Russian adoptee's PTSD claim denied by ACC over residency rules
The young man began to suffer PTSD brought on by abuse he suffered as a child in Russia.
Photo:
Unsplash
A Russian child who was adopted by New Zealanders and suffered physical abuse in his home country has had his claim for PTSD as an adult declined.
Despite a High Court and District Court ruling that the man was eligible for mental health cover, the Court of Appeal overturned their rulings, stating he was not entitled to cover for a mental injury, because the physical assault occurred when he was not a New Zealand resident.
The man, whose name is suppressed, was born in Russia in August 2001 and arrived in New Zealand as a three-year-old.
Twenty years later, while living here as a New Zealand citizen, he was diagnosed with PTSD, stemming from abuse he suffered before arriving.
ACC declined his claim for mental injury cover, stating the physical injury had occurred when he was not a New Zealand resident and therefore he was not entitled to compensation.
Under the Accident Compensation Act 2001, for mental injury to be covered, it must arise out of a physical injury, or be caused by certain criminal acts or a workplace incident.
The man challenged ACC's decision, which was overturned by the District Court and - on appeal from ACC - the High Court, which found his mental injury was suffered in New Zealand and therefore he was eligible for cover.
ACC took the case to the Court of Appeal, which had the task of determining where the physical injury occurred that triggered the mental injury.
The man's lawyers, Beatrix Woodhouse and Mathew McKillop, argued the PTSD diagnosis in 2019 marked the point at which the mental injury was suffered, and because he was living in New Zealand, this qualified him for cover.
The lawyers submitted that, although the act specified a physical injury must match the mental injury, it did not specify a location.
The Court of Appeal determined that how the personal injury was caused was critical.
"Causation is the primary consideration," the court said in its recently released decision. "A mental injury which has arisen because of a physical injury may well be latent - the date the mental injury is triggered or the symptoms manifest is no doubt dependent on a variety of circumstances," .
"But it is the physical injury which is the root of the mental injury. It is therefore the date and, in our view, the location of that physical injury which is the key to whether cover is available under the Act."
New Zealand's Court of Appeal is the last avenue to appeal ACC decisions.
Photo:
RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King
The Court of Appeal determined the High Court and District Court erred in their decision-making, as the man was not a resident of New Zealand at the time of the abuse and, therefore, was not covered for ACC.
"The Act cannot be interpreted as intending to provide cover for injuries caused overseas to people who are not ordinarily resident in New Zealand. Such an approach would mean the scheme was required to fund the consequences of events outside its jurisdiction and over which it could have no influence.
"In our view, it is clear that Parliament intended to provide cover for mental injuries suffered because of physical injuries where the causative physical injuries occurred in New Zealand or, if suffered outside New Zealand, when the person was ordinarily resident in New Zealand when the cause occurred."
The parents of the man released a statement to NZME to the effect that they believed the decision was deeply unfair to their son.
"He is a New Zealander, adopted by New Zealanders under New Zealand law, and has known no other home," the statement said. "The Adoption Act is clear that an adoptee is to be treated as our natural-born child in every respect.
"Yet, due to an injury that occurred before his adoption, he is now denied ACC-funded treatment for a condition that only manifested later in life."
Their lawyer, Beatrix Woodhouse, said the Court of Appeal was the end of the road for all ACC claims.
"Therefore, this decision represents the definitive legal position on this issue," she said. "It sets a precedent for other cases with comparable facts."
ACC deputy chief executive for corporate and finance Stewart McRobie told NZME the organisation was seeking clarification of the law and acknowledged the Court of Appeal's decision.
"We also acknowledge the impact of the decision on the claimant, and empathise with them and their family."
*
This story originally appeared in the
New Zealand Herald
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
35 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Oranga Tamariki practice of motel accommodation continues despite calls to stop
Oranga Tamariki does not know how or when it will be able to avoid using motels. Photo: RNZ Children in Oranga Tamariki care are still being checked into motels despite years of calls to stop. The Children's Commissioner said the "unacceptable" practice had become normalised, and the agency itself agreed it was not okay. But Oranga Tamariki did not yet know how or when it could avoid using motels. "No one really thinks it's ideal that children and young people stay in motels," said tamariki and whānau services national commissioner North Alison Cronin. "I think it's still happening because we really do have a lack of ... immediate resources for children who are coming into care, or their placements may have broken down." Figures released to RNZ showed in 2022, 224 children in Oranga Tamariki care stayed in motels. That dropped to 187 in 2023, then 185 last year. In the first five months of this year, 99 have stayed in motels. Since 2022 the most common length of stay was one night, but the average was 19 nights - which Oranga Tamariki said was skewed due to the few who had longer stays, some for more than 100 nights. Motels were only used as a last resort "following a careful exploration of possible alternatives," the agency said. Some children were placed in motels because of "extremely challenging" behaviours that put themselves or others at risk. For others, Oranga Tamariki said it was better for the children to be in a place where it's easier to keep up family contact, go to school or access support services while a longer term placement was being arranged. The young people - which include babies less than a year old - are cared for by family members, care providers or "briefly" by Oranga Tamariki staff. They were supported to maintain their routines like school, community activities, and contact with family, it said. Cronin said Oranga Tamariki was exploring how to stop the use of motels, but she could not give a timeframe on that piece of work. "We haven't quite got the answers at the moment," she said. "I think one of the the major issues is we don't have enough physical homes or houses or places for children to stay, which is why we end up defaulting to motels." Children's Commissioner Dr Claire Achmad said that it was isolating and unstable for children. "If we look at the data, it's clear that unfortunately this practice has become somewhat normalised over the last few years and Oranga Tamariki needs to focus on it as one of the basics that it needs to get right, and it needs to change," she said. "It needs to increase its availability of pre-approved caregivers and over the long term, I'd really like to see more community based group home living environments available for children in need of care and protection." Achmad also wanted people across the country to consider becoming caregivers. "I encourage people to step up and consider whether they might be able to take on this kind of role, which can make a huge difference for children and young people." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
35 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Aged Care Association says it warned government on lack of hospital discharge options
Aged Care Association chief executive Tracey Martin. Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon Retirement homes and aged care centres want a cross-party agreement to build more facilities - and to stop older people getting stuck in hospital unnecessarily. North Shore Hospital has a ward full of patients who have been medically discharged but who cannot leave hospital because they have nowhere to go for further, non-hospital care. The Aged Care Association represents nearly all rest homes and retirement villages and says the North Shore situation an example of a nationwide problem . Its chief executive Tracey Martin said those working in aged care had been warning the government for years that it would happen. An agreement needed to be reached that went beyond politics to ensure there would be enough health care for older people, she said. Politicians needed to agree on an infrastructure grant for aged care facilities - particularly those that were smaller, run by charities, or rural - so they could afford to provide higher level care, such as dementia units. "We need at least the major parties to agree on the problem, to agree on the solution - and we need at least a decade of travel time to shift the current system into a more sustainable system with the number of beds New Zealanders are going to need," she said. North Shore Hospital said it had brought the patients together into one ward [Ward 6] to help ease pressure on the hospital in the busy winter. But it was not uncommon for New Zealanders in other parts of the country to wait in hospital for a space in a place that could help with, for example, stroke rehabilitation or demential care. It did not always mean a move to permanent residential care, but could be a stepping stone to getting home. Aged Care Minister Casey Costello. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Aged Care Minister Casey Costello said the government had "extensive work underway" to ensure older New Zealanders were able to receive the right care and support. "This includes looking at improvements to the aged care system across the spectrum of care from homecare services through to dementia and specialist psycho-geriatric services," she said It would try to improve transitions between different levels of care, she said The government had invested $24 million in the last budget to help people transfer from hospital when they no longer needed hospital-level care, Costello said. Some of that funding was helping patients at North Shore Hospital to be placed in aged residential care (ARC). "However, the patients in Ward 6 have additional complexities, which means they can't be appropriately cared for in ARC straight away," she said. There were real benefits to people getting out of hospital when they no longer needed hospital-level care, Costello said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Three staff involved in pharmacy error that led to two-month-old's death
Bellamere Duncan died at Starship Hospital on 19 July. Photo: Supplied An intern pharmacist misread the prescribed dosage of medication for a two-month-old baby who later died from an overdose, RNZ can reveal. Afterwards, a trainee technician, who was handling a phosphate product for the first time, did not notice the dosage error. Then a registered pharmacist who carried out the final check did not pick up that the prescription was for an infant and that it was new medication. The intern pharmacist has since been suspended, and the registered pharmacist has resigned. The baby's parents say they do not blame the intern pharmacist for their daughter's death, and say he should have had more support. "It just makes no sense that he was left to make up these prescriptions without having someone there with him making sure that he is filling out each one correctly." RNZ earlier revealed Bellamere Arwyn Duncan died at Starship Hospital on 19 July. A Manawatū pharmacy dispensed an adult dosage of phosphate to the two-month-old's parents. A coroner's preliminary opinion is she died from phosphate toxicity. The revelations have prompted the Ministry of Health and Health New Zealand to "urgently" undertake a joint review into the incident with Medsafe visiting the pharmacy to ensure it was safe to continue operating. The Pharmacy Council, which is also investigating, said it was "clear that an awful error has occurred". On Friday, the owner of the Manawatū Pharmacy emailed Bellamere's parents with a summary of what happened. "Once again, we recognise the immense impact of our error on you and your family," the email began. Bellamere Duncan's parents were given an adult dosage of phosphate by the pharmacy. Photo: Supplied The owner said the pharmacy's standard dispensing process involved intern pharmacists entering each prescription into the dispensary computer. The pharmacy used a dispensing system called Toniq. A technician would then use the information in Toniq and the prescription to identify the medication and put the correct amounts in containers. The labels were then printed out and placed in a basket with the original prescription and the medication. A registered pharmacist would then check the prescription, the labels and the medication itself before it was given to the patient. The owner said the pharmacy received the prescription by email on 1 July from Palmerston North Hospital. The prescription was entered into Toniq by an intern pharmacist. "This person unfortunately misread the prescribed dosage and entered the prescription dose as '1 tablet twice daily' rather than '1.2 mmol twice daily'," the owner said. The Toniq system then generated an original label for the prescription. "This includes a warning label with the patient's age, if they are under 18 years old, and if the patient has not been prescribed the medication before. "The second warning prompts the checking pharmacist to counsel (speak with) the patient or their caregiver about how to take the medication." The product was supplied in tubes of 20 tablets. The trainee technician printed out three further labels. They were to be placed on the three tubes that were being dispensed. "This was the trainee technician's first time handling a phosphate product. She was also unfamiliar with the mmol dosage. She did not notice the dosage error as a result. She put the original prescription, labels and the medication in a basket on the dispensing bench for the registered pharmacist to check. "Unfortunately, the original label and the warning label was not kept with other items." The registered pharmacist who carried out the final check did not pick up that the medication was for an infant, the owner said. "In addition, it was not identified that this was a new medication. The fact that the warning label was not retained contributed to this error." The owner said the intern pharmacist had been suspended by the Pharmacy Council. The registered pharmacist had taken leave and then resigned. "This person does not intend to return to work in the immediate future," the owner said. Bellamere Duncan's parents are calling for a law change that would make it mandatory for medication to be checked by two people before it is dispensed. Photo: 123RF The pharmacy was "urgently re-evaluating our dispensing and checking protocols and reinforcing safety checks at every stage". "We are actively recruiting additional staff to help manage our workloads. In addition, we are engaging an independent pharmacist from outside the Manawatū region to conduct a full review of our dispensing procedures and provide further guidance on system improvements." The owner said the pharmacy was "fully co-operating" with investigations being carried out by Medsafe, the Pharmacy Council and the police on behalf of the coroner. The owner signed off the email with "heartfelt apologies and regret". Speaking to RNZ on Monday, Bellamere's parents Tempest Puklowski and Tristan Duncan said after reading the email they did not blame the intern pharmacist for what happened. "My first initial reaction after reading it was I felt really bad for the intern," Puklowski said. "I don't blame him for the mistakes. I blame whoever was meant to be looking over his shoulder, whoever put him in that responsibility and just left him to it." Puklowski said it should have been picked up that the medication was for a baby. "It just seems like there's something lacking there that could have avoided it being missed or messed up," she said. Duncan said the system "needs to be better". Tempest said she remained "frustrated and angry" about her daughter's death. "It's just an endless sort of questioning of how and where it went wrong, to the point of, yeah, how could it have been avoided? "Obviously, those questions don't do much now, which then brings on the sadness of just knowing that she could still be here if these things were pulled up on initially, if maybe the intern wasn't left just to do the job by themselves. Or if you know something else is put in place, we would've never even gotten it and then we wouldn't be beating ourselves up for giving it to her." Duncan said the past two weeks since Bellamere's death had been "really hard". "Just empty is the only word that really comes to mind," he said. "It's unfair. Just stolen away by a singular document. That's what it comes down to." Puklowski said the couple "don't really know what to do with ourselves really". They were now waiting to see what happened with the multiple investigations that are under way. "I want things to change," Duncan said. In a statement to RNZ on Friday Pharmacy Council chief executive Michael Pead said whenever the Pharmacy Council received a notification of an incident, it began an "initial enquiry" to assess the situation. "At the start of any enquiry, our focus is on ensuring there is no further risk to public safety. There are many ways to achieve this, including suspension of the pharmacist or pharmacists involved or a voluntary agreement that the individual/s will stop working." In order to ensure the inquiry into Bellamere's death was "fair and thorough", and to avoid pre-empting any findings, the council could not provide any further details. "We can confirm that the Pharmacy Council is comfortable that immediate steps have been taken to prevent the risk of further harm while the enquiry is ongoing." While in hospital Puklowski gave Bellamere her drops for Vitamin D. Nurses also administered her phosphate. When they left hospital they were given some Vitamin D in a little bottle, and a prescription for iron and Vitamin D. The following day Duncan went to a Manawatū pharmacy with the prescriptions. He was given the iron, but said the pharmacy refused to give the Vitamin D as the staff thought the dosage was "too high for her age and her weight". The staff said they would call the neonatal unit and follow-up. A few days later Puklowski received a call from the unit to organise a home care visit. During the call she was asked if she had any concerns, and Puklowski asked if they had been contacted about the Vitamin D. They had not, and said they would follow up and rewrite the prescription along with a prescription for phosphate. A day after the phone call, on 2 July, Duncan went to the pharmacy to collect the medication and came home with just the phosphate. Unbeknown to the parents they had been given an adult dosage of phosphate. The label on the medication directed them to dissolve one 500mg tablet of phosphate twice daily in a glass of water. That evening they gave Bellamere her first dose of the medicine in her formula water. They would give her three bottles in 24 hours as was recommended. The couple noticed in that period that her eating was off, and thought she was "extra gassy," Puklowski said. "She was still feeding fine. She just wasn't maybe going through a whole bottle compared to what she was," she recalled. Then, the day after she got her first dosage Bellamere suddenly stopped breathing. Bellamere was taken to hospital and rushed to the emergency department. Once she was stabilised she was taken to the neonatal unit where she stayed overnight before she was flown to Starship Hospital. The couple had taken a bottle of the medicine with them to Starship Hospital. She gave it to the staff who saw that they had been given an adult dose. The staff then requested the original prescription which confirmed the script had been written with the correct dosage, but somehow the pharmacy had given the wrong dosage Puklowski said. "I keep thinking about how much she ended up having and it just makes me feel sick." Tragically, Bellamere died at Starship Hospital on 19 July. On Wednesday, a Ministry of Health spokesperson told RNZ there were a number of investigations underway. "Medsafe has completed an urgent assessment and is comfortable there is no immediate patient safety issue at the pharmacy. Medsafe will continue to work with Health New Zealand and these findings which will inform the information provided to the coroner. Medsafe is also sharing information with the Pharmacy Council. "Once these reviews are completed, we will be able to look at next steps." Health Minister Simeon Brown earlier told RNZ he raised the incident with the Director-General of Health as soon as he was made aware. "She assured me that there would be an investigation undertaken by both the Ministry of Health and Health New Zealand. That investigation is underway. "I am advised that this incident has led to Medsafe undertaking an urgent assessment of the pharmacy. A further investigation is being undertaken by the Pharmacy Council, and the death is also the subject of a Coroner's inquest." Health agencies would provide information to the coroner as needed to support the inquest. "It is important that the reviews are undertaken, and that the circumstances that led to this incident are understood. I expect that these investigations may propose recommendations, and that these will be reviewed once reports are complete." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
