
Women's rights pioneer and Ops Lalang detainee Theresa Lim dies at 68, mourned by activists
Malaysiakini cited her son Daniel Jeyachristi Anthony confirming the death at Universiti Malaya Medical Centre over cancer complications.
'She was diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma earlier this week. She was too weak to start chemotherapy and deteriorated further,' he was quoted saying.
Lim was formerly detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) during Ops Lalang on October 27, 1987, and released on June 3, 1988.
She had then been involved in All Women's Action Society (Awam) and the Women's Development Collective (WDC).
Her photograph had appeared on The Star's front page on October 28, 1987 recording the ISA detention, labelled 'Miss Lim Chin Chin – Aliran women's leader'.
She later documented her 60-day solitary confinement experience in a published account.
After her release, she had continued her activism to the end of her life.
Former Batu MP Chua Tian Chang today mourned her death, saying her sacrifices had paved the way for today's movements.
'Her unwavering spirit will continue to inspire us forward. Rest well Lim, your legacy lives on in our hearts as well as in the fight for justice,' the activist known as Tian Chua posted on Instagram.
Activist Kua Kia Soong also paid tribute to Lim. They had both been detained under Ops Lalang.
'She suffered torture during her detention, especially during the first 60 days of solitary confinement. The trauma left her with an auto-immune disability that left her unwell for many years,' he posted on Facebook.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
10 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Nilai police probe RM1.4m scam after businessman falls for fake app investment
SEREMBAN, July 22 — A businessman suffered losses of over RM1 million after falling victim to a non-existent online investment scheme in April. Nilai police chief Supt Abdul Malik Hasim said the police received a report from the man, in his 50s, at 4.22 pm yesterday at the Pantai police station. 'The victim claimed he had dealings with an individual who offered the scheme on April 29 and was attracted to invest after being promised high returns. 'He was then instructed to download a mobile application called 'CDT MAX' before transferring money into seven different bank accounts provided for the investment. A total of 15 transactions were made, amounting to RM1,449,750,' he said in a statement. Abdul Malik added that the victim realised he had been scammed when he was asked to make additional payments in order to withdraw his so-called investment profits. He said further investigations are underway to trace the suspect under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating. — Bernama

Malay Mail
10 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
In latest bid, lawyer sues to make Federal Constitution's BM translation override original English text
KUALA LUMPUR, July 22 — Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla has filed a lawsuit against the Malaysian government, as he wants the Bahasa Malaysia translation of the Federal Constitution to be the authoritative text or to override the original text which is in English. In his court challenge filed last night at the High Court in Kuala Lumpur, Haniff is seeking two main court orders. He wants the court to declare that the Federal Constitution's text in the national language is the authoritative text under Article 160B, and that this national language text would prevail over the text in the English language, if there are any conflicts or discrepancies between the two texts. Alternatively, he wants the court to order the Malaysian government to take all necessary steps to ensure that the national language text of the Federal Constitution is prescribed to be the authoritative text within five years from the court order. The Federal Constitution's Article 160B states that when the Constitution has been translated into the national language, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong 'may prescribe' the national language text to be authoritative, and that it would then prevail over the English language text if there are any conflicts or discrepancies. In his lawsuit, Haniff argued that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's 2003 'launch' of the BM translation of the Federal Constitution would amount to 'prescribing' it as the authoritative text. This is not the first time that Haniff has raised this argument in the courts to claim that the BM text is the authoritative version, as he has previously raised it on behalf of Islamic religious bodies to argue that unilateral religious conversions of children are valid. Previously, the Federal Court had in 2018 unanimously decided in Hindu mother M. Indira Gandhi's case that the Federal Constitution's English text is authoritative as there is no evidence that the BM text has been prescribed to be authoritative. The Federal Court in 2024 had also unanimously in Hindu mother Loh Siew Hong's case ruled that the Federal Constitution's English text is the authoritative text and held that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had not prescribed the BM translation to be authoritative. The Federal Constitution was drafted in the English language and it has been the authoritative text in Malaysia since 1963, while the BM translation was reportedly launched in 2003. The latest reprint as of 2020 of the Federal Constitution's BM translation carries this note: 'Teks ini HANYALAH TERJEMAHAN oleh Jabatan Peguam Negara bagi Federal Constitution. Melainkan jika dan sehingga ditetapkan sahih di bawah Perkara 160B Perlembagaan Persekutuan, teks ini bukan perundangan'. In English, the note means: 'This text is ONLY A TRANSLATION by the Attorney General's Chambers for the Federal Constitution. Unless and until prescribed as authoritative under Article 160B of the Federal Constitution, this text is not law.' In 2023, then attorney general Tan Sri Idrus Harun announced plans to propose for the Federal Constitution's BM text to be the authoritative text under Article 160B, and said this plan would be subject to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's approval.

Malay Mail
10 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Report on AG-public prosecutor separation to be sent to Cabinet this month, says law minister
KUALA LUMPUR, July 22 — The Comparative Study Task Force's final report on the proposed separation of powers between the attorney general (AG) and the public prosecutor will be presented to the Cabinet this month, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said today. The minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) said the Cabinet had already agreed in principle to the reform, and that two task forces — one for comparative studies and another for technical implementation — had been set up. 'The final report from the Comparative Study Task Force will be submitted to the Cabinet in July. 'After that, the Technical Task Force will take over to work on how the separation will be implemented,' she said in a written parliamentary reply to Pulai MP Suhaizan Kayat. Azalina said the comparative task force, which she led, carried out working visits to Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. The delegation included MPs from both sides of the aisle, the Bar Council, Attorney General's Chambers (AGC), and the Legal Affairs Division of the Prime Minister's Department. An interim report from the task force, she said, had outlined key policy issues such as appointment and dismissal powers, role clarity, institutional independence, transparency, and accountability. It was tabled before parliamentary select committees in both the Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara. Azalina added that doctrinal research involving nine countries — including Kenya, India, Hong Kong and South Africa — had also been completed, along with a public opinion study which showed strong support for separating the AG's advisory role from prosecutorial powers. The technical task force, she said, is chaired by the deputy law minister and comprises representatives from the Legal Affairs Division, AGC, Public Service Department, Finance Ministry, and the Judicial and Legal Services Commission. 'Overall, the proposed Bill is currently being finalised and will be tabled once it receives approval from the Cabinet,' she added.