F1 Academy driver Chloe Chong shares the advice Lewis Hamilton gave her: 'I get goosebumps thinking about it'
The British-Canadian teenager was just 16 during the inaugural F1 Academy season in 2023. Today, at age 18, Chong is still learning how to balance life as a teenager with that of a high-performance athlete.
"There's one part of your life where you're an athlete and you're very focused" on training, media commitments, sponsorship deals, as well as your sport, Chong told Yahoo Canada. But "there's another side of yourself that is just a normal teenager."
"A lot of athletes sometimes feel limited by their sport, that competitive side of their life," she said. "They feel like if they take time to do stuff they really want to do, it shows that they're not trying enough, or they're not working hard enough.
"For me, I've realized that working hard is one part, but I also need to be able to do the things I want to do and not get overly invested in my sport." If you get overly invested, you try too hard. And if you fall out of love with it, "it all goes downhill."
Racing in the #27 Charlotte Tilbury car operated by Rodin Motorsport, Chong is still very much invested — and in love — with racing.
When you're in the thick of it, when you're competing against some of the best and fastest drivers out there, "the whole world slows down," she said. "You don't think about anything except your feelings in the car. That's what keeps me going."
Have you ever wondered what the world's most interesting, successful and talented people are adding to their shopping carts? Yahoo Canada's new series, , is exploring just that. From the supplement regime of professional athletes to supermodel-approved skincare, this is what celebrities actually spend their money on.
F1 Academy is an all-female racing series launched in 2023 by Formula 1 to develop and promote young female drivers in the motorsport industry. The Formula 4-level racing series recently partnered with Netflix for a new docuseries, F1: The Academy, which shines a light on one of the world's most demanding sports.
Chong, who is nicknamed "Miss Second Place" among her peers, said it was fellow driver Lewis Hamilton who told her "don't let anyone tell you no."
"He said, 'nothing's easy. Nothing good comes easily,' which applies to my journey into racing," Chong told Yahoo Canada. So far, in the 2025 season, with eight races behind her, she is sitting in 11th place with 11 points.
His advice "taught me to keep tenacity and keep looking forward and not look back at the mistakes I've made, because everyone makes the same mistakes." Hamilton, who competes in Formula One for Ferrari, "was so inspiring to me," she said. "I get goosebumps thinking about it."
Still in the early stages of her F1 Academy racing career, Chong said the nickname motivates her to work hard and push herself to "always do better."
"Every driver in the championship that I'm racing in will not accept second place as a victory," she said. You always want P1 [first place]. You want world records. You want something above what you've already got. And that's what keeps the sport very interesting, because you're always looking for more."
From her "game-changing" tinted moisturizer to her "go-to" pair of workout leggings, here are five things F1 Academy driver Chloe Chong is Adding to Cart.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question
The UK government recently unveiled a £700 million package aimed at jumpstarting the electric vehicle (EV) transition. At the heart of the plan is a £640 million subsidy scheme to help drivers cover the upfront cost of a new electric vehicle, and an additional £63 million to expand EV charging infrastructure. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect The message from Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is clear: electric vehicles must become more accessible to the average motorist. 'There are a lot of people out there who think that EVs are just for the very wealthiest,' she admitted to The Telegraph. And on the surface, she's not wrong. The average price of a new electric car in Britain is just shy of £50,000, more than double the cost of a typical petrol model. But the message beneath the headline is more ambiguous. Is this plan enough to truly democratise the EV market? Or is it just another patchwork attempt to meet the looming 2030 petrol and diesel car ban, without fully reckoning with the underlying economics of the transition? Too steep for the mass market Let's be blunt: for the vast majority of households in Britain, a £50,000 vehicle is simply not in the realm of possibility. Even with a government grant, rumoured to prioritise UK-made EVs like the upcoming Nissan Leaf from Sunderland, the affordability gap remains vast. The previous Conservative government scrapped EV subsidies in 2022, claiming the market had matured. Since then, demand from private buyers has plummeted, with new consumer EV enquiries dropping 65% year-on-year. It's not just the sticker price. EVs face high depreciation rates due to battery degradation, and many consumers remain wary of both their long-term reliability and resale value. Buying an EV is still perceived by many as a financial risk, not a forward-looking investment. This is the crux of the problem: net zero targets depend on mass adoption, but mass adoption depends on affordability. And the market has failed to close that gap on its own. A patch for a broken model? To be fair, the government's new package includes more than just subsidies. Councils will receive £25 million for cross-pavement gullies, allowing people in terraced houses to charge their EVs at home using cheaper electricity rates. A further £63 million will expand public charging infrastructure and improve signage, a necessary step to address so-called 'range anxiety.' Yet infrastructure is not the primary barrier, it's economics. According to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT), EVs accounted for about 20% of new car sales in the first half of 2025. But that growth is increasingly driven by fleet and leasing schemes, not individual consumers. Motability One potentially transformative idea comes from Julian Rose of Asset Finance Policy, who argues that the government could build on the existing Motability scheme to create a fairer and more effective solution to the EV affordability crisis. Rose proposes a revised scheme focused on used EVs and hybrids, with eligibility expanded to include not just those with medical conditions, but also households on low incomes. Key to the idea is removing VAT from lease payments, as with the current Motability model, and offering a modest upfront grant — perhaps £1,000 — to reduce monthly payments. Rose also suggests capped interest rates and using the proven administrative frameworks of Clean Air Zone vehicle replacement schemes to prevent abuse. This approach, he argues, would not only 'help struggling families obtain vital mobility at an affordable monthly cost,' but would also 'strengthen the used car EV market,' reducing depreciation risk and encouraging new EV purchases. With used EV prices currently low, Rose sees this as a 'one-off opportunity' to both support families and build resilience into the second-hand EV market—complementing, not competing with, the government's newly announced subsidy programme. Leasing Meanwhile, private leasing continues to offer a critical bridge. UK-based and continental initiatives like Belgium's LIZY have made second-hand EV leasing more accessible, offering fixed monthly costs that are often lower than car loans. These platforms are proving essential for younger, urban drivers and SMEs who need flexibility and lower upfront investment. Such business models show that affordability isn't just about the purchase price, it's about the total cost of use. Leasing could help normalise EVs in the public mind and serve as a bridge to wider ownership, but these solutions are only scalable if backed by supportive policies and a competitive second-hand EV market. Risk of a two-tier transition What the government is offering now is a partial step forward, welcome, but insufficient. A £640 million grant scheme may provide short-term stimulus, especially for British-made models, but it won't fix the structural problems of price, depreciation, and market segmentation. There's a very real risk we're heading toward a two-tier EV transition: one where company fleets and wealthy households lead the charge, while ordinary drivers are left behind. That undermines both climate goals and social equity. If this revolution is truly meant for everyone, then it can't be designed around those who can already afford to participate. The electric future must be one the average person can actually buy into — literally. So yes, £700 million is a big number. But unless it translates into genuine affordability for the mass market, it won't be nearly enough. "Who can afford the electric revolution? The £700m question" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hockey Canada sex assault defence lawyers respond to verdict: 'Public narrative was one-sided'
Five former Canadian world junior hockey players were found not guilty in a high-profile sexual assault trial related to a 2018 incident in London, Ont. The case had sparked a national reckoning over hockey culture, and what is and what isn't considered consent. Here's how the lawyers for Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote reacted to Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's verdict, which was delivered in a London courtroom on Thursday. David Humphrey, lawyer for Michael McLeod Mr. McLeod will not be speaking to the media, and I understand the other players will not be speaking to the media. I will not be taking questions and other counsel who come to address you, they will not be taking any questions. Mr. McLeod had confidence in the Justice process, and he welcomes Justice Carrocia's decision, confirming that he and his co defendants are not guilty of sexual assault. Justice Carrocia's carefully reasoned decision represents a resounding vindication for Mr. McLeod and for his co defendants. Justice Carrocia's found that the complainant's testimony was incredible and was unreliable. For years, public perception was shaped by a one-sided narrative from a civil lawsuit that went unchallenged. In large part because hockey Canada settled the claim without first informing or consulting the players. The decision was made unilaterally, and the players were only told of the lawsuit and the settlement after the fact. Had they been consulted, they would have refused to settle, and they would have vigorously contested EM's allegations. That version of events dominated headlines and created a lasting and, a false, a false impression of guilt. It was only through this criminal trial that the allegations were fully and finally tested. The court compared the complainant's 2018 statements to the police, which rightly resulted in no charges with the later conflicting civil claim. Key elements of EM's story were contradicted by the evidence, exposing serious falsehood and leading to today's clear and just verdict of not guilty. Justice Carrocia rejected EM's claims of fear and her claims of non consent. That should be the takeaway from today's judgment. The damage to Mr. McLeod's reputation and his career has been significant. But today's decision begins to restore what was very unfairly taken away from him. Mr. McLeod is deeply grateful to his family, friends, his agent, and everybody who stood by him. Megan Savard, defence lawyer for Carter Hart It is both gratifying and unsurprising to hear an impartial and fully informed decision maker, except Mr. Hart's testimony about what happened on June 19, 2018, as unshaken, credible and truth. The public narrative of this event was, until this trial, one sided and untested. Now, the criminal process has shown it to be false. To anyone who is surprised or angered by today's outcome, it is the direct result of the media's ongoing failure to publicize the weaknesses in the prosecution's case as it unfolded. The office of the Crown attorney knew what today's verdict was likely to be. And the evidence at trial came as no surprise to them or anyone with full knowledge of the investigation. Almost every single feature of the evidence that Justice Carrocia identified today as fatal flaws for the Crown was known to prosecutors and to police from 2018. Today's outcome was not just predictable, it was predicted. The Crown attorney did not have to take this case to trial. Mr. Hart, in particular, was willing to engage in a restorative justice process. He was willing to be publicly named and prepared to use his public platform to teach other athletes about how to ensure that their sexual encounters are responsible and thoughtful. Instead of pursuing restorative justice, the Crown forced a distressing and unnecessary trial to the detriment of Mr. Hart, his co defendants, the complainant, and the Canadian public. Mr. Hart regrets that it took a criminal trial for the truth to come out, but he has learned from the experience, and he is committing to sharing what he has learned with others in his personal circle and in his professional life. He will be taking time today to process today's outcome, and is grateful to his family, his friends, and his supporters for standing by him during this profoundly challenging time. Thank you. Julianna Greenspan, lawyer for Cal Foote I promise I'm the last one. We are the last ones. Juliana Greenspan and this is Lauren Crawford, and we were counsel for Mr. Foote. Just have some brief comments that I want to say at this time. At the start of this trial, Cal Foote walked into this courthouse, an innocent man, and he walks out today exactly that. Cal never lost faith that justice would be done, despite the clamor of external pressures, and agendas, outside the courthouse doors. Criminal investigations and the trial process must always be free from these influences. On behalf of Cal and his family, we appreciate the court's careful and thorough consideration and for the just verdict delivered today. Seven years ago, Cal was 19. He is now 26. That is a significant part of a young man's life. He is still young. He has a wonderful future ahead of him, and he is eager to embark on his next chapter. Thank you. He's not answering any questions, but thank you. Daniel Brown, lawyer for Alex Formenton After what was meant to be a night of celebration with coaches and teammates. For the last seven years, he's lived under a dark cloud. The public now knows what Alex has always maintained, that he is completely innocent of this false allegation. But only after his case has erupted into a massively publicized social cause, Alex's face has appeared on millions of screens and newspaper pages, and there could be little doubt that an untold number of people out there believed he was guilty, simply because he was accused of a crime, long before any evidence was presented in court. This rush to judgment to believe the worst of people is one of the most regrettable of human traits. So, too, is our reluctance to change that opinion, even when it's proven wrong, after a full and fair trial. Notwithstanding Justice Carrocia's unequivocal exoneration of Alex today, there will inevitably be those who will still believe he committed a crime. Nobody in Room 209 that night has emerged unscarred from these events. The criminal court process is a bruising experience for everyone, but never more than when a case is high profile incorporates such high stakes. In Alex's case, he was condemned and felt banished from society. This experience for him has been crushing. Nonetheless, the impact of this case has changed Alex as a person, and he's matured well beyond his years. It is inevitable that some people will not forgive Alex for what he was accused of doing. Others, however, will understand that this tragic matter, rightly comes to an end today. Alex has never minimized his role in the sexual encounter or denied engaging in consensual sexual activity with the complainants. He fully cooperated with the police investigation and provided investigators with a complete account of his behaviour back in 2018. Alex's narrative isn't conjecture. His police statement was corroborated at trial by several crown witnesses, by video evidence, and was even supported in large measure by the complainant's evidence herself. Even Justice Carrocia said today that she accepted that Alex told the truth in that police statement. And while no police investigation is perfect, the London police got it right seven years ago when they decided it would be a mistake to charge Alex. The evidence always demonstrated that he didn't commit sexual assaults. However, political and media pressure brought this allegation back into the spotlight in 2022, and the Crown attorney knowingly forged ahead with a hopeless prosecution. Besides the human toll of everyone involved, this lengthy legal process exhausted valuable resources that could have been deployed elsewhere in the justice system, but were lost here. Alex, his family, and his defense team are grateful to Justice Carrocia for our careful consideration of all the evidence that was presented to this trial. She's reached a just and correct verdict that must be respected. Nobody disputes that sexual assault is a terrible societal plague, and Alex sincerely hopes that this prosecution doesn't stop the quest to combat sexual violence and to bring genuine offenders to justice. However, an accusation is just that, an accusation. This case stands to the fact that we must never lose sight of the fundamental right to be presumed innocent. Now, more than ever before, a fair response to sexual assault claims requires a balanced perspective and public trust and the decision making of the courts. Anything less, only harms the justice system and the cause of eliminating sexual violence. Thank you. Julie Santarossa, lawyer for Dillon Dubé For Mr. Dubé, this has been a long and difficult process. He is relieved by the outcome, and he is grateful that Justice Carrocia decided what she did and did so fairly and efficiently. Throughout this trial, Mr. Dube was impressed by the fairness and impartiality demonstrated by her honor. This decision comes as a result of careful deliberation by her honor. She engaged with the evidence in a thoughtful, methodical, and principled manner. Her reasons reflect not only a command of the legal principles at stake, but also a deep sense of responsibility in assessing the evidence, applying the law, and demonstrating a strong commitment to justice. Mr. Dubé has always maintained his innocence. He is thankful for all of the unwavering support from his friends and family who have also believed in him. For all of you that have been by his side throughout this period of time, you know who you are, we thank you. Mr. Dubé is hopeful that everyone can move forward from this in a positive manner. He is requesting privacy during this period of time. In view of the court's decision, Mr. Dubé will not be making any further statements at this time. Thank you. Read the full statement from the complainant's lawyer Gasps in court as all five players acquitted in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial Hockey Canada sex assault complainant 'very disappointed' with judge's assessment of her honesty, lawyer says Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Verstappen doesn't think Horner's firing 'will matter at all' for his future at Red Bull
SPA-FRANCORCHAMPS, Belgium (AP) — Max Verstappen doesn't think Christian Horner's firing at Red Bull 'will matter at all" amid speculation that he could leave the team after this season. 'Life is unpredictable, but in general I'm very happy where I'm at and I hope — and it was still the target that we set out when we signed the new deal — that I would drive here until the end of my career,' Verstappen said Thursday at the Belgian Grand Prix. Verstappen has won the last four F1 titles while racing under Horner but sits third this year behind McLaren's Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris. 'The relationship between myself and Christian, that doesn't change,' Verstappen said. 'Of course, he's not here now during a race weekend, but he's still like a second family to me.' Verstappen's contract at Red Bull runs through 2028 but there have been indications that a performance-related clause could allow him to exit earlier. The exact details are not public. 'I don't think it will matter at all for my decision in the future, and the only thing that matters is that we work on the car and make it as fast as we can," Verstappen said. "The last one and a half years have not been what we want to be. Now we try and be more competitive this year a little bit, but for sure also with the new regulations.' Laurent Mekies of sister team Racing Bulls replaced Horner as team principal. 'I've had a few meetings with him already,' Verstappen said. 'I cannot say right now within two weeks of not even action on track that suddenly everything is different or better, but we are trying to be better and it's been good.' ___ AP auto racing:
