As Christian missionary, I oppose increasing deficit to deport peaceful migrants
Few leaders today are willing to stand up against policies that saddle our children and grandchildren with massive debt. As the "big beautiful bill" comes before the U.S. Senate for consideration, Wisconsin's senior U.S. Senator, Ron Johnson, is right to oppose the current version. I spent most of my career as an evangelical missionary in Central America, and now in my retirement I teach English to immigrants through my church. There are some provisions of this bill that I appreciate. As a pro-life Christian, for example, I would be happy to see Planned Parenthood defunded. Yet, there are several problems with the bill overall, which would add $3 trillion to the federal deficit over the next decade, in part as an effect of the bill's dramatic spending on immigration enforcement. There's no question that Sen. Johnson is committed to secure borders, as am I. But the reality is that the border is relatively quiet right now, with so few individuals arriving unlawfully that most Border Patrol agents along the U.S.-Mexico border do not interact with a single unlawful crosser in a typical month. While some new resources may be needed, $60 billion for border security is a ton. At a certain point, more walls and Border Patrol staffing start to look more like a government-subsidized jobs program than a real national security strategy.
Similarly, Immigration & Customs Enforcement needs enough funding to detain and deport violent criminals, as President Trump has said is the priority. But with $3.4 billion currently allocated for detention, most currently-detained individuals have not been convicted of any crime, and the greatest increase in detainees has been among those never accused of any crime. This suggests that the funding is not targeting violent criminals but rather sweeping up peaceful individuals who pose no threat. Yet this bill proposes $45 billion in new funding for detention alone.
Letters: House budget provision exempts executive branch from following court orders
That spending doesn't just increase the deficit. It also means detaining hardworking members of our community, including the dairy workers our state depends upon. Many of these individuals entered lawfully. They were sponsored by churches or family members, came through airports and lived and worked legally in our state until the administration terminated their temporary legal protections, making them vulnerable to detention and deportation.
Johnson has rightly affirmed that legal immigrants contribute in important ways to our state's economy, and Trump has also acknowledged the indispensable role of many immigrants in agriculture and other sectors of our economy. But the budget bill would almost certainly lead to many being detained and deported at taxpayers' expense.
When I lived abroad as an American in Costa Rica, I had to navigate that country's rules governing foreigners' presence, and I understand that our country must have such processes as well. But I was never made to feel hunted or harassed, as many immigrants do here today, even those who entered lawfully and have been working lawfully.
Now, as I help hardworking farmworkers and other immigrants learn English here in rural Sheboygan County, I've noticed how our current political climate has instilled fear among the honest, hardworking immigrants I serve. It concerns me deeply. So, while I'm concerned about this bill for fiscal reasons, I'm especially concerned as a Christian. Four out of five of those vulnerable to detention with all this extra money are fellow Christians, as a report from the National Association of Evangelicals and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops documents.
Opinion: Wisconsin voters don't want to lose health coverage. Yet 96,000 will under Trump
Some of them — such as Afghan Christians who have recently been threatened with deportation — would be returned to likely martyrdom. This has drawn the concern of leaders at conservative Christian organizations like Focus on the Family, the Family Research Council and the Wisconsin Family Council. I'm thankful for Johnson's independence in speaking out against the fiscal excesses of this bill, and I hope and pray he'll hold his ground. There are existing bipartisan frameworks for immigration reform, such as Republican Representative Maria Salazar's Dignity Act, which would present a much better option, ensuring secure borders without terrorizing law-abiding individuals and indebting out grandchildren.
I pray that Congress will consider these potential solutions. Rev. Thomas Soerens served for three decades with the mission agency of the Christian Reformed Church in North America and now is retired in Oostburg.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Political climate instills fear in honest immigrants | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
24 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Rescinds Voice of America Layoffs After Errors in Notices
The Trump administration on Friday rescinded the layoff notices it had sent to employees at Voice of America after employees discovered errors in documents detailing the terms that could later nullify or significantly delay President Trump's attempts to gut the news organization. The email rescinding last week's layoff notices was sent by Voice of America's human resources office to employees based in Washington, where around 90 percent of its union-protected employees reside, according to the layoff plan the Trump administration sent to Congress earlier this month. But those reporters and support staff are not being called back to work, and Voice of America's parent agency, U.S. Agency for Global Media, 'will be running another RIF in the near future,' the email said, referring to federal layoffs with the acronym for 'reductions in force.' Hundreds of journalists and support staff at Voice of America had been scheduled to be laid off on Sept. 1. Kari Lake, a close Trump ally and the senior adviser to the global media agency, is leading the effort to gut Voice of America. She said in an email that her plan to reduce the agency's work force by 85 percent 'has remained unchanged.' 'The email that went out today allows employees to access and update their personnel files ahead of completion of the RIF,' Ms. Lake said. The Trump administration has accused Voice of America of spreading partisan 'propaganda,' calling it 'the voice of Radical America.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Paterson councilman rips AG for delays on 5-year-old election fraud case
PATERSON — William McKoy, who spent 20 years on the City Council, says the state attorney general owes the people of Paterson an explanation for the five-year duration of the still-pending election fraud case against current Council President Alex Mendez. Otherwise, McKoy said the state prosecutors ought to start the trial against Mendez without further delay, assertions he made in statements issued to Paterson Press on June 26 and June 27. 'The residents' and voters' confidence in the justice system has been shattered and must be restored,' McKoy said. 'This is the sole responsibility of the attorney general.' McKoy has more than a passing interest in the was the other candidate in the 3rd Ward council election in May 2020 in which state investigators say Mendez and his campaign staff stole absentee ballots from home mailboxes, destroyed those with votes for McKoy, and replaced them with votes for Mendez. Mendez — who was in the Dominican Republic in recent days based on his social media postings — couldn't be reached for comment. He repeatedly has professed his innocence and predicted he will clear his name when the charges go to trial. McKoy and Mendez — longtime, bitter political rivals — seem to agree on one thing. They both say they are frustrated by the lack of progress in the case. But McKoy has accused Mendez of causing some of the delays, by doing such things as filing motions attempting to have the charges against him dismissed. 'It is entirely understandable that a candidate who competed against Mendez in the election at issue would be frustrated by the alleged criminal acts committed by the defendants,' said Daniel Prochilo, an Attorney General's Office spokesman. Prochilo noted that Mendez has been 'accused of attempting to deprive Paterson residents of a fair and impartially conducted election by submitting fraudulent ballots and vote-by-mail registrations, and of stealing the ballots of prospective voters with intent to deprive them of their votes.' 'But our office doesn't set the trial calendar,' the AG spokesman added. 'Cases are set for trial when the case has reached the appropriate point, as determined by the court. "The discovery of additional acts, additional charges, defense review of discovery, defense pretrial motions, and court rulings can take time before a trial is scheduled, and they are an essential part of the due process that must occur before a defendant's innocence or guilt can be decided,' Prochilo said. The AG's office also has a separate election fraud case from 2020 pending against Paterson's 1st Ward councilman, Michael Jackson. That prosecution has been stalled by a two-year cell phone passcode battle as authorities pursue witness tampering charges against Jackson after a witness recanted testimony, a judge said. In the Mendez case, the AG's office waited 40 months after filing the initial charges to expand the prosecution in Oct. 2023 to include criminal complaints against the councilman's wife, Yohanny, and two of his campaign workers, Omar Ledesma and Iris Ruiz. A grand jury rendered indictments against all the defendants at the end of April. Probable cause documents say investigators have a cooperating witness from within the Mendez camp as well as recordings and photos. 'It is clear that the attorney general has the necessary evidence and eyewitness accounts of his criminal voter fraud activities to successfully prosecute this case and convict him and his criminal associates on all charges,' McKoy said of Mendez. 'The only outstanding question is whether there is the willingness on the part of the attorney general to actually do so before his term in office comes to an end,' McKoy added. 'Having observed the attorney general's commitment to the defense of our civil liberties and constitutional protection under the law, I choose to believe that in the end, justice will ultimately prevail.' In Jun 2020, McKoy successfully filed a court challenge having Mendez's May 2020 election victory nullified. But Mendez defeated McKoy in a special election in Nov. 2020 and did the same in Paterson's 2024 ward contests. In the past, Mendez has dismissed McKoy's attacks on him regarding the election fraud charges as whining by what he called a 'sore loser.' Back in 2020, Mayor Andre Sayegh was one of McKoy's strongest backers in his condemnations of Mendez. Sayegh even made a political contribution to McKoy to help pay his legal fees in the court challenge. But Sayegh and Mendez have forged somewhat of an alliance in the past years, as Mendez became president of the council in July 2023. This article originally appeared on Former Paterson councilman rips AG over election fraud case


Vox
28 minutes ago
- Vox
What the '12-day war' teaches us about Trump's foreign policy
is a senior politics correspondent at Vox, covering the White House, elections, and political scandals and investigations. He's worked at Vox since the site's launch in 2014, and before that, he worked as a research assistant at the New Yorker's Washington, DC, bureau. When President Donald Trump announced late Saturday that he ordered the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, critics on both the left and the right feared a spiral into a wider war. Yet just two days later, Trump announced a ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran that he claimed would end what he called 'the 12-day war' entirely. And though this ceasefire looked quite fragile at first, three days later, it's still holding. There's much we still don't know about whether Trump's strikes were successful in their short-term objective of disabling Iran's nuclear program. And of course, the long-term consequences of the war for Iran and the region are very far from clear. The past week's events did, however, clarify some things about Trump and his approach to foreign policy in his second term. Specifically, though Trump attacked Iran's nuclear program, he quickly pivoted to a ceasefire, suggesting that he's still wary of the hawks' transformational 'regime change' ambitions. He instead prefers to deal with countries' existing leaders at the negotiating table — and views military force as a tool to get himself a better deal. At first, it seemed that Trump had handed hawks on the right a decisive victory. Sweeping aside the concerns of the 'America First' faction that urged restraint and feared entanglement in a new 'forever war,' Trump supported Israel's attack on Iran and then sent US bombers in as well. But what Trump did next is just as revealing. Though the Iranian government was badly weakened, and some hawks were hoping it could be toppled, Trump demurred, dismissing Iran's retaliation against the US Monday as inconsequential and working to put together a ceasefire. That is, he had an opportunity to push onward for regime change in Tehran but turned it down. Then, when it looked like the new ceasefire might not hold, Trump profanely berated both Iran and Israel and particularly urged Israel to scale back a retaliatory mission that was in progress. After Israel complied, Trump did a solid for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with a Truth Social post urging Israeli authorities to cancel Netanyahu's corruption trial. Finally, Trump also declared the US strikes a complete success, insisting that Iran's nuclear program has been wiped out and disputing leaked intelligence estimates that say otherwise. He seems uninterested in hawkish arguments that he hasn't finished the job. This week, administration officials have even tried to restart nuclear talks with Iran, unlikely as that may seem. All this suggests that, despite bombing the nuclear sites, Trump has not embraced open-ended war as US foreign policy just yet. He rolled the dice on a risky military operation — but remained intent on avoiding a wider war. He supported Israel — but then, when he wanted the war to stop, called the Israelis out. It also suggests that Trump, unlike the GOP's more hawkish faction, is uninterested in seeking transformational regime change in Iran. Despite a Truth Social post on Sunday (after the strikes and before the ceasefire) in which Trump suggested 'Regime change' might be a possibility, he didn't go through with it. During his first presidential run, Trump trashed George W. Bush's Iraq War as a debacle, and the collapse of Iran's government would likely bring similar turmoil. Rather, Trump would prefer to settle things at the negotiating table, and he continues to view military action like his strikes on Iran as another way to enhance his leverage there. If negotiations aren't going the way he likes, however, dropping bombs is still a card he could play — or at least, that's what he wants his negotiating partner to fear. As I wrote before the US struck Iran, Trump has some wariness toward the hawks, but he's not a dove or a peacenik: If he's persuaded a military action will go well and make him look strong and successful, he's happy to endorse it. It is clear, though, that he continues to be wary of more prolonged wars that could go poorly. So for now at least, Trump appears to lack the appetite for a prolonged, costly, and painful war. He approved the Iran strikes because he thought Iran had been so weakened that he could get away with them, with limited consequences to Americans. But just as soon as he approved them, he hastened to wrap up the conflict.