Three men convicted in the murder trial of Mangosuthu University lecturer Chanlall Dwarika
Image: Supplied
Three men have been found guilty of the murder of an electrical engineer lecturer Chanlall Dwarika from the Mangosuthu University of Technology (MUT) .
At the same time, one was acquitted of all charges in the Durban High Court on Wednesday.
Siyabonga Mahaye, Thobani Mhlongo, and Kwanele Makhaye were found guilty of kidnapping and killing 63-year-old Dwarika and robbing him. Their co-accused,
Sihle Mkhize was acquitted of all charges as the court said that without him, Dwarika would never be found.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Dwarika was kidnapped on May 28, 2023, and his body was found in the bushes of Durban's notorious township, iNanda, on June 3, 2023.
On the day he was kidnapped, he had come to his investment property situated in Sea Cow Lake to conduct maintenance.
The daughter of Chanlall Dwarika, Ayuushi Dwarika-Rajbansi, and her mother, Janitha Dwarika.
Image: Nomonde Zondi
CCTV footage from the area showed Dwarika speaking to three men, who then forced him into the rear of his Honda CR-V.
When he failed to return home, his family reported him missing to the police. His pictures were circulated on social media, and MUT held a media briefing calling for his safe return. The post-mortem results revealed that his throat had been slit and partially decapitated.
Delivering her ruling, Judge Khosi Hadebe said the evidence presented by the State set out the role played by each of the accused on the day Dwarika met his gruesome death.
She stated that it was evident to the court that Mahaye, Mhlongo, and Makhaye viewed Dwarika as a source of easy money.
'It is very possible that the Dwarika owed them unpaid wages,' Judge Hadebe said.
She said Dwarika provided a shelter for the accused, he saw it fit to feed them, and he trusted them. 'Unfortunately, his trust cost him his life,' she added.
She said the behaviors of the accused put them in a category of low lives, adding that the court was satisfied that the State proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.
She said Mahaye was guilty of kidnapping and robbery with aggravating circumstances. According to her, the State failed to prove that he murdered Dwarika.
She said Mhlongo and Makhaye were guilty of all the charges. Discharging Mkhize on all counts, Judge Hadebe said he was a sincere witness, and his actions of going to tell his supervisor after witnessing Dwarika being killed helped police make a breakthrough in the case.
The wife of Dwarika, Janitha Dwarika, whom they had been married to for 40 years, could not utter a word as she cried after the court proceedings.
His daughter, Ayuushi Dwarika-Rajbansi, said that since the passing of her father, they had received support from other academics from MUT who checked them from time to time.
She got emotional talking about the trial. 'It was quite sad to hear what my father had to endure. I wish we had known sooner and tried to help. I wish we had a fighting chance to have helped him,' she said.
Sentencing is expected on Thursday.
nomonde.zondi@inl.co.za
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Judge Rejects Prosecutors' Bid for Clarity in High-Profile Omotoso Case
Sifiso Mahlangu | Published 2 hours ago A case that has gripped South Africa for years, Judge Irma Schoeman has dismissed the National Prosecuting Authority's attempt to seek clarification regarding her earlier ruling that acquitted Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso and two of his co-accused. The court's recent decision marks another dramatic chapter in a legal battle that has garnered national attention and sparked public debate over justice, procedure, and the rights of the accused. Earlier this year, Judge Schoeman handed down a ruling in the Eastern Cape High Court that effectively cleared Omotoso and his co-accused of charges including human trafficking and sexual assault. The April judgment stunned many observers, especially given the serious nature of the allegations. The prosecution, evidently dissatisfied with the outcome, had hoped to gain further insight into the court's reasoning before proceeding with an application for leave to appeal. However, in a decision released this week, Judge Schoeman dismissed the NPA's request. She ruled that the State is not entitled to seek clarification from the court as a precursor to filing an appeal. In her view, the law does not provide for a two-step process in such matters. Instead, the State must proceed directly with its appeal application if it believes there are grounds to challenge the verdict. Legal analysts suggest the ruling reflects a strict interpretation of procedural law. Judge Schoeman emphasised that the judgment she issued in April was comprehensive and clear enough for the State to understand the basis for the acquittal. Any further elaboration, she argued, would fall outside the bounds of what the court is required to provide post-verdict. The case itself has been fraught with delays, complications, and public scrutiny. Timothy Omotoso, a well-known figure in religious circles, was first arrested in 2017. Accused by several women of running a religious cult under the guise of ministry work, he faced charges that included sexual exploitation and trafficking. Two female co-accused were also charged in connection with the alleged crimes. Over time, the case took on national significance, with many viewing it as a test of the justice system's ability to handle cases involving powerful figures and vulnerable victims. The April acquittal was a turning point. Judge Schoeman found that the State had failed to present sufficient evidence to justify continuing the trial. The decision drew criticism from activists and some members of the public, who feared that it could discourage survivors of abuse from coming forward in future cases. Now, with the latest ruling, the NPA faces a tough decision. Without the benefit of additional judicial guidance, prosecutors must decide whether to move forward with their appeal. Legal experts caution that any appeal will have to be carefully argued, relying strictly on points of law rather than seeking to relitigate the facts of the case. As the legal process continues, the case of Timothy Omotoso remains a stark reminder of the complexities and limitations of the justice system in high-profile, emotionally charged trial
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Judge Rejects Prosecutors' Bid for Clarity in High-Profile Omotoso Case
Judge Schoeman emphasized that the judgment she issued in April was comprehensive and clear enough for the State to understand the basis for the Timothy Omotoso acquittal. Image: Raahil Sain / IOL A case that has gripped South Africa for years, Judge Irma Schoeman has dismissed the National Prosecuting Authority's attempt to seek clarification regarding her earlier ruling that acquitted Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso and two of his co-accused. The court's recent decision marks another dramatic chapter in a legal battle that has garnered national attention and sparked public debate over justice, procedure, and the rights of the accused. Earlier this year, Judge Schoeman handed down a ruling in the Eastern Cape High Court that effectively cleared Omotoso and his co-accused of charges including human trafficking and sexual assault. The April judgment stunned many observers, especially given the serious nature of the allegations. The prosecution, evidently dissatisfied with the outcome, had hoped to gain further insight into the court's reasoning before proceeding with an application for leave to appeal. However, in a decision released this week, Judge Schoeman dismissed the NPA's request. She ruled that the State is not entitled to seek clarification from the court as a precursor to filing an appeal. In her view, the law does not provide for a two-step process in such matters. Instead, the State must proceed directly with its appeal application if it believes there are grounds to challenge the verdict. Legal analysts suggest the ruling reflects a strict interpretation of procedural law. Judge Schoeman emphasised that the judgment she issued in April was comprehensive and clear enough for the State to understand the basis for the acquittal. Any further elaboration, she argued, would fall outside the bounds of what the court is required to provide post-verdict. The case itself has been fraught with delays, complications, and public scrutiny. Timothy Omotoso, a well-known figure in religious circles, was first arrested in 2017. Accused by several women of running a religious cult under the guise of ministry work, he faced charges that included sexual exploitation and trafficking. Two female co-accused were also charged in connection with the alleged crimes. Over time, the case took on national significance, with many viewing it as a test of the justice system's ability to handle cases involving powerful figures and vulnerable victims. The April acquittal was a turning point. Judge Schoeman found that the State had failed to present sufficient evidence to justify continuing the trial. The decision drew criticism from activists and some members of the public, who feared that it could discourage survivors of abuse from coming forward in future cases. Now, with the latest ruling, the NPA faces a tough decision. Without the benefit of additional judicial guidance, prosecutors must decide whether to move forward with their appeal. Legal experts caution that any appeal will have to be carefully argued, relying strictly on points of law rather than seeking to relitigate the facts of the case. As the legal process continues, the case of Timothy Omotoso remains a stark reminder of the complexities and limitations of the justice system in high-profile, emotionally charged trial
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
City security chief calls for 'cop killer' to stay behind bars
BUSTED: Craig 'Krake' De Lilly, 36, appeared in Cape Town Magistrates Court Image: Supplied Safety and security mayco member JP Smith has called on the State to reconsider it's stance in deciding not to oppose bail for an accused cop killer. Craig "Krake" De Lilly appeared in the Cape Town Magistrates Court on Monday after his arrest on Friday after new information emerged in the murder case of traffic cop Walton van Rooyen on March 17, 2020. De Lilly, a taxi driver, is alleged to have shot and killed traffic cop Van Rooyen in his patrol car. KILLED Slain traffic cop Walton van Rooyen, 49. Image: Supplied De Lilly was arrested along with his taxi guard and two other men shortly after the shooting in Acre Road, however a month later the case was provisionally withdrawn. The accused returned to the dock making a brief court appearance on Monday facing Schedule 6 charges of murder, the unlawful possession of a 9mm pistol and the unlawful possession of 14 cartridges. The court heard that the warrant for his arrest was issued back in March 2025. The State said that the investigation is complete and that it will not oppose bail. In a statement, Smith called for the State to reconsider their decision on his bail. Smith said: "While the reasons for the unopposed bail application are unclear at the stage, we call on the courts to use their discretion when the matter returns to court next week. "We believe that individuals accused of murdering officers in the line of duty should not be allowed to roam our streets while on trial. If we cannot protect our officers, we cannot protect the public." Smith added: 'We hope this arrest brings the family some comfort and we call on the courts to act diligently. 'We hope this serves as a lesson to those who callously kill officers executing their duties. If we cannot protect our officers, we cannot protect the public.' 'The case was postponed to July 28 for bail information and for a lawyer to represent the accused." De Lilly is alleged to be a member of the 26 gang, has a criminal record dating back to 1999 and had been convicted of robbery, kidnapping and rape. Cape Times
