How to get the best bang for your climate buck
I recall reading something that accurately predicted the deniers' playbook in a climate change version of the stages of grief. First they would deny it was happening. Then they would acknowledge it was real, but deny that humans had caused it or could do anything about it. Next they would appear to acknowledge the reality of anthropogenic climate change and the need to act, but ensure the debate became bogged down in the minutiae of what to do about it.
Deniers still exist, but for the most part, we are in stage three. A case in point is the fact that we just fought an election in which a major party was proposing with a straight face that we should start a nationally owned, domestic nuclear energy program mostly from scratch. Whatever you think of nuclear energy, nearly all experts agreed this would cost too much, be too slow and keep ageing coal-fired power plants going well past the point of viability.
There are still endless debates that we don't need to have. No, electric vehicles will not 'ruin your weekend', as former prime minister Scott Morrison once said. Yes, wind turbines really are green. No, offshore wind farms don't kill whales.
Then there is legitimate policy debate. Taxpayer money is not a magic pudding, so governments wanting to fund emissions reduction or climate adaptation need to consider how to get the best bang for their climate buck.
This is a concern in the growing world of climate philanthropy, too – naturally, most donors want to ensure their money makes a difference. The question of how to get the best value becomes one of effective altruism – the philosophy that charity dollars should be spent where they will have the most impact.
Climate philanthropists sometimes join giving circles such as Groundswell Giving or Effective Altruism Australia's Environment Fund, which conduct rigorous research to determine where to direct donations for outsized impact. The recipients may be lesser known and far from home – such as Project InnerSpace, a US non-profit organisation focused on geothermal energy globally.
For governments, the decision of where to direct a climate budget is not made purely on climate grounds. Perhaps the most efficient way to reduce global greenhouse emissions is to pay to accelerate the shutdown of South Africa's notoriously dirty coal industry. But that's not going to fly for any Australian parliament because governments have a primary responsibility to their constituents. Good policy means both tackling climate change in a way that directly benefits citizens and residents of Australia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
8 minutes ago
- West Australian
Barnaby Joyce warns future generations facing China ‘threat'
Nationals maverick Barnaby Joyce says Australia's approach to defence is 'putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat' amid fears over China's military build-up and aggression toward Taiwan. The warning comes as Talisman Sabre, Australia's biggest war-games, reaches its tail end. Some 35,000 troops from 19 of the country's allies are taking part in the military exercises — drills Taiwan is pushing to be part of in the future. Mr Joyce, a former deputy prime minister, said on Monday Australia's 'strategic ambiguity' on Taiwan must be 'backed up with incredible strength'. 'There's not multiple rules-based orders in the world — there's one,' he told Seven's Sunrise, citing French President Emmanuel Macron. 'If a country wants to be outside that by just taking the South China Sea, by what we've seen with journalists in Hong Kong just (being) taken off the street, with tennis players who disappear if they say the wrong thing. 'We've had a massive build-up of (China's) armed capacity, including their nuclear capacity, and no real explanation as to why and (Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong) brought that to our attention lately.' Mr Joyce went on to say the 'Australian people really haven't grasped exactly what's before us'. 'We need to become as strong as possible as quickly as possible,' he said. 'We really are putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat. 'China does not believe in a democratic world order. 'They believe in an alternate order that does not include democracy and ultimately … where we lie in that, if we don't get this right, is as a vassal state. 'You will be dominated by economically, socially in your media, by a totalitarian regime.' Adding that Australia is 'not as strong as we should be at the moment', Mr Joyce said the answer was working with allies to bolster collective defence. Bringing Taiwan into the fold would mean Australia needs to 'look like you are strong enough to back yourself in'. More to come


Perth Now
8 minutes ago
- Perth Now
‘You will be dominated': Huge China warning
Nationals maverick Barnaby Joyce says Australia's approach to defence is 'putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat' amid fears over China's military build-up and aggression toward Taiwan. The warning comes as Talisman Sabre, Australia's biggest war-games, reaches its tail end. Some 35,000 troops from 19 of the country's allies are taking part in the military exercises — drills Taiwan is pushing to be part of in the future. Mr Joyce, a former deputy prime minister, said on Monday Australia's 'strategic ambiguity' on Taiwan must be 'backed up with incredible strength'. Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce says Australia is putting future generations at 'threat' by not acting faster to bolster the military. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'There's not multiple rules-based orders in the world — there's one,' he told Seven's Sunrise, citing French President Emmanuel Macron. 'If a country wants to be outside that by just taking the South China Sea, by what we've seen with journalists in Hong Kong just (being) taken off the street, with tennis players who disappear if they say the wrong thing. 'We've had a massive build-up of (China's) armed capacity, including their nuclear capacity, and no real explanation as to why and (Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong) brought that to our attention lately.' Mr Joyce went on to say the 'Australian people really haven't grasped exactly what's before us'. 'We need to become as strong as possible as quickly as possible,' he said. 'We really are putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat. 'China does not believe in a democratic world order. 'They believe in an alternate order that does not include democracy and ultimately … where we lie in that, if we don't get this right, is as a vassal state. 'You will be dominated by economically, socially in your media, by a totalitarian regime.' Adding that Australia is 'not as strong as we should be at the moment', Mr Joyce said the answer was working with allies to bolster collective defence. Bringing Taiwan into the fold would mean Australia needs to 'look like you are strong enough to back yourself in'. More to come

AU Financial Review
an hour ago
- AU Financial Review
US reaches new trade deal with European Union
Global pharmaceutical giants, including Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, are paying a tiny fraction of the billions of dollars they earn from drug sales in local taxes, at a time when they're lobbying US President Donald Trump to force an overhaul of Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. An analysis of earnings statements filed with the corporate regulator by five of the biggest US and European drugmakers shows the companies on average pay between 2 per cent and 4 per cent of their Australian sales in income tax. The numbers may make for uncomfortable reading for drug multinationals as they step up efforts to loosen the PBS' grip on the pricing of key medicines.