
Watch: Emmanuel Macron Gets A Taste Of Singapore Hawker Culture
Also Read: Here's What French President Emmanuel Macron Ate On His Trip To India
After their street food adventure, they had dinner at The Fullerton Hotel in Singapore, as shown in the same video posted by PM Wong. Part of the caption reads, "We began with a visit to Lau Pa Sat to experience Singapore's vibrant hawker culture and local flavours. Over dinner, we had a wide-ranging and fruitful discussion on global and regional developments." Take a look below:
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Lawrence Wong (@lawrencewongst)
More About Lau Pa Sat:
Lau Pa Sat, literally meaning "Old Market," is also known as Telok Ayer Market. It was rebuilt in its present location in the downtown core area in 1894. It is one of the most famous cultural landmarks in the city, and it has significantly evolved over the years. The Victorian-era architecture of the building is quite distinctive, featuring structures made of cast iron. Today, Lau Pa Sat is mainly known for its food hawkers. It houses numerous stalls selling various kinds of local Singaporean delicacies and other street-style favourites, including dishes like satay, chicken rice and char kway teow. One of the most popular attractions here is "Satay Street. Boon Tat Street is closed to traffic from 7 pm onwards. The place is then opened for people to dine al-fresco and relish the satay treats grilled on open flames by many vendors.
Also Read: 5 Hawker Centres You Must Visit When In Singapore
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Home Ministry moves out of British-era North Block
The iconic North Block building at Raisina Hills in Lutyens Delhi will no longer be home to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). The Ministry has been known by the address for nearly 90 years. This week, several MHA offices started shifting to the Common Central Secretariat (CCS) building on Janpath as part of the Central Vista redevelopment plan. The British-era buildings – North Block and South Block – house key administrative buildings such as office of the Prime Minister, and Ministries of Defence, Home, External Affairs and Finance. These red-sandstone buildings were built by British architect Herbert Baker and inaugurated in 1921. Once all the offices move out of both the blocks, these will be turned into a museum. Named 'Yuge Yugeen Bharat National Museum', it will display an estimated 25,000-30,000 artefacts, and is likely to be one of the largest museums in the world. On July 17, an order issued by the MHA in Hindi said the process of shifting all offices located at the North Block to CCS-3 had been initiated and nodal authorities designated for the smooth transfer. As a part of the Central Vista redevelopment, the Centre had proposed a CCS of 10 office buildings and a conference centre on Kartavya Path to accommodate all Ministries. The first three of these office buildings are nearly completed. 347 rooms for MHA Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan was among the first to move to the new office complex. The MHA has been allotted 347 rooms in the new complex. According to the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA), 'the imperial buildings were unquestionably claimed by the people of India as the seat of the Government of India after Independence,' adding that the most important Ministries were housed in the North and South Blocks. It said that the objective of building CCS is to improve coordination, collaboration and synergy among various organs of the Central Government that will boost productivity and obviate the need for unnecessary travel of documents and officials from the offices spread over different parts of the city. This will reduce congestion and pollution as well. 'Shifting all Central Government offices to the CCS buildings will get various Ministries/ departments or their attached/ subordinate offices vacate rented accommodations, which will save around ₹1,000 crore per annum,' the MoHUA said. According to a government order, CCS-3 is to house the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser, Ministries of External Affairs, Petroleum and Natural Gas, Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Rural Development and Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT).


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Brigitte Macron ‘born a man' explosive theory gains traction after lawsuit against far-right podcaster Candace Owens
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte have filed a defamation lawsuit in the US against conservative influencer Candace Owens over her claims that France's first lady is secretly a man, reports The Financial Times. The defamation lawsuit has been filed against Candace Owens over the far-right influencer's 'relentless and unjustified smear campaign' falsely accusing Brigitte of being a man. Tom Clare of Clare Locke LLP, who is representing the Macrons, announced the lawsuit in a release on Wednesday, July 23. The Macrons filed their 218-page lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science Others Data Science Technology MCA Design Thinking Finance Management Data Analytics MBA Cybersecurity Healthcare Leadership PGDM others Public Policy Artificial Intelligence Degree Product Management Digital Marketing Operations Management CXO Project Management healthcare Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Interpretation Programming Proficiency Problem-Solving Skills Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT MSc in Data Science Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI Duration: 8 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Macrons sue far-right podcaster The lawsuit accuses Owens of proliferating 'demonstrably false' claims through her platforms, including in an eight-part podcast and on social media, designed to feed a 'frenzied fan base' in 'pursuit of fame,' the Macrons allege. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo 'These lies have caused tremendous damage to the Macrons,' according to the lawsuit, which names Owens as well her business entities, which are incorporated in Delaware. ALSO READ: Inside Eve Jobs' lavish $6.7million wedding to Harry Charles: Kamala Harris, Elton John confirmed guests Live Events The lawsuit calls Owens' various claims "outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions" and said they had caused "relentless bullying on a worldwide scale," doing "tremendous damage to the Macrons". Owens, a popular rightwing podcaster, had posted to X in 2024: "After looking into this, I would stake my entire professional reputation on the fact that Brigitte Macron is in fact a man." She posted an eight-part video series to her YouTube channel, titled Becoming Brigitte, laying out her claims. "Because Ms. Owens systematically reaffirmed these falsehoods in response to each of our attorneys' repeated requests for a retraction, we ultimately concluded that referring the matter to a court of law was the only remaining avenue for remedy," said the Macrons in a statement. ALSO READ: $1,390 Stimulus check in 2025: Do Americans need to pay tax on the amount and who needs to apply? What did the Macrons say? The false claims have subjected the Macrons to a 'campaign of global humiliation, turning their lives into fodder for profit-driven lies,' the complaint says. 'Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history — twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade,' the complaint alleges. 'The result is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale. Every time the Macrons leave their home, they do so knowing that countless people have heard, and many believe, these vile fabrications. It is invasive, dehumanizing, and deeply unjust.' ALSO READ: Elon Musk's Tesla diner has robots serving popcorn, cybertruck food boxes and 66ft movie screens. Check full list of menu Brigitte Macron was previously awarded £6,750 in damages last year after two other far-right influencers falsely accused her of being a transgender woman. Amandine Roy, 53, and Natacha Rey, 49, a blogger, were cleared of the charges as the judges of the Paris Appeal Court ruled that they had every right to make those allegations. Brigette Macron has found herself under attack not just in France but across the world. A controversial book named 'Becoming Brigitte,' published by journalist Xavier Poussard, also became the breeding ground for conspiracy theories.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Trump has his biggest target in crosshairs. What can happen
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The political temperature in Washington has surged again, this time over a storm of accusations from President Donald Trump , targeting former President Barack Obama . During a press appearance alongside Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., Trump accused Obama of orchestrating a 'coup' in 2016 by politicising intelligence regarding Russian election interference . The spark for this latest escalation: a set of newly declassified documents released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard last week, which Trump claims are proof of treason. He is now demanding that the Department of Justice (DOJ) open a criminal unprecedented moment raises a pressing question: can a former US president actually face prosecution for actions taken while in office? And what are the legal and political implications of such a move?At the heart of the controversy are intelligence documents recently declassified by Tulsi Gabbard, who now heads the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Gabbard's disclosures allege that Obama-era officials -- specifically James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey, Susan Rice, and Andrew McCabe --deliberately distorted or suppressed intelligence to frame a narrative of Russian election interference that would damage argued that this manipulation of intelligence was not only unethical but possibly criminal, referring to it as a 'treasonous conspiracy". According to her statements, certain intelligence reports that cleared the Trump campaign of collusion were deliberately downplayed or ignored, while narratives emphasising Russian interference were selectively elevated. Importantly, the materials do not show that votes were altered or that Obama directly interfered in vote counts. Rather, they appear to suggest a pattern of politically motivated intelligence shaping which is serious, but far from the clear-cut criminal behaviour that would normally prompt a DOJ on the released documents, Trump quickly amplified the narrative. He accused Obama of treason and insisted that the DOJ open an investigation. Trump even went so far as to post an AI-generated video showing the FBI arresting Obama in the Oval Office, a move that was widely condemned as inflammatory and reckless. While Obama's office rarely responds to Trump's ongoing attacks, the former president issued a statement calling the accusations 'bizarre,' 'ridiculous,' and 'a weak attempt at distraction". The statement emphasised the unprecedented nature of the accusation and suggested it was designed to distract from Trump's own mounting legal and political Trump's message resonated with his base. Conservative media and MAGA-aligned lawmakers echoed his call for accountability, with several suggesting that the disclosures represent the biggest scandal in American the political firestorm, the likelihood that Obama will face criminal prosecution remains extremely slim. The evidence currently available may not establish that Obama committed a prosecutable offence. The documents suggest internal disagreements and potentially politicised decision-making, but not necessarily criminal behaviour. Under US law, proving treason or criminal conspiracy requires evidence of intent, coordination and direct action to break the there is the matter of precedent and prosecutorial norms. No former US president has ever been prosecuted for actions taken while in office unless there was incontrovertible proof of criminal conduct. Even in high-profile cases like Watergate, those involved were either pardoned or avoided criminal charges through plea deals and immunity arrangements. While it is possible that the DOJ may quietly review the Gabbard disclosures, the standard for launching a formal criminal case against a former president is extraordinarily high. Without compelling evidence, it's unlikely that Attorney General Merrick Garland would take the risk of igniting a constitutional has promised more disclosures in the coming weeks. If new documents emerge that contain stronger evidence of deliberate falsification or political manipulation, especially if Obama is directly implicated, then the DOJ could face renewed pressure to the allegations have already become a powerful tool for Trump and his allies, who are using the narrative to galvanise support and frame the 2016 Russia investigation as a calculated attack. For Democrats, however, the accusations are viewed largely as a diversion tactic, aimed at deflecting attention from Trump's own troubles. Within the intelligence community, Gabbard's unilateral declassification has raised alarm, with critics arguing that it undermines institutional credibility and could damage relationships with allied intelligence services. These concerns have been echoed by figures such as Senator Mark Warner, who warned that such politicisation erodes the foundational trust that intelligence-sharing depends the legal pathway seems narrow, the political implications are far-reaching. Trump and his allies have seized on the moment to reframe the Russia investigation as a political weapon wielded by Obama to undermine the peaceful transfer of power. In their view, the disclosures prove that the 2016 Russia investigation was a 'hoax' built on fabricated intelligence and partisan motives. This can help Trump regain support of many of those among MAGA who have been disppointed by the Trump adminsitration's handling of Epstein role in all of this cannot be overstated. Once a Democratic congresswoman known for her anti-establishment stance, she has become a central figure in reshaping how intelligence is handled in the executive branch. Critics say she is politicising national security, while supporters argue she is exposing long-standing corruption.