done little else in their lives," says Dasgupta. When one has no clue what's coming up next, it's a very good reason to just continue doing what they have done all their life.
One more game. One more series. One more tournament. Every player has a greedy mindset, that's why they succeed, says Sreejesh. Athletes try to keep playing as long as possible, adds Dasgupta.
'After all, you start playing sport as a child because you love the game and enjoy playing it. The love of the game and the hunger to keep playing don't diminish at the same rate as your body's abilities do," he says.
But some, like Sharma and Kohli, are content with what they have achieved and level-headed enough to go out on their own terms.
'I could have played on…I still had two more years in me, but I wanted to leave at the top of my game. The biggest compliment to me today is when people ask me, 'Why did you stop playing,'" says Sreejesh.
Shrenik Avlani is a writer and editor and the co-author of The Shivfit Way, a book on functional fitness. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
26 minutes ago
- News18
'Virat Was Averaging 30...': Manjrekar Says India Have Moved On From Kohli-Rohit
Last Updated: Sanjay Manjrekar has noted Rohit Sharma's average of 10 in recent Tests and Virat Kohli's average of 30 over five years, suggesting their retirements weren't a big loss for India. Former India cricketer Sanjay Manjrekar has said that Rohit Sharma was averaging a dismal 10 in the last two Test series that he played, while ace batter Virat Kohli was averaging 30 in the last five years and although they weren't easy to replace, their retirements haven't been a huge loss to India. In the absence of Rohit and Kohli, Test skipper Shubman Gill led India's batting charge twice, first in the Birmingham victory over England, then in the Manchester draw that kept the series alive. Former England batter Jonathan Trott admitted that had the scenario been reversed, England wouldn't have managed to pull off the same. 'If you're taking the Joe Root out of the side or taking two experienced players like India have had to retire recently, it would be a very, very different scenario. I think India have given a great account of themselves," Trott said while speaking on Sony Sports. 'They've kept the series alive and it's certainly interesting to see the mood in the bus on the England bus when it goes down to London compared to the Indian bus on the way down to London," Trott added. The anchor pointed out that the situation was different for India, leading to Manjrekar highlighting Rohit-Kohli's diminishing returns. 'Rohit Sharma was averaging 10 in the last two series that he played and Virat Kohli was averaging 30 in the last five years. So they were perhaps not easy to replace, but it wasn't like it was a huge loss," Manjrekar said. 'It was a loss of two very senior players, but not a loss of contribution, because they weren't contributing as much," Manjrekar added. Having conceded a 311-run lead and lost their openers for ducks in the second innings, India displayed resolve to get a favourable result because of the efforts of Gill (103 off 238), KL Rahul (90 off 230), Jadeja (107 not out off 185) and Washington (101 not out off 206). With inspirational England captain Ben Stokes and Jofra Archer removing a well-set Gill and Rahul in the morning, England sensed a series-sealing win against India, but Jadeja and Washington hung in there before milking the bowlers towards the end of the day. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Women's Euro 2025: Spain being ‘the best team of the tournament' wasn't enough to win trophy, says Aitana Bonmati
Being the most skillful and technically best team at the Women's European Championship wasn't enough to get Spain the title on Sunday. The 2023 World Cup winner and 2024 UEFA Nations League title holder still does not have a European title for its stellar generation after a penalty shootout loss to England in the final after a 1-1 draw after extra time. Spain trailed for just four minutes' play across six games in the entire tournament. England led for barely five minutes' play in its three knockout rounds games — and none against Spain. 'We were the best team of the tournament, but sometimes that's not enough,' Spain star Aitana Bonmatí said. Bonmatí cut a sad figure walking to the trophy ceremony platform to collect her trophy as the best player of the tournament, which she began days after being hospitalized with a bout of viral meningitis. Bonmatí's spot kick in the shootout was one of two saved by England goalkeeper Hannah Hampton. Mariona Caldentey, whose 25th-minute headed goal seemed to set Spain on track for victory, also had her penalty saved. Caldentey also went close to scoring a second time in the first half, in which tournament top scorer Esther Gonzalez had three chances to score. Early in the second half, Caldentey's Arsenal teammates Chloe Kelly and Alessia Russo combined to level the score on Russo's header. 'I'm a bit in shock,' Bonmatí said. 'It was cruel. We played better, created more scoring chances, but in soccer sometimes that's not enough. It all came down to the penalties.' 'I'm sorry for my miss,' said two-time Ballon d'Or winner Bonmatí, whose teammates Caldentey and Alexia Putellas also failed from the spot in a 2-0 quarterfinal win over Switzerland. 'I think this team deserved more. At least not living with this bitter feeling,' Spain coach Montse Tomé said in translated comments. Spain captain Irene Paredes said it was 'hard to look for the positives so soon. Right now, it's a very tough moment.' 'England were happy just to reach penalties but, in the shootout, we didn't perform well,' said Paredes, whose Barcelona team also lost the Women's Champions League final in May to an English opponent, Arsenal. 'To be a champion you need some luck, and I believe they had it.' Spain still is a world champion and will soon prepare to start qualifying for the defense of its title. The 2027 World Cup is being played in Brazil. 'We will be back,' Bonmatí said. 'There will be a World Cup in a couple of years, and that's our goal now. This is a golden generation, with a lot of young players.'


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
India wins 2 gold, 5 silver and 5 bronze at FISU World University Games
India concluded their campaign at the FISU World University Games with a total of 12 medals, including two bronze medals and a silver medal by Ankita Dhyani in women's 3,000 m steeplechase on the final day of the competition on Sunday. Fireworks during the opening ceremony of the Rhine-Ruhr 2025 FISU World University Games in Duisburg, western Germany, on July 16, 2025. India finished the campaign with 12 medals(AFP) Also read: Education ministry seeks explanation from JNU VC for skipping key conference without approval The three medals on the final day took the Indian tally to two gold, five silver and five bronze medals, a total of 12 medals. The bronze medals were secured by the men's 4x100m relay and women's race walk teams on Sunday, as per Ankita, who took part in the 5,000 m event in the 2024 Paris Olympics, took the steeplechase late last year and, in April, clocked her previous best timings of 9:39.00 in Iowa Ilona Mononen of Finland bagged the gold after finishing in 9:31.86, and Germany's Adia Budde bagged bronze with a time of 9:33.34. Also read: DU UG Admission 2025: CSAS 2nd allotment list today at 5 pm on India kick-started the final day of the competition with a bronze medal in the women's 20 km race walk event as the trio of Sejal Singh, Munita Prajapati, and Mansi Negi secured a combined timing of 4:56:06 hours. Sejal was the fastest amongst all Indian walkers, finishing 15th individually with a 1:35:21 hour timing, while Munita Prajapati (1:39:33) finished in 18th spot, and Mansi Negi (1:41:12) finished 20th. China walked away with the gold medal in the event with a time of 4:28:51 hours, and Australia finished second with a time of 4:31:20 hours in the women's 20km race walk event. Coming to the men's 4x100m relay, the quartet of Lalu Prasad Bhoi, Animesh Kujur, Manikanta Hoblidhar and Dondapati Mrutyum Jayaram took home the bronze medal with a timing of 38.89, while South Korea took home the gold with 38.50 and South Africa got the silver with 38.80. India secured a total of five athletics medals at the competition, with Praveen Chitravel and Seema getting the silver medals in men's triple jump and the women's 5000m race, respectively, on Saturday. India also had a fine medal count in compound archery, as Sahil Rajesh Jadhav and Parneet Kaur walked away with gold and silver medals in the men's and women's compound events. India also landed a gold medal in the mixed team event, and the men's team got a silver. The women's team bronze was another highlight in the compound category. Also read: NIRF Rankings 2024: How are India's best universities ranked? Here's everything you need to know India's medal tally opened with its second-ever badminton medal at the event, a historic bronze medal in the mixed team event. In tennis as well, India secured their first-ever medal, with Vaishnavi Adkar claiming a singles bronze. The first-ever tennis medal was won by Nandan Bal in 1979 in Mexico, a silver. India's best-ever performance in the World University Games came back in 2023 at Chengdu, finishing seventh with 26 medals, including 11 gold medals.