Doug Beattie: Ex-UUP leader was 'beaten badly' in the Army for being Irish
Speaking to BBC News NI's Red Lines podcast, Beattie said he joined the military as a teenager, after his mother died and his father struggled with alcohol addiction.He said he went to Somerset to do his initial Army training, where he faced discrimination because of his background."Because I was an Irishman - and I've always been an Irishman - I was beaten badly by instructors, by people I was looking up to," he said."I found myself bullied quite badly, it doesn't matter that I was a unionist or my father was a military man. "The fact I came from Northern Ireland meant I found myself being bullied and beaten quite a lot and that had an effect on my life as a young man."
'Lack' of women in high-profile roles
Beattie also spoke to the podcast for the first time about how the furore over his resignation as party leader unfolded last summer.He stepped down as leader after an internal row over the selection contest to replace Robin Swann as the UUP's North Antrim MLA after he became the MP for South Antrim. Beattie said he had wanted a female candidate to replace Robin Swann, saying the party had a "lack" of women in high-profile jobs at Stormont, and that he was "prevented" from bringing in another candidate he preferred over Colin Crawford, who was selected by the party's North Antrim association to take on the role.
The Upper Bann MLA said when that happened, he felt it was "clear I could no longer influence the party"."People who weren't supporting me made what I was doing really difficult to stay on... the truth was I had no choice," he added."I put in a letter of resignation, I didn't go to anyone I just went to the party chair. Then I was persuaded by the MLA group to withdraw it, I went back to withdraw and the party chair said no, they put it to party officers who said 'we're not letting you withdraw it, the letter stands'."The bottom line is I stepped down, I found my place back in the party as an MLA and that's where I'm working now."Beattie admitted the affair had left him "bruised" after three years in charge, but said he would like to run for the assembly again in the next election scheduled for May 2027.He acknowledged that the UUP was a "broad church", which sometimes made the party "impossible to lead when you're trying to appease every level"."It's a fair criticism... it's never been easy to be leader of the UUP regardless of who it is," added Beattie.He was replaced as leader by Mike Nesbitt, Stormont's Health Minister, who also previously led the party from 2012 until 2017.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Four people charged by terror police after £7million worth of damage done to two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton 'by Palestine Action'
Four people have been charged by terror police after two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton were vandalised in an attack claimed by the group Palestine Action. Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 35, and Lewie Chiaramello, 22, have been remanded in custody after £7million in damage was caused to two Voyager aircraft at the Oxfordshire base on June 20. Counter Terrorism Policing South East (CTPSE) said they had been charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage. CTPSE said a 41-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender had been released on bail until September 19. A 23-year-old man was released without charge. They will appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday. The charges came as MPs backed the Government's move to ban the direct action group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. The move on Wednesday was passed in the Commons as MPs voted 385 to 26, majority 359 in favour of proscribing the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. The motion is expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords on Thursday before it becomes law. After the June 20 vandalism, CTPSE said in a statement: 'A 29-year-old woman of no fixed abode, and two men; aged 36 and 24, both from London, were arrested on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism, contrary to Section 41 of the Terrorism Act 2000. 'A 41-year-old woman, of no fixed abode, was arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender. 'The arrests, which took place yesterday [Thursday] in Newbury, Berkshire, and in London, are in connection with an incident in the early hours of [last] Friday during which damage was caused to two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. 'Those arrested are currently in police custody while enquiries are ongoing.' The Ministry of Defence also said at the time: 'The UK's defence estate is vital to our national security and this government will not tolerate those who put that security at risk. 'This Government is taking the strong step of proscribing Palestine Action due to its activities, which are a threat to our national security.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Tim Davie shouldn't quit over Glastonbury
There probably never has been a time when a governing party much liked its MPs. If you are on a mission, as governments imagine they are, you are always impatient when your own side raises objections. But it is only recently that governments have seemed positively affronted by the idea that their MPs should have a say. This was encapsulated by Sir Keir Starmer when he dismissed Labour's backbench revolt over welfare cuts as 'noises off'. Off what, exactly? Legislators have the sole right to legislate and that includes the right to refuse legislation. Those, like Rachael Maskell, who parade their consciences may be tiresome, but there is no way of governing this country except through parliament (though people like Lord Hermer are striving mightily to alter this). Prime ministers are oddly blind to the ultimate consequence, which is that their MPs get rid of them. Sir Keir's blindness led to his capitulation on Monday night, turning his gigantic majority into his potentially fatal problem. It is always confusing for the BBC to decide what to ban, cut or edit. In 1972, in the wake of Bloody Sunday, it banned Paul McCartney's rather tame song 'Give Ireland back to the Irish' ('Great Britain, you are tremendous/And nobody knows like me/ But really, what are you doin'/ In the land across the sea?') but allowed John Lennon's 'Sunday Bloody Sunday' which attacked 'You Anglo pigs and Scotties/ Sent to colonise the North', complained about 'the concentration camps' (unspecified) in Northern Ireland and regretted that although 'the cries of 13 martyrs filled the free Derry air', 'not a soldier boy was bleeding/ When they nailed the coffin lids'. If you do not have your own moral compass, you will be guided only by levels of public outrage and will find these hard to predict. In the case of Bob Vylan, the story is about management of coverage, not endorsement, of dreadful views. It does not exhibit the monstrous anti-Israel bias daily apparent in BBC documentaries, news reports, BBC Verify, BBC Arabic, Jeremy Bowen etc. It is more a lack of due diligence. I doubt the resignation of Tim Davie would produce visible improvement. He is actually the first D-G even to admit and pursue the anti-Semitism problem. More shocking is the way the Glastonbury crowd (and therefore, unthinkingly, the BBC) rolls with this type of thing. If – unimaginable, I know – an extreme-right popstar had appeared and announced that he hated 'Zionists' and that Israeli soldiers should die, he would have been howled down. But the left has so normalised Islamist extremism that the overwhelmingly white, middle-class establishment audience has no sense of its weirdness. In a passage not widely reported, Bob Vylan announced to the Glastoholics, 'We are not pacifist punks here. We are the violent punks.' Some of them cheered. Was that a tattoo of a guillotine that I saw on his right arm? Does Glastonbury have to suffer the fate of the Manchester Arena before they understand? Ex-prime ministers are sparing in their public interventions. So far as I can see, Rishi Sunak had made only one Commons speech (as opposed to asking questions) since leaving office – on Rachel Reeves's first Budget. Last week, however, he made his second, in Westminster Hall. It began: 'I last spoke on this subject in this very place back in 2016. A lot has changed in the last nine years – notably, ten chief secretaries to the Treasury, seven chancellors and, indeed, five prime ministers – but one thing that has not changed is my view on grouse shooting.' From that good start, Mr Sunak went on to argue that the sport 'is a part of our local social fabric, and… one of the world's great conservation success stories'. He criticised the tendency of 'some conservationists… to act as though farmers and gamekeepers are somehow trespassing on Britain's landscape, but without their hands repairing our dry-stone walls or their dairy cows keeping the fields lush, the rural beauty of our countryside would soon fade. Heather moorland… is rarer than rainforest, and 75 per cent of it is found right here in Britain. It is a national treasure.' The fanatic Chris Packham, who was attending the debate, was seen to hold his head in his hands as he listened. I hope this oration marks the start of Mr Sunak's comeback. Charm is easy to recognise but notoriously hard to describe. Sandy Gall, who has just died aged 97, had it. When he and the tipsy Reggie Bosanquet co-presented ITN News in the 1970s, charm was visible nightly on the nation's screens. It had something to do with being at ease, a lack of self-importance and the sense that the pair were often repressing laughter. Sandy retained these qualities in many dangerous situations covering wars for more than half a century, and into old age. In 2010, when he was 82, we accompanied him to Afghanistan. It was supposed to be a holiday, plus a visit to the charity which he had established to give prosthetic limbs to children injured by the war when he first covered Afghanistan, hidden in Russian-occupied territory, in the 1980s. Sandy's two rules for later journeys there were that he should never have security – it just makes one a target, he said – and that he should always carry a bottle of whisky, which was illegal. It being high summer, he had advised us not to bring waterproofs, but when we flew in a light aircraft to see Bamiyan and the mountainside which held the colossal Buddhas smashed in their niches by the Taliban, we found the place flooded. The airport was on a plateau. Our hotel was visible below, surrounded by water. Undismayed, Sandy ordered ten donkeys to carry us through the inundation and breakfast to eat until these could be found. By the time we had finished the breakfast, the waters had sufficiently receded for the donkeys to be laid off. He was a dear man, neither broken by the horrors of war, nor puffed up by his courage in the face of them – a true reporter.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Labour delivers mixed picture on environment after one year, campaigners say
Labour's environmental record after one year in office shows 'glimmers of hope', but concerns remain over nature and anti-protest policies, green groups said. Greenpeace UK and Friends of the Earth together assessed the party's progress on tackling the climate and nature crises ahead of Thursday, which marks one year since the general election. The two groups said the Government's overall environmental record is a 'mixed picture'. Assessing key policy areas, they rated the Government highest for its progress on climate and energy because of Energy Secretary Ed Miliband's efforts to reposition the UK as a global climate leader and oversee the UK's transition towards clean energy. But the campaigners also criticised decisions to invest billions into nuclear power, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and roads, instead of funnelling more money towards carbon-cutting measures. In terms of homes and transport, the groups welcomed investment in buses and railways, promotion of cleaner modes of transport and the requirement for landlords to raise energy efficiency standards. However, they criticised Labour's support for airport expansion and said more money is needed to decarbonise these sectors if the UK is to meet its climate targets. The Government fared worse on nature and the environment in the organisations' assessment. While moving to ban bee-harming pesticides, launching reforms of the polluting water sector and banning bottom-trawling in some protected areas, the campaigners said planning reforms that sideline nature in pursuit of growth have been particularly alarming. There has also been little progress on adopting laws to ensure UK companies do not contribute to illegal deforestation globally, nor the ratification of a UN treaty to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, they added. The Government saw the worst rating, however, in the policy areas of justice and democracy, with the groups claiming there has been an increase in arrests and imprisonment of non-violent protesters. The campaigners also called for the introduction of taxes on the largest polluters through measures such as a stronger windfall tax on oil and gas profits, a frequent flyer levy and wealth taxes. Mike Childs, head of science, policy and research at Friends of the Earth, said: 'There's no denying Labour has made some good progress on its clean energy mission, and it's extremely encouraging the Government remains committed to delivering on climate targets despite the breakdown in the political consensus. 'But where there have been some positive wins for nature, they've been overshadowed by false claims that protecting wildlife and vital habitats is hindering development. 'What has been most worrying is this Government's attitude to protest, which has seen it continue the last government's legacy of cracking down on dissent and encroaching on the right of us all to stand up for what we believe.' Reshima Sharma, deputy head of politics at Greenpeace UK, said: 'This Government's record is like a dance pattern with impressive forward strides and sudden backwards steps. 'A year in, this administration certainly deserves much credit for holding the course on climate action and fully backing renewables, as well as investing in public transport, but championing a third runway at Heathrow is a blot on their climate record. 'Tough action on polluting water companies, bee-harming pesticides and destructive fishing are all welcome moves, but the obsession with putting growth above everything else risks undoing some of the good work on nature protection.' The groups said improvement is needed across all four policy areas, arguing that action to protect the environment will actively benefit people's lives through cheaper energy bills, cleaner air, thousands of new jobs and a stronger economy. PA has contacted the Government for comment.
