logo
Bizarre I-T law to penalise taxpayer to change soon: Income Tax Bill 2025 may give relief to specified small taxpayers filing ITR only to claim tax refunds

Bizarre I-T law to penalise taxpayer to change soon: Income Tax Bill 2025 may give relief to specified small taxpayers filing ITR only to claim tax refunds

Time of India12 hours ago
What did the select committee of Lok Sabha recommend?
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
The Committee observed that the current mandatory requirement to file a return solely for the purpose of claiming a refund could inadvertently lead to prosecution, particularly for small taxpayers whose income falls below the taxable threshold but from whom tax has been deducted at source.
In such scenarios, the law should not compel a return merely to avoid penal provisions for non-filing. The Committee, therefore, recommended to remove sub-clause (1)(ix) from Clause 263 to provide flexibility for allowing refund claims in cases where the return is not filed in due time.
What does this mean for taxpayers?
Clause 263(1)(ix) of the Income-tax Bill, 2025 can be read to mean that every person in whose case TDS is deducted should mandatorily file his/ her income tax return (ITR). Non filing of income tax return (ITR) may result in penalty under clause 479, and imprisonment for a minimum period of three months.
Though sub-clause (2) of clause 479 indicates that prosecution cannot be initiated unless an assessment order is passed resulting in a tax demand of Rs 10,000 or more, out of abundant precaution, it appears that the Select Committee has recommended omission of Clause 263(1)(ix) of the 2025 Bill.
What does Clause 479 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 say about penal provisions for failure to file an ITR?
(a) in a case, where the amount of tax, which would have been evaded if the failure had not been discovered, exceeds twenty- five lakh rupees, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine;
(b) in any other case, with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three months but which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to fine.
Sub-clause 2 of clause 479 reads as follows:
What is the existing rule for tax refunds and ITR filing as per Income Tax Act, 1961?
How would you feel if you file ITR late for claiming legitimate tax refund but you get penalized for it especially when as per I-T law does not require you to even file ITR. Isn't this bizarre? However, it is going to change soon.One of the important recommendations by the select committee of the Lok Sabha on the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 is about tax refunds and ITR filing. The committee said that if any specified small taxpayers wants to file an Income Tax Return (ITR) solely for the purpose of claiming tax refund then he/she can do so even after the original deadline to file an ITR is over, without the fear of penalties. This means if you are a small taxpayer who wants to claim tax refund but fail to file an ITR on or before July 31, 2025 then it's not a problem anymore. You can still file your ITR on or before December 31, 2025 without attracting any penal provisions.Read below to know who is eligible for this relaxation and what the select committee recommended.According to the press release dated July 21, 2025, here's what the select committee said:S. Sriram, Executive Partner, Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan Attorneys explainsAs can be seen from above, the select committee of the Lok Sabha has specified that this relief is only for small taxpayers whose income level falls below the taxable threshold. S. Sriram says that the phrase 'income below the taxable threshold' means the basic exemption limit which is Rs 2.5 lakh for old tax regime and Rs 4 lakh under new tax regime for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27).S. Sriram says: 'The maximum amount, which is not chargeable to tax, would mean the minimum amount referred to the slab rate, without having regard to rebates, deductions, allowances, etc.'Sub clause 1 of Clause 479 reads as follows:(1) If a person wilfully fails to furnish in due time the return of income, which is required to be furnished under section 263(1), or by notice given under sections 268(1) or 280, he shall be punishable,—(2) A person shall not be proceeded against under sub-section (1) for failure to furnish in due time the return of income under section 263(1) for any tax year, if(a) the return is furnished by him before the expiry of one year from the end of the tax year or a return is furnished by him under section 263(6) within the time provided in that section; or(b) the tax payable by such person, not being a company, on the total income determined on regular assessment, as reduced by the advance tax or self-assessment tax, if any, paid before the expiry of one year from the end of the tax year, and any tax deducted or collected at source, does not exceed ten thousand rupees.S. Sriram explains that as per the Income Tax Act, 1961 individual taxpayers are not required to file their income-tax return (ITR), if their total income is less than the maximum amount not liable to tax. 'Even if TDS is deducted on their income (say by a bank on their interest income, or by a company on their dividend income), the individual is not required to file ITR. The only consequence in such cases of non-filing of tax return is that the taxpayer would have to forgo refund of TDS.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament
BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament

News18

time42 minutes ago

  • News18

BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament

Last Updated: Despite not receiving government funding, the BCCI, like other national sports bodies, will have to comply with regulations set out by the sports ministry once the bill is enacted Union sports minister Mansukh Mandaviya is set to introduce the highly anticipated National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The legislation, focused on athlete welfare and systemic reform, represents a significant step towards transparency and accountability in Indian sports governance. A key provision of the bill is to bring all national sports bodies, including the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. This long-debated and previously resisted move is expected to finally become law, ending years of delay and political pushback. A previous attempt during the UPA era by then sports minister Ajay Maken failed due to opposition within his own party. Despite not receiving government funding, the BCCI, like other national sports federations, will be required to comply with the regulations set out by the sports ministry once the bill is enacted. This is particularly significant as the Indian cricket team prepares to compete at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, which will place the BCCI within the framework of a national sports federation. 'It wasn't easy to bring the BCCI on board, but extensive dialogue was held between lawmakers and the BCCI top brass to ensure their cooperation," a source involved in the legislative process told CNN-News18. 'The government's intent is clear: to instill accountability and transparency across all sports federations in the country." Once enacted, the bill will mandate all recognised sports bodies to comply with the RTI Act, opening up access to decision-making processes, financial records, and governance structures to the public. The National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, aims to overhaul the Indian sports ecosystem through a series of structural reforms, including legal clarity, gender equality, athlete empowerment, and enhanced public oversight. More than just a legal framework, the bill signals the dawn of a new era where athletes are not just competitors but active stakeholders in India's sporting future. India's sports sector has long been plagued by controversies such as mismanagement, opaque elections in sports federations, and poor athlete representation. With over 350 court cases pending across federations, the judiciary has consistently urged the government to legislate a comprehensive governance structure. Efforts to introduce such a bill date back to 2011, but progress was repeatedly blocked by legal challenges, shifting political priorities, and unresolved court interventions. The Delhi High Court's endorsement of the 2011 Sports Code and pending litigations around the 2017 draft further stalled momentum. Officials believe that beyond governance reform, the bill will also contribute to employment generation, better protection for athletes—especially women and minors—and a more ethical, competitive, and globally aligned sporting culture in India. First Published: July 23, 2025, 01:42 IST Latest News Bangladesh Air Force's F-7 BGI that crashed was a Chinese copy of the MiG-21 Breaking News Sports BCCI Under RTI: Long-Stalled Sports Bill To Be Tabled Today, Likely To Clear Parliament Cricket Harmanpreet's Century, Gaud's 6-Fer Help IND Beat ENG, Clinch ODI Series 2-1 Hollywood Benny Blanco Posts Selena Gomez's Sleeping Pics On Her Birthday: 'Never Waking U Up' news DOJ Seeks Meeting With Epstein's Ex Ghislaine Maxwell, Donald Trump Calls It An "Appropriate" Move latest news

Land pooling promises false: Warring
Land pooling promises false: Warring

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Land pooling promises false: Warring

Chandigarh: Punjab Congress president Amrinder Singh Raja Warring accused the Aam Aadmi Party govt of trying to cheat the farmers by promising compensation "which it is not in a position to pay". "It is like a post-dated cheque on a crashing bank," he remarked. Responding to the govt decision offering acre-based compensation to farmers until the area is developed, Warring observed that this is a diversionary tactic to befool farmers by the AAP govt. "Farmers will not bite the bait," he asserted, while pointing out, "when the govt doesn't have enough money to run its own day-to-day affairs, pay the salaries, or pay the promised Rs 1,000 to every woman, where will it get the money from to pay the farmers?" "This is a ploy to defraud the farmers and make them walk into the trap," he warned. Reiterating his appeal to the govt to withdraw the policy, Warring said: "What is the point when there is no need for land pooling." tnn

Hate speech case: HC to hear Abbas Ansari's revision plea on July 30
Hate speech case: HC to hear Abbas Ansari's revision plea on July 30

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Hate speech case: HC to hear Abbas Ansari's revision plea on July 30

Prayagraj: The Allahabad High Court on Tuesday adjourned till July 30 the hearing of the revision petition filed by ex-MLA Abbas Ansari challenging the conviction in 2022 hate speech case. Abbas, son of late gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari, was MLA from Mau Assembly constituency from Suheldev Bhartiya Samaj Party (SBSP). Justice Sameer Jain deferred the hearing after additional advocate general MC Chaturvedi, appearing for the state, sought additional time to prepare the case. The courts in its one-page order observed: "At the very outset, the additional advocate general (AAG) submitted that for proper assistance, some time may be given to him to prepare the case properly." Abbas was convicted by the MP-MLA court of Mau on May 31 under sections 153-A (promoting enmity between groups) and 189 (threatening a public servant) of the Indian Penal Code. The conviction pertains to a controversial speech delivered during the 2022 assembly election campaign in Mau when Abbas targeted a govt officer and his speech video went viral on social media, leading to the lodging of the case. He was sentenced to two years' imprisonment and fined Rs 2,000. His election agent, Mansoor Ansari, who was present on the stage during the rally, was also convicted and sentenced to six months in jail. Subsequently after conviction, he was disqualified as a member of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly. The seat has now been declared vacant.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store