Centre to file review plea against Madras HC order dispensing with husband's signature in passport form
Appearing before Justice N. Anand Venkatesh on Wednesday (July 2, 2025), Additional Solicitor General AR.L. Sundaresan said, the passport authorities insist on the husband's signature only to avoid malpractices of obtaining a passport with false details regarding the spouse's name.
He said, there was an office memorandum to that effect. 'Sometimes, applicants obtain passports by mentioning a third person's name as their spouse and use the details entered in the passport as evidence elsewhere. That is the reason we want to file a review,' he added.
The judge accepted his request and agreed to hear the review petition as and when it gets listed.
While allowing a writ petition filed by a woman applicant from Chennai, the judge on June 18, 2025, observed that married women could not be treated as chattels belonging to their husbands.
Since the petitioner before the court was facing a divorce case against her husband, the judge had pointed out that it would be next to impossible for her to obtain her husband's signature in Form J. He had also stated that women could not be considered to have lost their individuality after marriage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Delay in appointing scientific officers, staff in forensic science labs: Kerala HC seeks report
The Kerala High Court has sought a report from the District Judiciary Registrar of the High Court regarding the pendency of criminal trials in the State owing to the delay in appointing scientific officers and other staff in forensic science laboratories. The Bench consisting of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice C. Jayachandran issued the order while considering a petition filed by Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KeLSA) seeking a directive to the State government and the Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC) to recruit adequate number of scientific assistants in the forensic labs. The KeLSA alleged that the vacancies and the failure to appoint scientific assistants in the labs adversely impacted the conduct of trials, particularly in Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) and Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) cases. The KeLSA also referred to delays in appointing special public prosecutors in POCSO courts. The PSC's counsel said that there were procedural requirements and inherent time lag involved in appointments. Stating that continued inaction would affect Kerala's criminal justice system, the court directed the government and the PSC to coordinate and ensure that the vacancies are filled without delay.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Arunthathiyar candidates can compete in SC general quota too: HC
An Arunthathiyar candidate can compete in the Scheduled Caste general category quota on merit basis and if he or she is selected, the sub-quota earmarked for Arunthathiyars will not be affected, said the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The most meritorious Arunthathiyar candidate shall not be adjusted against the SC (Arunthathiyar) vacancy in the first instance, observed a Division Bench of Justices G. R. Swaminathan and K. Rajasekar. The court was hearing an appeal preferred by E. Surya, belonging to the Hindu Pallan community. The Teachers Recruitment Board issued a notification in 2019 for the post of Lecturers in Government Polytechnic Colleges and Special Institutions (Engineering/Non-Engineering). She had applied for the post of Lecturer (Information Technology) under the Scheduled Caste category. However, the two vacancies for the post were filled up by candidates belonging to SC (Arunthathiyar) community. The case of the appellant is that one Ms R, Jeyasudha, who scored more marks than her, ought to have been selected against the SC(A) category in the first instance. In that event, in the SC (General) vacancy, the appellant would have competed with others, all of whom had scored lower marks compared to her. Since Ms Jeyasudha was selected against SC (General) vacancy in the first instance itself, the appellant who is not an Arunthathiyar could not be considered for the remaining vacancy which had been reserved for a person belonging to the SC(A) category. She contended the procedure adopted by the recruiting agency was not in conformity with the statutory provisions. A Single Bench dismissed her petition. She preferred an appeal against the order. The Division Bench observed that reservation was introduced with the aim of advancing and giving adequate representation to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and other socially and educationally backward classes of citizens. It is well settled that candidates who make it on their own merit have to be adjusted against the General Category candidates. In other words, when vacancies are filled up, the open quota opens first and candidates irrespective of caste, sex etc., are allowed to compete based on merit. The meritorious candidates should be first selected as against the open quota vacancies. Only thereafter, selection has to be made for the vertical reservation category from among the remaining candidates belonging to that particular reserved category (vertical) based on merits, the court observed. It must then be seen if sufficient numbers of candidates to satisfy special reservation (horizontal reservation) have been selected. If not, the required number of special reservation candidates shall have to be accommodated as against social reservation categories by deleting the number of candidates therefrom. At any rate candidates who were selected against a post under the open quota shall not be adjusted against the reserved quota under vertical reservations, the court observed. When a reserved candidate can compete in the open quota on merit and his/her selection would not affect the number of vacancies earmarked for his/her group the same approach should be adopted in the case of sub-reservation also. The court consequently upheld the manner of selection made by the Teachers Recruitment Board.
New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Nainital HC sounds alarm on teen marriages, orders awareness drive
DEHRADUN: The Uttarakhand High Court has expressed deep concern over the rising number of adolescents entering into marriages and subsequently seeking court protection. The court deems the trend alarming and fraught with serious consequences, including potential charges under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court had previously summoned Uttrakhand's Secretary for Child Rights Welfare, Chandresh Yadav, who appeared before the bench on Thursday. During the proceedings, the court directed Secretary Chandresh Kumar to prepare and present a comprehensive plan within two weeks. This plan aims to raise public awareness about the seriousness of the POCSO Act and address the growing issue of underage unions. The plan also focusses at sensitising parents especially, about the gravity of the POCSO Act, thereby enabling them to guide their children effectively. A division bench of the Nainital High Court, comprising Chief Justice G. Narendar and Justice Alok Mehra, observed during the hearing of one such case, stating, "This trend is alarming and needs attention." The specific matter before the court involved a 19-year-old youth who, after marrying a girl of his age, sought court protection from her family. The bench noted with concern the increasing number of such cases where petitioners are often adolescents. While acknowledging the legal right to choose one's life partner, the court underscored that the growing tendency of marriages among minors makes it difficult for them to develop a sense of responsibility at such a young age.
