A Beckham peace deal? Elton John acts as mediator in Brooklyn's family feud as he shakes hands with his godson after 'saying his piece' on row while treating him and his wife Nicola Peltz to a swanky lunch in St Tropez
The legendary musician, who has been friends with David, 50, and Victoria Beckham, 51, for over 30 years, treated Brooklyn and his wife Nicola Peltz, 30, to a swanky lunch at fancy La Guerite beach club in the South of France.
New pictures show the couple wining and dining with Sir Elton and his husband David Furnish where the hitmaker reportedly took the opportunity to 'say his piece'.
The Beckham family have been at the centre of a feud that has pitted Brooklyn and his wife Nicola against the rest of the family.
According to The Sun, Sir Elton 'briefly' spoke about the family's feud in the hope Brooklyn would patch things up with his parents, and footage of the outing shared on social media showed the pair shaking hands.
Speaking about Elton's attempts to play peacekeeper in the row, a source said; 'Elton is the showbiz equivalent of Switzerland. He's utterly neutral in this row.'
'Elton of old may have relished in taking sides - in this case his young godson, Brooklyn - but two years off his 80th birthday, he's a man who has seen and done it all. He just wants everyone to be happy.
'There is no side-taking as such; he simply adores his godson, and really has a laugh with Nicola who he thinks has a great sense of humour. He wants to look after them in his role as 'spiritual adviser' as a godfather, it's a role he takes seriously.
'Elton and David think the situation is terribly sad, and has gently suggested to all involved that life is short - to patch things up.'
The source added Elton is 'adamant he doesn't want to stick his nose in' the feud, he just simply 'wants peace'.
MailOnline has contacted the Beckhams and Elton's representatives for comment.
Nicola couldn't wipe the smile off her face during the lunch as she sipped on Aperol Spritz at the fancy beach club.
Sir Elton is also said to have generously picked up the entire bill, after dining on the restaurant's signature lobster linguine which comes in at an eye-watering £190.
Nicola went onto pay tribute to Elton in a new Instagram post, as she stripped naked for a racy bath snap, while his song Cold Heart played over it.
David affectionately calls the musician 'Uncle Elton' after becoming friends in his football heyday.
Sir Elton was due to perform at the Beckhams wedding in 1999 before suffering a heart attack that prevented him from playing. He later sang at one of the children's christenings.
Meanwhile Victoria once disclosed that it was Elton who inspired her to say goodbye to the Spice Girls, penning an emotional letter to her older self where she confessed that watching her friend perform made her realise that her true calling lay beyond singing.
It comes after Nicola doubled down on the family feud as she declared Brooklyn 'her everything' on Instagram last week during their luxury St Tropez trip.
Nicola took to her Instagram Stories with snaps of the pair embracing during their sun-soaked getaway on board her billionaire father's yacht in St Tropez.
The couple only had eyes for each other as she wrapped her arms around his neck while he pulled her in close.
She wore a bikini top and skimpy white shorts while her husband shielded his eyes behind shades and a baseball cap and cheekily squeezed her bottom.
Nicola captioned the post: 'My everything @BrooklynBeckhamPeltz' with Brooklyn later resharing it with his followers.
Last week, it was revealed that Brooklyn and Nicola's Instagram accounts no longer follow his younger brothers Cruz, 20, and Romeo, 22, in the latest family drama.
Nicola doubled down amid her and husband Brooklyn's feud with his family as she declared him 'her everything' last week
However, Brooklyn's friends told MailOnline on Friday that Cruz and Romeo have actually blocked them on the social media platform.
This would make sense given that Brooklyn and Nicola are still following Victoria, 51 and David, 50.
Cruz and Romeo were still following Brooklyn and Nicola earlier this month but appeared to take action after Brooklyn posted a birthday tribute to sister Harper, sharing a family photo without them in it – which Nicola reposted.
There was much speculation whether Brooklyn would reach out to Harper on her 14th birthday on Thursday, but despite him doing so, it seems all is not well in the camp.
Brooklyn's birthday tribute to Harper marked his first public interaction with his family since he paid tribute to his grandmother Sandra on June 26, despite remaining silent and shunning his father's 50th birthday earlier that same month.
Sources close to the family have told MailOnline of their fears that Brooklyn and his wife Nicola have also distanced themselves from Harper after they failed to visit her when they flew into London in May to film an advert for French-Italian clothing brand Moncler just over a mile from the family home in Holland Park.
David and Victoria had no idea whether Brooklyn, who Harper has idolised since she was a little girl, would message her privately or publicly on Instagram because they have no communication with him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
4 minutes ago
- The Sun
Horoscope today, July 24 2025: Daily star sign guide from Mystic Meg
OUR much-loved astrologer Meg sadly died in 2023 but her column is being kept alive by her friend and protégée Maggie Innes. Read on to see what's written in the stars for you today. ♈ ARIES March 21 to April 20 Find time for sorting family stuff early in the day as later the new moon urges you to focus on your creative self and where you would like this to take you next. Trying an online space for size can be one of your day's breakthroughs. Love that keeps talking can keep growing, so deal with any silences sooner rather than later. 2 ♉ TAURUS April 21 to May 21 That message or call you have hesitated to reply to needs dealing with by tonight. If, deep down, you know what you want to say, this is the time to say it. Your new sun-sent ability to take people as you find them can stand you in good stead at work, as you celebrate skills and accept flaws. Get all the latest Taurus horoscope new s including your weekly and monthly predictions ♊ GEMINI May 22 to June 21 A new moon of new starts reminds you it's never too late to correct words or actions you have regretted. It's better to say something today than carry on worrying tomorrow. Your star strength is rooted in Saturn and the stability of bonds and beliefs this brings. If you have to rock the surface, underneath stays strong. Get all the latest Gemini horoscope news including your weekly and monthly predictions ♋ CANCER June 22 to July 22 You are ready to take your own love-style and make it matter instead of feeling you have to copy others. The right romantic path for you should be selected by you, no one else. Mars's might in your communication zone helps your voice carry further and mean more than it has for weeks, so do use this well. ♌ LEO July 23 to August 23 The new moon lights up your sign and you see clearly how you can make a set of circumstances work better for you. This may mean 'giving in' a little in order to gain a lot down the line. So let your instincts lead you today and right into the evening. A talent for telling stories in unusual ways can be a great outlet. ♍ VIRGO August 24 to September 22 The part of yourself you always try to hide is the bit to set free today – and live and love in more authentic ways. Your kind heart may have been holding back certain truths but unless you are honest, you may always feel something is missing. Your strongest beliefs about the past and the future are ready to merge. Get all the latest Virgo horoscope news including your weekly and monthly predictions ♎ LIBRA September 23 to October 23 A 'To Do' list should be tackled as soon as you can to free your attention for a new group appearing on the horizon. At first you may assume they are not for you, but something special can happen when you simply go with the flow. This can include 'M' romance that turns out to be both challenging and cherishing. ♏ SCORPIO October 24 to November 22 That personal journey you feel you've been on forever can take a U-turn. The driving force is a deep ambition you have been denying. Perhaps because you assume it's too fancy, or chancy, for you. This is the moment to prove yourself wrong. Music that always gets you dancing can be your soundtrack to luck. Get all the latest Scorpio horoscope news including your weekly and monthly predictions ♐ SAGITTARIUS November 23 to December 21 Rebel planet Uranus puts you on a pedestal – as your true skills shine bright. Accepting not everyone can succeed at the same time but everyone can have their turn helps you make a difficult career choice. The new moon lights up learning and asks you not to limit how far your mind, and heart, can reach. Get all the latest Sagittarius horoscope news including your weekly and monthly predictions ♑ CAPRICORN December 22 to January 20 Today's new moon adds extra energy to the already-supporting sun and this shifts a personal transformation towards reality. You may want to look or feel different, and now you can make this happen. Love-wise, your mix of imagination and devotion is second to none and all levels of partners can feel the difference. Get all the latest Capricorn horoscope news including your weekly and monthly predictions 2 ♒ AQUARIUS January 21 to February 18 Reforming, even restarting, relationships and deals of all kinds is your new moon skill. You can present even tricky facts and figures with a cool but also kind manner so everyone feels heard and involved In love? At least one surprise set of words is brewing. Single? A fellow Aquarius, who loves to tease, can be The One. Get all the latest Aquarius horoscope news including your weekly and monthly predictions ♓ PISCES February 19 to March 20 A time of allowing others to steer your work and well-being future can end. If you have been feeling a direction is not right, this is your moment to say – but have an alternative ready to go.
Spectator
10 minutes ago
- Spectator
Why has the world turned on the Waltz King?
On 17 June 1872, Johann Strauss II conducted the biggest concert of his life. The city was Boston, USA, and the promoters provided Strauss with an orchestra and a chorus numbering more than 20,000. One hundred assistant conductors were placed at his disposal, and a cannon shot cued The Blue Danube – the only way of silencing the expectant crowds. Estimates vary, but the audience was reckoned to number between 50,000 and 100,000; in all, there must have been a minimum of 70,000 people present. This month's Oasis reunion only played to 80,000. The result, in an age before modern amplification, was much as you might expect. 'A fearful racket that I shall never forget as long as I live,' was Strauss's own description. Still, the point stands. Johann Strauss II was famous; very famous. A Europe-wide newspaper poll, conducted in 1890, named Strauss as the third most popular individual in Europe – pipped to the top slot only by Queen Victoria and (in second place) Otto von Bismarck. Strauss died in 1899, before the era of recorded music, but within his lifetime sheet music for The Blue Danube sold upwards of one million copies. That's platinum disc territory, and in the 21st century, the phenomenon endures. The perma-tanned Dutch violinist André Rieu, whose classical pops orchestra is named after Strauss, has picked up some 500 platinum discs while his live shows – built around Strauss's music – play across the world to stadium-size audiences. His 2018 tour outgrossed Elton John, globally. Again, this is old news. I'm not here to tell you that Johann Strauss's waltzes, polkas and operetta hits were the pop music of their day: that people loved them, and continue to love them, is a matter of record. So why – in 2025, the 200th anniversary of his birth – is there a Strauss-shaped hole in the programmes of our major orchestras and opera companies? Classical music is obsessed with anniversaries and Strauss is proven box office, so where are the festivals, the rediscoveries, the operetta revivals? The Proms has a single Saturday morning concert; the Grange Festival staged Die Fledermaus – and in the UK, that's basically it. In Britain, at least, it seems that the people who decide what classical music we should hear have rather fallen out of love with this most accessible of 19th-century masters. If that's the case, they're swimming against the tide of history and the judgment of genius. The deepest divide in late 19th- century European music – a culture war of generation-defining bitterness – was between the devotees of Wagner and Brahms. Yet both composers revered Strauss. For Wagner, Strauss was 'the most musical man in Europe'. He hired a private orchestra so that he could conduct Strauss waltzes as a birthday treat, and licensed the Strauss orchestra to première excerpts from Tristan und Isolde in Vienna at a time when the city's ultra-conservative musical establishment refused all contact with Wagner's 'music of the future'. Brahms, meanwhile, was practically a fanboy, comparing Strauss to Mozart. When Strauss's stepdaughter asked him for an autograph, Brahms scribbled the opening of The Blue Danube and wrote 'Unfortunately not by Johannes Brahms'. For several generations afterwards, to be a progressive force in European music was to admire Johann Strauss. Gustav Mahler put Die Fledermaus on the stage of the Vienna Court Opera, and there's hardly a Mahler symphony that doesn't, at some point, swing into waltz time, or pause to squeeze the sadness and sweetness of life out of the succulent close harmonies – the yearning, Italianate thirds and sixths – that were Strauss's hallmark. Mahler's disciples, the arch-modernists Schoenberg, Berg and Webern, made exquisite pared-down arrangements of the Emperor Waltz, the Treasure Waltz and Wine, Women and Song. It wasn't just a German thing, either. In Paris, Ravel's La Valse portrayed the 19th century dancing to its doom, but Ravel had only love for the composer he called 'the great Strauss, not Richard, the other one – Johann'. A distinction needed to be made. The Bavarian Richard Strauss was no relation to Johann but in 1911 he'd woven a garland of waltzes into the score of Der Rosenkavalier. The opera was set in the 18th century, but that didn't matter. Like Stanley Kubrick (five decades later, in 2001: A Space Odyssey), Richard perceived that Johann's music embodied an entire civilisation. I could say more: of the eminent conductors (from Henry Wood to Christian Thielemann) who've adored Strauss; of his legacy in popular music, from the Gershwins' admiring tribute 'By Strauss' ('It laughs, it sings! The world is in rhyme/ Swinging in three-quarter time') to the way the long, poetic introductions and codas of Strauss's greatest waltzes anticipate contemporary DJ sets – building and shaping a collective mood, as well as providing a beat for dancing. Most startling of all is the knowledge that, having outlawed the works of Mendelssohn and Mahler, Goebbels suppressed evidence of Strauss's Jewish ancestry. Cancelling Johann Strauss was a step too far even for the Third Reich. Still, here we are, in a Strauss-deprived classical music world. Why? Perhaps the televising of the Vienna Philharmonic's annual New Year's Day concert has normalised the idea that Strauss is a purely seasonal treat. Most British orchestras programme a solitary Viennese evening in early January – typically under-rehearsed and delegated to a novice conductor, though artists who shortchange this music pass sentence on themselves. As with Mozart or Haydn, the superficial simplicity of Strauss's inspiration is a mirror that reveals a conductor's soul. Furtwängler's Emperor Waltz has a monumental inner logic; Karajan's Blue Danube shimmers with sensuous richness. Carlos Kleiber made the Thousand and One Nights waltz sound like a long, warm smile. The original score of Johann Strauss II's The Blue Danube (1867). ART IMAGES / GETTY IMAGES And then there's our old friend snobbery. Rieu may be a factor there; likewise the high-kitsch framing of the annual New Year broadcast from Vienna. Euro-camp dance routines and crowds of Belgian retirees are just not cool. The tastemakers of the classical world say they want diverse audiences – but not that kind of diversity, and classical music social media foams with disdain on the morning of New Year's Day. It's embarrassing to witness. True, any creator as prolific as Strauss will have off days and arid patches (even Bach was no exception). But any truly musical listener should be able to discern the fundamental artistic quality of Strauss's finest work. Brahms heard it; Wagner heard it. It shouldn't be this hard. We live in an aesthetic climate that favours the arduous over the graceful, and privileges the grim over the joyous (though no one with ears to hear can miss the ever-present melancholy that offsets Strauss's sweetness). In the meantime, it's hard not to feel that we're missing out on something life-enhancing – and god knows, we could use it. Strauss can (and does) flourish even without elite orchestras and big-name maestros, but the pleasure that comes from hearing genius exploring its own lighter side shouldn't be confined to the first of January. Until the 1980s, Viennese nights used to be a regular (and best-selling) feature of the Proms, and there is a vast untapped repertoire to explore. Imagine an inventively programmed evening of Strauss rarities and favourites performed by, say, Ivan Fischer and the Budapest Festival Orchestra (who played an exquisite sequence of Strauss waltzes in the 2014 Proms), or John Wilson and the Sinfonia of London (who delivered an exhilarating Fledermaus overture as recently as 2021). Preconceptions and prejudices would evaporate like mist on the Prater. Hope springs eternal. There's another Strauss anniversary in 2029: a second chance to celebrate some of the most perfect popular music ever created. And to join Brahms, Wagner, Mahler, Schoenberg, Webern, Ravel, Gershwin, Richard Strauss, Furtwängler, Karajan, Kleiber and (yes) André Rieu – plus millions of music-lovers across continents and centuries – in grateful homage to the Waltz King.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
HAPs, warriors and power ponies: what to say about the Lionesses
W ell, here we are again. England's women footballers are into the Euro 2025 final, their third consecutive major final, having knocked out Italy in a match that left the nation hiding behind the sofa, well after its bedtime. That followed a quarter-final against Sweden that ended in a penalty shoot-out and during which I chewed my nail varnish clean off. Some things never change in English football, then. But when it comes to the Lionesses there are new faces, more lucrative endorsement deals and weddings to report. At least our Dutch manager, Sarina Wiegman, still wears her trademark white T-shirts. So what do you need to know? Here's your guide to the team before Sunday's match. Chloe Kelly has been a household name since celebrating England's 2022 Euros win in her sports bra. But as recently as January the super-sub was considering giving it all up and in a 'dark place' after being left out of her Manchester City side and at risk of dropping out of the Lionesses due to a lack of regular match play. Thankfully, a successful loan to Arsenal — where the Londoner began her career aged 12 and with whom she signed permanently just three weeks ago — led to her securing her spot at the Euros.
