logo
ACC encouraging seniors to attend fall prevention classes

ACC encouraging seniors to attend fall prevention classes

Caroline Upward takes part in a balancing exercise during a strength and mobility class. Photo: supplied
A Wānaka local is helping advocate for the importance of strength and balance exercises as ACC launches a new campaign on the importance of classes for those aged 65 years and over.
The Community Strength and Balance Campaign is looking to highlight the importance of improving strength and balance to prevent falls.
Caroline Upward, aged 69, fell twice while walking the Mt Iron track which prompted her to attend local ACC classes that promised to improve her balance and strength.
Despite having done the walk countless times, Ms Upward found herself with a fractured shoulder after the first fall and a ruptured wrist after the second.
Having experienced two serious injuries while walking, which had been her main source of exercise, Ms Upward felt a change was needed.
"I always thought I was strong, but as I got older, I realised I needed to do more than just walking," she said.
"The body doesn't keep going unless you give it attention."
That is when she found a senior strength and mobility class in Wānaka through the Live Stronger for Longer campaign.
The classes were welcoming, filled with locals who had similar experiences and needed exercises that would help them rebuild their strength.
They became a priority for Ms Upward especially as her own 86-year-old mother injured her wrists and hip after numerous falls.
She now attends classes twice a week where a qualified occupational therapist takes participants through a range of targeted exercises, working with resistance bands and weights, as well as going through breathwork and stretching.
ACC injury prevention leader James Whitaker said falls are the most common cause of injury in New Zealand, accounting for nearly 40% of all ACC claims.
"Falls can have a significant impact on a person's quality of life, especially if it results in a fracture, so we want to do what we can to prevent them from happening in the first place," he said.
He added that exercises which focus on strength and balance can reduce falls by 20% to 30%.
ACC will be campaigning next week to raise awareness of the classes available nationwide which include tai chi, yoga, pool classes, dance classes and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russian adoptee's PTSD claim denied by ACC over residency rules
Russian adoptee's PTSD claim denied by ACC over residency rules

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Russian adoptee's PTSD claim denied by ACC over residency rules

By Shannon Pitman, Open Justice reporter of The young man began to suffer PTSD brought on by abuse he suffered as a child in Russia. Photo: Unsplash A Russian child who was adopted by New Zealanders and suffered physical abuse in his home country has had his claim for PTSD as an adult declined. Despite a High Court and District Court ruling that the man was eligible for mental health cover, the Court of Appeal overturned their rulings, stating he was not entitled to cover for a mental injury, because the physical assault occurred when he was not a New Zealand resident. The man, whose name is suppressed, was born in Russia in August 2001 and arrived in New Zealand as a three-year-old. Twenty years later, while living here as a New Zealand citizen, he was diagnosed with PTSD, stemming from abuse he suffered before arriving. ACC declined his claim for mental injury cover, stating the physical injury had occurred when he was not a New Zealand resident and therefore he was not entitled to compensation. Under the Accident Compensation Act 2001, for mental injury to be covered, it must arise out of a physical injury, or be caused by certain criminal acts or a workplace incident. The man challenged ACC's decision, which was overturned by the District Court and - on appeal from ACC - the High Court, which found his mental injury was suffered in New Zealand and therefore he was eligible for cover. ACC took the case to the Court of Appeal, which had the task of determining where the physical injury occurred that triggered the mental injury. The man's lawyers, Beatrix Woodhouse and Mathew McKillop, argued the PTSD diagnosis in 2019 marked the point at which the mental injury was suffered, and because he was living in New Zealand, this qualified him for cover. The lawyers submitted that, although the act specified a physical injury must match the mental injury, it did not specify a location. The Court of Appeal determined that how the personal injury was caused was critical. "Causation is the primary consideration," the court said in its recently released decision. "A mental injury which has arisen because of a physical injury may well be latent - the date the mental injury is triggered or the symptoms manifest is no doubt dependent on a variety of circumstances," . "But it is the physical injury which is the root of the mental injury. It is therefore the date and, in our view, the location of that physical injury which is the key to whether cover is available under the Act." New Zealand's Court of Appeal is the last avenue to appeal ACC decisions. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King The Court of Appeal determined the High Court and District Court erred in their decision-making, as the man was not a resident of New Zealand at the time of the abuse and, therefore, was not covered for ACC. "The Act cannot be interpreted as intending to provide cover for injuries caused overseas to people who are not ordinarily resident in New Zealand. Such an approach would mean the scheme was required to fund the consequences of events outside its jurisdiction and over which it could have no influence. "In our view, it is clear that Parliament intended to provide cover for mental injuries suffered because of physical injuries where the causative physical injuries occurred in New Zealand or, if suffered outside New Zealand, when the person was ordinarily resident in New Zealand when the cause occurred." The parents of the man released a statement to NZME to the effect that they believed the decision was deeply unfair to their son. "He is a New Zealander, adopted by New Zealanders under New Zealand law, and has known no other home," the statement said. "The Adoption Act is clear that an adoptee is to be treated as our natural-born child in every respect. "Yet, due to an injury that occurred before his adoption, he is now denied ACC-funded treatment for a condition that only manifested later in life." Their lawyer, Beatrix Woodhouse, said the Court of Appeal was the end of the road for all ACC claims. "Therefore, this decision represents the definitive legal position on this issue," she said. "It sets a precedent for other cases with comparable facts." ACC deputy chief executive for corporate and finance Stewart McRobie told NZME the organisation was seeking clarification of the law and acknowledged the Court of Appeal's decision. "We also acknowledge the impact of the decision on the claimant, and empathise with them and their family." * This story originally appeared in the New Zealand Herald .

Big increase in workers taking weeks off on ACC
Big increase in workers taking weeks off on ACC

Newsroom

time3 days ago

  • Newsroom

Big increase in workers taking weeks off on ACC

A "swamped" healthcare system and changes to ACC's case management model are behind a steady rise in claims for injuries keeping New Zealanders off work for a prolonged period, experts say. This trend, which contrasts with an overall decrease in work-related injury claims, is outlined in an aide memoire prepared for Workplace Safety Minister Brooke van Velden by ACC after she requested information on the increasing trend in work-related injury claims by those needing more than a week off work.

Russian-born man who was adopted as child loses ACC appeal as injury occurred before immigrating
Russian-born man who was adopted as child loses ACC appeal as injury occurred before immigrating

RNZ News

time4 days ago

  • RNZ News

Russian-born man who was adopted as child loses ACC appeal as injury occurred before immigrating

Photo: Supplied A child who was assaulted in Russia before his adoption into New Zealand has been declined cover for mental injury by ACC in the Court of Appeal. The child, referred to as D in the recent decision by Justice Susan Thomas, was born in Russia in August 2001 and was a Russian citizen when he was physically assaulted as a young child. In August 2004, D was adopted by New Zealanders and emigrated to New Zealand. In November 2019, D was diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) attributed to the physical injuries he suffered in Russia. He applied for ACC cover, and was declined - a decision that was confirmed on review in February 2020 - because the personal injury had not been suffered locally. The decision to decline cover was appealed in the district court, which ruled ACC should have approved D's cover, because the mental injury resulting from those physical injuries was suffered in New Zealand. That decision was then appealed in the High Court, and upheld, before escalating to the Court of Appeal. Now, the Court of Appeal has set aside that decision, ruling D is not covered by ACC, as "the causative physical injury did not occur in New Zealand and D was not ordinarily resident in New Zealand at the time he was physically injured". Thomas wrote in her decision that causation was the "primary consideration" as "it is the physical injury which is the root of the mental injury". "When D suffered the physical injuries which caused his mental injury, he was neither in New Zealand nor ordinarily resident in New Zealand. It follows that D does not have cover under the Act." She said that interpretation was "consistent with the overarching purpose of the Act, focused as it is on enhancing the public good and reinforcing the personal injury social contract between New Zealanders". "The Act cannot be interpreted as intending to provide cover for injuries caused overseas to people who are not ordinarily resident in New Zealand. Such an approach would mean the scheme was required to fund the consequences of events outside its jurisdiction and over which it could have no influence." The decision made no orders as to costs. ACC's deputy chief executive corporate and finance, Stewart McRobie, said in a statement: "ACC was seeking clarification of the law and acknowledges the Court of Appeal's decision." "ACC acknowledges the impact of the decision on the claimant, and empathises with them and their family." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store