Axelrod: Ernst response to Medicaid remarks ‘insensitive,' ‘politically stupid'
'It was really insensitive of her to put that video up and politically stupid,' Axelrod said in a panel discussion with CNN's Jake Tapper.
Ernst, a military veteran who has been in the Senate for more than a decade, posted a mock apology video on Instagram that showed her walking through a cemetery and discussing the backlash she faced from telling the Butler, Iowa crowd a day earlier, ' Well, we're all going to die ' when an attendee yelled that people would die because of the Medicaid cuts in the House-approved version of President Trump's agenda-setting ' One Big, Beautiful Bill.'
'I made an incorrect assumption that everyone in the auditorium understood that, yes, we are all going to perish from this earth,' Ernst said in the video. 'So I apologize, and I'm really, really glad that I did not have to bring up the subject of the tooth fairy as well.'
Axelrod, a chief political analyst at CNN and podcast host who was a top adviser to former President Obama, said Ernst 'probably could have gotten away' with her initial comments at the town hall as she made the case that the proposed Medicaid cuts are directed at people who should not receive benefits, including undocumented migrants and able-bodied adults who are not seeking employment.
'But putting up that spot the next day …' Axelrod said. 'When you take 10, you know, seven, eight, nine million people off of Medicaid, there will be people who will die. There will be people who are affected.'
Conservative political commentator Scott Jennings, who also appeared on the panel, agreed that Ernst's video was not wise but said her initial message was sound.
'She had it right in the town hall meeting, and then she deviated at the end,' Jennings said. 'I wouldn't have posted the follow-up video myself, but I think the Republicans can actually win this debate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate pushes bill that would give disaster victims six months of mortgage relief as they rebuild
A new bill, introduced in the Senate on Thursday, aims to give natural disaster victims at least six months of mortgage relief – which comes as more Americans experience damage and loss from natural disasters and severe weather. Under the 'Mortgage Relief for Disaster Survivors Act,' homeowners with federally-backed loans located in areas declared disaster zones would be able to seek relief from paying mortgages for 180 days without accumulating interest or penalties. The legislation also gives people an opportunity to apply for a 180-day extension. Mortgage payments do not automatically pause in times of disaster. Those whose homes are destroyed or damaged can request their mortgage servicer to forbear their payments temporarily. But the uncertainty around mortgage forbearance can add more stress during a fraught time. Democratic Senators Adam Schiff of California, whose state sees deadly wildfires every year, and Michael Bennet of Colorado, whose state experiences wildfires and severe flooding, co-sponsored the bill. In a statement, Schiff said families in Los Angeles that were impacted by the wildfires in January are 'still struggling' to rebuild from the disaster. More than 9,000 homes were destroyed by the blazing fires that destroyed parts of the Pacific Palisades, Altadena, and other neighborhoods in and around Los Angeles. 'As natural disasters become more frequent due to climate change, it is critical that we pave a path to stability for homeowners in times of crisis,' Schiff said, adding that the issue impacts Republican-led and Democratic-led states. A near-identical bill was introduced in the House of Representatives earlier this year. Bennet's home state has also experienced its fair share of wildfires and other disasters. Residents in Boulder County lived through the most destructive fire in Colorado history in 2022 when the Marshall Fire broke out, destroying at least 1,000 homes and hundreds of other structures. 'Coloradans know all too well how difficult it is to pick up the pieces and move forward after catastrophic wildfires,' Bennet said in a statement. 'When mounting financial and emotional costs of recovery weigh on families, they should be able to take time to put their lives back together and rebuild their homes.' Mortgage delinquencies rise in the wake of a natural disaster, data from the Mortgage Bankers Association shows. In the fourth quarter of 2024, the delinquency rate rose six basis points from the third quarter and 10 basis points from the same time the previous year. The largest quarterly increases occurred in Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Georgia, all of which experienced devastation after Hurricane Helene struck in September. The bill is endorsed by the Consumer Federation of America, National Consumer Law Center, National Low Income Housing Center, Consumer Watchdog, National Housing Law Project, and more.
New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Dems' confirmation obstruction is an anti-democratic, dangerous stunt
Senate Democrats are throwing a hissy fit for the ages with an unprecedented drive to drag out the confirmations of President Donald Trump's nominees. Every new prez must get not just his Cabinet chiefs confirmed, but also hundreds of other top officials across the Executive Branch. After getting out of committee, these 'sub-Cabinet' picks are traditionally OK'd on the Senate floor in batches, often by unanimous consent. But Dems are instead now insisting on hours of 'debate' and a full roll-call vote for every single Trump nominee — making the process so time-consuming that countless federal agencies still lack permanent leadership as acting officials hold down the fort. This is pure spite: Republicans won the White House and control of Congress fair and square last fall; Democrats just don't want to honor the election results. Indeed, the party's base demands that its reps in Washington do all they can to frustrate the new president's agenda — no matter what price the country as a whole pays. No wonder Democrats' approval ratings are circling the drain. Dem partisans may feel like they're 'resisting fascism,' but they're really just defying the democratic process. Assuming (fingers crossed) that no harm is done because key desks at the Pentagon or State Department are needlessly vacant, this stall won't change anything in the long run: It's purely performative, the equivalent of when then-Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulled a fire alarm to delay a vote Dems were sure to lose. Heck, the real point may be to save Chuck Schumer: Progressives have been howling for the Senate minority leader's scalp ever since he followed his conscience to avoid a government shutdown a few months back. It's pretty sad that Schumer's reduced to these games just so he can keep trying to protect his party from the consequences of its demented turn to the hard left. Maybe it's time to take the risk of facing down the lunatics, Chuck: Appeasing them only makes all Democrats look bad.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans Pan Trump's Idea Of Tariff Rebates
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's proposal to send checks to millions of Americans hurt by his tariff policies is running into resistance from some Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill who'd like to pay down the deficit instead. Last week, Trump said he was considering providing consumers with financial relief from the tens of billions of dollars his administration has collected since it instituted its higher duties earlier this year on nearly every good the U.S. imports. The U.S. Treasury has reported raising about $150 billion from the program so far. 'We're thinking about a little rebate. But the big thing we want to do is pay down debt. But we're thinking about a rebate,' Trump said at the White House, adding that it would likely include an income threshold. Congress would have to approve any such move, and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) introduced legislation this week that would provide $600 tariff rebates in the form of a tax credit. 'Why not reward the working people who have taken it in the shins for the last four years and give them something out of this? I think they need it, deserve it,' Hawley told HuffPost on Tuesday. In reality, the money pouring into the U.S. Treasury is coming from American businesses and consumers, who are the ones actually paying for Trump's tariffs. So the idea of a tariff rebate is similar to putting a Band-Aid on a wound one intentionally gave oneself. Coincidentally, Congress is essentially doing the same thing by providing financial assistance to rural hospitals hurt by the GOP's recent law cutting funding to Medicaid. Other Republican senators told HuffPost the tariff revenue would be better used to pay down the national debt, as Trump had also suggested in his remarks last week. After all, that was initially one of the reasons the Trump administration gave for instituting the tariffs in the first place. 'We're $37 trillion in debt, running a $2 trillion-a-year deficit. No, we shouldn't be rebating,' said Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). 'That would defeat the purpose that the president may be looking at in terms of reducing the size of the deficit,' added Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). 'Nonetheless, the reality is tariffs are basically a national sales tax on a lot of products that come from overseas, and it's something that would be worth considering.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected that Trump's tariffs could shave $2.8 trillion off the federal debt over the next decade, if they remain in place. However, the CBO also forecast that Trump's tariffs would reduce the size of the U.S. economy by lowering the rate of real GDP growth, and would increase annual average inflation.
