logo
Semi-trailer truck crash snags I-55 in Plainfield, Illinois

Semi-trailer truck crash snags I-55 in Plainfield, Illinois

CBS News3 days ago
A semi-trailer truck wiped out on Interstate 55 in Plainfield, Illinois, Tuesday afternoon, causing a major traffic jam in the southbound lanes.
The crash happened on southbound I-55 at Renwick Road. The semi-trailer truck struck a concrete barrier, leaving heavy front-end damage and a ruptured fuel tank.
Traffic was solid past I-355, and drivers were advised to get off at Weber Road to avoid getting stuck.
Information about injuries was not immediately available.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla Stock Rises as U.S. Hits China With 160% Graphite Tariff
Tesla Stock Rises as U.S. Hits China With 160% Graphite Tariff

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Stock Rises as U.S. Hits China With 160% Graphite Tariff

July 18 - Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) shares surged on Friday as investors assessed new trade restrictions targeting a critical electric vehicle battery input. The stock rose 3%, extending gains for the week. The S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were little changed. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with BZAI. The U.S. Commerce Department on Thursday imposed a 93.5% anti-dumping duty on specific graphite imports from China, following a determination that the material was being sold below market value. The penalty adds to existing tariffs, lifting the total levy on some graphite products to as much as 160%. Graphite is a core component in EV batteries, with each car using an estimated 100 to 200 pounds. China remains the world's dominant supplier, contributing around 75% of global output in 2024, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Higher import costs could push up battery production expenses, but analysts suggest the overall effect on EV pricing will be limited. The new tariffs come alongside other policy changes impacting the EV sector, including the loss of the $7,500 federal tax credit for some buyers. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tesla Just Lost Another Sales Exec. How Should You Play TSLA Stock Now Before July 23?
Tesla Just Lost Another Sales Exec. How Should You Play TSLA Stock Now Before July 23?

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Just Lost Another Sales Exec. How Should You Play TSLA Stock Now Before July 23?

Tesla (TSLA) is back in focus following the abrupt departure of its highest-ranking sales and delivery executive for North America, Troy Jones. It is the latest of several high-profile executive departures that have come as the electric car pioneer struggles to overcome sluggish sales and growing investor angst. The automanufacturer is experiencing a tumultuous 2025 as its auto sales have fallen in key markets and as CEO Elon Musk's political involvements create reputational damage. Tesla's delivery miss in Q2 has further raised questions about its ability to recover demand and preserve margins. More News from Barchart Insider Trading Alert: Here's Who Bought Nvidia and AMD Stock Before the U.S. Chip Deal with China Dear Tesla Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for July 23 Robinhood Keeps Hitting New Highs. How Should You Play HOOD Stock Here? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. In the days leading up to July 23 earnings, everyone is eager to know if the company can reframe its story, or if leadership shuffles are merely the beginning of its structural issues. About Tesla Stock Currently valued at $1 trillion, Tesla (TSLA) is a true giant in the electric vehicle and clean energy industry. However, that has not protected it from volatility. In the last 52 weeks, TSLA has varied between $182.00 and $488.54. Shares are currently trading at the $330 level, down more than 30% from their 52-week high and down 19% in the year to date. Tesla has a price-earnings multiple of 244.77x and price-sales multiple of 10.61x, significantly above its industry peers. Despite the very high valuation, profit margins are stretched at 7.3%, and year-over-year net earnings fell 71% last quarter. These high multiples, once justified by hypergrowth expectations, appear stretched now as sales decline and demand dips. Tesla stock, on most comparisons, is pricey based on its growth profile. Tesla Misses on Earnings Tesla's Q1 2025 earnings missed Wall Street expectations across the board. Adjusted EPS came out as $0.27, way below the predicted $0.39, and revenue equaled $19.34 billion, lower than the forecasted $21.11 billion. Vehicle revenue decreased 20% year-over-year to $14 billion, due to declining Model 3 and Model Y deliveries and increasing price competition. Net earnings fell to $409 million, down significantly from $1.39 billion for the same quarter last year. Operating earnings fell 66%, as operating margins fell to 2.1%, the lowest since Q1 2020. Management attributed the miss to seasonal factory line updates for the upgraded Model Y, as well as sturdier sales incentives and weaker price power. Still, the company gave no conclusive 2025 forecast and only said that it would 'revisit' estimates in its July 23 Q2 earnings report. Tesla is pressing ahead with its Austin robotaxi pilot and is due to begin assembling humanoid robots later this year. What Analysts Foresee for Tesla Stock Tesla earns a 'Hold' rating consensus. Long-term conviction in its innovation pipeline persists, but sentiment has deteriorated for the near term. Tesla's mean price target is $296, which is 10% down from its current trading price. Such an outlook, combined with mixed sentiment and slowing delivery growth, argues that the market is waiting for Tesla to reassert an appealing growth story before re-rating the shares. On the date of publication, Yiannis Zourmpanos had a position in: TSLA. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on

That bargain e-bike you bought online? It might burn your house down
That bargain e-bike you bought online? It might burn your house down

Fast Company

time20 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

That bargain e-bike you bought online? It might burn your house down

If you bought an e-bike on Amazon for a price that seemed too good to be true, there's a fair chance you might've been right. A federal consumer watchdog just issued a recall for about 24,000 e-bikes in the sub-$1,000 price range, all of which were sold at popular retailers including Amazon, Walmart, Sears, and Wayfair. According to the recall notice, issued by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on July 17, the affected bikes were sold under the brand name 'VIVI.' The recall comes due to a potential fire and burn risk posed by the bikes' 36-volt lithium-ion rechargeable batteries, which have already resulted in 14 reports of overheating and three reports of fires, though, thankfully, no injuries have been reported. Full details of the recall—including affected models and retailers—are listed in the notice. Unfortunately, this isn't the first time that the next-to-non-existent e-bike and e-bike battery regulations in the U.S. have resulted in fire concerns. Why are e-bikes catching fire? According to a 2022 article by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA), the first UL Standards & Engagement safety standards (a voluntary safety certification) for personal electric micromobility devices were created back in 2016, after more than half a million electric hoverboards were recalled due to overheating and, in some cases, explosions. 'The truth is battery-powered electric micromobility devices, including the e-bikes and e-scooters that have become immensely popular in recent years, do catch fire,' the NFPA wrote. 'Specifically, it's their batteries, which are often lithium-ion, that pose a risk.' Today, UL Standards & Engagement has two separate safety standards for both e-bikes (UL 2849) and e-bike batteries (UL 2271). These standards require a one-time certification test to confirm that a product is safe, which typically cost between $30,000 and $100,000. However, in most U.S. jurisdictions, these certifications are not required—and there is currently no federally mandated safety standard. Of the VIVI brand e-bikes involved in the recent recall, all of the affected models that are currently available on VIVI's website claim to be certified with UL 2849, but not with the battery specific UL 2271. Several of the affected models appear to be either unavailable or no longer sol d. A 2022 investigation by Consumer Reports found that loose regulations have resulted in many companies skirting around adequate safety precautions for both e-bikes and their lithium-ion batteries to avoid added costs. This trend was made even worse by the fact that, before May 2 of this year, Chinese importers (which account for the majority of the U.S. e-bike market) were incentivized to keep prices low by the de minimis exception, which allowed goods under $800 to enter the U.S. tax-free. 'Lack of regulation or industry-wide acceptance of safety standards may leave lower-income users at greater risk than those able to afford high-end devices that are likelier to be UL-certified,' Consumer Reports noted. As of 2023, New York City began requiring UL certification on all e-bikes. A UL Standards & Engagement study published in 2024 found that the rate of deaths and injuries in the city began to slow significantly after the law was put into place. And, this coming January, California is set to follow New York City's example with its own UL requirements. However, as the Consumer Reports' investigation noted, until a federal standard for e-bike safety is set, it's likely that other states will continue to encounter problems caused by faulty batteries. 'Despite the mounting toll of fires, injuries, and deaths tied to e-bike batteries, manufacturers and sellers have failed to take vital steps that would protect people's safety,' said Gabe Knight, policy advocate for Consumer Reports, in a press release. 'When an industry isn't putting safety first, people rightly expect the Consumer Product Safety Commission to step in. CR's investigation shows that the CPSC can't do its job as quickly or effectively as it needs to as long as Congress forces the agency to fight with one hand tied behind its back.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store