logo
Man Sues Trump Admin To Keep 70 Million-Year-Old Tyrannosaurus Skull

Man Sues Trump Admin To Keep 70 Million-Year-Old Tyrannosaurus Skull

Newsweek10 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Texas man is suing the Trump administration over its attempts to seize his 70 million-year-old Tyrannosaurus bataar skull.
Robert M. Lavinsky bought the ancient fossil from a Gem & Mineral and Fossil Show dealer in 2005. It is now stored in Texas.
However, he has been under investigation since 2014 by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), both of which allege the skull is stolen property.
Lavinsky is suing the agencies, with a complaint filed on Wednesday stating: "The Government's demand for forfeiture of Plaintiff's personal property constitutes a concrete and particularized injury."
DHS and attorneys for Lavinsky have been contacted via email outside business hours for comment.
The skull and jawbone of a Tyrannosaurus bataar skeleton is displayed during a ceremony of its repatriation to Mongolia, in New York, Monday, May 6, 2013. This is not the skull owned by Robert Lavinsky....
The skull and jawbone of a Tyrannosaurus bataar skeleton is displayed during a ceremony of its repatriation to Mongolia, in New York, Monday, May 6, 2013. This is not the skull owned by Robert Lavinsky. More
Richard Drew/AP Photo
Why It Matters
The Trump administration, particularly DHS, is already being sued by several groups of Attorneys General, citizens, and people who have been detained by ICE as part of the government's hardline immigration agenda. This is another lawsuit to add to its extensive legal schedule.
Unlike other cases against the federal government, however, this suit is not related to specific Trump administration policies, as it relates to DHS activity that was initiated during the Obama era.
What To Know
According to Lavinsky's court filing, an investigation into the skull began in 2014, two years after the government launched an inquiry into the store owners who sold Lavinsky the bataar skull.
The skull originated from Mongolia, and according to the US government, "under U.S. law, generally, paleontological artifacts of Mongolian origin are considered to be stolen property and vertebrate paleontological artifacts of Chinese origin are considered to be stolen property."
The government then said Lavinsky had broken the law by requesting the skull be imported into the U.S., and said it would "initiate legal action to compel the production of and/or seizure and forfeiture of" the item, says the filing.
Lavinsky and his legal team argue he did not import the skull, but rather bought it when it was already in the United States.
This new suit arose because the government froze Lavinsky's ownership rights over the skull in 2014.
In 2017, James Godwin, the owner of the store that sold Lavinsky the skull, sued the government, saying it had gone beyond its statute of limitations in the case of the skull.
Per Lavinsky's filing: "The Court found that the Government discovered facts showing Dr. Godwin's Bataar skull existed in the United States and was in Dr. Godwin's possession when it received the July 2012 Production [of records exchanged between Godwin and the government regarding the skull.]"
The filing went on to say: "Notably, the Court adopted the 'known or should have known' standard for the running of 5-year statute of limitations under 19 U.S.C. § 1621 for civil forfeiture claims... The Government failed to timely file its request for forfeiture."
Despite this ruling, Lavinsky's ownership rights remain in question. He says he wants to donate the skull to Wyoming Dinosaur Center & Dig Sites in Thermopolis, but is unable to do so because he worries that if he tried to donate the skull the government would seize it.
What People Are Saying
Robert Lavinsky's Filing states: "Plaintiff Dr. Robert M. Lavinsky requests that the Court declare that the Government is barred by the statute of limitations to pursue any forfeiture claims of Dr. Lavinsky's Bataar Skull and declare that Dr. Lavinsky has unencumbered ownership and clear title of the Bataar Skull, and for all such other and further relief, at law and in equity, to which he must be justly entitled."
What Happens Next
Lavinsky has requested a declaratory injunction from the government, for them to state that he is the owner of the skull so that he can donate it to the center in Wyoming.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemetic
Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemetic

The Hill

time36 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump says he wasn't aware term used at rally viewed as antisemetic

President Trump said he was unaware that the term 'shylock' is considered antisemitic, after using it during his Iowa speech Thursday to describe lenders that add too many conditions on their loans. Trump said he 'never heard it that way' and did not recognize that it was an offensive term for Jewish people. The word comes from a Shakespeare's 'The Merchant of Venice,' in which a Jewish lender requires a debtor to hand over a pound of flesh as interest. 'To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates,' he told reporters after returning to Washington. 'I've never heard it that way, you view it differently than me. I've never heard that.' His use of the term came during a speech celebrating the passage of his 'big, beautiful bill,' which is full of his domestic priorities — from major spending cuts to tax breaks. The House and Senate, following weeks of infighting and debate, sent the legislation to Trump's desk a day ahead of the July 4 deadline. The president will sign the megabill into law Friday at the start of a Fourth of July picnic. Trump in one part of his remarks, while touting many of the provisions, referred to a measure that would protect family farmers by allowing them to pay reduced estate taxes. 'No death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker, and in some cases, shylocks and bad people,' Trump said. 'They destroyed a lot of families, but we did the opposite.' The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a nonprofit whose mission is to combat antisemitism, condemned the remarks, calling them 'troubling and irresponsible.' 'The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous,' the ADL wrote early Friday on social platform X. 'President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible.' 'It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country,' the group added. 'Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States.' It is not the first time the president, who has made fighting antisemitism a focus in his second term, has found himself in the middle of controversy regarding Jewish people. During his time on the campaign trail, Trump claimed any Jew who votes for Democrats 'hates their religion' and was criticized in 2022 for dining with Nick Fuentes, an outspoken white supremacist who is known for antisemitic rhetoric. The pushback also comes more than a decade after former President Biden, while vice president, used the term during a speech in 2014 to describe moneylenders who issued loans with bad conditions to members of the military. He later apologized for the gaffe, calling it a 'poor choice of words.' The Associated Press contributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store