House advances bill to change school nutrition standards
A bill passed the Iowa House Wednesday that would require schools to forgo federal nutrition standards to instead prioritize Iowa-specific guidelines.
House Democrats, who opposed the bill, said in floor debate it makes Iowa students 'guinea pigs' for unproven nutrition practices, while failing to address the number of students in the state who can't afford lunch.
House File 851 would have the Iowa Department of Education apply for a waiver from federal nutrition guidelines to exempt Iowa school districts from grain and produce variation requirements and sodium limits in favor of nutritional standards that 'align with Iowa's dietary recommendations or cultural food practices.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Supporters of the bill said federal nutrition guidelines are 'out of date.'
Rep. Derek Wulf, R-Hudson, critiqued the past administration's nutrition decisions and implementation of initiatives like 'meatless Mondays.'
'We're not making the kids of Iowa guinea pigs; D.C. has been making the kids of Iowa guinea pigs,' Wulf said. 'Nobody knows nutrition and food better than us here. We're the bread basket of America.'
Wulf said the bill puts 'common sense nutrition knowledge' in place.
'Our kids are obviously not getting healthier in the past few years, so it's time to do something drastically different,' he said.
Rep. Elinor Levin, D-Iowa City, said the bill tries to 'redefine' local food by prioritizing 'multinational corporations.'
'This bill is not about supporting Iowa's small and independent farmers,' Levin said. 'Instead, it serves the interests of powerful industry players, which are using this legislation to increase sales under the guise of promoting local agriculture, while actually perverting that definition.'
Iowa lawmakers move to prioritize corn, pork and dairy in school lunches
The bill notes specifically that Iowa students would be 'better served' by regional nutrition guidelines, because federal guidelines do not 'adequately address' Iowa's 'unique regional food sources' like corn, pork and dairy.
The bill would also prioritize animal-based proteins and dairy ahead of fruits and vegetables, which Rep. Austin Baeth, D-Des Moines, said is 'flipping this evidence-based food pyramid on its head.'
'I'm very proud Iowan, but I believe that we should benefit from the science, the medical expertise, that has been gained over the decades of national and international studies as to what is the healthiest diet for kids, and not just give that all up for the sake of helping out part of the food industry,' Baeth, a physician, said.
Rep. Sami Scheetz, D-Cedar Rapids, said he worried the waiver would jeopardize federal funding for schools.
Scheetz cited part of federal code that states the U.S. secretary of agriculture cannot grant a waiver if it relates to 'the nutritional content of meals served.'
Rep. Jeff Shipley, R-Fairfield, said the bill would benefit school nutrition staff who he said are 'very frustrated' at having to 'conform every single thing on their school menu to the whims of the bureaucracy.'
Shipley said the bill allows Iowans to step out from the 'federal bureaucrats' that hold tax money 'hostage.'
'The USDA is a big problem when it comes to school nutrition,' Shipley said. 'And yeah, we appreciate their money, but the rules just don't make sense, and they're out of date and they're obsolete … The people of Iowa deserve to set our own nutritional guidelines.'
Scheetz said it was 'fundamentally wrong' to risk losing that funding for school lunches when many students cannot afford to eat lunch.
'If we want to have the discussion about school lunches in our state, let's start by feeding our kids first,' Scheetz said.
Scheetz introduced two amendments to the bill, which were defeated.
One amendment would have conditioned the bill's implementation until Iowa had universal free lunch for its students.
'I think it's critically important that we first ensure that every kid in this state will be eating a lunch before we start messing with what's inside of it,' Scheetz said.
The other amendment called for a $3 million appropriation to fund a purchasing program for schools and food banks to buy from Iowa producers via the Choose Iowa program.
Choose Iowa, headed by the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship, has a pilot program with this purpose underway, but the amendment would have significantly grown the local food purchasing program.
Scheetz said it was especially important following an announcement in March that canceled the federal Local Food for Schools program, from which Iowa schools and food banks would have received an estimated $11.3 million over the next three years.
Wulf proposed an amendment to delay implementation of the nutrition guidelines until July 2026, which was adopted.
The bill passed with the one amendment on a vote of 60-36.
The Senate version of the bill has not yet been debated.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
4 minutes ago
- UPI
Senate Democrats vote against arms sales to Israel in record number
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. in March. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo July 31 (UPI) -- The U.S. Senate has approved weapons sales to Israel, despite the fact that a majority of Senate Democrats voted against the measure. Twenty-seven of the 47 Democrats voted Wednesday in favor of two resolutions to block U.S. military sales to Israel, a change from the historically typical bipartisan support such resolutions are expected to receive. The resolutions were sponsored by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who said in a press release Wednesday that "the members of the Senate Democratic caucus voted to stop sending arms shipments to a Netanyahu government which has waged a horrific, immoral, and illegal war against the Palestinian people." "The tide is turning," he added. "The American people do not want to spend billions to starve children in Gaza." Sanders' resolutions may have failed, but the 27 senators in support is the most he has received in the three times he sponsored them. His first attempt in November of last year received 18 Democratic votes, and a second attempt in April scored 15. However, 70 senators voted against Sanders' first resolution that sought to block over $675 million in weapons sales to Israel. His second resolution, which would have prohibited the sale of thousands of assault rifles, lost more support as it was defeated by a 73-24 margin. Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., voted in support of Sanders' resolutions for the first time. "Tonight I voted YES to block the sale of certain weapons to Israel to send a message to Netanyahu's government," she posted to X Wednesday. "This legislative tool is not perfect, but frankly it is time to say ENOUGH to the suffering of innocent young children and families." "Tonight, I voted in favor of blocking the Trump Administration from sending more weapons to Israel," said Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., in an X post Wednesday, after voting yes for the first time. "My votes tonight reflect my deep frustration with the Netanyahu government's abject failure to address humanitarian needs in Gaza and send a message to the Trump administration that it must change course if it wants to help end this devastating war," she concluded. "The Democrats are moving forward on this issue, and I look forward to Republican support in the near future," Sanders further noted in his release.


Axios
6 minutes ago
- Axios
New Iowa network aims for a progressive, Democratic revival
A new political network has emerged in Iowa to support progressive grassroots groups statewide, especially in rural areas where progressives have struggled to stay influential. Why it matters: The launch of the Grassroots Iowa Network (GIN) reflects a growing urgency to restore the Democratic brand in the state after years of electoral losses and brand erosion. Catch up quick: GIN was launched in May by volunteers and political veterans, including Democrats and former state Sens. Jack Hatch and Ralph Rosenberg, child policy advocate Charlie Bruner, and Iowa Democratic Party Women's Caucus chairperson Mary Weaver. They aim to strengthen issue-based organizing — separate from the Democratic Party — and rebuild trust in progressive values. At least 60 groups from across the state are already part of the network, including Bitches Get Stuff Done in Bondurant and the Sierra Club. The intrigue: Although most of GIN's founders have deep Democratic roots, the group intentionally distances itself from official Democratic institutions and welcomes conservative-leaning organizations to participate in their discussions, Hatch tells Axios. "We're not trying to create a brand for the Democrats. We're listening to all of these grassroots groups that are saying we need to focus on our local needs," Hatch said. State of play: Iowa's red wave has gained traction for years, with Republicans holding a trifecta — control of the governor's office and majorities in both the House and Senate — since January 2017. Republicans took control of all the state's congressional seats after the 2022 elections. Between the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections, 93 of Iowa's 99 counties shifted more Republican. Zoom in: State Auditor Rob Sand, a 2026 candidate for governor, is the sole remaining statewide elected Democrat. The state party is now working to reclaim its traditional role as the first to hold contests in the presidential primary season after losing its 50-year caucus reign in the last cycle. What they're saying: The party is like a big ocean liner, and it takes a lot to turn it around, Hatch said. GIN organizers are not blaming Democratic Party leaders, but they also didn't want to wait for the party to reinvent itself, he said. The other side: Democrats are so weak that they're relying on outside groups to prop up their party, Jade Cichy, a spokesperson for the Iowa GOP, tells Axios. "No matter how many new organizations they launch, they're still out of touch with the issues Iowans care about," Cichy said. What's next: GIN recently held an event in Monticello and plans more in-person and virtual events, with special attention to small towns, Rosenberg tells Axios.


Newsweek
8 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Look Set To Get Wiped Out in 2025 and 2026
Someday, someone will crack the most difficult code in American politics—how to win midterm elections two years after securing a governing trifecta. But based on the polling that we have right now, President Donald Trump and his Republican allies in Congress are not going to be the ones to do it. President Trump burned mindlessly through his limited political capital within weeks of taking office in January, and the Republican-controlled Congress has essentially ceded its constitutional authority—and its political fate—to the White House. Unless something dramatic changes in the coming months, that may have fateful consequences for Republicans up and down the ballot starting with November's bellwether off-year gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey. The numbers are already stark. The GOP has trailed averages of the generic congressional ballot—which asks voters whether they would vote for a Democrat or a Republican for the House—since March. By way of comparison, after Joe Biden took office in 2021, Republicans didn't take the lead in Real Clear Politics averages until November of that year. The race for the House of Representatives is starting to look much more like the 2018 cycle, when Republicans trailed from pretty much the day pollsters started asking thanks to the enduring unpopularity of President Trump's policy agenda, and more importantly, his gratuitously provocative and confrontational political style. President Donald Trump listens as he meets British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for bilateral talks at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 28, 2025, in Turnberry, Scotland. President Donald Trump listens as he meets British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for bilateral talks at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 28, 2025, in Turnberry, betting site Polymarket gives Democrats a 70 percent chance of retaking the House in 2026, and this grim outlook certainly isn't lost on the GOP, which is scrambling to pull off a mid-decade redistricting in Texas to squeeze a few extra seats out of an already-aggressive gerrymander that gave them 25 out of 38 seats in both 2022 and 2024. As Princeton's Sam Wang noted, this may ultimately backfire on them even if they get it done, by creating a larger number of seats with significant but not unbreachable Republican advantages that could be overcome in a true wave election. There's actually a nearer-term threat on the horizon. Republican gubernatorial candidates in Virginia and New Jersey are also trailing badly in races that will be decided in just a few months. In 2017, Democrats scored blowouts in both races that previewed the 2018 blue wave. And in 2021, Republican Glenn Youngkin's shock win over Democrat Terry McAuliffe in Virginia, and Democrat Phil Murphy's surprisingly narrow 3-point reelection over Republican Jack Ciattarelli were clear warning signs that Democrats had already lost the public's trust less than a year into the Biden administration. That recent history has to worry Republicans. Former Democratic Representative Abigail Spanberger led the last two public polls of the race against Republican Winsome Earle-Sears by 17 and 12 points. And in the only polls taken of the race between Democrat Mikie Sherrill and Ciattarelli in New Jersey, Sherrill led by 21 and 8 points. Are Democrats likely to win by those margins? Probably not, but these are already Democratic-leaning states that could tilt toward a big, blue blowout if the political environment for Trump and the Republicans doesn't improve quickly. The bad news for Republicans doesn't end with the House. While Democrats are a distinct underdog in the race to control the Senate, they scored a major victory this week when Roy Cooper, the popular former Democratic governor of North Carolina, announced he would seek the seat being vacated by the retiring Senator Thom Tillis. Democrats are already favored in Maine, where 72 year-old Senator Susan Collins' remarkable run of defying partisan polarization seems unlikely to continue even if she chooses not to retire. But even assuming Democrats win all the battleground state seats they have to defend, including Michigan and Georgia, flipping North Carolina and Maine would still leave them two seats short of a majority. But Republican primary voters might own-goal themselves yet again. Democrats are eagerly watching the mess unfolding in Texas, where scandal-ridden extremist Ken Paxton is ahead in limited polling against incumbent Republican Senator John Cornyn. While he would probably still be the favorite, a Paxton win in the primary would without question put Texas in play. Even with a Texas miracle, though, Democrats will still need to win a race in at least one state that Donald Trump carried by double digits in 2024, whether that's Iowa, Alaska, Florida, or Nebraska. It's an extremely heavy lift, but Republicans certainly can't feel as secure about their lock on the Senate as they did after November's elections unexpectedly left them with a seemingly insurmountable 53 seats. Is there anything Republicans could do to avoid the fate that almost every president's party has met in the midterm elections? For starters, President Trump would need to stop doing unpopular things—like building a lavishly funded internal detention gulag, securing trade "deals" that make daily life more expensive for ordinary Americans, and wasting his time whining about what D.C.'s football team is named, or what's happening in the writer's room of adult cartoon TV shows—and start governing in a way that isn't designed to deliberately alienate more than half the country. I'm no gambling whiz, but I certainly wouldn't bet on that. David Faris is a professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It's Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Washington Monthly, and more. You can find him on Twitter @davidmfaris and Bluesky @ The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.