How language LLMs will lead the India's AI leap
You trust a doctor who speaks your language. You trust a banker who understands your context. So why would you trust an algorithm that doesn't know who you are, where you're from, or what your words mean?
This question is being asked by governments, developers, and communities across the Global South who have seen how powerful large language models (LLMs) can be—and how irrelevant they often are to people who don't speak English or live in Silicon Valley.
In India, the response until now has been BharatGPT. This is a collaboration between startups like CoRover.ai, government-backed platforms like Bhashini, and academic institutions such as the IITs. Its aim is not to chase ChatGPT on global benchmarks. Instead, it hopes to solve problems at home—helping citizens navigate government forms in Hindi, automating railway queries in Tamil, or enabling voice assistants in other regional languages. CoRover has already deployed multilingual chatbots in sectors like railways, insurance, and banking. The value here isn't just in automation. It's in comprehension.
This isn't unique to India. In South Africa, Lelapa AI is working on InkubaLM, a small language model trained in African languages. In Latin America, a consortium is building LatAm GPT, rooted in Spanish, Portuguese, and indigenous dialects. Each of these projects is a rebellion: against invisibility, against standardization, against a worldview where the technology speaks only in one accent.
What's driving this shift? 'Current large language models do not adequately represent the linguistic, cultural, or civic realities of many regions,' says Shrinath V, a Bengaluru-based product coach and Google for Startups mentor. 'As governments begin exploring AI-powered delivery of public services, from education and legal aid to citizen support, they recognize the need for models that reflect local languages, data, and social context. Regional LLMs are being positioned to fill that gap,' he explains.
Manoj Menon, founder of the Singapore-based research firm Twimbit, is on the same page as Shrinath: 'With AI there are several nuances that come into play—how we train them to be contextually relevant for our local, national needs.'
At the heart of it lies something more political: digital sovereignty. Shrinath breaks it down and says, 'Data sovereignty is no longer an abstract idea. Countries don't want to depend on models trained on data they don't control. Indigenous models are a way to retain that control.'
It boils down to geopolitical leverage. Nations that build their own models won't just protect cultural identity—they'll shape trade, diplomacy, and security doctrines in the AI era. 'This is a reasonable argument,' says Menon. 'How we interpret a particular subject or issue depends completely on the context. Hence geo-politics is a significant input. Also the ability to train based on local issues and context.'
Viewed through this lens, the shift underway towards frugal AI is more radical than most people realise. These are models that don't need massive GPUs or high-speed internet. They're lean, nimble, and context-rich. Think of it like this: if ChatGPT is a Tesla on a six-lane highway, BharatGPT is a motorbike designed for rough, narrow roads. Not as flashy. But it gets where it needs to go.
'Most countries will want a say in shaping how AI is adopted, governed, and deployed within a sovereign context,' points out Shrinath. This matters because AI is starting to mediate access to public services—healthcare, legal advice, welfare. And in that context, a model that doesn't understand a citizen's language isn't just ineffective. It's dangerous. It can mislead, it can exclude and it can fail silently.
So yes, Silicon Valley still leads the headlines. But away from the noise, something deeper is unfolding. A shift in who gets to define intelligence, in whose language it speaks and in whose image it is built. Regional AI, says Menon, 'won't go head-on with what is built in Silicon Valley. They will complement it and their opportunity will help AI be more relevant locally.'
These regional AI efforts don't seek applause, they seek agency. They aren't chasing scale, they're chasing significance instead. This revolution is not being televised, it's being trained.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
OpenAI CEO admits he is ‘scared' of using AI
New Delhi: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently admitted that is scared to use 'certain AI stuff' sometimes. Speaking at one of the episodes of Theo Von's podcast 'This Past Weekend', Altman said: 'I get scared sometimes to use certain AI stuff, because I don't know how much personal information I want to put in, because I don't know who's going to have it.' Sam Altman was responding to Von's question on the fast pace of AI development, 'Do you think there should be kind of like a slowing things down?' During the conversation, the OpenAI CEO compared the current competition among AI companies as an 'intense' race not only for commercial domination, but as tool that will echo for generations. He further stated that ChatGPT-maker OpenAI does not move quickly, someone else will, adding that fate of AI could slip out of hands of those most mindful about its social consequences. During the podcast, Altman acknowledged how uncertain the human future is. 'I think all of human history suggests we find a way to put ourselves at the centre of the story and feel really good about it … Even in a world where AI is doing all of this stuff that humans used to do, we are going to find a way in our own telling of the story to feel like the main characters,' he said. Sam Altman also addressed the fear of certain jobs becoming obsolete because of AI. 'How will people survive?' host Von asked. To this, Sam Altman replied: 'AI will create possibilities for individuals to pursue more creative, philosophical, or interpersonal goals.' He said that when everyone can get instant help and knowledge through AI, people can rethink what it means to contribute to society. However, he warned that the shift could be very difficult for those who lose their jobs in the short term.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Pakistan's ally Turkey develops most deadliest 'wrath' bomb, three times more destructive than U.S. MK-84, the name is..., can be dropped from...
Pakistan's ally Turkey develops most deadliest 'wrath' bomb, three times more destructive than U.S. MK-84, the name is..., can be dropped from... With recent conflicts around the world, Turkey is increasingly enhancing its military capabilities in the global arms market. In a major highlight, Turkey has unveiled a new bomb named GAZAP, which means 'Wrath' in English. The bomb was demonstrated publicly for the first time at the IDEF 2025 International Defence Industry Fair. What Is the GAZAP Bomb? Why Is It Making Headlines Worldwide? According to media reports, the GAZAP bomb is not only technologically sophisticated but also very deadly in both design and effect. Turkey has released a video showing the explosion from this bomb, and the footage of the blast has gone viral and captured attention worldwide. Some experts state that this bomb is more lethal than conventional bombs and has tactical importance for modern warfare. With its precision, intensity of explosive work, and level of destruction, it is now a major addition to Turkey's capabilities, which are on the rise. What are the key features of GAZAP (Wrath) bomb? As per Turkish media sources, the GAZAP bomb supposedly weighs about 970 kilograms(2000 pounds) approximately. Once detonated, it explodes around 10,000 specialized lethal fragments that split into 10 separate types of deadly shrapnel and cause tremendous damage. The advanced fragmentation technology alone distinguishes it from conventional bombs and makes it tonally more effective on the battlefield. According to a Daily Sabah report, the GAZAP bomb possesses an extremely destructive capability due to its powerful blast effect and can be deployed from an F-16 fighter jet. Why is GAZAP Considered More Dangerous Than the U.S. MK-84 Bomb? As per Turkish media sources, the GAZAP bomb supposedly weighs about 970 kilograms(2000 pounds) approximately. While speaking to Anadolu Agency (AA), an official said that the bomb, made by Türkiye's National Defense Ministry's research and development (R&D) center disperses 10.16 fragment explosions per meter (3.2 feet) – a remarkable improvement from a fragmentation spread of previous bombs of 3 meters (9.8 feet). It is important to highlight that the MK-84 bomb has been used for decades by NATO and Western military forces. The GAZAP bomb is based on the same platform but is thought to be far superior in terms of fragmentation count, explosive power, and area of effect. Experts believe that this bomb has the potential to give Turkey a major advantage in modern warfare—especially in operations in which both precision strikes and maximum impact are required. The GAZAP bomb is more than a weapon—it's a revolution for Turkey's defense industry. It indicates there is an increasing level of self-sufficiency in the area of military technology. In the years since 2015, Turkey's domestic arms industry has progressed rapidly, and the GAZAP bomb is just one more step in that direction. This development is further expected to decrease Turkey's dependence on foreign defense suppliers as well as considerably increase the strategic military strength of the nation. How will Turkey's development and testing of the GAZAP bomb impact India's security and regional strategic balance? India and Turkey share a complicated and nuanced historical, cultural, and diplomatic relationship. India and Turkey have enjoyed cooperative relations through trade and cultural exchanges, but at the same time, political disagreements have stressed relations between the two. One of the major points of tension between the countries is Turkey's open advocacy for Pakistan, as well as its strong stance on the Kashmir question, which India feels is ultimately a national issue. The disparities have sometimes eclipsed endeavours to improve bilateral relations at times, resulting in a mix of cooperation and controversy in the India-Turkey relationship. Turkey and Pakistan maintain strong military and diplomatic relations, and Turkey has provided Pakistan with a variety of advanced weapons, including Bayraktar TB2 drones and MİLGEM corvette warships. A recent example of this collaboration is the PNS Babur, the latest warship built with Turkish assistance. If Turkey were to provide or export its latest bombs, such as the GAZAP and NEB-2, to Pakistan, Pakistan's military capabilities would be greatly enhanced. These advanced weapons would allow Pakistan to demonstrate greater levels of firepower, precision, and military strategic advantage within its defense portfolio. Such developments would have repercussions for security development in the South Asia region due to geographic sensitivity.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Three years on, AI is prompting IT services companies to cut workforce.
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) will lay off approximately 12,000 employees this fiscal year, as India's biggest private employer adjusts to slowing growth and rising artificial intelligence (AI). The company attributed the decision, which will primarily impact senior and middle-level employees, partly to AI. "TCS is on a journey to become a future-ready organization," a company statement said on Sunday. "This includes strategic initiatives on multiple fronts including investing in new-tech areas, entering new markets, deploying AI at scale for our clients and ourselves, deepening our partnerships, creating next-gen infrastructure and realigning our workforce model. 'As part of this journey, we will also be releasing associates from the organization whose deployment may not be feasible. This will impact about 2% of our global workforce, primarily in the middle and the senior grades, over the course of the year." This would imply that TCS, which ended the June quarter with 613,069 employees, will let go of 12,200 employees. Mint has learnt that TCS has already asked 100 employees in Bengaluru to go over the last fortnight. The TCS job cut comes 30 months after the debut of ChatGPT cast a shadow over the business model of India's IT giants, who employ armies of coders. Just two weeks ago, India's third-largest IT services HCL Technologies Ltd mentioned potential layoffs as automation replaces work done by graduates. 'The impact of AI is eating into the people-heavy services model and forcing the large service providers such as TCS to rebalance their workforces to maintain their profit margins and stay price competitive in a cut-throat market where clients are demanding 20-30% price reductions on deals," said Phil Fersht, chief executive of HFS Research. 'This trend will last for about a year as the leading providers focus on training junior talent to work with AI solutions, and are forced to move on people who will struggle to align with the new AI model we call services-as-software," said Fersht. Meanwhile, fourth-largest Wipro Ltd is planning English competency tests for senior executives. Employees faring poorly in the first-of-its-kind exercise may be put on performance improvement plans, according to three executives privy to the development, stoking fears of potential layoffs. 'Please note that it is mandatory to take the communication assessment and clear it," read an internal email shared with Wipro employees on 19 July and accessed by Mint. 'Not taking the assessment will invite disciplinary action. Not clearing it in one attempt will result in a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)," read Wipro's email. A PIP is often seen as a prelude to termination. An email sent to Wipro seeking a comment went unanswered. At HCL Technologies, it is graduates who are in the crosshairs, unlike TCS and Wipro, where the heat is on middle and senior employees. "Of course, we have had a good amount of people released due to the productivity improvements. Now, not all of them are readily redeployable, because the requirements for some of the entry-level or lower-end skills are being addressed through automation and other elements," CEO C. Vijayakumar told analysts on 14 July. "The training and the redeployment time is longer. Some of them will be redeployed, but for others, it may not be possible. So, some amount of change in the industry is also kind of causing this," said Vijayakumar. HCL did not specify what percentage of workforce would be impacted. An email seeking comment went unanswered. The news of layoffs at TCS, first reported by Moneycontrol on Sunday, has also sparked debate about whether it is due to disruption from AI or the company's underperformance. "This round of layoffs is completely on account of slow growth," a TCS executive said on the condition of anonymity. 'Automation and GenAI cannot be displacing executives with 10 or more years of experience." TCS's under-performance under K. Krithivasan, who took over as CEO on 1 June, 2023, has caused anxiety among senior executives and a few analysts. In the June quarter, the company reported the slowest revenue growth among the top five, reporting a 0.59% sequential revenue decline to $7.42 billion. It's not a one-off either. Between 1 July 2023, and 30 June 2025, TCS achieved a 0.34% compounded quarterly dollar revenue growth, with its revenue increasing from $7.22 billion in the June quarter of 2023 to $7.42 billion in the June quarter of 2025. Infosys, in comparison, achieved a growth of 0.85% during this period, while HCL Technologies achieved 1.29%. For this reason, analysts at Kotak Institutional Equities believe TCS has lost its sheen compared to its peers in recent years. "TCS's relative resilience (ability to bounce back from a shock) versus peers has narrowed compared with the past. Relative competitive advantage has declined," its analysts Kawaljeet Saluja, Sathishkumar S., and Vamshi Krishna wrote on 11 April. 'TCS did not lead growth in the past two years, even when demand was driven by cost take-outs. Performance in developed markets in FY2025 has been poor with a decline in North America," the Kotak note added. Keith Bachman, analyst at BMO Capital Advisors, said AI-related productivity benefits could be meaningful in the 20-30% range over time. "Hence, all services providers will need to 1) gain share and/ or 2) enable and capture new addressable market opportunities to sustain growth. We remain concerned on impact to long-term growth from AI efficiency," wrote Bachman, who was among the first to cite GenAI's threat to IT services firms, on 23 July. Nearly a year after the launch of ChatGPT, Bachman had cautioned, 'First, all IT service providers have adopted new tools or end solutions that caused pressure on billable hours, to include Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and code repositories, amongst other areas. Further, each new tool or solution generates higher efficiency than the previous tools or solutions."
