Pakistan's ally Turkey develops most deadliest 'wrath' bomb, three times more destructive than U.S. MK-84, the name is..., can be dropped from...
With recent conflicts around the world, Turkey is increasingly enhancing its military capabilities in the global arms market. In a major highlight, Turkey has unveiled a new bomb named GAZAP, which means 'Wrath' in English. The bomb was demonstrated publicly for the first time at the IDEF 2025 International Defence Industry Fair. What Is the GAZAP Bomb? Why Is It Making Headlines Worldwide?
According to media reports, the GAZAP bomb is not only technologically sophisticated but also very deadly in both design and effect. Turkey has released a video showing the explosion from this bomb, and the footage of the blast has gone viral and captured attention worldwide.
Some experts state that this bomb is more lethal than conventional bombs and has tactical importance for modern warfare. With its precision, intensity of explosive work, and level of destruction, it is now a major addition to Turkey's capabilities, which are on the rise. What are the key features of GAZAP (Wrath) bomb?
As per Turkish media sources, the GAZAP bomb supposedly weighs about 970 kilograms(2000 pounds) approximately. Once detonated, it explodes around 10,000 specialized lethal fragments that split into 10 separate types of deadly shrapnel and cause tremendous damage. The advanced fragmentation technology alone distinguishes it from conventional bombs and makes it tonally more effective on the battlefield. According to a Daily Sabah report, the GAZAP bomb possesses an extremely destructive capability due to its powerful blast effect and can be deployed from an F-16 fighter jet. Why is GAZAP Considered More Dangerous Than the U.S. MK-84 Bomb?
As per Turkish media sources, the GAZAP bomb supposedly weighs about 970 kilograms(2000 pounds) approximately. While speaking to Anadolu Agency (AA), an official said that the bomb, made by Türkiye's National Defense Ministry's research and development (R&D) center disperses 10.16 fragment explosions per meter (3.2 feet) – a remarkable improvement from a fragmentation spread of previous bombs of 3 meters (9.8 feet).
It is important to highlight that the MK-84 bomb has been used for decades by NATO and Western military forces. The GAZAP bomb is based on the same platform but is thought to be far superior in terms of fragmentation count, explosive power, and area of effect. Experts believe that this bomb has the potential to give Turkey a major advantage in modern warfare—especially in operations in which both precision strikes and maximum impact are required.
The GAZAP bomb is more than a weapon—it's a revolution for Turkey's defense industry. It indicates there is an increasing level of self-sufficiency in the area of military technology. In the years since 2015, Turkey's domestic arms industry has progressed rapidly, and the GAZAP bomb is just one more step in that direction. This development is further expected to decrease Turkey's dependence on foreign defense suppliers as well as considerably increase the strategic military strength of the nation. How will Turkey's development and testing of the GAZAP bomb impact India's security and regional strategic balance?
India and Turkey share a complicated and nuanced historical, cultural, and diplomatic relationship. India and Turkey have enjoyed cooperative relations through trade and cultural exchanges, but at the same time, political disagreements have stressed relations between the two. One of the major points of tension between the countries is Turkey's open advocacy for Pakistan, as well as its strong stance on the Kashmir question, which India feels is ultimately a national issue. The disparities have sometimes eclipsed endeavours to improve bilateral relations at times, resulting in a mix of cooperation and controversy in the India-Turkey relationship.
Turkey and Pakistan maintain strong military and diplomatic relations, and Turkey has provided Pakistan with a variety of advanced weapons, including Bayraktar TB2 drones and MİLGEM corvette warships. A recent example of this collaboration is the PNS Babur, the latest warship built with Turkish assistance.
If Turkey were to provide or export its latest bombs, such as the GAZAP and NEB-2, to Pakistan, Pakistan's military capabilities would be greatly enhanced. These advanced weapons would allow Pakistan to demonstrate greater levels of firepower, precision, and military strategic advantage within its defense portfolio. Such developments would have repercussions for security development in the South Asia region due to geographic sensitivity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
19 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
With great AI power comes great skilling responsibility
There was a time when power meant scale. Armies, empires, institutions. Today, a single person with a laptop and internet access can move markets, generate headlines, influence public discourse, or build tools that touch millions of lives. With AI, that power is multiplying fast. AI (Representational Image)(Pixabay) We are now in a world where one person's skill can ripple through entire systems. A line of code, a prompt, or an automation script can decide who gets a loan, how a company is run, or how a generation learns to think. This is not science fiction. It is the present. The question is no longer whether AI will change the world. It already is. The real question is who will shape that change. That answer begins with how we skill people. Just like AI needs quality training data, people need quality thinking. AI skilling has often been treated as a technical milestone. Learning how to write better prompts, use a new model, or automate a repetitive task. All of that is useful. But if that is where it stops, we are missing the bigger picture. The people who use AI are not just executing tasks. They are making choices. They decide what gets automated, what is left out, and who is affected. And if they do not have the right awareness, even good intentions can lead to harm. This is why we need a different kind of skilling. One that builds judgment, not just speed. One that encourages people to ask: Should I be doing this? Do I understand how this model was trained? What happens if it gets something wrong? These are not technical questions. They are questions of intent. They come from reflection, from exposure, from learning to pause before building. And India, in particular, cannot afford to get this wrong. We have the world's largest youth population, a fast-growing digital economy, and an enormous appetite for AI and automation. But scale alone does not create readiness. Not if we are teaching people how to use tools without helping them understand the weight of what they are creating. This is not just about job-readiness. It is about decision-readiness. Consider a chatbot trained to give mental health advice. It is launched in a regional language, without oversight. One day, it gives dangerous advice to someone in distress. Not because of bad intent, but because no one tested it well enough. Or a resume screening tool built on data from a single metro. It starts excluding candidates from smaller towns, different backgrounds, or non-English-speaking schools. Quietly. Repeatedly. Or a deepfake tool used for a prank. A video goes viral. Reputations are damaged. Lives are affected. And the person behind it does not understand what line they crossed. These are not failures of code. They are failures of context. And they could have been prevented with better skilling. Not just technical training, but education that includes ethics, systems thinking, real-world exposure, and long-term consequences. This is India's opportunity. We already have the numbers. What we need is a generation that understands the responsibility that comes with building and using AI. A generation that is not just AI-literate, but AI-conscious. We often wonder if humans can keep up with AI. But maybe the more urgent question is whether our judgment can grow fast enough to use AI well. Because the tools will keep getting smarter. They will get cheaper. They will spread faster than anyone expects. But what they end up doing will still depend on the people behind them. Skilling, in this moment, is not just about employment. It is about values. It is not just an economic need. It is a civic one. And how we teach, what we teach, will define far more than who gets hired next. This article is authored by Raghav Gupta, founder, Futurense.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
'Anonymity is a mirage,' says Asmongold, backing 'gov authentication token' as platforms adopt ID checks
(Image via YouTube/Asmongold TV) Popular streamer and commentator Zack 'Asmongold' Hoyt sparked a debate with his recent take on online identity verification. As per his argument, true anonymity is just an illusion. This comment comes at a time when some of the major platforms like YouTube, Spotify, and others are implementing strict age verification checks that would require government IDs. The popular streamer has argued that the trend is just unstoppable, and it's better to have specific safeguards for protecting user privacy from corporations. Asmongold and his take on the digital world's anonymity — Asmongold (@Asmongold) It's contended by Asmongold that, for internet users overwhelming majority, the idea of complete anonymity is a 'mirage.' He pointed out that individuals are already surrendering their significant personal information to the Internet Service Providers (ISPs). Quite crucially, he has emphasized that ISPs are obligated legally to comply with the government subpoenas, and have to hand over the user data, as and when it's required; as this is the law. Asmongold even believes that resistance to ID verification is just futile, and it's an inevitable shift. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo Asmongold argued that private companies hold a large amount of sensitive ID data, and this creates unacceptable risk. He even cited some high-profile data breaches. So, instead of the platforms directly handling the passports or driver licences, Asmongold believes a 'government authentication token' system is the best solution here. The token, while verifying all necessary details like citizenship or age, doesn't expose the full public records or identity of the user to the platform itself. As stressed by him, 'what isn't inevitable' is 'private companies having access to our public records.' Asmongold's take on ID-based age-check system was not accepted well I'm very concerned The stance of the streamer has sparked controversy and reactions. While some users do agree with the anonymity assessment and see value in accountability, particularly for combating bots and protecting minors, there are many who do not think it is the solution. While the supporters of the stance believe, internet ID will start holding people accountable for the things they would never say or even do in their real life. The opposition centers upon the distrust of government overreach. They believe one cannot trust the government, and they are really worried about the future where such ID checks will be the reality for them all. Supporting critics, even Elon Musk ensured not to stand back. His comments read, 'Government is MUCH worse than any corporation or you don't understand government. Government is simply the most powerful corporation and with a monopoly on violence.' Standing up with the words of the X owner, many users stood up. A user in this regard commented, 'Corporation can do whatever it wants unlike government. There are no next elections in corporation. No democracy. Only bosses.' While the other said, 'You're kidding, right? Corporations are some of the most corrupt entities on the planet right now. At least we can hold politicians accountable.' '100%. SpaceX can never force me to buy a rocket. Amazon can never force me to buy a package. Apple can never force me to buy a phone. Government daily forces me to spend in ways that are actively harmful. Bloated Government is the real threat,' said another. A user even went ahead to mention it loud and clear that soon Asmongold, who think he's above the law, too will be 'subpoenaed to explain why you continued a Twitter algorithm psyop, tried to get Trump to give you freebies and started political wars with your salacious and intentional EPSTEIN rumors when you didn't get what you demanded — which also greatly added to the debt you complain so much about. YOUR monopoly is the problem. 👇' A user openly declared, "We're not going to comply, period." With all being said and done, critics fear that such systems would enable constant surveillance and censorship, irrespective of the proposed token model. As for the debate that got started after Asmongold's take, it shows deep divides on the concerns over security, privacy and online interaction in the future. What is the future of internet verification? With governments like Australia and the UK enforcing strict ID checks, the prediction of Asmongold might soon be a reality. The only question that remains is, should verification be handled by the government, corporations or any neutral third-party? With the discussion evolving, the one thing that remains clear is that online anonymity, which we know and enjoy today, is soon going to fade away. So, it's better to be prepared for what's coming ahead. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Best of Both Sides: TCS lay-offs are worrying but India's IT story isn't over yet
From the printing press to the steam engine, from electricity to the internet, every wave of technology has made societies fret and question old certainties, rethink economic models and invent new financial and social ideas. Yet through every industrial revolution, humans adapted, adopted and ultimately thrived. Today's AI wave is different in its speed and breadth, and disruptions like it will become the norm in this century. For decades, the Indian IT-ITeS sector has been the ladder to the middle class and above, a steady recruiter of young graduates, a constant on equities markets and a quiet assertion of India's competence on the global stage. Yet, its traditional pyramid model of mass entry-level hiring is giving way to a diamond-shaped structure built around mid-level specialists and deeper expertise. Since TCS announced plans to lay off up to 12,000 employees, the anxiety has been palpable. While TCS cites skill mismatch and denies AI is the cause, Infosys is instead doubling down on campus hiring and retraining over two lakh staff in AI and cloud. What it really signals is that the first moat the industry built — cost, process discipline and scale — has served its purpose and is now being overtaken by new forces, especially AI. Yet, the sector does not face this transition empty-handed. Decades of serving demanding global clients have given Indian IT some of the highest corporate governance standards among emerging markets, and competitive ability to navigate complex business demands worldwide. The real question is whether they can now build a second moat: Wider, deeper and harder to breach, based on skill, IP and product leadership. To see why this is not a simple story of decline, it helps to look back. The IT-ITES industry became a global force by offering reliable, standardised services at a fraction of global cost, powered by an English-speaking coding and software talent pool and disciplined delivery. Even before AI's surge, this model had begun to plateau. Net hiring slowed, global clients shifted from volume to value, and industry starting salaries barely changed over a decade. The arrival of commercially usable AI has simply made the need for reinvention impossible to ignore. It is, in a way, like the moment every Indian child knows too well: When the report card brings home bad marks, and a tough conversation with parents becomes the trigger to study harder for the next quarterly exam. AI need not kill the Indian tech sector. Global demand is rising for cybersecurity specialists, AI operations experts, data engineers and cloud architects. These roles will not hire tens of thousands of freshers each year, but they will pay better, demand deeper expertise and be harder to automate. Instead, by embedding AI literacy (right from middle school) and advanced skills across its workforce, the industry can go beyond cost arbitrage and build higher-value, globally respected services. This evolution comes with trade-offs. Not everyone in today's workforce can be retrained for specialised roles, which is exactly what TCS has boldly announced. It is neither practical nor wise to force companies to keep every worker purely as a political or policy gesture. These firms are accountable to shareholders, and long-term strength will come from better returns through innovation. So what must India do next? First, we must stop measuring the sector's health purely by the number of freshers it hires. The signs of resilience will now be revenue per employee, the share of digital and consulting in revenue and the creation of home-grown intellectual property. Second, remember that the sector has rebuilt itself before. From Y2K to ERP, from outsourcing to digital, Indian IT has pivoted repeatedly. What makes AI different is the speed and depth of its impact. This time, it will test whether industry, academia and policy can move together. Now is the time to invest at scale in skill transformation. This means completely redesigning curricula right from middle school to higher graduate degrees, especially across AI, cybersecurity, chip design and data engineering; funding industry-aligned research; and making lifelong learning real. We need genuine co-creation (and not just collaboration) between industry and academia, teaching problem-solving and interdisciplinary thinking. There is little sense in building new education campuses if what is taught inside is outdated. And both the Union and state governments must see the merit in the National Education Policy not as a political contest, but as a chance to modernise upskilling and multi-skilling at scale. The goal must be to help the next generation become global citizens, fluent in technology and resilient across domains. India's demographic dividend still exists, though not forever. AI will reshape the global economy whether we wish it or not. India already enjoys a reputation as a disciplined, trusted technology hub. It is a strength we can extend to AI by investing in agile regulations on data and ethics, and positioning ourselves as a global centre for 'responsible AI'. The writer is a corporate advisor and author of Family and Dhanda
