logo
NASA Wasn't Happy When Astronaut John Young Smuggled This Food Into Space

NASA Wasn't Happy When Astronaut John Young Smuggled This Food Into Space

Yahoo2 days ago
On March 23, 1965, NASA launched astronauts Virgil "Gus" Grissom and John Young into orbit on the Gemini III mission. The launch was the result of countless hours of preparation and research, and, of course, millions upon millions of dollars. Every detail of the mission was meticulously planned, including approved foods that could be eaten once up and out of the atmosphere. NASA didn't send many provisions on the mission (it was less than five hours long). In fact, there were only rations for Young. Young took it upon himself to smuggle in a meal for Grissom, one he knew that Grissom enjoyed. The sneaky astronaut tucked a corned beef sandwich on rye bread into his spacesuit without informing NASA, a move which the space giant (and Congress) wasn't happy about once the secret was uncovered.
Once the astronauts were in orbit, Young passed the sandwich to his commander, who ate some of the sandwich but hid the remainder in his own pocket. It's unclear when NASA found out about the unapproved food, but the two rule-breakers were disciplined by their employer once the beef was out of the bag. The event even appears in the Guinness Book of World Records as the first food smuggled into space, further cementing the exchange in history. The sandwich (or rather, a replica caked in resin) and the incident is memorialized at the Grissom Memorial Museum in Mitchell, Indiana.
You may be wondering what the big deal is. The fact is, any foods allowed to go out of this world are thoroughly vetted because certain items can be downright dangerous for either the astronauts or the spacecraft itself.
Read more: Once Popular Sandwiches People Don't Eat Anymore
Space food and menu planning are an important part of any space mission. Not only do the nutritional and caloric needs of the astronauts need to be taken into account, but logistics as well. For example, there's limited storage space. If a food is too bulky, it might get banned to prioritize smaller, more calorie-dense items.
The lack of gravity is another factor, as is any mess potential. In fact, mess is precisely why bread is on NASA's list of banned foods. Bread crumbs will begin to float in the absence of gravity and could potentially end up in an astronaut's eye or in important equipment. Tortillas are NASA's preferred type of grain.
For similar reasons, salt and pepper are also not allowed in space, but that doesn't mean space food must be bland. Liquid seasonings have been developed for astronauts to use. Carbonated drinks like sodas stay on earth. In space, the carbon dioxide (bubbles) in these beverages don't rise up and out of the liquid. If a person were to drink one in orbit, they'd be ingesting more carbonation than they would if they were drinking one on earth. This can cause stomach aches.
Space food has come a long way since the first Mercury missions, where food was largely freeze-dried, unappetizing, and packaged in aluminum tubes. As space exploration has evolved, so has the menu for astronauts. It's unclear whether corned beef (which isn't the same as pastrami) on tortillas is allowed to go to infinity and beyond, but we do know that bacon already made it to the moon with NASA's approval.
For more food and drink goodness, join The Takeout's newsletter. Get taste tests, food & drink news, deals from your favorite chains, recipes, cooking tips, and more!
Read the original article on The Takeout.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breast cancer vaccine breakthrough as more than 75% of women show immune response in new test
Breast cancer vaccine breakthrough as more than 75% of women show immune response in new test

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Breast cancer vaccine breakthrough as more than 75% of women show immune response in new test

A breakthrough breast cancer vaccine has completed Phase one trials, with over 75 percent of participants showing a strong immune response, raising hopes it could help eradicate the disease by 2030. The vaccine, developed by Anixa Biosciences and the Cleveland Clinic, targets alpha‑lactalbumin, a milk protein linked to aggressive triple-negative breast cancer, to help prevent and treat the disease. That form of cancer is known as the most deadly. During the first phase of the trial, 35 women, many with triple-negative breast cancer or a genetic risk, received the vaccine. Blood tests showed that more than 75 percent developed a strong immune response, indicated by antibodies on their white blood cells. That improved response can help a person's immune system identify and destroy cancerous cells. Side effects of the vaccine were limited to mild injection‑site irritation. Dr. Amit Kumar, Anixa's CEO, called the findings 'very exciting' in an interview with the New York Post. 'It's a very new mechanism and we think that if this works and is able to prevent cancer, then we can perhaps eliminate breast cancer as a disease, just like we've done for polio and various other infectious diseases,' Kumar told the outlet. Phase two is scheduled for next year and will test a larger group of participants and expand testing to additional types of breast cancer. Unlike vaccines for infections, cancer vaccines face challenges because cancer originates from the body's own cells, making it harder for the immune system to distinguish them. Past attempts often targeted proteins found in both cancerous and healthy tissues, sometimes causing harmful immune responses. Breast cancer cells often contain alpha-lactalbumin, a protein normally only present during pregnancy and breastfeeding. A Cleveland Clinic scientist proposed targeting it in women not planning to have more children 20 years ago, leading to the current vaccine trial. The US Department of Defense funded the study, but future progress may be affected by budget cuts. Researchers plan to present their results to the agency this year.

New study claims the universe will start shrinking in 7 billion years
New study claims the universe will start shrinking in 7 billion years

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

New study claims the universe will start shrinking in 7 billion years

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. How will the world end? While some, like Robert Frost, have waxed poetic about the end of life on Earth—fire or ice—others have been looking to science to solve the mystery. Even still, others have been looking at the bigger picture, trying to figure out when the entire universe will end. Now, a new study claims that the universe itself might start shrinking within the next 7 billion years, leading to what scientists call 'the Big Crunch.' The study was published by physicists from Cornell University, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and several other institutions. Using data collected from many different astronomical surveys, including the Dark Energy Survey, the researchers have created a new model that predicts our universe will end with what scientists have long theorized will be a 'Big Crunch.' The model suggests the universe will end roughly 33.3 billion years after the Big Bang. Today's Top Deals XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Using that date, the researchers then began looking backward. So far, the universe is estimated to be around 13.8 billion years old. Based on that number and the model's prediction of when the universe will end, we have roughly 20 billion years before the universe collapses in on itself. This study, and the theory of the 'Big Crunch,' challenges long held assumptions that the universe will expand forever, eventually leading to a 'Big Freeze.' Instead, the researchers estimate that the universe will continue to expand for another 7 billion years. At that point, the universe will then begin contracting. Essentially, it will collapse in on itself until a single point remains, destroying everything. It's an interesting and somewhat terrifying theory, even if we aren't expecting it to happen in our lifetime. One easy way to think about it is to imagine the universe as a massive rubber band. As the universe expands, the rubber band stretches. But then it eventually reaches a point where it can't be stretched anymore, forcing the band to become stronger than its expansion force. This then causes everything to snap back together. It's a bit of a sad way for the universe to end, and I can't imagine what it would actually look like if there was any way to see it taking place. Luckily, it's not really something we have to worry about, and this research is far from actual confirmation that this is what will happen. For all we know, the theories could be incorrect, and the universe could indeed keep expanding forever. More Top Deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 See the

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store