&w=3840&q=100)
Independent report flagged misuse of studies before SO2 rollback nod
In an analysis released last month, the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) alleged that studies by institutions such as NEERI, NIAS and IIT Delhi were being "selectively used to justify inaction" by power plants across the country, which continue to delay the installation of flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) units to control SO2?? emissions -- a major air pollutant.
India established stringent sulphur dioxide emission standards for coal-based power plants in December 2015, requiring compliance within two years.
Even after multiple extensions, 92 per cent of coal-fired power plants have not yet installed flue gas desulphurization units to control SO2 emissions, a major air pollutant that converts into fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and causes a range of diseases.
In a notification dated July 11, the environment ministry again extended the SO2 compliance deadline for coal-based power plants located within 10 km of the National Capital Region or cities with over one million population from December 2024 to December 2027.
Plants in critically polluted or non-attainment areas will now be assessed on a case-by-case basis, while those located elsewhere have been fully exempted, provided they meet stack height criteria.
Of around 600 thermal power units in India, 462 are Category C units and 72 are Category B units.
The ministry cited "many studies" as one of the reasons for this move, along with techno-economic concerns, COVID-related delays and a recommendation from the Ministry of Power.
CREA's report, titled "From scientific evidence to excuses", countered this reasoning and said: "What is worse, studies by institutions like NEERI, NIAS, and IIT Delhi (2022 and 2024) are now being selectively used to justify this inaction, citing low SO2 levels or small CO2 increases to argue that FGDs are unnecessary. These arguments simply don't hold up." CREA said NEERI's assertion that ambient SO2 levels are already low is "highly misleading".
"The air quality monitoring stations (CAAQMS) do not capture the real impact of power plant pollution because they do not track whether emissions drift upwind or downwind and they certainly do not account for chemical reactions that convert SO2 into other pollutants like PM2.5. Just because the station reading is low ambient SO2 does not mean the plant is not polluting," the report said.
It said that SO2 emission norms and the requirement to install FGDs are based on stack emissions, not on ambient SO2 levels. "Using low ambient readings to argue against FGD is not just scientifically wrong, it completely misleads how pollution control works".
Ironically, CREA noted, the NEERI report being used to question the utility of FGDs had itself acknowledged, "if a flue gas desulfurization technique is installed to reduce sulphur emissions from thermal power stations, it will reduce a part of it, and the overall reduction in ambient air PM will be at most 20 micrograms per cubic metre." CREA said that this would translate to a 20 per cent reduction in cities where PM2.5 levels are around 100-120 micrograms per cubic metre.
Similarly, the 2022 IIT Delhi report concluded that "with the implementation of FGD in the Vindhyachal TPP, we can expect to see a decrease in the monthly mean surface concentrations of sulfate aerosols in the range of 10-15 per cent of the climatological values at certain places as far as 100 km from the location of this TPP".
The IIT Delhi report added: "Significant decreases in sulfate aerosol concentrations are also observed as far as 200 km from the TPP".
CREA noted that despite these findings, a 2024 IIT Delhi report narrowed its scope to six cities and recommended halting FGD rollout in plants that have yet to adopt it.
The analysis also highlighted that "coal-fired power plants led to 47,000 deaths in 2014; 62,000 deaths in 2017 and 78,000 deaths in 2018", and warned that "it is very likely that the health impacts would be much worse than what is being estimated now" as India plans to add 80-100 GW of new coal-fired capacity.
A NIAS report previously estimated that full FGD implementation would add "approximately 23 million tonnes of CO2 by 2030, which is just 0.9 per cent of India's total CO2 emissions in 2020".
CREA said it is comparable to "the output of a single coal-based power plant with over 3 GW capacity".
The analysis added that "the irony lies in the fact that while this marginal CO2 increase by FGD is criticised, plans to build an additional 80 to 100 GW of coal capacity, which would result in far greater CO2 emissions, are not questioned with the same urgency".
On the claim that FGD installations cause prolonged shutdowns, CREA said: "NTPC RTI data shows that most FGDs were fitted during regular maintenance, with no additional shutdown period." NTPC, it added, had already installed FGDs in plants with 20 GW capacity and had another 47 GW under construction.
CREA said the latest studies by IIT Delhi and IIT Bombay confirmed that "power plants are a leading cause of India's air pollution", contributing up to 12 per cent of PM2.5 during winter and 16 per cent of cross-boundary urban pollution.
It added that this level of contribution is "on par with the vehicle sector, where the country went through a national initiative to switch to BSVI many years before".
"Since emissions from coal-fired power plants have long-range impacts, affecting air quality at the national level, FGD installation should be mandatory across India, regardless of plant location," the research organization said.
FGDs are a critical, life-saving tool that India should have deployed years ago. Every delay means "more lives lost, more children breathing toxic air, and more communities suffering from preventable disease", it cautioned.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
Studies misused to justify SO2 rollback, independent report warned ahead of govt exemption
Before India significantly relaxed sulphur dioxide (SO2) emission control norms exempting a large number of coal-fired power plants, an independent analysis had warned that key scientific studies being cited to justify the move were riddled with contradictions and risked undermining public health. The deadly impact of air pollution In an analysis released last month, the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) alleged that studies by institutions such as NEERI, NIAS and IIT Delhi were being "selectively used to justify inaction" by power plants across the country, which continue to delay the installation of flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) units to control SO2 emissions -- a major air pollutant. India established stringent sulphur dioxide emission standards for coal-based power plants in December 2015, requiring compliance within two years. Even after multiple extensions, 92 per cent of coal-fired power plants have not yet installed flue gas desulphurization units to control SO2 emissions, a major air pollutant that converts into fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and causes a range of diseases. In a notification dated July 11, the environment ministry again extended the SO2 compliance deadline for coal-based power plants located within 10 km of the National Capital Region or cities with over one million population from December 2024 to December 2027. Plants in critically polluted or non-attainment areas will now be assessed on a case-by-case basis, while those located elsewhere have been fully exempted, provided they meet stack height criteria. Of around 600 thermal power units in India, 462 are Category C units and 72 are Category B units. The ministry cited "many studies" as one of the reasons for this move, along with techno-economic concerns, COVID-related delays and a recommendation from the Ministry of Power. SO2 ambient levels and FGDs CREA's report, titled "From scientific evidence to excuses", countered this reasoning and said: "What is worse, studies by institutions like NEERI, NIAS, and IIT Delhi (2022 and 2024) are now being selectively used to justify this inaction, citing low SO2 levels or small CO2 increases to argue that FGDs are unnecessary. These arguments simply don't hold up." CREA said NEERI's assertion that ambient SO2 levels are already low is "highly misleading". "The air quality monitoring stations (CAAQMS) do not capture the real impact of power plant pollution because they do not track whether emissions drift upwind or downwind and they certainly do not account for chemical reactions that convert SO2 into other pollutants like PM2.5. Just because the station reading is low ambient SO2 does not mean the plant is not polluting," the report said. It said that SO2 emission norms and the requirement to install FGDs are based on stack emissions, not on ambient SO2 levels. "Using low ambient readings to argue against FGD is not just scientifically wrong, it completely misleads how pollution control works". Ironically, CREA noted, the NEERI report being used to question the utility of FGDs had itself acknowledged, "if a flue gas desulfurization technique is installed to reduce sulphur emissions from thermal power stations, it will reduce a part of it, and the overall reduction in ambient air PM will be at most 20 micrograms per cubic metre." CREA said that this would translate to a 20 per cent reduction in cities where PM2.5 levels are around 100-120 micrograms per cubic metre. Similarly, the 2022 IIT Delhi report concluded that "with the implementation of FGD in the Vindhyachal TPP, we can expect to see a decrease in the monthly mean surface concentrations of sulfate aerosols in the range of 10-15 per cent of the climatological values at certain places as far as 100 km from the location of this TPP". The IIT Delhi report added: "Significant decreases in sulfate aerosol concentrations are also observed as far as 200 km from the TPP". CREA noted that despite these findings, a 2024 IIT Delhi report narrowed its scope to six cities and recommended halting FGD rollout in plants that have yet to adopt it. Health and environment impacts The analysis also highlighted that "coal-fired power plants led to 47,000 deaths in 2014; 62,000 deaths in 2017 and 78,000 deaths in 2018", and warned that "it is very likely that the health impacts would be much worse than what is being estimated now" as India plans to add 80-100 GW of new coal-fired capacity. A NIAS report previously estimated that full FGD implementation would add "approximately 23 million tonnes of CO2 by 2030, which is just 0.9 per cent of India's total CO2 emissions in 2020". CREA said it is comparable to "the output of a single coal-based power plant with over 3 GW capacity". The analysis added that "the irony lies in the fact that while this marginal CO2 increase by FGD is criticised, plans to build an additional 80 to 100 GW of coal capacity, which would result in far greater CO2 emissions, are not questioned with the same urgency". On the claim that FGD installations cause prolonged shutdowns, CREA said: "NTPC RTI data shows that most FGDs were fitted during regular maintenance, with no additional shutdown period." NTPC, it added, had already installed FGDs in plants with 20 GW capacity and had another 47 GW under construction. CREA said the latest studies by IIT Delhi and IIT Bombay confirmed that "power plants are a leading cause of India's air pollution", contributing up to 12 per cent of PM2.5 during winter and 16 per cent of cross-boundary urban pollution. It added that this level of contribution is "on par with the vehicle sector, where the country went through a national initiative to switch to BSVI many years before". "Since emissions from coal-fired power plants have long-range impacts, affecting air quality at the national level, FGD installation should be mandatory across India, regardless of plant location," the research organisation said. FGDs are a critical, life-saving tool that India should have deployed years ago. Every delay means "more lives lost, more children breathing toxic air, and more communities suffering from preventable disease", it cautioned.
The Hindu
11 hours ago
- The Hindu
Facial, speech problems among after-effects of mucormycosis post recovery: ICMR study
People who suffered from mucormycosis and recovered continue to battle long-term health effects of the fungal infection, such as facial disfigurement and speech difficulty, found an ICMR study. There was an uptick in cases of mucormycosis, a rare infection also known as 'Black Fungus', during the COVID-19 pandemic. Published last month in Clinical Microbiology and Infection, a leading microbiology journal, the study found that 14.7 per cent of 686 hospitalised mucormycosis patients died within a year, with most deaths occurring during initial hospitalisation. Critical predictors of poor survival included involvement of the brain or eyes, intensive care admission, poor glycaemic control, and comorbid conditions. Conversely, patients who received both surgical treatment and combination antifungal therapy (particularly Amphotericin-B formulations with Posaconazole) had significantly higher survival rates, said Dr Rizwan Suliankatchi Abdulkader, from ICMR's National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), the lead author of the study. "But survivors often faced disfigurement and psychological distress, with more than 70 per cent reporting at least one clinical sequela (complication or disability) and a substantial proportion experiencing loss of employment," Rizwan said. 'These are not abstract complications. Facial disfigurement, impaired speech, anxiety, and loss of livelihood are lived realities for many survivors. It is time for India to move beyond life-saving interventions and focus on life-restoring systems of care, including mental health support and rehabilitation,' he said. Led by Rizwan and the All-India Mucormycosis Consortium, the study assessed survival, treatment outcomes, and post-recovery quality of life among hospitalised patients in India. This large-scale study, covering 686 patients from 26 tertiary hospitals across the country, is the first of its kind to offer long-term, prospective data on this critical public health concern. As a part of the study, 686 patients who had contracted mucormycosis between March and July 2021 were followed up for one year. Of the 686, 80 per cent (549) also had COVID-19. The prevalence of mucormycosis varies significantly, from 0.01 to 2 cases per million in developed countries to 140 cases per million in India and similar nations, with incidence approximately 80 times higher in India. Despite advances in medical care, mucormycosis remains a highly lethal and debilitating condition. 'This study reinforces the pressing need to ensure access to timely diagnosis, surgical interventions, and combination antifungal therapy in all parts of India," said Dr Manoj Murhekar, Director of Chennai-based ICMR-NIE. "We cannot overstate how essential high-quality, multidisciplinary care is for patients battling mucormycosis, especially given the irreversible complications they face if treatment is delayed," said Murhekar, a senior author of the study. Spanning the length and breadth of India, the study involved institutions from nearly every region, capturing a diverse and realistic picture of mucormycosis management in both urban and rural populations. Rizwan stressed, 'This is not just a story of numbers. Behind every data point is a person who struggled with pain, disfigurement, and long-term disability. Our duty as clinicians and public health professionals is to reduce not just mortality but also the suffering that comes with survival. "India has a disproportionately high burden of this disease. Our health systems must be better prepared.' The research comes at a time when India is still grappling with the long-term fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, during which mucormycosis surged dramatically. As the global community turns its attention to pandemic preparedness and health system resilience, the study serves as a sobering reminder of the challenges posed by neglected fungal diseases. 'We hope our findings will serve as a call to action for policymakers, hospital administrators, and clinicians. Mucormycosis is not just a complication of COVID-19. It is a disease that demands long-term clinical attention, public health surveillance, and above all, compassion in care," Rizwan said.
Business Standard
19 hours ago
- Business Standard
Independent report flagged misuse of studies before SO2 rollback nod
Before India significantly relaxed sulphur dioxide (SO2) emission control norms exempting a large number of coal-fired power plants, an independent analysis had warned that key scientific studies being cited to justify the move were riddled with contradictions and risked undermining public health. In an analysis released last month, the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA) alleged that studies by institutions such as NEERI, NIAS and IIT Delhi were being "selectively used to justify inaction" by power plants across the country, which continue to delay the installation of flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) units to control SO2?? emissions -- a major air pollutant. India established stringent sulphur dioxide emission standards for coal-based power plants in December 2015, requiring compliance within two years. Even after multiple extensions, 92 per cent of coal-fired power plants have not yet installed flue gas desulphurization units to control SO2 emissions, a major air pollutant that converts into fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and causes a range of diseases. In a notification dated July 11, the environment ministry again extended the SO2 compliance deadline for coal-based power plants located within 10 km of the National Capital Region or cities with over one million population from December 2024 to December 2027. Plants in critically polluted or non-attainment areas will now be assessed on a case-by-case basis, while those located elsewhere have been fully exempted, provided they meet stack height criteria. Of around 600 thermal power units in India, 462 are Category C units and 72 are Category B units. The ministry cited "many studies" as one of the reasons for this move, along with techno-economic concerns, COVID-related delays and a recommendation from the Ministry of Power. CREA's report, titled "From scientific evidence to excuses", countered this reasoning and said: "What is worse, studies by institutions like NEERI, NIAS, and IIT Delhi (2022 and 2024) are now being selectively used to justify this inaction, citing low SO2 levels or small CO2 increases to argue that FGDs are unnecessary. These arguments simply don't hold up." CREA said NEERI's assertion that ambient SO2 levels are already low is "highly misleading". "The air quality monitoring stations (CAAQMS) do not capture the real impact of power plant pollution because they do not track whether emissions drift upwind or downwind and they certainly do not account for chemical reactions that convert SO2 into other pollutants like PM2.5. Just because the station reading is low ambient SO2 does not mean the plant is not polluting," the report said. It said that SO2 emission norms and the requirement to install FGDs are based on stack emissions, not on ambient SO2 levels. "Using low ambient readings to argue against FGD is not just scientifically wrong, it completely misleads how pollution control works". Ironically, CREA noted, the NEERI report being used to question the utility of FGDs had itself acknowledged, "if a flue gas desulfurization technique is installed to reduce sulphur emissions from thermal power stations, it will reduce a part of it, and the overall reduction in ambient air PM will be at most 20 micrograms per cubic metre." CREA said that this would translate to a 20 per cent reduction in cities where PM2.5 levels are around 100-120 micrograms per cubic metre. Similarly, the 2022 IIT Delhi report concluded that "with the implementation of FGD in the Vindhyachal TPP, we can expect to see a decrease in the monthly mean surface concentrations of sulfate aerosols in the range of 10-15 per cent of the climatological values at certain places as far as 100 km from the location of this TPP". The IIT Delhi report added: "Significant decreases in sulfate aerosol concentrations are also observed as far as 200 km from the TPP". CREA noted that despite these findings, a 2024 IIT Delhi report narrowed its scope to six cities and recommended halting FGD rollout in plants that have yet to adopt it. The analysis also highlighted that "coal-fired power plants led to 47,000 deaths in 2014; 62,000 deaths in 2017 and 78,000 deaths in 2018", and warned that "it is very likely that the health impacts would be much worse than what is being estimated now" as India plans to add 80-100 GW of new coal-fired capacity. A NIAS report previously estimated that full FGD implementation would add "approximately 23 million tonnes of CO2 by 2030, which is just 0.9 per cent of India's total CO2 emissions in 2020". CREA said it is comparable to "the output of a single coal-based power plant with over 3 GW capacity". The analysis added that "the irony lies in the fact that while this marginal CO2 increase by FGD is criticised, plans to build an additional 80 to 100 GW of coal capacity, which would result in far greater CO2 emissions, are not questioned with the same urgency". On the claim that FGD installations cause prolonged shutdowns, CREA said: "NTPC RTI data shows that most FGDs were fitted during regular maintenance, with no additional shutdown period." NTPC, it added, had already installed FGDs in plants with 20 GW capacity and had another 47 GW under construction. CREA said the latest studies by IIT Delhi and IIT Bombay confirmed that "power plants are a leading cause of India's air pollution", contributing up to 12 per cent of PM2.5 during winter and 16 per cent of cross-boundary urban pollution. It added that this level of contribution is "on par with the vehicle sector, where the country went through a national initiative to switch to BSVI many years before". "Since emissions from coal-fired power plants have long-range impacts, affecting air quality at the national level, FGD installation should be mandatory across India, regardless of plant location," the research organization said. FGDs are a critical, life-saving tool that India should have deployed years ago. Every delay means "more lives lost, more children breathing toxic air, and more communities suffering from preventable disease", it cautioned. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
