&w=3840&q=100)
TCS announces leadership rejig with a focus on AI-first transformation
As part of this transformation, the company appointed Janardhan Santhanam as the chief information officer (CIO) with effect from July 1, 2025. Sanathanam will be reporting to the chief operating officer (COO) Aarthi Subramanian.
The company added that Krishnakanth Narayanrao, who heads Ultimatix, will report to Sanathanam. Ultimatix is an internal platform that caters to TCS employees to access various resources and services.
'The AI-first transformation of TCS is as much about culture as it is about technology. This will require exceptional collaboration across functions and groups, and active participation from each one of you,' wrote K Krithivasan, CEO and MD, TCS in an internal email to employees announcing these changes. The email has been seen by Business Standard.
Sanathanam has been with TCS for 25 years, and brings deep experience across technology, delivery, domain and talent development.
'The opportunities to leverage AI to reimagine various aspects of our operations are immense. We must now look at how we can leverage AI technologies to achieve greater efficiency, improve employee experience, and enhance customer engagement. Our goal will be to make TCS the best showcase of what can be achieved with AI,' he said.
TCS also announced the elevation of Sreenivasa Chakravarti as the head of IoT and Digital Engineering Services with effect from July 1, 2025. He takes this role over from Regu Ayyaswamy who retires from TCS on September 30, 2025. Chakravarti will also report to COO Subramanian.
Chakravarti has been part of the IoT-DE unit and has been responsible for sales, delivery & operations for the last two years. Ayyaswamy will be mentoring and supporting Chakravarti over the next quarter, said the email addressed to employees by Subramanian.
These leadership changes are in lieu with the focus on AI, data and cloud along with security and enterprise solutions. A few months back the company also announced the appointment of a COO and a chief strategy officer.
TCS will be announcing its first quarter FY26 results on July 10. The company closed FY25 with revenue of ₹255,342 crore. It crossed the $30 billion revenue milestone. The order book TCV for FY25 was at $39.2 billion.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Samsung share price dips: Earnings miss to Trump tariffs — key reasons behind the fall explained
Samsung share price: Samsung Electronics' share price declined in trade on Tuesday after the company delivered an earnings shock, projecting a 56% drop in its second-quarter operating profit, dented by US curbs on China and delays in supplying high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips to key US customer Nvidia. Additionally, US President Donald Trump levied a 25% tariff on South Korea, further clouding the outlook for the stock. Samsung, one of the world's largest makers of memory chips, reported a preliminary operating profit of 4.6 trillion won in the June quarter — the company's lowest since 2023 and short of analysts' projections, as per a Bloomberg report. The revenue was flat at 74 trillion won. The company will provide a full financial statement with net income and divisional breakdowns later this month. Samsung reported a drop in profit after its foundry division, partly dependent on Chinese demand, incurred a one-time inventory charge for unsold AI chips. The company also noted a decline in utilisation rates, explaining the weaker-than-expected performance in an unusual statement. However, Samsung expects operating losses in its contract chipmaking business to narrow in the second half of the year, citing a gradual recovery in demand. Samsung lost its leadership in the AI market to rival SK Hynix Inc. Its longstanding rival — along with Micron Technology Inc. — now sells more of the cutting-edge high-bandwidth memory chips paired with Nvidia Corp.'s AI accelerators, the Bloomberg report said. What's worse, the problem for Samsung has been compounded by the US restrictions on tech exports to China, thus slowing a turnaround in its chipmaking operation. "Samsung's operating profit dropped by a sharper-than-expected 56% due to inventory write-downs triggered by US export restrictions on AI chips destined for China. Trump's tariff policy had a significant impact on the company's performance," said capital market expert Anuj Gupta. He said that given growing macroeconomic uncertainties due to recent global trade tensions and slowing global economic growth, it is difficult to predict future performance. Due to the festival season in India, we expect its performance to improve in the second half of the year and expect an increase in demand growth, Gupta added. Samsung share price declined over 1% to 61,000 KRW from its last closing price of 61,700 KRW. "Last year, prices corrected by 32.23%. Currently, it has strong resistance at 65000krw and support at 57300krw. We are expecting the price to go down. Traders can use buy-on dips as prices are traded in an oversold zone," Gupta advised. Meanwhile, Anshul Jain, Head of Research at Lakshmishree Investments said that Samsung Electronics' share price has been trading in a wide 240-week range between 85,000 and 49,000 South Korean Won (KRW), recently rejecting the lower end of this range and forming a promising double bottom setup. This, he said, signals a potential preemptive reversal with a solid base. "A sustained move above 62,000 KRW per share will likely propel the stock towards 71,000 KRW apiece, and if momentum persists, a test of 85,000 KRW per share could be in sight. The substantial accumulation at the range lows suggests buyers are defending this zone aggressively. Only a close below 48,000 KRW per share can damage this structure, which currently looks unlikely given the price," Jain opined. (With inputs from agencies) Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Samsung to buy US healthcare services company Xealth
Samsung Electronics said on Tuesday it had signed an agreement to acquire Xealth, a U.S.-based healthcare platform, as part of its efforts to expand its mobile healthcare services business. The South Korean company did not disclose the value of the transaction. Samsung said the two companies hoped to create "synergy between Samsung's advanced wearable technology and Xealth's digital health platform " which runs digital health programs and manages data linking care providers, including more than 500 U.S. hospitals, with their patients. The acquisition comes as Samsung steps up efforts to diversify beyond its core semiconductor and smartphone businesses. Samsung has been betting on the medical sector as one of its new growth engines, along with consumer audio, cooling and heating systems, and robotics. In May, Samsung Electronics agreed to buy Germany's FlaktGroup for 1.5 billion euros ($1.68 billion) as it looks to meet growing demand for cooling of data centres used for artificial intelligence projects. Live Events Samsung, led by Chairman Jay Y. Lee, said at a shareholder meeting in March that it was looking for "meaningful" deals this year to drive growth after having lagged rivals in tapping the AI chip boom led by Nvidia. Samsung earlier on Tuesday projected a far worse-than- expected 56% plunge in second-quarter operating profit due to weak AI chip sales, deepening investor concerns over the tech giant's ability to revive its struggling semiconductor business .


Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Beware the market risk of AI-guided investment gaining mass popularity
As artificial intelligence (AI) expands its role in the financial world, regulators are confronted by the rise of new risks. It is a sign of a growing AI appetite among retail investors in India's stock market that the popular online trading platform Zerodha offers its users access to AI advice. It has deployed an open-source framework that can be used to obtain the counsel of Anthropic's Claude AI on how one could rejig one's stock portfolio, for example, to meet specified aims. Once set up, this AI tool can scan and study the user's holdings before responding to 'prompts' on the basis of its analysis. Something as general as 'How can I make my portfolio less risky?" will make it crunch risk metrics and spout suggestions far quicker than a human advisor would. One could even ask for specific stocks to buy that would maximize returns over a given time horizon. It may not be long before such tools gain sufficient popularity for them to play investment whisperers of the AI age. A recent consultation paper by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi)—which requires AI advisors to abide by Indian rules of investment advice and protect investor privacy—outlines a clear set of principles for the use of AI. Also Read: Siddharth Pai: India's IT firms have a unique opportunity in AI's trust deficit The legitimacy of such AI tools is not in doubt. Since the technology exists, we are at liberty to use it. And how useful they prove is for users to determine. In that context, Zerodha's move to arm its users with AI is clearly innovative. As for the competition posed by AI to human advisors, that too comes with the turf. Machines can do complex calculations much faster than we can and that's that. Of course, the standard caveat of investing applies: users take the advice of any chatbot at their own risk. Yet, it would serve us well to dwell on this aspect. While we could assume that AI models have absorbed most of what there is to know about financial markets, given how they are reputed to have devoured the internet, it is also clear that they are not infallible. For all their claims to accuracy, chatbots are found to 'hallucinate' (or make up 'facts') and misread queries without making an effort to get clarity. Even more unsettling is their inherent amorality. Tests have found that some AI models can behave in ways that would be scandalous if they were human; unless they are explicitly told to operate within a given set of rules, they may potentially overlook them to achieve their prompted goals. Asked to 'maximize profit," an AI bot might propose a path that runs rings around ethical precepts. Also Read: AI privacy paradox: Is India's Digital Personal Data Protection law ready for the chatbot revolution? Sebi's paper speaks of tests and audits, but are we really in a position to detect if an AI tool has begun to play fast and loose with market rules? Should AI advisors gain influence over millions of retail investors, they could conceivably combine it with their market overview to reach positions of power that would need tight regulatory oversight. If their analysis breaches privacy norms to draw upon the personal data of users, collusive strategies could plausibly be crafted that venture into market manipulation. AI toolmakers may claim to have made rule-compliant tools, but they must demonstrably minimize risks at their very source. Also Read: AI didn't take the job. It changed what the job is. For one, their bots should be fully up-to-date on the rulebooks of major markets like ours. For another, since we cannot expect retail users to include rule adherence in their prompts, AI tools should verifiably be preset to comply with the rules no matter what they're asked. Vitally, advisory tools must keep all user data confidential. AI holds promise as an aid, no doubt, but it mustn't blow it.