logo
Could my power bank start a fire on board a plane? Here are the rules and the risks

Could my power bank start a fire on board a plane? Here are the rules and the risks

The Guardian4 days ago
Virgin Australia says it is considering changes to its rules around lithium batteries after a fire on a flight from Sydney was thought to have been caused by a power bank in a passenger's carry-on luggage.
Australia's Civil Aviation Safety Authority (Casa) has said the average passenger travels with at least four rechargeable lithium battery devices, which can be contained in smartphones, laptops and portable power banks.
If you're wondering what the rules are, and why lithium-ion batteries are considered a risk on flights, here's a quick overview.
Yes. But rules vary, so you should check the airline's restrictions before you fly.
Generally, laptops and cameras can be packed in checked luggage as long as they are completely switched off, according to Casa.
But spare batteries and power banks should only go into carry-on baggage because batteries and power banks can short circuit, overheat and catch fire during a flight.
Lithium-ion batteries that exceed 160Wh are not permitted at all, unless they are used for mobility aids.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Smart bags with power banks or lithium-ion batteries are allowed as long as the battery can be removed before check-in and carried in a passenger's cabin baggage.
Virgin Australia says any spare or loose batteries, including power banks, must be in carry-on baggage only and must be protected by placing them in their original retail packaging, or placing each battery in a separate plastic bag or protective pouch, or taping over exposed terminals.
Qantas says passengers travelling with power banks, including Apple AirPod cases, and spare or loose batteries, must only take them in carry-on baggage.
The airline says it does not recommend the use or charging of power banks onboard due to safety.
Several international airlines have banned the use of power banks on board, including Thai Airways, South Korean Airlines, EVA Air, Cathay Pacific, China Airlines, Singapore Airlines and its budget subsidiary, Scoot.
If you're flying with an international carrier, you should check its rules before your flight.
Generally, passengers are required to pack their power banks in their carry-on luggage. But whether they can be used on the plane depends on the specific airline.
Not necessarily. Prof Neeraj Sharma, a battery expert at the University of New South Wales, says lithium-ion batteries can have 20 different components, some of which are liquids, making them more volatile than other, solid parts such as the electrodes or casing.
Applying pressure to a lithium-ion battery can lead to 'thermal runaway' – an uncontrollable increase in temperature – but a battery exploding is incredibly rare.
Sharma says airlines still instruct people to carry batteries in their hand luggage as a way to mitigate risk, because there is a minimal pressure difference in a plane cabin compared to the baggage hold.
Sharma says power banks and other lithium-ion battery devices that aren't as well regulated as mobile phones or laptops – such as e-scooters and vapes – pose more of a risk and may have lower quality batteries.
Prof Amanda Ellis, the head of the University of Melbourne's School of Chemical & Biomedical Engineering, says lithium battery fires aren't more likely on planes.
She says airline cabin pressure wouldn't get to the batteries because they are covered by 'multiple layers of casing' but any enclosed environment makes fires particularly dangerous, especially as a plane can't be evacuated mid-air.
'They give off a very toxic gas and in a confined space that's not ideal,' she says.
Ellis says lithium-ion battery fires are difficult to extinguish because often the lithium metal catches on fire, along with all the casing and the plastic – high energy materials that can burn for much longer.
'You wouldn't want to put water on a lithium fire. And that's the first thing people [on a plane] might think of doing.'
The batteries contain lithium ions suspended in an electrolyte solution. The ions flow through the electrolyte, travelling back and forth between two electrodes as the battery charges and discharges.
Ellis says a common cause is from people overcharging their batteries, so they overheat, which results in thermal runaway. If there's too much energy in the battery, it can crack, causing the highly flammable electrolyte inside it to burst into flames when exposed to air.
She says phones and other, more sophisticated lithium battery-powered devices have an internal 'trickle system' which slowly adds current into the battery to prevent overcharging.
But cheaper power banks typically don't have this safeguard, Ellis says, making them more of a risk.
'Never charge your power bank overnight,' she says. 'Never charge it more than it has to be charged. In a way you've got to watch the power bank for when the light goes from red to green, and unplug it.'
Ellis says that, overall, batteries are very safe if used appropriately and in the right conditions, and people shouldn't be worried about flying because of them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Southwest flight out of Burbank rapidly descends shortly after takeoff to avoid mid-air collision
Southwest flight out of Burbank rapidly descends shortly after takeoff to avoid mid-air collision

The Independent

time6 hours ago

  • The Independent

Southwest flight out of Burbank rapidly descends shortly after takeoff to avoid mid-air collision

A Southwest flight out of Burbank, California, rapidly descended shortly after takeoff on Friday to avoid a mid-air collision. The flight, bound for Las Vegas, descended 475 feet from an altitude of 14,100 feet, ABC News affiliate KABC reported, citing data from Flightradar24, a flight tracking site. Passenger Steve Ulasewicz told ABC News it felt like a 'significant drop,' and the pilot had said the maneuver was performed to 'avoid a mid-air collision." The budget airline said in a statement it was 'engaged with the Federal Aviation Administration to further understand the circumstances.' 'No injuries were immediately reported by Customers, but two Flight Attendants are being treated for injuries,' the statement continued. 'We appreciate the professionalism of our Flight Crew and Flight Attendants in responding to this event. Nothing is more important to Southwest than the Safety of our Customers and Employees.'

Foreign Office staff take three domestic flights a day
Foreign Office staff take three domestic flights a day

Telegraph

time16 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Foreign Office staff take three domestic flights a day

Foreign Office staff took the equivalent of three domestic flights every day last year, amassing enough air miles to take 20 round trips to Australia. New figures obtained by The Telegraph show civil servants in David Lammy's department took more than 1,000 flights within the UK in 2024-25, despite a bid to shift towards more 'sustainable travel options'. The flights covered a distance of 708,551km, enough to fly to Sydney and back 20 times, and generated 114 tonnes of carbon. The revelations have prompted questions about Labour's green credentials after it emerged that Angela Rayner's department amassed enough international air miles last year to jet around the world 13 times. Climate commitments into question The number of domestic flights taken by the Foreign Office in the year to April 2025 came in at 1,027, down from 1,739 in 2023-24 and 2,112 in 2022-23. However, the distance covered was still more than the 514,785km that Ms Rayner's department racked up on international trips last year. The Green Party said the figures called the Government's climate commitments into question and urged Labour to ban all domestic flights for official trips that can be easily taken by train. 'Setting an example' Sian Berry, the Green MP for Brighton Pavilion, said: 'Government departments should be setting an example and using trains whenever possible for domestic travel. 'Taking three domestic flights every day flies in the face of climate science and government ministers' commitments to taking the climate crisis seriously. 'This Labour Government should ban domestic flights for official trips that can be done by train in just a few hours – this has already happened in France. 'They must also urgently implement a 'frequent flyer levy' to disincentivise those who take the vast majority of flights. This is what taking the climate crisis seriously looks like.' 'By default' The Telegraph obtained the number of domestic flights taken by the Foreign Office after the department published the distance travelled and carbon emissions produced in its annual report for 2024-25. It set out the department's commitment to 'reducing the number of UK domestic flights and increasing sustainable travel options as operations embed hybrid working practices'. 'Our duty travel policy requires all staff travelling within the UK and between England and Eurostar destinations to travel by train by default,' it said. 'This policy and increased use of technology to collaborate without the necessity for travel will help the FCDO reduce emissions.' The report confirmed that the Foreign Office has met Labour's target to reduce emissions from domestic flights by 30 per cent compared to 2017-18. Carbon produced However, the 114 tonnes of carbon produced in the year to April were still higher than the 92 tonnes emitted by Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing. The flight records for the Deputy Prime Minister's department caused a stir when they were published earlier this week, revealing a huge rise in air miles compared to the previous year. In its annual report, the Ministry of Housing revealed that its staff took foreign flights totalling 514,785km in 2024-25, almost five times the 108,060km amassed in 2023-24. The department blamed the rise partly on an increase in 'significant international conferences' attended by staff at Homes England, the housing quango. It is unclear whether the 1,027 domestic flights taken by the Foreign Office last year accounted for separate plane trips or journeys by individuals who may have travelled on the same plane.

Elon Musk weighs in on Aussie miner's expletive spray about the future of coal
Elon Musk weighs in on Aussie miner's expletive spray about the future of coal

Daily Mail​

time16 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Elon Musk weighs in on Aussie miner's expletive spray about the future of coal

An Aussie miner's expletive-filled spray about the decline of coal has drawn the attention of climate-conscious billionaire Elon Musk. Gerry Noonan, a mining industry veteran, founded his company Geotech in 1972 and now serves as a technical manager at Mining Equipment Safety (ME Safety). In an interview with global mining equipment supplier Epiroc, he complained about the move away from the use of coal as a primary energy source. 'We have coal, because we have the biggest coal deposits in the world, but we're not allowed to burn the f***ing stuff, so the world's rooted, really,' he said. 'It's alright to be idealistic, but you have to be realistic. And until the lights go out, the idiots that want to be green on everything and not do mining and not do coal, not do anything, they're going to have to go back and use candles and live in tents.' 'You might f***ing laugh, but it's true,' he told the interviewer. The clip resurfaced on Thursday after it was shared by Money of Mine podcast co-host Travis Ricciardo, gaining attention on social media including from Elon Musk. 'If he looks up, he will see something called 'The Sun',' Musk posted on X. Ricciardo fired back: 'Coal is ancient solar power, compressed over millions of years. 'A natural wonder that affords reliable energy when the sun goes down.' '(Musk is) not an idiot, but he is a f***wit.' During the original interview, Mr Noonan lashed out at Australia's uranium policy. 'We're not allowed to use uranium, we've got the biggest uranium deposits in the world in Australia and we're not allowed to mine the f***ing stuff,' he said. 'So, it's all fed. When half these c***s die, the world will be a better place, and those of us that survive will get going again.' He also mocked his lawyer neighbour during the rant, taking issue with their suggestion that people build electric-vehicle charging plugs along highways. 'I said, "But if you haven't got a f***ing source from a power station, plugs on the highways aren't going to do jacks***".' Daily Mail Australia has contacted Geotech and ME Safety for comment. The federal government has a target of reaching 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030, up from 43 per cent this year. Almost half of renewable energy investors rate Australia as only 'somewhat attractive' for future projects, The Clean Energy Investor Group revealed earlier in July. The group, whose 26 members have combined investments of about $38billion, were quizzed on topics including the biggest challenges, opportunities and locations for renewable energy. Of the 13 investors who responded, almost half (46 per cent) rated Australia as a 'somewhat attractive' destination for clean energy investments, while 23 per cent remained neutral and another 23 per cent classified the nation as 'very attractive'. Electric vehicles also accounted for a record high of 10 per cent of Australian sales in 2024, still falling well short of the 20 per cent of new purchases globally.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store