Trump mobile phone may not be ‘made in the USA' after all
WASHINGTON: The Trump mobile phone is no longer being billed as 'Made in the USA' as it was when the idea was launched but is now being advertised as 'designed with American values in mind,' according to the Trumpmobile.com website, reported German news agency dpa.
'The T1 isn't just another smartphone – it's a bold step toward wireless independence. Designed with American values in mind, the T1 delivers top-tier performance, sleek design, and powerful features - all without the inflated price tag,' the website says.
'With American hands behind every device, we bring care, precision, and trusted quality to every detail,' the blurb continues.
Other changes have been made, with the gold-coloured phone slightly smaller at a 15.87 cm (6.25 inch) diagonal, down from 17.22 cm (6.78 inch) previously. Introduction is now set for later this year, and no longer September.
Scepticism has swirled around the T1 since its June unveiling, particularly over the claim that it could be produced in the US for US$499 — a price many experts deemed unrealistic given the lack of domestic manufacturing capacity.
Trump has been attempting to push Apple to manufacture in the US by threatening tariffs among other measures. Tech analyst Dan Ives recently estimated that it would be years before an iPhone could be made in the US, and that it would cost more than US$3,000.
Currently, Apple products are mostly imported to the US from India rather than China, while nearly all smartphones worldwide are manufactured in Asia.
The T1 is being launched by a company called T1 Mobile LLC, which is licensing the Trump name. The phone was unveiled in Trump's signature gold, with sons Donald Jr and Eric Trump leading the announcement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Ex-New York official facing China agent charge indicted for kickbacks
A former top New York official earlier charged with acting as a Chinese agent was handed a second federal indictment alleging she received kickbacks for steering some US$35 million worth of healthcare contracts to favoured suppliers during the coronavirus pandemic, federal prosecutors said on Thursday. The new charges against Linda Sun, 41 – once an aide to New York governors Kathy Hochul and Andrew Cuomo – and against her husband and co-defendant, Chris Hu, 40, included wire fraud, bribery, tax evasion and conspiracy to defraud the US. 'As alleged, Linda Sun not only acted as [an] unregistered agent of the government of the People's Republic of China but also enriched herself to the tune of millions of dollars when New York state was at its most vulnerable' during the start of the pandemic, US attorney Joseph Nocella with the Eastern District of New York said in a statement. 'When masks, gloves and other protective supplies were hard to find, Sun abused her position of trust to steer contracts to her associates so that she and her husband could share in the profits,' he added. Details of the superseding indictment were released on Thursday after the additional charges were handed down on Wednesday. As outlined in court documents, in early 2020, Sun and a team of state employees drew on her connections in Beijing to obtain highly sought-after protective gear. But Sun also allegedly claimed falsely that China had recommended two additional vendors, one operated by her second cousin and another operated by her husband and his business associates. Sun reportedly failed to disclose the alleged dealings, which involved routing government contracts worth millions of dollars to each of the two companies, as required in her capacity as a state official. The couple reportedly siphoned off US$2.3 million in kickbacks in 2020 and 2021. 'This husband-and-wife team with supposed ties to corruption has been rooted out,' Harry Chavis, a special investigator with the Internal Revenue Service, said in a statement. 'In legitimate government spending, there is no friends-and-family discount.' The indictment also alleges Sun falsified records to convince New York authorities that Jiangsu province's commerce department had recommended her cousin's company for its 'gold standard' masks and that the 'Chinese chamber of commerce' recommended the second firm operated by her husband and associates for its products. The indictment claims that Sun and Hu failed to declare the US$2.3 million payments to tax authorities and 'laundered the income' by routing three US$500,000 payments to American accounts set up by Hu in the name of a close relative. According to a spreadsheet reportedly found in one of Hu's electronic accounts, the total profits from the two companies that Hu expected to realise totalled US$8,029,741. This week's indictment follows earlier charges of visa fraud, alien smuggling and money laundering against Sun filed last September tied to her allegedly working as an unregistered agent of China during her tenure in state government. Sun and Hu pleaded not guilty to the earlier charges following their arrest last September and were released on US$1.5 million and US$500,000 bonds, respectively. The Chinese embassy in Washington declined to comment on the specifics of the case but pushed back on Sun's alleged links to Beijing. 'The U.S. government and media have frequently hyped up the 'China agent' narratives—many of which were later proven to be entirely unfounded,' said embassy spokesman Liu Pengyu. 'China firmly opposes such ill-intended associating and unfounded smears.' Jarrod Schaeffer, a lawyer for Sun, on Thursday said 'shoving new charges' into an indictment with a trial approaching is 'unfortunate and telling'. 'The newest allegations continue the government's trend of making and publicising feverish accusations unmoored from the facts and evidence that we expect will actually come out at trial,' said Schaeffer, a partner at the New York-based law firm Abell Eskew Landau. 'Ms Sun vehemently denies these latest allegations and intends to vigorously contest them in court.' Ken Abell, a lawyer for Hu, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the charges. During her time working for New York, according to the court filings, Sun allegedly helped shape state policy in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks and gifts. That included a 2024 Ferrari Roma sports car and property in Honolulu and on New York's Long Island worth about US$6 million in total, along with specially cooked salted ducks prepared for her parents by the Chinese consulate. Hu allegedly blocked representatives of Taiwan's government from meeting state officials, provided unauthorised invitation letters from the office for Chinese officials and tried to arrange for a high-level New York state official to visit China. Beijing sees Taiwan as part of China to be reunited by force if necessary. Most countries, including the US, do not recognise Taiwan as an independent state, but Washington is opposed to any attempt to take the self-governed island by force and is committed to supplying it with weapons . Hu faces earlier charges for money laundering conspiracy, money laundering and conspiracy to commit bank fraud. The defendants, both naturalised US citizens, are due to be arraigned on the latest charges on Monday. -- SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Carmakers GM, Tesla and Ford lead list of US companies in China exposure: report
General Motors, one of America's top carmakers, leads US companies in its exposure to China, perched in a delicate position as bilateral trade tensions persist amid US President Donald Trump's steep 55 per cent tariffs on imports from the country, according to a research report published this week. Other high-profile firms, including Elon Musk's electric vehicle company Tesla, rival carmaker Ford, engine manufacturer Cummins, aerospace and tech firm Honeywell, beverage giant Coca-Cola, and chipmaker Qualcomm also rank in the top 10, illustrating corporate America's dependence on the country. Influential companies Amazon, Apple, Meta and Nvidia did not make it to the top 10, but remain among the largest tech firms at risk due to disruptions in the Chinese market and their global supply chains. That is according to the latest annual index from market research firm Strategy Risks, which assessed the top 250 publicly listed US companies to identify those most vulnerable to US-China trade tensions in 2025. The report analyses a range of public information – including company filings, media reports, and government data – to assign each firm an exposure score from 0 to 100. The evaluation considered factors such as supply-chain dynamics, ties to the Chinese government and Communist Party officials, industry-specific regulations in China and even biases in the data sets related to a firm's transparency on China-related information. With a score of 69.8, GM topped the list, followed closely by Cummins and Honeywell at 65.6 and 62.9 respectively. Tesla scored 60.7 while Coca-Cola tallied 58, closely trailed by Ford at 56.5 and Qualcomm at 56.2. The report attributes GM's top ranking to its 'relatively high number of joint ventures with Chinese state-owned companies'. According to the carmaker's website, it has 10 joint ventures in China, including a 50-50 joint venture called SAIC-GM with SAIC Motor, a state-owned Chinese company. In December, GM said it expected to lose more than US$5 billion as it reorganised its struggling business in China, where car sales have dropped sharply. According to Juozapas Bagdonas of Strategy Risks, General Motors has not only been significantly affected by tariffs, but recent restructuring of some of its joint ventures in China has also made the company more 'politically exposed'. 'They hold less power over those joint ventures,' he said, 'and potentially the government could impose their will on intellectual property, or any other things that might be important for some American company like GM.' Chinese officials have recently sought to allay concerns that foreign companies operating on the mainland might harbour amid ever-escalating trade tensions. Speaking at the US-China Business Council in Washington last week, Xie Feng, Beijing's ambassador to Washington, said many American firms were increasingly worried about 'losing the Chinese market' and that their R&D efforts would 'slow down'. 'Your concerns should be heeded,' Xie added. Tesla and Ford scored high this year in the category assessing exposure to politically sensitive areas and human-rights concerns 'due to their extensive presence in Xinjiang and Tibet, as well as their public overtures to the Chinese government on sensitive issues', the report stated. Colgate-Palmolive, a consumer products company, was also listed as among the most vulnerable to disruptions due to its heavy reliance on Chinese exports of plastic and electric toothbrushes, 'with hundreds of containers shipped from Chinese ports to the US in 2024'. Apple, which topped last year's list at No 2, slipped to No 27 this year, but it still rated among the largest tech companies most exposed to China, along with Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and Nvidia. The California-based tech giant still earns about 17 per cent of its revenue from China, and a substantial risk lies in its hundreds of manufacturing facilities across the country that build iPhones and MacBooks. The report warned that any serious supply-chain disruption in China 'could prove catastrophic' for Apple, even as it shifts more of its production to India. Electronics like smartphones and laptops are currently exempt from Trump's 10 per cent reciprocal tariffs on China. Bagdonas believed tariffs played a major role in companies looking to reduce their exposure to China. More than Trump's on-and-off reciprocal duties, the Section 301 tariffs imposed in response to alleged unfair Chinese trade practices, including forced tech transfers and intellectual property violations, were longer lasting and of greater concern, he said. These tariffs, introduced at the outset of the US-China trade war in 2018, were repeatedly renewed under former US president Joe Biden. 'For example, Tesla is subject to pretty high tariffs that have stayed in place since Biden took office and continue to be extended,' Bagdonas said. 'But then again, companies like Apple have largely been exempt from tariffs on smartphones, MacBooks and other electronics.' In the report's overall rankings, Amazon came in at 20th, driven by its heavy reliance on Chinese-made products, which dominate its shipments to Western markets. In 2023, US shoppers spent about US$200 billion on Chinese goods via Amazon, bringing the company an estimated US$70 billion in net profit. Microsoft placed 29th, with the report citing thousands of electronics shipped from China in 2024. Key AI components like doped silicon wafers face a 50 per cent tariff, potentially slowing its AI expansion. Nvidia came in at 85th, hindered by American export bans on its top chips to China. The company is now focusing on autonomous driving, supplying Orin chips to Chinese electric vehicle maker BYD, the world's largest in the sector. Meta ranked 94th, with its China revenue rising 34 per cent in 2024 to account for 11 per cent of total earnings. It also earns about US$7 billion a year from Chinese retailers like Temu and Shein through ad sales and relies on Chinese electronics for its VR and AI hardware, the report found.
The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
German court rules Dubai chocolate must originate from Dubai
COLOGNE: A German court has ruled that Aldi Süd can no longer sell its 'Dubai chocolate' bars after confirming the product was manufactured in Turkey, not Dubai. The Higher Regional Court in Cologne delivered the final verdict on Friday, overturning previous lower court decisions. The legal dispute arose when a confectionery importer challenged Aldi Süd's sale of Alyan Dubai Handmade Chocolate, arguing the packaging clearly stated Turkish production. Aldi defended the product name, claiming consumers understood 'Dubai chocolate' as a style of pistachio kadayif-filled treat rather than an origin label. However, the court ruled that the name misleads buyers, as 15 to 20 per cent of consumers still associate it with Dubai. 'It is sufficient that around 15 to 20 per cent of the consumers addressed still associate the term with a specific geographical origin,' the senate stated. Aldi Süd has already pulled the product from shelves as a precaution. A company spokeswoman said they are reviewing the ruling but have not decided on further legal action. The judgment was issued in summary proceedings, leaving room for potential main proceedings if either party appeals.
