NHL contract grades: Canucks take a risk giving big money to Thatcher Demko
When Demko is firing on all cylinders, he can be a game-changer in net. His 2023-24 captured just how high his ceiling can be, when he earned 32 quality starts and saved 25.8 goals above expected, which ranked fourth in the league.
But that season also showed what makes him such a wild card in Vancouver: his durability. Injuries ended Demko's year early and limited his postseason to just one game. That carried into 2024-25. And just when he started to shake the rust off in goal after a delayed start, he ended up missing more time with injury. That's why management invested in Kevin Lankinen with a five-year deal carrying a $4.5 million cap hit.
Advertisement
That Lankinen contract isn't starting goalie money, it's more in the range of a 1A-1B. So there was still room to invest in Demko to form a balanced tandem that gives Vancouver insurance with that injury wild card in mind.
It just doesn't make sense at this cost, or this early.
By extending Demko now, management solidifies a Lankinen-Demko tandem. That gives Canucks a chance to sell high on Arturs Silovs, after he won MVP-honors in the Calder Cup. The free agent goalie market is incredibly thin, and Silovs is very cost-effective, so there could be buyers. As much as it makes sense for management to know that Demko is locked in for another couple of years before dealing Silovs, this extension does hurt Vancouver's trade leverage.
But the biggest risk is the fact that this contract is done a year early, because who knows what might happen this year. Can Demko get back on track after all of last year's ups and downs? He is reportedly healthy and already training, but will that last? Can he get through a full season in an even rotation with Lankinen, or as a 1A, and carry this team into the playoffs? If the answer is no, the team just sunk $13 million into a crease it can't be confident in. That's why it's a short-term deal. But that only protects the Canucks so much.
From Demko's perspective, the contract makes a ton of sense. His last year was filled with ups and downs, and a lot of durability question marks. Now he doesn't have to worry that an injury would derail his chance of a lucrative extension — he already has one in place. Sure, it doesn't have the long-term certainty of a six-plus year deal. But if all goes well over the next three years, the door should be open for another solid contract when he is 33 years old.
The trade-off is an $8.5 million cap hit, which is the same as … Connor Hellebuyck. Only three active goalies have a higher AAV — Andrei Vasilevskiy, Sergei Bobrovsky, and Igor Shesterkin. And while that doesn't account for cap inflation ($8.5 million will be worth 8.2 percent of the cap in 2026-27, while Hellebuyck's cap hit percentage is 8.9 percent), it doesn't move the needle away from bonafide starter money.
Contract grade: B-
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
3 minutes ago
- New York Times
WNBA mailbag: Submit your questions
We're in the second half of the WNBA season and the playoff race is on. Which teams are making a push? Who's having an MVP season? What's going to happen with the collective bargaining agreement negotiations? Submit your questions in the comment section, and our expert, Sabreena Merchant, will answer later this week.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"He's done a lot of things that probably angered other players" - Matt Barnes reveals some NBA players have hatred for Curry
"He's done a lot of things that probably angered other players" - Matt Barnes reveals some NBA players have hatred for Curry originally appeared on Basketball Network. Stephen Curry never walked into the league demanding attention. Steph didn't have the build of a franchise savior or the personality of a dominant alpha. He was skinny. He smiled a lot. He shot jumpers. And for a while, that was all people saw. They figured Curry would have a decent career, maybe hit a few big shots, sell some tickets, and go home. Nobody saw what was coming. But somewhere between the early ankle injuries and the parades down Market Street, he rewrote the blueprint. What Curry did wasn't loud, angry or packaged in the usual swagger. It just kept showing up, every night, right in people's faces. "I think, he came in, he's the golden boy," Matt Barnes, a 14-year NBA veteran, said, explaining why some in the NBA grew to resent the Warriors guard. "He came in and destroyed record books, won championships, beat LeBron [James] — he's done a lot of things that probably angered other players and other fans. That's why I don't think he gets the respect he deserves." The golden boy Barnes played with Kobe Bryant. He guarded Kevin Durant and threw elbows in the old Western Conference when it was still gritty and bruising. If anyone understands how resentment brews in NBA circles, it's him. And Matt was speaking from a place of knowing what players say behind the curtain. Curry didn't climb the league's hierarchy the traditional way, dominate the combine, or get handed the keys as a rookie. Steph had to break through gradually by changing the game as he went. Suddenly, coaches were telling kids to shoot 3-pointers on the break. Suddenly, seven-footers were stuck chasing him out to the perimeter. Teams started building rosters around the space he created. The league had never seen anything like it. By the time everyone realized how far ahead of the curve he was, it was too late. The Warriors were already rolling. Curry was already MVP, and the foundation of basketball, as people knew it, had already started to people see, and what they can't stand There's something about Curry that still doesn't sit right with many people, and it's rarely about his game. Steph's skill set is impossible to argue with. The shooting numbers are absurd and the hardware speaks loudly. However, it's the image that rubs some players the wrong way. "He's obviously the greatest shooter to ever play the game, and I can see people being bitter from that," Barnes said. "Not to mention the whole light-skinned thing, and people have problems with that. Like I said, he's a perfect example of what the NBA needs to be represented as, and people don't like that either. Most of the time when people are so good or something's so perfect, people don't like that, and that's exactly what you get with Steph." That part is hard to quantify, but it's real. Curry came in with a clean image. Family man, college sweetheart and son of a former pro, Steph looked polished before he ever won anything, which perhaps bothered people. He didn't fit the underdog narrative the league loves to market, but he also wasn't built like the superstars who came before him. There was no sense of threat, or physical intimidation, or that chip-on-the-shoulder meanness. And then Curry started winning everything. SC broke 3-point records in his sleep and hit daggers from 35 feet and jogged back on defense before the ball dropped. He embarrassed defenses and didn't need to say a word while doing it. Steph took the heart out of playoff teams just by moving without the ball. For players who had spent their whole careers chasing respect through force, watching someone dance his way to dominance like that didn't sit well. Barnes brought up skin tone because he knows it plays a role in how players are perceived. There's always been a cultural undercurrent in the league regarding style and identity. The way Curry presents himself — quiet, corporate-friendly, camera-ready — is what the league pushes forward. And that's maybe what some players push back against. But Curry has heard it all: the slights and the subtle digs from players who never found a way to stop him. He doesn't fire back, nor does he chase validation. Steph just keeps doing what he does. Jealousy's a quiet thing in the NBA. You don't hear it as much as you feel it. But when a former player says it out loud, you can bet he is not story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jul 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana Fever vs Phoenix Mercury prediction, TV, time, schedule. Is Caitlin Clark playing?
The Indiana Fever are on a two-game winning streak going into their home matchup against the Phoenix Mercury on Wednesday night. DeWanna Bonner returns to Indianapolis after being waived by the Fever in June. Bonner missed five games for personal reasons. Caitlin Clark has missed the last four games with a right groin injury and is not expected to play against the Mercury. Chloe Peterson is your best Fever follow, and sign up for our Caitlin Clark Fever newsletter. 7 p.m. ET Wednesday, July 30, 2025, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. TV: ESPN3, FanDuel Sports Network - Indiana Radio: 93.5 and 107.5 FM in Indianapolis, with John Nolan (play-by-play), Bria Goss (analysis) Chloe Peterson, IndyStar: Mercury 78-72 "Indiana and Phoenix will play for the first time on Wednesday, with the Mercury coming to Indianapolis for their third of a six-game road trip over the East Coast in a week and a half. "The Mercury, which reloaded in the offseason, has a lot of star power in MVP candidate Alyssa Thomas, forward Satou Sabally, and guard Kahleah Copper. Thomas embodies the role of a point forward, averaging a league-leading 9.4 assists per game, while Sabally is averaging 18.0 points per game. "All three of their big three have been plagued with injury issues this season so far, they are all healthy coming into Indianapolis. And the Mercury, despite those injuries, have managed a 16-9 record to be No. 3 in the standings. "Indiana will still be without its star, Caitlin Clark, who doesn't have a timetable to return from her right groin injury. The Fever have found spurts of success without her, but haven't been able to put together those types of games consistently." Caitlin Clark has not played since suffering a right groin injury on July 15. She sought a second opinion during the team's trip to New York. The Fever announced there were no signs of additional damage or injuries, and they are maintaining a long-term focus on her recovery, prioritizing her future health. There is no timetable for her return. ESPN's matchup predictor gives the Fever a 64.5% chance of winning. In 13 games this season, Caitlin Clark averages 16.5 points, 8.8 assists, 5.0 rebounds and 1.6 steals, making 27.9% of her 3-pointers. (with season averages) Our team of savvy editors independently handpicks all recommendations. If you purchase through our links, the USA Today Network may earn a commission. Prices were accurate at the time of publication but may change. Gambling involves risk. Please only gamble with funds that you can comfortably afford to lose. While we do our utmost to offer good advice and information we cannot be held responsible for any loss that may be incurred as a result of gambling. We do our best to make sure all the information that we provide on this site is correct. However, from time to time mistakes will be made and we will not be held liable. Please check any stats or information if you are unsure how accurate they are. No guarantees are made with regards to results or financial gain. All forms of betting carry financial risk and it is up to the individual to make bets with or without the assistance of information provided on this site and we cannot be held responsible for any loss that may be incurred as a result of following the betting tips provided on this site. Past performances do not guarantee success in the future and betting odds fluctuate from one minute to the next. The material contained on this site is intended to inform, entertain and educate the reader and in no way represents an inducement to gamble legally or illegally or any sort of professional advice.
