5-Year-Old Sarah Roberts Resisted Segregation 100 Years Before Brown v. Board of Education
In 1849, one family took on segregation in Boston, laying early groundwork for that Supreme Court victory nearly a century later. Five-year-old Sarah Roberts, the daughter of a local printer, had to walk past five white schools on her way to the one Black school every morning due to Boston's school segregation laws — and her family decided to fight back.
Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue Take
Massachusetts was one of the first states to abolish slavery in its Constitution, and by 1790, there was no record of any enslaved people living there. This newly freed Black community settled onto the northern slope of Boston's Beacon Hill neighborhood. Although they lived a couple blocks from the state's capital and opposite some of Boston's wealthier residents, the Black community lived a more modest life.
Many Black Bostonians worked jobs on the city's harbor as mariners. As they obtained more wealth, Boston's Black residents put down roots in their Beacon Hill community, building homes and gathering spaces, like the African Meeting House, which doubled as a church and community center.
As Boston's Black community grew, they were excluded from many public institutions, including the public school system. Prince Hall, a prominent abolitionist and African American Freemason, founded the African School in 1798 with his son, Primus, to serve Black students.
The African School was a community-led education initiative teaching people of all ages in the area. As the school attracted more students, it outgrew the Hall's home and moved to the African Meeting House in 1808. The school could now accommodate more students, but as a community-led institution, it received minimal funding and, therefore, had a shortage of books and materials.
Over two decades later, a public school finally opened for Boston's Black community. Abiel Smith, a wealthy white businessman, left $4,000 in his will for the education of Boston's African American children. With this donation, the Abiel Smith School opened its doors in 1835.
While the Abiel Smith School filled an urgent need for Black children in Boston, many of the same challenges that had existed at the African School, such as overcrowding, limited resources, and poorer conditions than white schools, continued at the Abiel Smith School. Students were mistreated by the majority white teachers and administrators, who neglected the building and its need for extensive repairs. Between 1844 and 1846, over 80 Black residents of Boston's Northern Slope petitioned the Boston Primary School Committee to correct the injustices at Abiel Smith School.
Despite the problems at the Abiel Smith School, it remained the only public school for Black children. Students like Sarah Roberts, who lived roughly half a mile from the Abiel Smith School in Boston's West End neighborhood, had to pass five all-white schools on her walk to the Smith School.
In 1847, Sarah's father, Benjamin Roberts, a local printer, had enough and petitioned the Boston Primary School Committee to send Sarah to the school closest to their home, which was only open to white children. The committee denied his petition four times. The Boston School Committee argued that because his daughter could attend Smith School, she did not need to be admitted into a school closest to her home. In 1848, Roberts ignored the committee and enrolled his daughter in the school closest to her home, but she was promptly ejected and told to attend the Smith School.
Roberts, furious at the treatment of his daughter, enlisted the help of attorney Robert Morris, the first Black man to pass the Massachusetts bar. Morris then recruited Charles Sumner, a white abolitionist and future Massachusetts Senator, to file a lawsuit against the City of Boston.
Morris and Sumner claimed that segregated schooling violated an 1854 statute stating, "Any child, unlawfully excluded from public school instruction, in this Commonwealth, shall recover damages therefor [sic]...against the city or town by which such public school instruction is supported.' In other words, any child in Massachusetts who is illegally left out of any public school can collect any money from the city or town supporting the school they have not been allowed to attend.
In a statement drafted by Morris, Sumner argued in court that 'all men and women were equal under Massachusetts law and that, according to the law, there is no discrimination of color or race inside the public school system."
Sumner and Morris also argued that by excluding Black children from the majority-white school system, the city would continue to uphold a caste system that denied racial equality. Unlike Black children who had to leave their neighborhoods to seek an education, white children in Boston had the option to attend quality schools within their communities. Sumner closed his argument by stating that the Boston Public School Committee had no power to segregate the school system based upon race and that the Massachusetts Constitution had abolished slavery and, therefore, had no authority to uphold a school system based upon race and caste.
Despite Morris and Sumner's compelling argument, Judge Lemuel Shaw of the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Boston Public School Committee. While the state of Massachusetts had equality under the law, Shaw argued, it did not prevent the Boston Public School Committee from separating the schools based on race. The state's law could not fix any of the prejudice or discrimination against African Americans if it did exist; the law itself did not create any of the alleged discrimination. In Shaw's opinion, 'as long as schools segregated based upon race remain equal, they could remain segregated.'
Shaw's decision helped set the legal precedent for 'separate but equal' — or the idea that Black and white people could be segregated so long as the facilities were equal in quality, which they rarely were — in the United States. In 1896, 'separate but equal' would be used in the Supreme Court Case Plessy v. Ferguson, which upheld segregation nationwide.
Although the Roberts family's case was unsuccessful, it inspired many activists and the community along the Northern Slope. In 1849, led by abolitionist speaker and writer William Cooper Nell, Boston's Black community began to boycott the Smith School. The boycott and continued lobbying in the statehouse throughout the first half of the 1850s finally led to change. In April 1855, lawmakers banned legally segregated schoolhouses in Massachusetts.
The Roberts family's courage sparked a significant movement for racial equality in Boston and across this country. While Sarah herself was young and may not have been the one arguing against the city in court, she became the face of this lawsuit and of school desegregation. She is an example of the larger, and at times unspoken, role that Black women and girls played in the school desegregation movement.
After the court case, Sarah Roberts and her family moved around the greater Boston area throughout her childhood. In 1865, at 22 years old, she settled back into Boston. After the Civil War and with the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, Boston's Black community continued the fight for equality, building on the legacy of people like Roberts. Simultaneously, the Roberts case also started a chain reaction that shaped the future of segregation — from the 'separate but equal' clause of Plessy v. Ferguson to the toppling of Brown v. Board of Education over 100 years later.
Today, the Museum of African American History in Boston, Massachusetts, continues to do more research on the life of Sarah Roberts and other Black women who played pivotal roles in the fight for equality.
This article was produced with Made By Us, a coalition of more than 400 history museums working to connect with today's youth.
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
Check out more Teen Vogue education coverage:
Affirmative Action Benefits White Women Most
How Our Obsession With Trauma Took Over College Essays
So Many People With Student Debt Never Graduated College
The Modern American University Is a Right-Wing Institution
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
4 hours ago
- CNBC
I got accepted to Harvard, Stanford and Princeton—3 things my parents did at an early age: It 'made all the difference'
For every high schooler, the college admissions process is incredibly daunting. Thankfully, for me, the years of hard work all paid off. I recently graduated from PCTI STEM Academy in Wayne, New Jersey. This spring, I was accepted into 10 of the top 25 universities in the U.S., including Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, and the University of Pennsylvania. This fall, I'll be attending Harvard University. Among my acceptances, I was offered a merit-based full ride from Washington University as a Langsdorf Scholar and a direct phone call from their Dean of Engineering, along with a Likely Scholar Designation through Columbia University's C.P. Davis Scholar program. What made all the difference? It started long before high school, with the way my parents raised me. We couldn't afford college consultants or expensive enrichment programs, so they focused on simple, consistent routines that laid the foundation for my success. Research consistently shows that good sleep and proper nutrition lead to better academic performance. My parents took this seriously. To make sure I got enough rest, my dad would wake up early so that he could drive me to school every morning before heading into work. Not having to catch the bus gave me an extra hour of sleep. My mom would similarly get up before sunrise, sometimes as early as 4:30 a.m., so that she could make me a nutritious breakfast — usually a couple of eggs, some protein, and garlic toast. My parents also arranged their schedules so that I'd never come home to an empty house. As soon as I was done with school, they'd be home from work. In Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers," he talks about how success requires not just talent and hard work, but also finding opportunities to develop our own interests. That really stuck with me. At the start of high school, I was too focused on academics. Yet, my parents encouraged me to join clubs. If I didn't like it, I didn't have to commit. Growing up, my immigrant parents didn't have access to extracurricular activities. I was reminded of how lucky I am. I became one of the most involved students in my district, and surprisingly ended up having a lot of fun. I participated in Robotics, Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA), and SkillsUSA. I even worked on real-world engineering projects, like optimizing math models for school-based initiatives. My proudest accomplishment? Leading a NASA HUNCH team that designed a lunar rover built to survive the moon's harsh terrain. We were invited to present our design at the Johnson Space Center in Houston, directly to NASA engineers and astronauts. My parents taught me that you can become talented through skill development, but you need opportunities to put that talent to good use. My parents, who immigrated to the U.S. without a formal American education, taught me that success means more than grades. It's also about character. They instilled in me values rooted in our Islamic faith: curiosity about the world, honesty, gratitude, and perseverance. Our faith also encourages us to observe and appreciate the beauty of the world, which is initially what got me interested in science! Those values shaped how I approached everything, from academics to relationships with teachers and classmates. When it came time for recommendation letters, my teachers didn't just write about my grades. They spoke about who I am as a person, and that came from how my parents raised me. What matters most to me is giving back — to my parents, my community, and everyone who helped me along the way. I believe that's how I'll truly make the most out of my Harvard education.
Cosmopolitan
6 hours ago
- Cosmopolitan
Data Shows That Young Women Are Just as Lonely as Men
A few years ago, my mom and I had a blowout fight. I can't recall what sparked the argument, but what I do remember is lying on the bathroom floor and sobbing as I scanned my texts for someone to reach out to who could keep me distracted from all the sadness. In my phone were the names of dozens of girls I met during my time at college, when I was rotating through late-night clubbing, brunches, and concerts in an attempt to get closer to people I hoped would one day be bridesmaids at my wedding. But truthfully? These friendships were superficial—nothing like what I watched and coveted in the TV show Girls. I couldn't rely on them during a panic attack. And if you can't call a friend at 10 p.m. on a weekday when the snot coming out of your nose has made you unintelligible, are they even a friend? I am a successful 21-year-old who is a published journalist and works a good, degree-aligned job. I live happily in New York City. I work out, love nature, and have a great boyfriend. The only thing missing? Friends. I lack them, and although this feels almost radical to confess these days, I know for a fact I'm not alone in it. Today, lonely women like me abound, and the data backs this up. About 1 in 6 Americans say they feel lonely or isolated from those around them all or most of the time, according to the Pew Research Center. The Campaign to End Loneliness goes one step further, finding that people under 30 are the loneliest age group and that women are significantly more likely to be chronically lonely than men. I have often dreaded the end of the workday when I'd find myself faced with the prospect of an evening spent alone. However, judging by recent media coverage, you'd be forgiven for thinking that loneliness is almost exclusively experienced by young men. Whether it's through stories of perpetually online Joe Rogan–devoted incels lashing out in anger over their own inadequacies or average guys who lack the tools needed to deal with their feelings, the message around loneliness is that it's affecting men at alarming rates—and we should all be concerned, especially when social isolation leads to violence and extremism in men. 'The epidemic of loneliness is hitting men hardest,' a Los Angeles Times op-ed from last year posits. 'Is the Cure to Male Loneliness Out on the Pickleball Court?' asks the New York Times. 'Are men okay?' wonders Vox. Earlier this week, the conversation on male loneliness was reinvigorated thanks to a New York Times article on 'mankeeping.' According to the Times, this is 'the work women do to meet the social and emotional needs of the men in their lives, from supporting their partners through daily challenges and inner turmoil to encouraging them to meet up with their friends.' Not only are women alarmed that the men in our lives are friendless, but it appears we feel responsible for helping them feel less alone. In pointing to a real problem, this media coverage glosses over another issue. Women's struggles with loneliness can be just as if not more severe than men's, but female isolation is rarely the topic of think pieces or trend stories. Are women okay? Some of us aren't, but when we're not occupied with 'mankeeping,' it's up to us to mitigate our own social anxiety. 'Women take on an especially high level of pressure and urgency to feel a deep connective tissue in a friendship,' Alyssa Petersel, LMSW, CEO of the therapist-match platform MyWellbeing, tells me in an interview. 'Women tend to view loneliness as a personal failure, but men, broadly speaking, are more likely to externalize the feeling (what's wrong with other people?) or not recognize it at all.' And while, according to Petersel, men may feel like 'their cup is full' after bonding with friends over concrete activities like watching sports, for women it's all about quality versus quantity. Even with a high weekly volume of lunch dates or Pilates meetups, we don't feel truly satisfied until our standard for a friendship's depth is met. 'Female loneliness is often existential: I know a lot of people, but who really knows me?' echoes Los Angeles–based clinical psychologist Dr. Lauren Kerwin. That's not to say men can't feel a mismatch between the friendships they have and the friendships they want to have, but the experts I talked to say men are less likely to blame themselves for it. 'There's a persistent cultural script that women should be naturally good at friendship. Lonely men may be socially accepted, even expected, but lonely women often carry shame,' says Kerwin. This pervasive loneliness has deep roots in art and culture. Reclusive and brilliant writers like Emily Dickinson or Emily Brontë described their own isolation at a time when women often couldn't work outside the home, gain a university education, or own property. Instead of going out to a tavern with a friend (unheard of) or bonding with coworkers, most of us could be found taking care of (ahem, 'mankeeping'?) our husbands by tending to their meals, trousers, and mood swings. In the process, we learned how to hide behind the mask of a seemingly perfect life—the magna cum laude college honors, say, or the beautiful photos on social media—which is one reason female loneliness hasn't seemed like an epidemic. The media, our partners and families, and the broader culture rarely see cause for concern or theorize about how to enhance our lackluster social lives. And so we are left to forge ahead on our own. Despite my efforts, I have struggled to tolerate superficial initial connections that (I assume) would slowly evolve into the close-knit, know-everything-about-your-life bonds I've seen and envied on TV. I don't want to talk about the merits of a new facial salon downtown or what's worth getting at the Alo Yoga sale, and so I don't even try. Still, I'm not okay with being a recluse. New York's beauty lies in the fact that you can find everyone here, and it stings not to have people tuned to my frequency. I have found a solution to all this, however, and it's fittingly retro. Bella and I became pen pals in 2020, at the age of 17, as part of Rachel Syme's Penpalooza letter-writing program. At its peak, the exchange had 10,000 members from over 75 different countries. Some pairings lasted for only a letter or two and others, like ours, are still ongoing. While I long for in-person friendships, as of right now, this long-distance platonic confidante knows my heart better than any of my lackluster college connections. Bella is a month older than me and also a journalist. In our early letters, when she was living in Florida, I used my best stationery to tell her about college applications, nature walks, and Covid-era existential crises. She wrote to me about the lake outside her window and the independent magazine she helmed. Bella lives in Spain now. We've only met once IRL. We can't share the joys of post-work drinks, trips to bookstores, or getaways to the beach on the Q train. At first, because of the distance, I didn't want to burden her in darker moments, like that post-fight meltdown on the bathroom floor. Week after week though, I felt giddy when running to my mailbox. Emily Dickinson lived a solitary life. Letter writing was also great joy for her—maybe because it let her express things she could never say out loud. 'This is an ode to all the girls we've been together,' Bella wrote in a card after I moved in with my boyfriend, accompanied by roses. The gesture made it feel as if she were in the apartment with us. So, in the tradition of deep and thoughtful long-distance correspondences between women who feel like they were born in the wrong century, I have come to realize true friendship doesn't require proximity. While the digital realm can be hazardous for isolated young men who stumble onto the manosphere, for lonely women like me, it's still a lifeline. Meeting Bella taught me that sometimes the best platonic connections live over 3,500 miles away but will still celebrate your wins, offer clarifying pushback when you're being stupid, and meet every new version of you with open arms. So while the media may never obsess over the fate of lonely letter-writing girls like me, thanks to modern technology, old-fashioned modes of correspondence, and a hefty dose of female resilience, there's still hope for us.
Boston Globe
8 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Fishing around for fun things to do? Use the South Coast commuter rail to explore New Bedford.
From the commuter rail station, you'll have to walk 15 minutes to reach Fisherman's Wharf. You'll pass the fish processing plants and cold storage facilities that support the nation's highest-grossing commercial fishing port. True to its name, Fisherman's Wharf is lined by vessels that range up to 100 feet long and tower above the mere human beings along the dock. The vast majority are rigged as scallop dredgers or groundfish boats, although offshore lobster boats, clammers, and deep-sea crabbers also call New Bedford home. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up According to the most recent Advertisement Plaques along the waterfront illuminate New Bedford's maritime history. David Lyon Advertisement That mentality was already part of New Bedford's cultural DNA. From 1830 to 1860, most American whaling ships sailed from New Bedford. Commercial fishing took hold when the whaling industry waned around 1900. Simply put, New Bedford had the infrastructure — why let all those piers go to waste? But the whaling industry has not been forgotten. The cobblestone streets, granite US Custom House, 'double″ bank building, and old candleworks recall that mid-19th-century heyday. Even the visitor center of the New Bedford Whaling National Historical Park occupies a handsome Greek Revival red sandstone structure. It was built in 1853 as a bank during the height of New Bedford's whaling fortunes. Stop in to pick up a map and get a swift overview of how whaling transformed New Bedford. Whale skeletons seem to float in the two-story atrium of the New Bedford Whaling Museum. David Lyon A block away, the This half-scale model of the whaling bark Lagoda is a prime exhibit in the New Bedford Whaling Museum. David Lyon On the museum's main level, a half-size model of the whaling bark Lagoda gives an idea of the complexity of a typical whaling vessel. An adjacent gallery holds the skeleton of a 48-foot sperm whale, the chief prey of New Bedford whalers. This 30-year-old male was found stranded on Nantucket in 2002. The toothed leviathan dwarfs the six-man whaleboat installed on a back wall in the same room. It is amazing that any whalers survived. Advertisement The New Bedford Whaling National Historical Park Visitor Center occupies a former bank building from the city's whaling heyday. David Lyon That sense of imminent mortality weighed on many a whaler. Central to the The Seamen's Bethel, established in 1832, offered solace and comfort to whalers and other sailors. David Lyon Herman Melville visited the Advertisement The Nathan and Polly Johnson House was a key location in New Bedford's anti-slavery struggle. David Lyon The Abolition movement burned bright in New Bedford, which had the highest percentage of African Americans in the Northeast. Among Rotch's neighbors in what is now called the County Street Historic District were Nathan and Polly Johnson, who owned a block on 7th Street. As free African American businesspeople, the Johnsons were leading anti-slavery activists. They also opened their home to harbor men and women fleeing bondage. On Sept. 17, 1838, they took in a fugitive who would assume the name Frederick Douglass along with his wife, Anna. The Johnson house at 21 7th St. is now owned by the The fried scallop plate at Moby Dick Brewing Co. comes with cole slaw and fried potato wedges. David Lyon From the park, it's only a 10-minute walk back to New Bedford's central historic district. Before leaving town, be sure to sample some New Bedford scallops. At If you go … One-way weekday fare on the MBTA commuter rail is $12.25 for adults, $6 for seniors and students. The MBTA offers a $10 Commuter Rail Weekend Pass for unlimited travel. On weekdays, 15 trains per day leave South Station for New Bedford (536 Acushnet Ave.) Advertisement New Bedford Fishing Heritage Center 38 Bethel St. 508-993-8894, Thurs.-Mon. 10 a.m.-4 p.m. Adults $8, seniors and students $5, under age 12 free New Bedford Whaling National Historical Park Visitor Center 33 William St. 508-996-4095, Wed.-Sun. 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Check for schedule of tours. Free New Bedford Whaling Museum 18 Johnny Cake Hill 508-997-0046, Open daily 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Adults $23, seniors $21, youth $13 Seamen's Bethel 15 Johnny Cake Hill 508-992-3295, Open Tues.-Sun. 10 a.m.-4 p.m. Donation requested Rotch-Jones-Duff House & Garden Museum 396 County St. 508-997-1401, Wed.-Sat. 10 a.m.-4 p.m., also Sun. noon-4 p.m. (closed Sun. after Oct. 13). Adults $8, seniors and students $6, ages 7-17 $3, under age 7 free Moby Dick Brewing Co. 16 South Water St. 774-202-6961, Mon.-Thu. 11:30 a.m.-9 p.m., Fri.-Sat. 11:30 a.m.-10 p.m., Sun. noon-8 p.m. sandwiches and entrees $13-$45 The Whale's Tail Clam Bar Advertisement 52 Fisherman's Wharf, Pier 3 774-425-8980, Open daily 11:30 a.m.-8 p.m. sandwiches and baskets $12-$28 Patricia Harris and David Lyon can be reached at . Patricia Harris can be reached at
