logo
New Iowa network aims for a progressive, Democratic revival

New Iowa network aims for a progressive, Democratic revival

Axios5 days ago
A new political network has emerged in Iowa to support progressive grassroots groups statewide, especially in rural areas where progressives have struggled to stay influential.
Why it matters: The launch of the Grassroots Iowa Network (GIN) reflects a growing urgency to restore the Democratic brand in the state after years of electoral losses and brand erosion.
Catch up quick: GIN was launched in May by volunteers and political veterans, including Democrats and former state Sens. Jack Hatch and Ralph Rosenberg, child policy advocate Charlie Bruner, and Iowa Democratic Party Women's Caucus chairperson Mary Weaver.
They aim to strengthen issue-based organizing — separate from the Democratic Party — and rebuild trust in progressive values.
At least 60 groups from across the state are already part of the network, including Bitches Get Stuff Done in Bondurant and the Sierra Club.
The intrigue: Although most of GIN's founders have deep Democratic roots, the group intentionally distances itself from official Democratic institutions and welcomes conservative-leaning organizations to participate in their discussions, Hatch tells Axios.
"We're not trying to create a brand for the Democrats. We're listening to all of these grassroots groups that are saying we need to focus on our local needs," Hatch said.
State of play: Iowa's red wave has gained traction for years, with Republicans holding a trifecta — control of the governor's office and majorities in both the House and Senate — since January 2017.
Republicans took control of all the state's congressional seats after the 2022 elections.
Between the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections, 93 of Iowa's 99 counties shifted more Republican.
Zoom in: State Auditor Rob Sand, a 2026 candidate for governor, is the sole remaining statewide elected Democrat.
The state party is now working to reclaim its traditional role as the first to hold contests in the presidential primary season after losing its 50-year caucus reign in the last cycle.
What they're saying: The party is like a big ocean liner, and it takes a lot to turn it around, Hatch said.
GIN organizers are not blaming Democratic Party leaders, but they also didn't want to wait for the party to reinvent itself, he said.
The other side: Democrats are so weak that they're relying on outside groups to prop up their party, Jade Cichy, a spokesperson for the Iowa GOP, tells Axios.
"No matter how many new organizations they launch, they're still out of touch with the issues Iowans care about," Cichy said.
What's next: GIN recently held an event in Monticello and plans more in-person and virtual events, with special attention to small towns, Rosenberg tells Axios.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump wonders if ‘low IQ' foe Jasmine Crockett ‘is any relationship to the late, great Davy' as he rips ‘lost' Democrats
Trump wonders if ‘low IQ' foe Jasmine Crockett ‘is any relationship to the late, great Davy' as he rips ‘lost' Democrats

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wonders if ‘low IQ' foe Jasmine Crockett ‘is any relationship to the late, great Davy' as he rips ‘lost' Democrats

President Donald Trump tore down the Democratic Party during an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning and targeted his frequent political foe, Rep. Jasmine Crockett, deriding her as an example of one of their 'low IQ' members. In a long-winded, and occasionally rambling, interview with Squawk Box, the president lashed out at the opposing political party for being 'lost' and 'self-destructing.' In between speaking about his economic policy record and plans for tariffs, the president took some time to insult prominent members of the party with whom he often quarrels. Using one of his commonly used phrases, Trump said members of the Democratic Party are 'low IQ people' and cited the Texas congresswoman as an example. 'I mean, when you have low-IQ people, like Crockett,' Trump began before suddenly going on a tangent. 'I wonder if she's any relationship to the late, great Davy Crockett, who was a great, great gentleman,' he said, falling back on the 'late, great' appellation he generally reserves for the fictional Silence of the Lambs serial killer Hannibal Lecter to oddly decry illegal immigration at campaign rallies. 'I wonder if she's got any relationship to Davy Crockett. The great old Davy Crockett,' Trump pondered. Davy Crockett was a politician and pioneerman who represented Tennessee in the House from 1827 until 1835. His legacy is often remembered for his larger-than-life storytelling and involvement in the Texas Revolution. Politically, Davy Crockett was staunchly opposed to President Andrew Jackson and switched from being a member of the National Republican Party to the Whig Party, which opposed strong presidential use of executive power, expansion of territory in the U.S., and advocated for the establishment of a national bank. Jasmine Crockett has never publicly said whether or not she is related to Davy Crockett. There is no evidence to suggest the two are related at this time. Although Trump's comment was not necessarily an insult, he has used his platform to bash Crockett, who vehemently disapproves of the president and many of his allies. After Crockett insulted Texas Governor Greg Abbott, Trump called her a 'lowlife.' Crockett has previously suggested Trump is mentally or physically unfit to serve as president and challenged him to an IQ test. She's also publicly called the president a "ridiculous tyrant' and 'piece of s***.' Trump has often claimed that those who bash him have 'Trump derangement syndrome' – diminishing criticisms as illogical, irrational, and done as a personal attack rather than a policy critique. 'The Democrats are lost. They have Trump derangement syndrome so bad that they can't walk, they can't talk, they don't know where they're going. Schumer is finished. I watched him the other day, he's lost all of his confidence,' Trump said on CNBC.

25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures
25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures

American Press

time25 minutes ago

  • American Press

25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures

On Monday, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill joined 24 other Republican attorneys general in backing President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at halting federal funding for sex change procedures on minors, marking the state's latest push in a broader legal fight over transgender care. Three days earlier, Massachusetts filed a brief joined by 19 states challenging the same executive order. The states argue the order is unconstitutional, discriminatory, and violates the Spending Clause by tying federal health funds to ideological conditions. The Massachusetts-led brief contends that the order jeopardizes care for transgender youth, strips states of medical decision-making authority, and undermines long-standing Medicaid protections. The suit seeks a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction against implementation. The attorneys general defending the Trump order, led by Alabama's Steve Marshall, filed amicus briefs in the 4th and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, supporting Trump's order and urging the courts to overturn preliminary injunctions issued earlier this year in lawsuits out of Washington and Maryland. The Alabama-led briefs argue that continuing to fund such procedures violates both medical ethics and constitutional principles. 'Even though President Trump is in office, common sense and constitutional principles are under constant assault by radical leftist groups like the ACLU,' said Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, who is leading the coalition. Marshall accused the ACLU of pushing courts to 'force taxpayers to fund sex-change procedures on children.' Murrill, who has been an outspoken critic of so-called 'gender-affirming' care for minors, did not release a separate public statement, but her participation in the brief underscores Louisiana's alignment with a growing number of Republican-led states that seek to limit access to such treatments. In recent years, Louisiana's Legislature has passed bans on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors. According to the coalition's legal filings, the brief draws on findings from Alabama's discovery in a now-dismissed challenge to its own ban on 'gender-affirming' care, where Marshall's office claimed to uncover a coordinated effort to remove age restrictions from national medical guidelines — a move he described as politically motivated rather than science-based. The Alabama-led team argues that federal funding for 'gender-affirming' care is based on 'discredited standards' and that such medical interventions for minors have irreversible consequences. 'The evidence says otherwise,' Marshall said. 'These harmful interventions have lasting consequences for vulnerable children.' The Alabama-led brief was filed in both the 9th Circuit and 4th Circuit federal courts of appeal. Louisiana was joined by attorneys general from Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming in addition to Louisiana. The filings are part of a broader conservative legal strategy seeking to bolster state laws banning so-called 'gender-affirming' care while reinforcing Trump-era federal policy that frames such care as medically unnecessary and ideologically driven.

GOP-Led House Panel Subpoenas Epstein Files and Testimony From Clintons
GOP-Led House Panel Subpoenas Epstein Files and Testimony From Clintons

Time​ Magazine

time26 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

GOP-Led House Panel Subpoenas Epstein Files and Testimony From Clintons

The Republican-led House Oversight Committee subpoenaed the Justice Department on Tuesday for files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, despite resistance from House GOP leadership and growing unease within the Trump Administration over the political and legal implications of such disclosures. The subpoena calls for the Justice Department to turn over all investigative materials related to Epstein's decades-long sex trafficking operation, with victims' identities redacted. The Committee also issued a broad array of subpoenas for deposition testimony from high-profile figures across both Democratic and Republican administrations—among them former President Bill Clinton, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former FBI Directors James Comey and Robert Mueller, and six former U.S. attorneys general, including Merrick Garland and William Barr. The latest activity from the Committee follows Justice Department officials interviewing Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell, and then Maxwell being moved to a minimum-security facility in Texas. "While the Department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell's cases, it is imperative that Congress conduct oversight of the federal government's enforcement of sex trafficking laws generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell," Rep. James Comer, the Oversight Chair, wrote in a subpoena to Attorney General Pam Bondi. The subpoenas come nearly two weeks after one of the panel's subcommittees voted to compel the Justice Department to release the files, just before the House left for its summer recess. House Speaker Mike Johnson publicly resisted the effort, arguing the Administration needs 'room to act' before Congress intervenes. But the committee's decision to subpoena the Justice Department shows that interest in the Epstein files remains high among Republicans, even as President Donald Trump has repeatedly tried to move past the Justice Department's decision not to release a full accounting of the investigation. A July memo from the Justice Department stated that Epstein died by suicide and that no 'client list' of abusers had been recovered—a conclusion that has only deepened suspicion among conspiracy-minded conservatives and Democrats alike. Democrats first pushed to subpoena the Justice Department for its files on Epstein, and were joined by three Republicans to initiate the subpoena in July. The Justice Department will have until Aug. 19 to hand over the requested records. The committee is also requesting that the former government officials appear for depositions between August and October, concluding with Hillary Clinton on Oct. 9 and Bill Clinton on Oct. 14. While former Presidents have often been subpoenaed, none have ever appeared before lawmakers under compulsion. Clinton's association with Epstein has been publicly known for years and included travel on his plane after he left office, according to court records. The Wall Street Journal reported last month that a book assembled for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003 included a message from Clinton, as well as Trump and others. Both Clinton and Trump were listed as 'friends' in the book. Trump has denied writing the letter and sued the Wall Street Journal. A spokesperson for Clinton said in 2019 that he cut off ties with Epstein prior to his 2019 arrest and was unaware of Epstein's alleged crimes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store