‘The reality is that accidents happen quickly and quietly.'
The incident was caught on camera at Stirling Leisure in the northern Perth suburb of Inglewood, with the AI detecting the medical emergency immediately.
Lifeguards were sent an urgent alert at the same time fellow swimmer Ofer Lefelman noticed something was wrong.
'When I realised he's in distress, I dove down, picked him up, put him on my shoulder, made sure his head was above the water,' he told 7NEWS.
Lifeguards then helped get the struggling swimmer to the water's edge, where further help was waiting.
'They were very quick, very fast, they grabbed all the gear we needed,' lifeguard Cameron told 7NEWS.
He believed it would have been 'a lot more stressful if I didn't have that initial alert'.
'That precious amount of seconds with the watch possibly saved him,' he said.
The Lynxight system is a critical set of eyes operated by the City of Stirling to keep watch over the pool and swimmers.
It is able to pinpoint a person in distress and send an alert via a smart watch with an exact GPS co-ordination.
Lynxight can connect to standard security cameras, detect unusual water movement and track multiple swimmers at once. The Lynxight pool monitoring system triggered a potentially lifesaving alert at a pool in Perth. Credit: 7NEWS
More than 300 people drown in Australia every year, and there were six drowning deaths and 8000 rescues at public pools in 2023 alone, Royal Life Saving Australia research shows.
The AI technology is also used at Gould Adams Park Aquatic Centre in Queensland but it is hoped it will be rolled out at more pools across the country and help to save more lives.
Royal Life Saving Society WA chief executive Peter Leaversuch said lifeguards have a challenging job watching lots of people in the water.
'The reality is that accidents happen quickly and quietly,' he said.
'To have a bit of technology that's watching is really powerful for not only the public but also the lifeguards.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
18 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Why the West has lost to China
These last few weeks I have been driving around in the latest and greatest cars from a number of European and Japanese manufacturers, cars that cost anywhere between $50,000 to around $500,000. While they're exceedingly lovely and do so many things well, it became clear to me as I kept losing my cool at the poor implementation of basic technology and general automotive smarts, that there is now an almost generational gap between where the Chinese automakers are and where the Western and Japanese manufacturers sit. Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today Want your Apple CarPlay to work wirelessly without dropping out and driving you mad? Don't look to Europe. Want your infotainment system to look like something from this century? Don't look to Japan. Want the screen on your $200,000 European car to have the same quality and responsiveness as what you will find in a $30,000 MG, Chery, GWM etc? Look elsewhere. Want your reversing camera to be in high definition? Japan prefers it in 320p. Want to be able to control a huge amount of your car remotely via an app that works? Best to look East (or at Chinese-made Teslas). If you're wondering what I'm talking about, because you have bought into the hysteria that Chinese cars are poorly made and unsafe, then you're living about a decade in the past. If you're in the market for a new car, and even if you have absolutely no intention of buying a Chinese car, I implore you to go and drive a few and take a look at the price, warranty, and build quality. Play with the technology, look at all the things it can do and then come back to a known legacy brand and tell me with a straight face it's a better value for money or a superior technological proposition. Take a moment to realise that the phone, laptop, screen or whatever you are reading this on, is made in China – and soon, most cars will be too. Paul Maric and I recently had dinner with the CEO of a legacy manufacturer who flat-out admitted his company is decades behind and has no hope of catching up in the near future. His literal words were, 'We buried our heads in the sand and now it's too late.' How did we get here? Let's take a walk back in time. The Europeans have had almost 140 years of internal combustion engine, engineering and manufacturing excellence and know-how. The first Daimler/Mercedes vehicle was made in 1886. To say they had a first mover advantage with the automobile would be an understatement. However, as is the nature of capitalism and short-term greed, most CEOs, executives, and shareholders tend to think only in the short term. There could be no more obvious example of this than the technology and knowledge transfer that has occurred from the West to China in the automotive sector. When the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) opened its market to Western car companies decades ago, they all rushed in like schoolchildren looking for free lollies and their personal mega-bonuses. However, there was a slight caveat: if you want to sell your product in China, you must form a 50:50 joint venture with a Chinese company. Which, coincidentally, is likely fully or partially owned by the CCP. You could almost imagine all the European CEOs smirking at the time, 'They will learn our ways, but I'm going to make so much money selling in China, I'll be long gone before that is an issue'. Fast forward three or so decades, and here we are. The issue is clearly apparent if you are a shareholder in a legacy manufacturer in Europe or the United States. The Chinese have taken almost every single industrial, manufacturing, engineering and technological know-how from the West and now not only have similar, if not better, cars, excellent engineering, and know-how… but they have stopped desiring Western cars. In fact, they are actually making (arguably better for the money) cars for the Europeans under European brands! Tell that to someone in the late 1990s, and they would laugh at you. This whole shift of power to the East has been heavily aided by the electric vehicle revolution. You may have recently seen that several German automakers have joined forces to develop software together, a near-admission that if they don't respond to the technological Chinese threat faster, they're doomed. The Japanese, too, are in trouble, but at least they didn't take the initial bait as hard (arguably due to the poor social relations between the countries). Still, we're talking about an insular culture that invented the Walkman and then refused to adapt when MP3s and streaming became a thing. Where the Chinese differ from the Japanese is their willingness to hire and bring in foreign experts – paying them huge sums of money – to improve their products. To really make a point, think about how many Western car brands the Japanese have bought versus how many the Chinese own? In many respects, the way the Japanese schooled the Americans and Europeans in the late 80s and early 90s when it came to quality and lean manufacturing, the Chinese are now doing on a global scale with respect to technology and electrification. Like my colleagues at CarExpert and across the industry, I attend many events where I get to speak to CEOs of many car companies and I get asked very frequently what I thought of their cars, and more often than not, my first response is 'have you driven a $30,000 Chinese car recently?' You know what? Most of them haven't, and the reason they haven't is because Europe and America have hefty tariffs to stop the Chinese from selling cars, which means most (but not all, with Ford's CEO Jim Farley being the most vocal exception) have no direct experience or idea of just how far behind they are. Australia is an incredibly unique market, where we have no meaningful tariffs and a low barrier to entry. This means that any manufacturer can easily set up shop in half a dozen key cities and experiment in our market. In fact, the aggression with which the Chinese have entered our market suggests to anyone with an economic mind that the goal here is not just profit, but to capture market share at the expense of legacy manufacturers. To drive them out and then, over time, raise prices. This is what China has achieved globally, encompassing everything from technology to core minerals. This is what happens when a country's government thinks 50 years ahead, rather than in a four-year election cycle. The irony that capitalist markets have blocked access to the 'communist' Chinese does not escape me. In a free market, everyone is allowed to sell their product without discrimination, but in Europe and America, when things get tough and the competition is better and cheaper, they close the market down. Of course, it makes sense to protect jobs and the local industry, but it also insulates those automakers from understanding their competition before it's too late. I know many of you will rush to the comments to say I am wrong, and I might be – in fact, I hope I am. There are also many areas where Chinese carmakers can improve. The thing is, though, they are listening and they are actually improving. For example, one Chinese OEM updated one of its best-selling cars three times within a 12-month period, purely based on customer feedback. I am not talking about minor changes; they redesigned the entire rear and altered the vehicle's dynamics, while also enhancing the interior. They treat cars like smartphones. From what I have seen during my recent trips to China, from the nine million senior software engineers to the incredible factories, R&D centres and the industrial and manufacturing knowledge that exists in the country, I can only assume that the tide has shifted so far East that it will never shift back again. There's an excellent quote from Apple CEO Tim Cook about how the West continues to misunderstand and underestimate the Chinese manufacturing complex. I have left it below in full, and while it doesn't directly apply to vehicle manufacturing, it gives you a good idea of why China is leaving the West behind: " 'There's a confusion about China. The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor cost. I'm not sure what part of China they go to, but the truth is China stopped being the low-labor-cost country many years ago. And that is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill, and the quantity of skill in one location and the type of skill it is. 'The products we do require really advanced tooling, and the precision that you have to have, the tooling and working with the materials that we do are state of the art. And the tooling skill is very deep here. In the U.S., you could have a meeting of tooling engineers and I'm not sure we could fill the room. In China, you could fill multiple football fields…' " You may have noticed that I have excluded the South Koreans from this, and that's for good reason: they can adapt and change, which has so far enabled them to remain very competitive with the Chinese. Like the Chinese, the Koreans and Indians are also eager to hire the best and learn as quickly as possible while having a long-term view. This may just be their saving grace.
Daily Telegraph
a day ago
- Daily Telegraph
Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs, company says
Don't miss out on the headlines from Technology. Followed categories will be added to My News. Amazon warehouses are still a viable job option for unskilled and entry-level workers, executives of the e-commerce giant say, despite massive robotics and AI investments. Speaking to NewsWire in Japan this week, Amazon's global head of PR for robotics and AI, Xavier Chao, compared AI robots and sorting machines to offices having a coffee machine and snacks close to the desks. 'Retention is very, vitally important for us if we want to continue to manage and sustain our business and grow; we have to retain our workforce,' Mr Chao said. 'And so we think that innovation is part of the solution of creating a nice workplace that attracts people, and retains staff.' A worker in front of an item-by-item timer at their station inside Amazon's Chiba Minato warehouse in Tokyo. Picture: NewsWire / Blair Jackson Australia has eight Amazon 'fulfilment centre' warehouses; seven of these do not have Amazon's robots. The custom designed and built robots operate using AI, moving stacks of products for humans to pick and put into boxes. Australia's robotised Amazon warehouse is at Kemps Creek in Sydney, and employs about 2500 workers. With Australia's comparatively low-tech Amazon facilities - compared to warehouses in comparable countries - retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots has stalled. In June, Amazon announced it would be investing $20bn in data centres in Australia, reiterating concerns about the e-commerce company's entrenchment in the Australian economy. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman in Seattle in June as AWS announced a $20bn investment into data centre infrastructure in Australia. Picture: NewsWire / PMO Anthony Albanese faces internal pressure from high-ranking Labor MPs, The Australian reports, over accusations Amazon undermines labour laws and employs tax avoidance tactics. These criticisms are echoed by unions - the ACTU, TWU and the SDA - who claim Amazon Australia's workplace practices are unethical. Asked if operating in countries with relatively strong workplace protections was tough for Amazon, Mr Chao said 'Right now, what we're really hyper-focused on is can these systems actually benefit our frontline workers, and getting feedback from them'. He argues wide-scale automation is good for workers. 'If we can create the most innovative workplace that we possibly can, we want to try to do three things. 'Safety … Ease - all of us want to have an easier job. 'And then three, it's exposure. So a lot of people who come and work at an Amazon facility, you know, there are people from all walks of life.' *Amazon paid for NewsWire's travel and accommodation in Japan Originally published as Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs as tech giant continues automation wave
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs as tech giant continues automation wave
Amazon warehouses are still a viable job option for unskilled and entry-level workers, executives of the e-commerce giant say, despite massive robotics and AI investments. Speaking to NewsWire in Japan this week, Amazon's global head of PR for robotics and AI, Xavier Chao, compared AI robots and sorting machines to offices having a coffee machine and snacks close to the desks. 'Retention is very, vitally important for us if we want to continue to manage and sustain our business and grow; we have to retain our workforce,' Mr Chao said. 'And so we think that innovation is part of the solution of creating a nice workplace that attracts people, and retains staff.' Australia has eight Amazon 'fulfilment centre' warehouses; seven of these do not have Amazon's robots. The custom designed and built robots operate using AI, moving stacks of products for humans to pick and put into boxes. Australia's robotised Amazon warehouse is at Kemps Creek in Sydney, and employs about 2500 workers. With Australia's comparatively low-tech Amazon facilities - compared to warehouses in comparable countries - retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots has stalled. In June, Amazon announced it would be investing $20bn in data centres in Australia, reiterating concerns about the e-commerce company's entrenchment in the Australian economy. Anthony Albanese faces internal pressure from high-ranking Labor MPs, The Australian reports, over accusations Amazon undermines labour laws and employs tax avoidance tactics. These criticisms are echoed by unions - the ACTU, TWU and the SDA - who claim Amazon Australia's workplace practices are unethical. Asked if operating in countries with relatively strong workplace protections was tough for Amazon, Mr Chao said 'Right now, what we're really hyper-focused on is can these systems actually benefit our frontline workers, and getting feedback from them'. He argues wide-scale automation is good for workers. 'If we can create the most innovative workplace that we possibly can, we want to try to do three things. 'Safety … Ease - all of us want to have an easier job. 'And then three, it's exposure. So a lot of people who come and work at an Amazon facility, you know, there are people from all walks of life.'
