Teen robot builder to take on world's best
Rhys Lewis is heading to Dallas for the VEX V5 Robotics World Championship in May with Quasar the robot. Photo: Geoff Sloan
Christchurch student Rhys Lewis is set to fly to the United States next Saturday to take on the world's top young robotics experts.
The 17-year-old from Papanui will take part in the Vex V5 Robotics World Championship high school competition in Dallas, Texas, from May 6-8.
'It is pretty cool – it has been the goal to get to the worlds.'
Rhys and his teammate Alex Griffin are students at Ao Tawhiti Unlimited Discovery.
Under their team name Maverick, they designed, built and programmed Quasar, the game-playing robot, over the past year.
Quasar is an expert at the game High Stakes, which involves picking up coloured plastic rings and using them to score goals over a two-minute period.
Rhys and Alex have competed in local scrimmages and dedicated many hours to perfecting their robot.
Quasar has been programmed to play the game High Stakes using coloured plastic rings. Photo: Geoff Sloan
Rhys said competing against teams from the United States and China will be vastly different because of the level of investment those countries put into robotics.
"The USA and Chinese teams, to them, these are full sports. Robotics have similar clout to rugby teams over here.'
Rhys said the robotics community in Christchurch is small but supportive.
'It is a tight-knit community, we were borrowing a field to practice on and now we are about to compete and compare ourselves against 800 teams of the best of other countries.'
The starting point to build a robot was about $3000, Rhys said.
Rhys Lewis and Alex Griffin. Photo: Geoff Sloan
Alex has only been involved in robotics competitions for one season so far and says making the world champs was a proud milestone.
"In my first season to make worlds is an achievement in itself. It is quite exciting.
"There are only two teams from the South Island going over and they're both from Canterbury," Alex said.
Said Rhys: "No matter where you place, you are in the top 5%."
The pair are both set to fly out to Texas on Saturday, May 3.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
16 hours ago
- 1News
WHO fails to find a definitive answer for how Covid-19 began
An expert group charged by the World Health Organization to investigate how the Covid-19 pandemic started released its final report, reaching an unsatisfying conclusion: Scientists still aren't sure how the worst health emergency in a century began. At a press briefing Marietjie Venter, the group's chair, said that most scientific data supports the hypothesis that the new coronavirus jumped to humans from animals. That was also the conclusion drawn by the first WHO expert group that investigated the pandemic's origins in 2021, when scientists concluded the virus likely spread from bats to humans, via another intermediary animal. At the time, WHO said a lab leak was 'extremely unlikely'. Venter said that after more than three years of work, WHO's expert group was unable to get the necessary data to evaluate whether or not Covid-19 was the result of a lab accident, despite repeated requests for hundreds of genetic sequences and more detailed biosecurity information that were made to the Chinese government. 'Therefore, this hypothesis could not be investigated or excluded,' she said. 'It was deemed to be very speculative, based on political opinions and not backed up by science.' ADVERTISEMENT She said that the 27-member group did not reach a consensus; one member resigned earlier this week and three others asked for their names to be removed from the report. Venter said there was no evidence to prove that Covid-19 had been manipulated in a lab, nor was there any indication that the virus had been spreading before December 2019 anywhere outside of China. 'Until more scientific data becomes available, the origins of how SARS-CoV-2 entered human populations will remain inconclusive,' Venter said, referring to the scientific name for the Covid-19 virus. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said it was a 'moral imperative' to determine how Covid began, noting that the virus killed at least 20 million people, wiped at least US$10 trillion (NZ$16.5 trillion) from the global economy and upended the lives of billions. Last year, the AP found that the Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus' origins in the first weeks of the outbreak in 2020 and that WHO itself may have missed early opportunities to investigate how Covid-19 began. US President Donald Trump has long blamed the emergence of the coronavirus on a laboratory accident in China, while a US intelligence analysis found there was insufficient evidence to prove the theory. Chinese officials have repeatedly dismissed the idea that the pandemic could have started in a lab, saying that the search for its origins should be conducted in other countries. ADVERTISEMENT Last September, researchers zeroed in on a short list of animals they think might have spread Covid-19 to humans, including racoon dogs, civet cats and bamboo rats.
Techday NZ
4 days ago
- Techday NZ
The risky race to AI: How DeepSeek is reshaping the AI landscape
The recent release of DeepSeek-R1 by the Chinese startup DeepSeek has garnered a lot of interest and could spark a new wave of innovation, potentially rebalancing the state of AI supremacy between the major competitors on the global stage. By introducing unique features and improving upon existing AI capabilities, DeepSeek-R1 set new standards in large language models (LLM) performance. DeepSeek introduced cost-effective, open-source LLMs, drastically reducing AI development expenses. Its models cost approximately USD$0.10 per million tokens, compared to OpenAI's $4.40. Making high-quality AI tools more accessible and affordable also democratises technology access. This inclusivity challenges existing models that are often exclusive or expensive, which broadens the user base for advanced AI solutions and encourages other companies to enhance their offerings, fostering a cycle of rapid advancements in the field. Since DeepSeek released its open and resource friendly but very competitive model, we are now standing at the advent of a potential open model boom. However, there are significant caution signs that point to security and data privacy risks and political bias and censorship. Nation-state influences In the context of geopolitical tensions, DeepSeek represents a homegrown solution for China that reduces reliance on foreign technologies. This self-reliance is crucial for maintaining technological sovereignty and enhancing national security. Organisations in Western countries are increasingly viewing DeepSeek as a security risk and are consequently blocking access to it. The primary concerns include data privacy, security and censorship. DeepSeek's data collection policies indicate that user information is stored on servers located in China. This raises fears that sensitive data could be accessed by the Chinese government under national security laws. Experts also warn that DeepSeek could be exploited for espionage or influence operations. The app's association with China Mobile, a state-owned telecommunications company, has heightened these concerns as researchers discovered code linking DeepSeek to China Mobile, suggesting potential data privacy issues. DeepSeek has also been observed censoring topics sensitive to the Chinese government, such as the Tiananmen Square incident and discussions about Taiwan. This behaviour raises concerns about the spread of disinformation and the suppression of free speech. Security risks and repercussions Following the rise in popularity of DeepSeek's R1 model, the New York-based cybersecurity firm Wiz examined the company's security measures. The firm's investigation revealed that DeepSeek had left its database infrastructure unsecured, allowing public internet access without any password protection. This oversight exposed a substantial amount of sensitive information, including chat histories, backend data and other confidential details. In response to these concerns, several countries and organisations have taken action. The Australian government, for example, has banned DeepSeek from all government devices, citing unacceptable security risks. Italy's data protection authority has blocked DeepSeek after the company failed to provide information about its data processing practices, sparking Belgian and Irish data protections authorities to open probes requesting information from DeepSeek on the processing and storing of their citizens' data. Multiple U.S. federal agencies, including the Navy and NASA, have restricted the use of DeepSeek due to privacy and security concerns. These actions reflect a growing apprehension in the West regarding the potential risks associated with DeepSeek's data practices and its connections to the Chinese government. DeepSeek also suffered the consequences of its sudden global prominence. Based on information from the Chinese Qi Anxin's XLab security firm, the Global Times, an English-language Chinese newspaper under the People's Daily, reported that DeepSeek has faced escalating cyberattacks since early January 2025, beginning with volumetric DDoS attacks leveraging SSDP and NTP reflection and amplification. The attacks, which further escalated to more sophisticated HTTP proxy and botnet-based DDoS attacks by late January, impacted DeepSeek's service and its ability to register new users. The Beijing-headquartered security firm NSFocus also monitored the attacks and concluded that "this highly coordinated and precise attack suggests that the incident was not accidental, but likely a well-planned and organised cyberattack executed by a professional team." Xlab also observed a significant volume of password brute-force attacks targeting DeepSeek's login page, with "a notable portion originating from U.S. IP addresses." It is important to recognise that surges in account takeover (ATO) attempts are not uncommon on platforms that impose restrictions on new registrations. When the availability of new accounts is constrained, they gain value as a tradeable commodity within underground markets, ultimately drawing the attention of malicious actors and increasing illicit traffic. Proceed with caution Despite the significant pushback against DeepSeek's service, the disruptive potential of the open-source model remains intact, as it is freely accessible for anyone to download, experiment with, and innovate upon. Organisations and users can leverage their own data as ground truth within the privacy of their own premises. This not only mitigates many of the drawbacks associated with DeepSeek's service but also fuels innovation across a spectrum of use cases, both benign and malicious.
Techday NZ
4 days ago
- Techday NZ
Asia Pacific set to overtake US in data centre capacity by 2030
Asia Pacific is forecasted to surpass the United States as the largest colocation data centre market globally before 2030, according to analysis by Cushman & Wakefield. The Asia Pacific Data Centre Investment Landscape report projects that by 2030, the region will possess approximately 23,904 MW of operational colocation capacity. In contrast, the United States is expected to have around 18,256 MW, placing APAC ahead in both capacity and projected rental revenue. Speaking on the findings, Pritesh Swamy, Head of Insights and Analysis for Cushman & Wakefield's Asia Pacific Data Centre Group, said: "Various forecast models show that Asia Pacific will overtake the United States as the largest colocation market in either 2028 or 2029. Based on the population differential, this is expected—but still significant given the depth and maturity of the US market." Based on the report's analysis, APAC colocation rental income is estimated to reach around USD $44 billion per year by 2030. Of this, 72% will be generated from the five largest markets based on capacity: Japan, Chinese mainland, Australia, India, and Malaysia. The report also indicates a significant market shift, with Malaysia anticipated to replace Singapore as the fifth largest market by or around 2029. Japan is positioned as the leading contributor among these markets, accounting for 22% of regional colocation revenue, an estimated USD $9.6 billion in 2030. Each of the other four top markets is also projected to generate in excess of USD $4 billion annually in colocation revenue. Changing development profiles Cushman & Wakefield's analysis identifies notable differences in operational approaches between APAC and the United States. Swamy commented on the capacity distribution: "Asia Pacific's higher proportion of operational colocation capacity, combined with higher average colo rents on a per kW basis, helped to drive the region's average rental rates above those in the US." Currently, colocation stock comprises 58% of operational data centre capacity in the United States compared to 85% in Asia Pacific. Projections show this gap narrowing incrementally through the decade. By 2030, colocation facilities are expected to account for 86% of total operational capacity in APAC, while the share in the US is forecast to rise to 61%. The report suggests that colocation capacity in the US will continue to grow in subsequent years, with hyperscale cloud and artificial intelligence providers turning increasingly to colocation services to keep pace with rising demand. Market indicators The Asia Pacific Data Centre Investment Landscape report is based on aggregated metrics across 14 regional markets. The analysis considers factors including population per megawatt of data centre capacity, regional demand, levels of direct US investment into APAC, capital expenditure requirements, rent revenue and cap rate estimates, and yield on cost. Population growth, increasing digitalisation, and strong regional economic activity are highlighted as substantial drivers for escalating demand and investment in data centre infrastructure across Asia Pacific markets. The anticipated increase in capacity and revenue is also predicted to result in evolving investment patterns and heightened focus from private and institutional investors in the APAC data centre sector.
