logo
What is a compressed work schedule? Pros, cons and how to ask your boss for one

What is a compressed work schedule? Pros, cons and how to ask your boss for one

USA Today2 days ago

The traditional 40-hour workweek has long been the hallmark of American employment — but is it still the best way to work? With more people logging in from home, balancing family demands and prioritizing flexibility, the once-sacred 9-to-5, five-day structure is showing its age.
'Nearly half of workers said they were interested in reducing work hours to a 32-hour week without a reduction in pay and workload, and 27% want flexible schedules where they could choose their start and end times [in a November 2024 survey],' says Vicki Salemi, a career expert with Monster. The Monster survey also showed that three out of four job seekers are more likely to apply to a role if it offers a four-day workweek.
Still, some employers are hesitant to reduce weekly hours while providing full pay and benefits. Enter the compressed work schedule, a growing alternative that trades longer workdays for fewer of them.
'A compressed work schedule means you're working fewer days,' Salemi says. 'For example, you might work 10-hour days Monday through Thursday.' That frees you up for a three-day weekend every weekend.
Though a compressed schedule may sound ideal, it's not the right fit for everyone. Before you commit to a longer weekend, here's how to decide if the trade-off is worth it.
Why embrace a compressed work schedule
For employees who want more control without sacrificing full-time status, a compressed schedule offers an appealing alternative. From extra time to recharge to real savings on commuting costs, here's why this alternative schedule is gaining traction with today's workforce.
One of the most significant advantages of a compressed work schedule is the added flexibility it gives you. Whether it's scheduling doctor's appointments, tackling errands or simply enjoying a slower-paced Friday, having an extra day off each week can make it easier to manage life outside of work.
That kind of breathing room can reduce stress, boost productivity during work hours and help you feel more in control of your routine.
A recent Gallup poll found one-third of workers are fully remote and half follow a hybrid schedule. But even for remote workers, fewer scheduled days can free up time and reduce screen fatigue.
By freeing up an additional day each week, you can significantly improve work-life balance and overall job satisfaction. You have more time to rest, spend with family or pursue hobbies — all without using vacation days.
The American Psychological Association reports that pilot programs have consistently shown a shift to a four-day workweek improves well-being and job satisfaction.
'Workers with particularly long, tedious commutes benefit most from compressed schedules,' Salemi says.
In 2023, the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics estimated that it costs $0.81 per mile to operate and maintain a vehicle. Using that number, a 20-mile daily round-trip commute costs roughly $16.20. Skipping one commute day per week across 50 working weeks saves you approximately $810 annually.
Spending one less day commuting each week can also have meaningful environmental benefits. A study by Cornell University and Microsoft found that skipping the commute just one day per week reduces an individual's carbon footprint by 2%.
Drawbacks of a compressed work schedule
Packing 40 hours into fewer days can lead to unintended challenges — from longer, more exhausting workdays to logistical hurdles such as childcare or team coordination. Before jumping into a condensed schedule, it's important to consider whether the benefits outweigh the potential stressors.
A compressed work schedule doesn't mean you're working fewer hours — your time is just condensed. That can result in increased stress during the workweek.
'It can lead to work imbalance during those four work days, such as less time and energy to spend time with family, workout, do personal errands or go to appointments,' Salemi says.
Additionally, if everyone is working on a different timeline, a team might have some difficulty coordinating meetings or events.
If your workload is heavy, compressing it into fewer days can backfire.
"If workers have an insurmountable workload, this can lead to burnout," says Salemi. "Even though a longer weekend can help boost work-life balance, during the week, they may find themselves more stressed out with those additional hours."
For jobs that involve physical labor, stress and fatigue can also raise the risk of exhaustion or even workplace accidents.
Many schools and childcare facilities open and close at hours aligned with the traditional workweek.
'This may not be the best scenario for parents or caregivers who need to attend to children or the elderly throughout the day or at least be at home around dinner time,' Salemi says.
How to pitch a condensed working schedule to your employer
If you believe the benefits of a compressed working schedule outweigh the drawbacks, consider presenting this idea to your employer. 'Keep the business top-of-mind,' Salemi says. 'Demonstrate how it can boost your productivity and hopefully customer satisfaction and the bottom line.'
Here's her recommended approach:
Whether you're aiming for more flexibility, greater efficiency or simply an extra day to breathe, a compressed schedule might be worth considering.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax
Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Updated Senate bill slashes wind and solar incentives – and adds a new tax

An updated draft of the Senate's megabill text slashes tax incentives for wind and solar energy – and adds a new tax on future wind and solar projects. The initial draft released by Senate Republicans earlier this month cut the credit for any wind and solar projects that did not 'begin construction' by certain dates, while the latest version bases incentives on when projects actually begin producing electricity — a much higher bar to clear. The first draft gave any project that began construction this year full credit, any project that began construction next year 60 percent credit and any project that began construction in 2027 20 percent of the credit, before they were phased out thereafter. The new legislation instead says that the credits will only apply to facilities that begin producing electricity before the end of 2027. In addition, it imposes a new tax on some wind and solar projects that are placed in service after 2027. The projects that will be taxed if a certain percentage of the value of their components come from China. The Democrats' 2022 Inflation Reduction Act included hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits for low-carbon energy sources, including renewable energy. These subsidies were expected to massively reduce the U.S.' planet warming emissions. The GOP's cuts to the credits are expected to severely curtail those gains. If they pass, the cuts represent a win for the party's right flank, which has pushed for major cuts to the credits, and a loss for it's more moderate wing which has called for a slower phaseout. The renewables lobby slammed the changes as hampering the sector. 'In what can only be described as 'midnight dumping,' the Senate has proposed a punitive tax hike targeting the fastest-growing sectors of our energy industry. It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households,' Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, said in a written statement. 'These new taxes will strand hundreds of billions of dollars in current investments, threaten energy security, and undermine growth in domestic manufacturing and land hardest on rural communities who would have been the greatest beneficiaries of clean energy investment,' he added.

Trade talks morph into Trump's global bargaining table
Trade talks morph into Trump's global bargaining table

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Trade talks morph into Trump's global bargaining table

President Donald Trump's trade talks aren't just about trade. They're about tech regulation, defense spending, critical minerals — even war and peace. Since slapping sweeping tariffs on nearly every country in April, Trump has turned narrow, trade-focused talks into kitchen-sink diplomatic forums. In closed-door negotiations, the president's top lieutenants have pressured foreign governments to significantly increase their military budgets, upend their tax systems and scuttle domestic legislation that could hurt U.S. businesses. The president has even leveraged U.S.-brokered ceasefires, such as the one between Israel and Iran, to induce other countries to buy more American goods It's part of a broader effort by Trump to use tariffs not only as a tool to boost domestic manufacturing and revenue, but as a lever to extract concessions on a host of unrelated issues. 'Access to the American market should cost you. Additional tariffs or additional levies — of course it makes sense to tie it to foreign policy. Why wouldn't we?' said former Trump adviser Steve Cortes. 'I get why countries are like, 'What the hell? This isn't the America we've been dealing with.' No, it isn't,' Cortes added. 'You just have to decide, is it worth it? If it is, well, play by our rules.' Trump sees a win-win: If countries refuse to bend to his will, he keeps his 'Liberation Day' tariffs in place, protecting domestic businesses and boosting U.S. coffers. Case in point: Trump on Friday ended trade negotiations with Canadain part because of its digital services tax on American tech companies slated to start being collected Monday, which he called a 'direct and blatant attack on our Country' in a post on Truth Social. The broad set of issues at play has frustrated other negotiations ahead of the president's self-imposed July 8 deadline to broker trade deals, as foreign leaders grapple with the fact that everything is on the table when negotiating with the United States. The ongoing uncertainty threatens to upend the global economy, confuse American industry, alienate U.S. allies and drive countries into the arms of China. 'It's unprecedented, if not completely dubious,' said one official from an Asian country, pointing to the Trump administration raising antitrust legislation in talks with South Korea and export controls in talks with China, as an example. The person, granted anonymity to discuss the negotiations, added: 'There is no indication it's working, and Trump will not reverse course.' But White House aides argue that the administration's kitchen-sink approach matches the scope of the problem. 'This whole thing is unprecedented. I mean, we are trying to basically reset what's a four or five decade-old status quo in which the United States was basically subject to free riding by a lot of our trading partners and other countries in the world, whether it be on trade, on defense and national security,' said a White House official, granted anonymity to share the administration's thinking. 'I push back on the idea that you can silo off trade,' the official added. 'They're all connected here.' At the NATO summit in the Netherlands this week, Trump threatened new tariffs on Spain after the country refused to increase its defense spending in line with other NATO allies — even though Spain is part of the European Union and doesn't negotiate trade deals independently. It's also been a hot topic in negotiations with Japan and South Korea, which have balked at the 5 percent across-the-board defense spending target the U.S. has set for its allies in Asia despite their exclusion from NATO. Trump this month said the U.S., which spends roughly 3.4 percent of its GDP on defense, would not abide by the 5 percent pledge. Trump has positioned Canadian investment in his 'Golden Dome' missile defense system for the United States as a way for the country to 'prove' itself amid ongoing trade negotiations — though the U.S. actually can't build the system without help from its northern neighbor. At the same time, the U.S. is pressuring South Korea to abandon antitrust legislative proposals aimed at regulating online platforms that are opposed by Google, Apple and Meta. It has also, like Canada, pressured the U.K. and EU countries to eliminate their digital services tax. On Tuesday, Trump added another demand, suggesting that China boost purchases of American oil as a thank you for the Israel-Iran ceasefire — an ask that comes as the president pushes Beijing to increase its imports from the U.S. And he's implied that he used the cudgel of trade wars to negotiate peace between India and Pakistan this spring, though India has disputed the suggestion. Trump took a similar approach during his first term when he threatened hefty levies to get Mexico to curb the flow of Central American migrants to the U.S., and tariffed China over 'unfair practices' in part related to the theft of U.S. intellectual property. In his second term, Trump has built on that strategy. He levied tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China in February aimed at curbing the tide of fentanyl and undocumented immigrants into the U.S. He also in April threatened 25 percent 'secondary tariffs' on any country that imports oil from Venezuela, a move he framed as targeting the country's authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro and the Tren de Aragua gang. Foreign leaders are confronting the very real possibility that if they slow walk negotiations or abandon talks, Trump would happily slap a tariff large enough to effectively serve as an embargo with the U.S. — cutting off access to the world's largest economy. 'The president feels that tariffs are leverage — leverage for the relationship, of which trade is one component. That's why each of these negotiations has unique elements to it, which makes matters more unpredictable,' said one former White House official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the president's approach. But giving into the president's demands on non-trade issues isn't a guarantee of tariff relief. Trump has shown no signs that he will heed French President Emmanuel Macron's calls for an end to the U.S.'s trade war with the European Union after NATO members agreed to hike defense spending to 5 percent of their gross domestic product. That unwillingness to significantly budge on his array of tariffs has bogged down trade negotiations and hindered the administration from crafting substantial trade deals. As the U.S. has set out to negotiate deals with more than 60 trading partners, world leaders have grown increasingly frustrated with what they say are unbalanced demands from the U.S. Other trading partners, including the European Union, have bristled at the terms of the UK framework and said they would not agree to a similar deal. That arrangement left a 10 percent so-called baseline tariff in place, while laying out a path to slash sector-specific tariffs. The bloc isn't alone, and Trump's numerous demands and 'do-it-or-else' approach have made it challenging for countries to corral the domestic political support they'll need in order to sell any deal at home. 'If the deal gets too imbalanced, it will get a very bad reception by most of our national public opinions,' said one European official granted anonymity to speak candidly about the state of negotiations with the United States. 'I don't think the EU side and countries can really accept a very imbalanced deal without risk of it backfiring.' But former Trump administration officials doubt the White House is about to change course. 'I see no evidence that the administration intends to reverse or scale back its use of this approach,' said Patrick Childress, a former U.S. Trade Representative assistant general counsel.

Coco Gauff is just 21 but already thinking about what to do after tennis
Coco Gauff is just 21 but already thinking about what to do after tennis

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Coco Gauff is just 21 but already thinking about what to do after tennis

LONDON — To be clear, Coco Gauff didn't bring up the word 'star' during a recent interview with the Associated Press; the reporter did. So as Gauff began to answer a question about balancing her life as a professional athlete with her off-court interests, she caught herself repeating that term. 'I definitely didn't know how it would look like,' she began with a smile, 'before I got to be, I guess, a star — feels weird to call myself that — but I definitely did want to expand outside of tennis. Always. Since I was young.' She still is young, by just about any measure, and she is a really good tennis player — Gauff owns the Grand Slam titles and No. 2 ranking to prove it as she heads into Wimbledon, which begins Monday — but the 21-year-old American is also more than that. Someone unafraid to express her opinions about societal issues. Someone who connects with fans via social media. Someone who is the highest-paid female athlete in any sport, topping $30 million last year, according to with less than a third of that from prize money and most via deals with companies such as UPS, New Balance, Rolex and Barilla. Someone who recently launched her own management firm. And someone who wants to succeed in the business world long after she no longer swings a racket on tour. 'It's definitely something that I want to start to step up for post-career. Kind of start building that process, which is why I wanted to do it early. Because I didn't want to feel like I was playing catch-up at the end of my career,' said Gauff, who will face Dayana Yastremska in the first round at the All England Club on Tuesday. 'On the business side of things, it doesn't come as natural as tennis feels. I'm still learning, and I have a lot to learn about,' Gauff said. 'I've debated different things and what paths I wanted to take when it came to just stimulating my brain outside of the court, because I always knew that once I finished high school that I needed to put my brain into something else.' In a campaign announced this week by UPS, which first partnered with Gauff in 2023 before she won that year's U.S. Open, she connects with business coach Emma Grede — known for working with Kim Kardashian on Skims, and with Khloe Kardashian on Good American — to offer mentoring to three small-business owners. 'Coco plays a key role in helping us connect with those younger Gen-Z business owners — emerging or younger entrepreneurs,' Betsy Wilson, vice president of digital marketing and brand activation at UPS, said in a phone interview. 'Obviously, she's very relevant in social media and in culture, and working with Coco helps us really connect with that younger group.' While Grede helped the entrepreneurs, Gauff also got the opportunity to pick up tips. 'It's really cool to learn from someone like her,' Gauff said. 'Whenever I feel like I'm ready to make that leap, I can definitely reach out to her for advice and things like that. ... This will help me right now and definitely in the long term.' Fendrich writes for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store